Alleged arsonist charged over fire at Australian synagogue
Advertisement
The congregation escaped without harm via a rear door and firefighters contained the blaze to the entrance area of the 148-year-old building.
It was the first of three apparent displays of antisemitic violence across the city on Friday and early Saturday morning.
Authorities have yet to establish a link between incidents at the synagogue and two businesses.
Antisemitism blamed for attacks on businesses
Also in downtown Melbourne on Friday night, around 20 masked protesters harassed diners in an Israeli-owned restaurant.
A restaurant window was cracked, tables were flipped and chairs thrown as protesters chanted 'Death to the IDF,' referring to the Israel Defense Forces. A 28-year-old woman was arrested at the scene and charged with hindering police.
Police are also investigating the spray-painting of a business in Melbourne's northern suburbs and an arson attack on three vehicles attached to the business before dawn on Saturday. The vehicles had also been graffitied.
Advertisement
Police said there were antisemitic 'inferences' at the scene. The business had also been the target of pro-Palestinian demonstrations in the past year.
Political leaders condemn antisemitism
Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke met with Jewish leaders at the damaged synagogue on Sunday.
Burke told reporters that investigators were searching for potential links between the three incidents.
'At this stage, our authorities have not drawn links between them. But obviously there's a link in antisemitism. There's a link in bigotry. There's a link in a willingness to either call for violence, to chant violence or to take out violent actions. They are very much linked in that way,' Burke said.
'There were three attacks that night and none of them belonged in Australia. Arson attacks, the chanting calls for death, other attacks and graffiti — none of it belonged in Australia and they were attacks on Australia,' Burke added.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called on the Australian government to 'take all action to deal with the rioters to the fullest extent of the law and prevent similar attacks in the future.'
'I view with utmost gravity the antisemitic attacks that occurred last night in Melbourne, which included attempted arson of a synagogue in the city and a violent assault against an Israeli restaurant by pro-Palestinian rioters,' Netanyahu said in a statement on Saturday.
'The reprehensible antisemitic attacks, with calls of 'death to the IDF' and an attempt to attack a place of worship, are severe hate crimes that must be uprooted,' he added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
16 minutes ago
DOJ, FBI review finds no Jeffrey Epstein 'client list,' confirms suicide: Memo
A review ordered by President Donald Trump-appointed leadership of the Justice Department and the FBI found no evidence that notorious deceased financier Jeffrey Epstein kept a "client list" of associates whom he blackmailed or conspired with to victimize dozens of women, according to a new memo reviewed by ABC News. The department has also released hours of purported footage as part of its review, which officials say further confirms Epstein died by suicide while in custody in his jail cell in Manhattan in 2019 -- contradicting conspiracy theories long embraced or spread by allies of President Trump and others. The memo is also likely to generate outrage among those who have claimed Epstein's known high-profile associates could be implicated in his crimes. According to the FBI and DOJ review, no further charges are expected in connection with their probes into Epstein, as investigators "did not uncover evidence that could predicate an investigation against uncharged third parties." Attorney General Pam Bondi had previously promised the public release of scores of records associated with federal probes into Epstein, though in recent interviews, she has claimed the delay was attributed to "tens of thousands" of videos within the FBI's possession showing potential pornography of minors. In late February, Bondi handed out binders with Epstein case files to pro-Trump social media influencers at the White House -- files that ultimately contained little new information. As ABC News reported at the time, the move caught White House officials off guard and outraged some supporters of the president, who had been promised that more details would be made public. Bondi has faced growing criticism from some Trump supporters over the delay in releasing the records. The Epstein files for years have been the subject of widespread speculation and conspiracy theories that the government was covering up information and a supposed "client list" to protect powerful businessmen and politicians. Multiple sources have told ABC News that no such list has ever surfaced. In explaining their determination not to release further records from the investigation, the DOJ memo states that one of the government's "highest priorities is combatting child exploitation and bringing justice to victims," before adding, "Perpetuating unfounded theories about Epstein serves neither of those ends." President Trump and the White House have been peppered