NYPD investigating theft pattern targeting elderly customers at ATMs
Detectives say there have been nine victims in the past two months at various Upper East Side banks. According to police, the thieves approach older customers at ATMs, remove their bank card and make unauthorized transactions.
Some victims lost a few thousand dollars, while one lost nearly $24,000, police say.
Police have released photos of individuals wanted in connection to at least three thefts.
Anyone with information regarding this incident is asked to call the NYPD's Crime Stoppers Hotline at 1-800-577-TIPS (8477) or for Spanish, 1-888-57-PISTA (74782), or submit tips online at crimestoppers.nypdonline.org or on X by messaging or tagging @NYPDTips.
The New York City Police Department is investigating an ATM scheme targeting elderly New Yorkers.
NYPD Crime Stoppers
"I can't believe that I fell for this"
The most recent incident happened at a Citibank on East 86th Street.
Penny Zorn, 93, says she went to the ATM last Thursday to deposit checks, but when she entered her PIN, the machine didn't work.
"A man comes up to me and says, 'This machiney' — machiney — 'doesn't work. Let's try that one.' And he goes, puts in my card," she said.
But instead of putting in Zorn's real card, police say he swapped it with a fake.
"I looked around and [I thought] there was nobody watching me punch my numbers," she said. "I didn't see him and that's why I feel dumb."
When Zorn checked her account later, she saw that $1,500 had been stolen.
"I can't believe that I fell for this," she said.
Zorn says this incident is changing how she does her banking business.
"Be aware that people are doing this," she said. "I'm looking around. I'm making sure nobody is near me. And that's the best I can do."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
26 minutes ago
- CNN
Takeaways from the verdict in Sean ‘Diddy' Combs' federal sex trafficking trial
People in entertainment Sean 'Diddy' Combs Human rights CrimeFacebookTweetLink Follow The jury in the federal sex trafficking trial of Sean 'Diddy' Combs returned its verdict on Wednesday, clearing the hip-hop mogul of the most serious charges, though he was convicted on two lesser charges of transportation to engage in prostitution. The verdict is, to some extent, a win for Combs, who will avoid the worst case scenario: If he had been convicted of the more serious charges of racketeering conspiracy or sex trafficking, Combs could have faced up to life in prison. Instead, he faces a maximum sentence of 20 years – though it's unlikely he'll serve a sentence that long, and he could even be sentenced to the time he's served since his arrest in September 2024. 'It's a bit of a paradox, because here we have Sean Combs, who has just been convicted of two federal felonies,' said CNN Senior Legal Analyst Elie Honig. 'And for all practical purposes, he has won. He has defeated the Southern District of New York.' Prosecutors accused Combs of leading a criminal enterprise made up of some of his closest employees, alleging they used threats, violence, forced labor, bribery and other crimes to force Casandra 'Cassie' Ventura and another woman, 'Jane,' to engage in drug-fueled sex acts with male escorts called 'Freak Offs' or 'hotel nights.' Combs pleaded not guilty to one count of racketeering conspiracy, two counts of sex trafficking and two counts of transportation for prostitution. His lawyers argued the sex acts were consensual and merely preferences, while trying to undermine the hip-hop mogul's accusers by contending they were trying to gain a monetary benefit from Combs. Here are takeaways from the jury's verdict. Combs and his defense team surely hoped he would be acquitted on all counts. But the verdict Wednesday is something of a boon for a star defendant who has seen his reputation diminish in the face of repeated accusations of wrongdoing. His acquittals on racketeering conspiracy and two counts of sex trafficking are striking when looked at within the context of the defendant's fall from grace: Two years ago, Ventura filed a lawsuit claiming Combs had raped and physically and emotionally abused her. Combs agreed to settle the lawsuit a day later; his attorney said it was 'in no way an admission of wrongdoing.' Ventura's lawsuit was only the beginning: More accusers came forward with allegations against Combs, and in March 2024, heavily armed federal agents searched the producer's homes in Los Angeles and Florida. Two months later, CNN published hotel surveillance video captured eight years earlier showing Combs physically assaulting Ventura in an elevator lobby at a Los Angeles hotel – footage included as part of the prosecution's case for sex trafficking as to Ventura. Now, while the verdict is mixed, Combs can claim some vindication on being cleared of the most serious charges. 