James Webb Space Telescope discovers its first exoplanet as stunning image is revealed
This discovery is out of this world.
For the first time since its operations began in 2021, the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) has captured a direct image, published by the journal Nature, of a new exoplanet — a planet that orbits outside the solar system.
This discovery marks a major breakthrough in astronomy and a 'new step' in the ongoing search for planets that exist beyond our solar system.
Advertisement
This discovery was made possible by a team from France's National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS), working at the Observatoire de Paris-PSL in partnership with Université Grenoble Alpes.
3 The James Webb Space Telescope captures images of exoplanet TWA 7 B's disk.
JWST/ESO/Lagrange
From Earth, these planets appear directly next to bright stars, so their faint signals often get lost in the glare.
Advertisement
To combat this, the CNRS team designed a chronograph — a special telegraphic tool for the JWST that blocks out a star's light, much like how the Moon blocks out the Sun during a solar eclipse.
Named TWA 7b, the newly discovered planet is surrounded by a swirling disk of rocky debris and dust — remnants from the early stages of planet formation.
It orbits a young star, TWA 7, which has three distinct rings, one of which is especially narrow, and is surrounded by two empty areas. The JWST revealed a source within the heart of this narrow ring.
Advertisement
This exoplanet is 10 times smaller — roughly the size of Saturn — than any exoplanet previously observed using this method.
Which has to be tiny considering the JWST gave way to six distant 'rogue' worlds, discovered by a team at Johns Hopkins University last summer.
At the time, researchers believed that these worlds were potentially brown dwarfs — the astronomical term for failed stars.
'If you have an object that looks like a young Jupiter, is it possible that it could have become a star under the right conditions?' said lead study author Adam Langeveld.
Advertisement
Other relevant discoveries made by the JWST around the same time provided data to researchers from the University of Michigan and Montreal to assume that there are potential oceans and air sources on the exoplanet dubbed LHS 1140 b, which is located within the constellation Cetus in the night sky.
3 The James Webb Space Telescope is shown before its 2021 launch.
via REUTERS
3 The Webb telescope previously captured jaw-dropping visualizations of other areas, including these dramatic 'cosmic cliffs' in the Carina Nebula Complex.
NASA/ESA/CSA/STScI. / SWNS
Most exoplanets we know about have been detected using indirect methods like measuring a star's wobble or dimming as a planet crosses in front of it — the method scientists artificially recreated to discover TWA 7 b.
In the bigger picture, learning how planets like TWA 7 b form and shape their surroundings brings us one step closer to understanding the origins of planetary systems, including our own.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Asteroid 2024 YR4 might smash into the moon
Earlier this year, astronomers alerted the world to a startling possibility: based on initial calculations, it appeared that a recently discovered asteroid known as 2024 YR4 had a not-zero chance of colliding with Earth in 2032. At 174–220 feet wide, the space rock has the potential to destroy a sizable city in less than a decade's time. In this case, however, 'not-zero' never amounted to anything higher than a three percent probability. And after gathering additional information from an array of terrestrial observatories as well as the James Webb Space Telescope, experts concluded in March that 2024 YR4 didn't pose any direct threat to the planet. But just because Earth was spared doesn't mean our moon is safe. Based on the most recent calculations, the chance that the asteroid has a 2032 date with the lunar surface is higher than it ever was for us. 'The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4 percent, and this probability was still slowly rising as the asteroid faded out of view,' the European Space Agency said in its most recent update. Okay, so it's not that much more likely than 2024 YR4's highest probability for Earth. But a 96-percent likelihood of missing the moon leaves room for the space rock to defy the odds. Astronomers will now need to wait until its orbit sends it around the sun in mid-2028 to begin conducting further observations. So what happens if 2024 YR4 really does collide with the moon? That's a great question—one that even the experts can't answer at the moment. 'No one knows what the exact effects would be,' admitted ESA Planetary Defense Office director Richard Moissl. 'It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon—and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance.' Moissl added the collision 'would certainly leave a new crater on the surface,' but it's not currently possible to accurately predict how much material would eject into space, and whether Earth's gravitational pull would catch any of it. That said, there isn't a major worry that an asteroid of 2024 YR's size would result in lunar armageddon. Moissl also explained that while the impact would likely be visible from Earth, astronomers remain 'excited by the prospect of observing and analyzing it.' If you're still uneasy about errant asteroids hurtling towards us, take comfort in knowing that international space agencies are working to improve our early detection capabilities and plan for worst-case scenarios. The ESA, for example, is currently planning to launch its Near-Earth Object Mission in the Infrared (NEOMIR) satellite in the early 2030s. NEOMIR is designed to position itself at the first Sun-Earth Lagrange Point, one of five locations where the planet's gravitational forces and the satellite's orbit interact to allow for a stable observation point. Once there, the array will be able to scan for unknown asteroids larger than 197-feet-wide that are potentially en route to Earth. This will provide governments and agencies much more time to identify, analyze, and plan for space emergencies. 'NEOMIR would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did,' Moissl explained. 'This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032.'