with questions in recent months over the timing of the release of the next "phase" of documents previously promised by Bondi. In an exchange in the Oval Office on April 22, Trump said he was unaware of when the Epstein files would be released. "I don't know. I'll speak to the Attorney General about that," Trump said. "I really don't know." Tech billionaire Elon Musk, in the midst of a public falling out with Trump in the wake of his departure from the administration last month -- shared a post on X that claimed the delay in releasing the Epstein files was due to Trump's name appearing in them. "Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files," he wrote. "That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT." The post was among several critical of Trump that Musk later removed from his account. Trump soon after dismissed Musk's claims in an interview with NBC News. "That's called 'old news.' That's been old news. That has been talked about for years. Even Epstein's lawyer said I had nothing to do with it -- it's old news," he said. "This has been talked about for years and years. And as you know, I was not friendly with Epstein for probably 18 years before he died. I was not at all friendly with him," Trump added. In tense private conversations, Bondi had previously pressed FBI Director Kash Patel to review the still-secret information from the case involving one of the most infamous sex trafficking criminals in modern history, sources told ABC News. As many as a thousand FBI agents, many of whom were typically focused on national security matters, were enlisted to help with the effort, sources added. In an interview in March, Bondi was asked about the increasing pressure from Trump's base to release more files, and confirmed that the department was working to make them public. "The MAGA group is mad that we don't know more about the Epstein files…are you going to give us any more information? Fox News' Maria Bartiromo asked the attorney general. Bondi responded that FBI Director Kash Patel was working on providing the DOJ with a timeline for the next document release. "We will get out as much as we can, as fast as we can to the American people," Bondi said.
Boston Globe
20 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Trump and Netanyahu may take a victory lap on Iran, but the Gaza war looms over their meeting
Advertisement 'The optics will be very positive,' said Michael Oren, a former Israeli ambassador to Washington. 'But behind the victory lap are going to be some very serious questions.' Before departing for Washington on Sunday, Netanyahu praised the cooperation with the U.S. for bringing a 'huge victory over our shared enemy.' He struck a positive note on a ceasefire for Gaza, saying he was working 'to achieve the deal under discussion, on the terms we agreed to.' 'I think that the discussion with President Trump can certainly help advance that result, which all of us hope for,' Netanyahu said. 'It changes from day to day' Israel and Hamas appear to be inching toward a new ceasefire agreement that would bring about a 60-day pause in the fighting, send aid flooding into Gaza and free at least some of the remaining 50 hostages held in the territory. Advertisement But a perennial sticking point is whether the ceasefire will end the war altogether. Hamas has said it is willing to free all the hostages in exchange for an end to the war and a full Israeli withdrawal from Gaza. Netanyahu says the war will end once Hamas surrenders, disarms and goes into exile — something it refuses to do. Trump has made it clear that he wants to be known as a peacemaker. He has repeatedly trumpeted recent peace deals that his administration facilitated between India and Pakistan, the Democratic Republic of Congo and Rwanda, and Israel and Iran, and for years has made little secret of the fact that he covets a Nobel Peace Prize. He has been pressuring Israel and Hamas to wrap up their own conflict, which has killed tens of thousands of Palestinians, ravaged Gaza, deepened Israel's international isolation and made any resolution to the broader conflict between Israel and the Palestinians more distant than ever. But the precise details of the deal, and whether it can lead to an end to the war, are still in flux. In the days before Netanyahu's visit, Trump seemed to downplay the chances for a breakthrough. Asked on Friday how confident he was a ceasefire deal would come together, Trump told reporters: 'I'm very optimistic — but you know, look, it changes from day to day.' On Sunday evening, he seemed to narrow his expectation, telling reporters that he thought an agreement related to the remaining hostages would be reached in the coming week. Trump and Netanyahu are more in sync than ever Those mood swings also have embodied Trump's relationship with Netanyahu. After Trump's decision to get involved in Israel's war in Iran with strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, the two leaders are more in sync than ever. But that's not always been the case. Advertisement As recently as Netanyahu's last visit to Washington in April, the tone was markedly different. Trump used the photo-op with Netanyahu to announce that the U.S. was entering into negotiations