'Regardless of what anyone thinks of Sean Combs … the simple fact is, as of right now, in the eyes of the law, he has not been convicted of a crime of violence,' said CNN Legal Analyst Elliot Williams. 'He has not been convicted of the far more serious, life-eligible crimes that he was charged with.' The verdict shows prosecutors failed to prove racketeering conspiracy; and while the jury's reasoning is not known, experts told CNN prior to deliberations that prosecutors' greatest challenge would be securing a conviction on this charge. That jurors found Combs not guilty shows they were unconvinced, either of the existence of a so-called 'enterprise' – a key piece of any racketeering case – or that he and others committed the underlying crimes that would support a conviction. The charge comes from the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, or RICO, which was passed by Congress in 1970 to prosecute organized crime. Racketeering is not a single, specific crime, but a framework for prosecuting many different crimes; in a RICO case, these are called 'predicate acts.' In Combs' case, prosecutors specifically argued the defendant and members of his inner circle had engaged in crimes involving kidnapping, arson, forced labor, bribery and sex trafficking. To convict, jurors would have needed to find Combs and at least one other person committed at least two predicate acts within a ten-year window. The use of RICO in Combs' case, while not entirely novel, was unusual in that he was charged alone. Jurors did not hear direct testimony from many of the people who would have been members of the alleged enterprise – namely his closest employees, like his chief of staff or some of his security guards. And legal analysts had wondered whether the evidence presented at trial had clearly linked Combs' alleged criminal acts to an enterprise. In their closing argument, the government offered jurors a roadmap, outlining the charge, the elements needed to prove it and the parts of their case that would support a conviction. Still, the argument did not persuade jurors. Combs' acquittal on sex trafficking charges is a big blow to the prosecutors for the Southern District of New York – and to his accusers, Ventura and a woman who testified under the pseudonym 'Jane,' each of whom spent days testifying, recounting years of abuse they said they suffered from Combs. While prosecutors accused Combs of sex trafficking as a predicate act under the umbrella of racketeering conspiracy, they also charged him with two separate counts of sex trafficking, one each for Ventura and Jane. To prove sex trafficking, prosecutors needed to prove Combs compelled the women to participate in commercial sex acts through force, fraud or coercion. And jurors were presented with myriad examples of alleged physical violence and financial control. Regarding Ventura, prosecutors contended physical force was illustrated in one instance by the InterContinental Hotel surveillance footage showing Combs assault Ventura in 2016 – first published by CNN. Testimony by both women suggested some level of financial or professional control; Ventura signed to Combs' record label at just 19, and prosecutors agued he controlled her career. Jane, meanwhile, testified she and Combs entered into a 'love contract' where he agreed to pay her $10,000 rent, but that he threatened to cut her off financially if she stopped participating in 'hotel nights.' Combs' attorneys had acknowledged physical abuse, but argued throughout the trial that domestic violence did not amount to sex trafficking. Prosecutors also told the jury they weren't suggesting every 'Freak Off' and 'hotel night' were instances of sex trafficking. Both Ventura and Jane testified they were willing to try the sexual encounters in the beginning of their relationships with Combs. The jury's verdict suggests prosecutors did not prove the elements needed to convict – like the force, fraud and coercion. 'My heart in this moment is going out to Cassie,' said Dream Hampton, the executive producer of 'Surviving R. Kelly.' 'I can't imagine what she's feeling.' 'I'm afraid that with Puff walking from the more serious charges that he's – not only him, the whole entire discourse – I just wonder what we're going to learn from this,' Hampton added. Combs was convicted, however, on two charges of transportation to engage in prostitution, each of which pertained to Ventura or Jane and the men Combs paid to have sex with them. Those charges were more straightforward than the other, and prosecutors merely needed to prove that people crossed state lines to engage in prostitution. Both women testified to having 'Freak Offs' or 'hotel nights' in a variety of locales, and prosecutors presented documents to bolster that testimony, including flight records, American Express charges and hotel invoices for Combs' former girlfriends and the men. 