Scientific American
14 hours ago
- Scientific American
Rocks in Canada Are Confirmed as World's Oldest
3 min read In 2008 scientists reported that rocks in Canada were the world's oldest. New data appear to confirm this contested claim By & Nature magazine On the shores of Hudson Bay in northeastern Canada lie what could be the world's oldest rocks. A study now suggests they are at least 4.16 billion years old — 160 million years older than any others recorded, and the only piece of Earth's crust known to have survived from the planet's earliest eon. In 2008, researchers reported that these rocks dated back 4.3 billion years, a claim that other scientists contested. Work reported today in Science 1 seems to confirm that the rocks, known as the Nuvvuagittuq Greenstone Belt, are record-breakers. Researchers say the rock formation offers a unique window into early Earth, after the planet cooled from its fiery birth 4.5 billion years ago. On supporting science journalism If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today. 'It's not a matter of 'my rock is older than yours',' says Jonathan O'Neil, a geologist at Ottawa University who leads the research team. 'It's just that this is a unique opportunity to understand what was going on during that time.' The 'oldest rocks' label has sometimes backfired. In the past few years, other teams have chiselled many samples out of the Nuvvuagittuq belt, leaving the landscape scarred. Last year, the local Inuit community closed access to the rocks to prevent further despoliation. Only a handful of geological samples in the world date back to 3.8 billion years or older. Of those, the oldest undisputed rocks are found in the Acasta gneiss formation in Canada's Northwest Territories; at 4 billion years old, they mark the boundary between Earth's first geological eon, the Hadean, and the following one, the Archaean. Geologists have also found tiny mineral crystals dating back to the Hadean — such as 4.4-billion-year-old zircon crystals from Western Australia — that have become embedded into newer rock. But there are no known surviving chunks of crust from the Hadean — except, perhaps, the Nuvvuagittuq Greenstone Belt. It consists primarily of material that started out as volcanic basalt before undergoing various modifications during Earth's tortured history. In their 2008 work, O'Neil and his colleagues analysed the chemical imprint left by the radioactive decay of the isotope samarium-146 into neodymium-142 to calculate that the Nuvvuagittuq rocks were 4.3 billion years old. (Samarium-146 is a short-lived isotope that was depleted in Earth's first 500 million years, and none was left after about 4 billion years ago.) Other scientists challenged that work, arguing, for instance, that Hadean-age crust had become mixed into younger crust, contaminating the results. For the latest work, O'Neil's team analysed some once-molten rocks that had intruded into the main Nuvvuagittuq rocks like a knife cutting into a cake. By dating the intruded rocks, O'Neil and his colleagues were able to establish a minimum age for the cake itself. They used two radioactive clocks: the decay of samarium-146 into neodymium-142 and that of samarium-147 into neodymium-143. Both yielded ages of around 4.16 billion years for the intruded rocks. 'If you don't agree with this, then you need a very speculative, intricate model to get to the same answer,' says O'Neil. Having both clocks agree on an age — which wasn't the case in the earlier work — strengthens the case for a Hadean age for the rocks, says Bernard Bourdon, a geochemist at the University of Lyon in France. He remains circumspect, though, and says he would like to see additional lines of evidence, involving other radioactive isotope decays. 'I would be happy if these rocks were truly Hadean, but I think we still need to be cautious,' Bourdon says. The paper 'provides a new data set that hopefully can advance this discussion', says Richard Carlson, a geochemist at Carnegie Science in Washington DC who has collaborated with O'Neil in previous work. To Carlson, the bulk of the evidence suggests that the rocks are indeed Hadean. For now, more answers might have to wait. The Pituvik Landholding Corporation in Inukjuak, Canada — the Inuit group that is steward of the land in question — is not currently granting permits for further scientific study, due to the earlier damage by other groups. 'It's unfortunate, but I would do the same,' O'Neil says.
Yahoo
18 hours ago
- Yahoo
How can the James Webb Space Telescope see so far?