with Iran over its nuclear deal — appearing to catch the Israeli leader off guard and at the time, slamming the brakes on any Israeli military plan. He also praised Turkish leader Recep Tayyip Erdogan, a fierce critic of Israel's, in front of Netanyahu, and the two made no apparent progress on a trade deal at the height of Trump's tariff expansion. Trump, whose policies have largely aligned with Israel's own priorities, pledged last week to be 'very firm' with Netanyahu on ending the war, without saying what that would entail. Pressure by Trump has worked on Netanyahu in the past, with a ceasefire deal having been reached right as the president was taking office again. Netanyahu has to balance the demands of his American ally with the far-right parties in his governing coalition who hold the key to his political survival and oppose ending the war. But given the strong U.S. support in Israel's war against Iran, highlighted by joint airstrikes on a fortified underground Iranian nuclear site, Netanyahu may have a tough time saying no. On Sunday evening, Trump said one of the matters he expected to discuss with Netanyahu 'is probably a permanent deal with Iran.' Trump also may expect something in return for his recent calls for Netanyahu's corruption trial to be canceled — a significant interference in the domestic affairs of a sovereign state. Advertisement 'Trump thinks that Netanyahu owes him,' said Eytan Gilboa, an expert on U.S.-Israel affairs at Bar-Ilan University near Tel Aviv. 'And if Trump thinks that he needs to end the war In Gaza, then that is what he will need to do.' Trump's regional vision The two men will likely discuss the ceasefire with Iran and how to respond to any perceived violations. But beyond Iran is Trump's grand vision for a new Middle East, where he hopes that additional countries will join the Abraham Accords, a series of agreements normalizing relations between Arab countries and Israel brokered during Trump's first term. Netanyahu and Trump are likely to discuss how to bring Syria into the fold. The country, a longtime enemy of Israel's, has new leadership after the fall of President Bashar Assad, and experts say conditions might be ripe for some kind of nonbelligerency agreement. But Trump's ultimate goal is to include regional powerhouse Saudi Arabia. The Saudis, whose clout could open the door for other Arab or Muslim countries to join, have expressed interest in normalizing ties with Israel but only if it is accompanied by serious steps toward resolving Israel's conflict with the Palestinians. For starters, that would seem to require action in Gaza. 'The most important thing (for Trump) is to end the war in Gaza,' Gilboa said. 'That is the key to all the regional peace in the Middle East.' Price reported from Washington.
Boston Globe
30 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Columbia tried to negotiate with the Trump administration. Here's what Harvard can learn from its efforts.
What did Columbia get in return? So far, not much. Though Trump's tone on Columbia has brightened, his administration still hit the school with a civil rights violation and threatened its accreditation. The canceled funding has not been restored. 'I see [Columbia] as conceding and for nothing; I see it as neglecting its values and opening the door for the administration to do the same to other institutions,' said Antoinette Flores, director of higher education accountability and quality at New America, a liberal-leaning Washington think tank. Advertisement Columbia's leadership has argued many policy shifts were reasonable responses to campus protests — particularly around the war in Gaza — that made Jewish and Muslim students deeply uncomfortable. Columbia's president, Claire Shipman, issued a statement June 23 acknowledging the university was 'facing the decimation of decades of research' because of Trump's cuts. She also insisted it hadn't capitulated to Trump. Advertisement 'Following the law and attempting to resolve a complaint is not capitulation. That narrative is incorrect,' Shipman said. A Columbia spokesperson did not address whether the school received any of the retracted $400 million, instead referring to Shipman's June statement. But researchers there said their work has become increasingly challenging, with no sign of when, or if, the funding will come back. Joshua Gordon, chair of Columbia's psychiatry program, said his department lost roughly $25 million and hasn't received renewals for existing grants or money for projects they've expensed. 