'What was clearer throughout this trial was acts of prostitution that were supported by airplane records, payments and so on – information that would just be hard to deny,' said Williams. 'There were sex acts, no one disputes that, and they were paid for. And there's a paper trail linking the defendant to them. That was far more straightforward for the prosecution to prove compared to some of the other things.' Prior to trial, Combs' defense unsuccessfully lobbied for the transportation to engage in prostitution charges, which stem from the Mann Act, to be dismissed, citing the statute's 'racist origins.' Attorneys for Combs have previously accused the government of racism, allegations the government denied. Doug Wigdor, Ventura's attorney, acknowledged Wednesday's verdict was 'not the exact outcome we wanted' in an interview with CNN. 'Cassie prompted this investigation…and now Sean Combs stands before the court as a convicted felon of two federal crimes. He faces significant incarceration,' he said. While the verdict marks the beginning of the end of one legal chapter for Combs, he still faces legal trouble. Most immediately, he'll face sentencing for the prostitution charges for which he was convicted Wednesday. Each carries up to ten years, but CNN legal analysts indicated it's possible he serves less. 'Certainly very few people are ever sentenced to the top of the statutory maximum,' Williams said. 'So we should get the ten year or 20 year figure out of our heads. But he will go to jail for some time.' Sentencing will be scheduled at a later date. In the meantime, his attorneys hope Combs will be released from federal custody while he waits. Judge Arun Subramanian asked the defense attorneys and prosecutors to submit letters on their positions about the possibility of releasing Sean 'Diddy' Combs ahead of a bail hearing Wednesday evening. 'Mr. Combs has been given his life by this jury,' said defense attorney Marc Agnifilo, as he argued for the judge to allow his client to return home. Combs also still faces a raft of civil lawsuits – nearly 70 have been filed so far, with several as recent as last week – accusing Combs of further wrongdoing, including sexual assault. Combs has denied all the allegations. Notably, civil claims carry a lower burden of proof. In the criminal trial, jurors needed to find Combs guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. But in a civil case, the proof only needs to meet what's called a 'preponderance of the evidence,' or more likely than not.
Bloomberg
28 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Boeing Judge Urged to Accept US Deal in 737 Max Crash Case
The US Justice Department urged a judge in Texas to accept a proposed settlement agreement reached with Boeing Co. that would allow the planemaker to avoid a criminal charge in a longstanding case over two fatal crashes of its 737 Max jets. In a court filing Wednesday, federal prosecutors defended the deal, arguing that it was made in good faith and will secure meaningful commitments from Boeing to make improvements.
CBS News
28 minutes ago
- CBS News
Family of 5 barely survives house explosion in downstate State Park Place, Illinois
A family in downstate Illinois barely survived their house exploding in the middle of the night with no warning. The Rodriguez family lives in State Park Place, Illinois, just outside St. Louis, Missouri. Around 1 a.m. Monday, an explosion leveled their home. The family of five plus their two dogs all made it out alive, but barely. "Based on pure adrenaline. I just was crawling on all fours trying to get out. My door was already like blocked," said 18-year-old Ashley Rodriguez "I was pushing stuff off, and it just burned my fingertips off this hand." Ashley's back was broken when the roof collapsed on her. Her 11-year-old sister was lucky, and suffered only minor burns. Her 6-year-old brother was pulled from the ashes by her father, who was burned on his arm and neck. Their mother suffered the worst burns on her entire body, and is hospitalized in critical condition. The family said she is due to undergo multiple surgeries. The state fire marshal is investigating the explosion, but the family said they called the gas company twice in the past six months to reporting a strong smell of gas near their front door. CNN contributed to this report.