Curious Kids is a series for children of all ages. If you have a question you'd like an expert to answer, send it to CuriousKidsUS@ How does the camera on the James Webb Space Telescope work and see so far out? – Kieran G., age 12, Minnesota Imagine a camera so powerful it can see light from galaxies that formed more than 13 billion years ago. That's exactly what NASA's James Webb Space Telescope is built to do. Since it launched in December 2021, Webb has been orbiting more than a million miles from Earth, capturing breathtaking images of deep space. But how does it actually work? And how can it see so far? The secret lies in its powerful cameras – especially ones that don't see light the way our eyes do. I'm an astrophysicist who studies galaxies and supermassive black holes, and the Webb telescope is an incredible tool for observing some of the earliest galaxies and black holes in the universe. When Webb takes a picture of a distant galaxy, astronomers like me are actually seeing what that galaxy looked like billions of years ago. The light from that galaxy has been traveling across space for the billions of years it takes to reach the telescope's mirror. It's like having a time machine that takes snapshots of the early universe. By using a giant mirror to collect ancient light, Webb has been discovering new secrets about the universe. Unlike regular cameras or even the Hubble Space Telescope, which take images of visible light, Webb is designed to see a kind of light that's invisible to your eyes: infrared light. Infrared light has longer wavelengths than visible light, which is why our eyes can't detect it. But with the right instruments, Webb can capture infrared light to study some of the earliest and most distant objects in the universe. Although the human eye cannot see it, people can detect infrared light as a form of heat using specialized technology, such as infrared cameras or thermal sensors. For example, night-vision goggles use infrared light to detect warm objects in the dark. Webb uses the same idea to study stars, galaxies and planets. Why infrared? When visible light from faraway galaxies travels across the universe, it stretches out. This is because the universe is expanding. That stretching turns visible light into infrared light. So, the most distant galaxies in space don't shine in visible light anymore – they glow in faint infrared. That's the light Webb is built to detect. Before the light reaches the cameras, it first has to be collected by the Webb telescope's enormous golden mirror. This mirror is over 21 feet (6.5 meters) wide and made of 18 smaller mirror pieces that fit together like a honeycomb. It's coated in a thin layer of real gold – not just to look fancy, but because gold reflects infrared light extremely well. The mirror gathers light from deep space and reflects it into the telescope's instruments. The bigger the mirror, the more light it can collect – and the farther it can see. Webb's mirror is the largest ever launched into space. The most important 'eyes' of the telescope are two science instruments that act like cameras: NIRCam and MIRI. NIRCam stands for near-infrared camera. It's the primary camera on Webb and takes stunning images of galaxies and stars. It also has a coronagraph – a device that blocks out starlight so it can photograph very faint objects near bright sources, such as planets orbiting bright stars. NIRCam works by imaging near-infrared light, the type closest to what human eyes can almost see, and splitting it into different wavelengths. This helps scientists learn not just what something looks like but what it's made of. Different materials in space absorb and emit infrared light at specific wavelengths, creating a kind of unique chemical fingerprint. By studying these fingerprints, scientists can uncover the properties of distant stars and galaxies. MIRI, or the mid-infrared instrument, detects longer infrared wavelengths, which are especially useful for spotting cooler and dustier objects, such as stars that are still forming inside clouds of gas. MIRI can even help find clues about the types of molecules in the atmospheres of planets that might support life. Both cameras are far more sensitive than the standard cameras used on Earth. NIRCam and MIRI can detect the tiniest amounts of heat from billions of light-years away. If you had Webb's NIRCam as your eyes, you could see the heat from a bumblebee on the Moon. That's how sensitive it is. Because Webb is trying to detect faint heat from faraway objects, it needs to keep itself as cold as possible. That's why it carries a giant sun shield about the size of a tennis court. This five-layer sun shield blocks heat from the Sun, Earth and even the Moon, helping Webb stay incredibly cold: around -370 degrees F (-223 degrees C). MIRI needs to be even colder. It has its own special refrigerator, called a cryocooler, to keep it chilled to nearly -447 degrees F (-266 degrees C). If Webb were even a little warm, its own heat would drown out the distant signals it's trying to detect. Once light reaches the Webb telescope's cameras, it hits sensors called detectors. These detectors don't capture regular photos like a phone camera. Instead, they convert the incoming infrared light into digital data. That data is then sent back to Earth, where scientists process it into full-color images. The colors we see in Webb's pictures aren't what the camera 'sees' directly. Because infrared light is invisible, scientists assign colors to different wavelengths to help us understand what's in the image. These processed images help show the structure, age and composition of galaxies, stars and more. By using a giant mirror to collect invisible infrared light and sending it to super-cold cameras, Webb lets us see galaxies that formed just after the universe began. Hello, curious kids! Do you have a question you'd like an expert to answer? Ask an adult to send your question to CuriousKidsUS@ Please tell us your name, age and the city where you live. And since curiosity has no age limit – adults, let us know what you're wondering, too. We won't be able to answer every question, but we will do our best. This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organization bringing you facts and trustworthy analysis to help you make sense of our complex world. It was written by: Adi Foord, University of Maryland, Baltimore County Read more: Could a telescope ever see the beginning of time? An astronomer explains How the James Webb Space Telescope has revealed a surprisingly bright, complex and element-filled early universe – podcast James Webb Space Telescope: An astronomer explains the stunning, newly released first images Adi Foord does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