'We are continuously told by the administration of Columbia University that negotiations with the federal government continue but other than that, we haven't been given any details,' Gordon said. Katherine Keyes, a Columbia professor of epidemiology, said her department scrambled to place researchers no longer appointed at Columbia elsewhere and cobble together stabilization funds to retain existing staff. Funds for her research on how environmental factors affect young people's mental health were terminated in March, not for cause or misconduct but 'because of allegations against the institution' — a fact she called a 'difficult pill to swallow.' Harvard's and Columbia's difficulties in making deals with the federal government come as other schools implement dramatic changes to avoid Trump's wrath. The University of Virginia president last month resigned after the Justice Department demanded his departure to end an investigation into the school's diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives. The University of Pennsylvania this past week agreed to ban transgender women from participating in women's sports and to strip Lia Thomas, a transgender swimmer, of her records and titles. For Harvard, the costs of the standoff grow by the day: Trump has announced cuts at Harvard that dwarf Columbia's. Though Harvard won some early court victories, the federal government retains many points of leverage to make university administrators' lives more miserable. Advertisement Also at risk is the public approval Harvard gained for fighting Trump, support by demonstrating the opposition to Trump. 'It's hard to imagine a successful negotiation for Harvard because both sides have to appear to win — the administration in Washington wants to be able to declare victory, and so does Harvard,' said Larry Ladd, a former Harvard budget chief. In many ways, Columbia's and Harvard's stories are similar: Both campuses were for two years roiled by student protests over the war in Gaza. Both faced investigations over allegedly allowing unchecked harassment of Jewish and Israeli students. And both underwent leadership changes: Columbia's and Harvard's presidents in place at the beginning of the turbulent 2023-24 school year both departed before students returned last fall. After the federal government said it would withdraw roughly $400 million promised to Columbia, the school made changes in March, such as banning masks used to hide protesters' identities and appointing a new administrator to oversee departments studying the Middle East. Those did not appear to stop the onslaught. The National Institutes of Health in April directed officials, without notice, to stop issuing grants to schools including Columbia. In May, Columbia announced it would lay off nearly 180 staff members with federally funded salaries. Then, the Health and Human Services Department in May found Columbia violated civil rights law by 'showing deliberate indifference' to hostility toward Jewish students. In June, the Department of Education recommended challenging Columbia's accreditation — jeopardizing even more federal resources. Advertisement Officials with Columbia and the Trump administration acknowledged talks are ongoing. Still, Education Secretary Linda McMahon told The Wall Street Journal Columbia has 'made such good progress' and the sides 'possibly are getting close to a negotiated resolution.' Trump in May said Columbia was out of the 'hot seat,' adding it was 'very anti-Semitic and lots of other things but they're working with us on finding a solution.' Harvard, by comparison, 'wants to fight, they want to show how smart they are, and they're getting their ass kicked,' he said. Harvard, meanwhile, earlier this spring was in talks with Trump officials about how to restore funding. But after officials sent the school their demands in April, president Alan Garber said Harvard wouldn't allow the government to dictate its decisions, a move celebrated by academics and Trump critics nationwide. Harvard has since waged several court battles against the administration, which took aim at Harvard's international students and nearly all its federal research funding. Late last month, the administration Political observers said Harvard, as it re-enters negotiations, has more advantages than Columbia: It benefits from a larger endowment and recognizable brand. Trump officials are eager to work toward a deal there, seeing it as the strongest place to influence higher education. But in some ways, Harvard, along with other higher education leaders, may have more to lose if Garber gives in. 'Because we put so much faith in their leadership, because of the size of their endowment, because it's the oldest university in the country, because it's Harvard, it really opens the floodgates for the Trump administration to have massive incursions into the operations of higher education," said Todd Wolfson, president of the American Association of University Professors. Advertisement The sweeping nature of the government's approach — and uncertainty about what will be enough — complicates negotiations. Attacks have come from all corners, from the Health and Human Services to Homeland Security departments. 'You can't negotiate with a party that is inconsistent and unreliable, and that appears to be the difficulty Columbia had,' said Ladd, now with the Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges. Harvard and Columbia are 'in a precarious position, but they have both opened lines of communication and can credibly claim they have taken some significant action,' said Rick Hess, director of education policy studies at the right-leaning American Enterprise Institute in D.C. The question, he said, is 'will that be enough that they can reach common ground with the administration and, if they do, can they spin it back to their campus communities as a principled agreement rather than capitulation?' Anjali Huynh can be reached at
