Top European court rules Russia committed abuses in Ukraine, downed MH17 flight
Image: Picture: Menahem Kahana / AFP
A top European court on Wednesday ruled that Russia committed a string of human rights violations in backing anti-Kyiv separatists in eastern Ukraine from 2014, in the downing of the MH17 flight that year and in invading Ukraine in 2022.
The European Court of Human Rights, part of the Council of Europe rights body, is tasked with implementing the European human rights convention in signatory countries.
Wednesday's largely symbolic ruling comes after the Council of Europe excluded Russia following its invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, and Moscow dropped out of the European rights convention in September that year.
The ECHR however still handles cases against Russia that were brought before that date.
A panel of 17 judges found Russia violated the convention through "extrajudicial killing of civilians and Ukrainian military personnel" outside of combat, "torture", "forced labour", "unlawful and arbitrary detention of civilians" as well as looting.
The judges also ruled that Russia had violated the European rights convention through "the transfer to Russia and, in many cases, the adoption there of Ukrainian children".
The court said Russia "must without delay release or safely return all persons who were deprived of liberty on Ukrainian territory under occupation by the Russian and Russian-controlled forces."
It added that Moscow should cooperate in the establishment of an international and independent mechanism to help identify "all children transferred from Ukraine to Russia and Russian-controlled territory" before September 2022 to restore contact between them and their families, and enable their safe reunification.
Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov on Wednesday said Russia had no intention of complying with the decision of the court, whose rulings it considered to be "null and void". 'Historic'
The court issued its verdict in response to four complaints.
Ukraine had filed three of these over events from 2014 to 2022, and the Netherlands had filed a fourth over the downing over eastern Ukraine of Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 flight from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur on July 17, 2014.
The UN's aviation agency has blamed Moscow for the tragedy that killed all 298 on board.
The ECHR found that "the suffering of the next of kin of the victims of the downing of flight MH17" violated the right to freedom from torture and punishment.
Ukraine celebrated what it said was a "historic decision".
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad loading
Its justice ministry said the court's recognition of "systematic and widespread human rights violations committed by Russia" was a "victory on the international stage".
Dutch Prime Minister Dick Schoof said it was "an important step toward justice".
"The court has designated Russia as responsible for the downing of MH17 and the death of its passengers, including 196 Dutch nationals," he said.
Piet Ploeg, who lost his brother, step-sister and nephew in the tragedy, said it was an "important day".
"I don't think Russia will pay anything but it is not about money today," he said.
"It is about getting justice and recognition and maybe getting apologies... You never know."
Usually individuals file cases at Europe's top human rights court, appealing to it as a last resort in cases where they have exhausted all domestic legal avenues.
But governments also can file complaints in what are known as inter-state cases.
AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
eNCA
an hour ago
- eNCA
Trump praises Liberian leader on English
WASHINGTON -US President Donald Trump complimented the president of Liberia Wednesday on his English-speaking skills -- despite English being the official language of the West African nation. Trump was hosting a White House lunch with African leaders Wednesday, and -- after brief remarks from President Joseph Boakai -- asked the business graduate where he had picked up his linguistic know-how. "Thank you, and such good English... Where did you learn to speak so beautifully? Where were you educated?" Trump said. Boakai -- who, like most Liberians, speaks English as a first language -- indicated he had been educated in his native country. He was facing away from the media, making his countenance hard to gauge -- but his laconic, mumbled response hinted at awkwardness. Trump, who was surrounded by French-speaking presidents from other West African nations, kept digging. "It's beautiful English. I have people at this table can't speak nearly as well," he said. AFP | Jim WATSON US engagement in Liberia began in the 1820s when the Congress- and slaveholder-funded American Colonization Society began sending freed slaves to its shores. Thousands of "Americo-Liberian" settlers followed, declaring themselves independent in 1847 and setting up a government to rule over a native African majority. The country has a diverse array of indigenous languages and a number of creolized dialects, while Kpelle-speakers are the largest single linguistic group. Boakai himself can read and write in Mendi and Kissi but converses in Liberia's official tongue and lingua franca -- English. ft/sla
The Citizen
2 hours ago
- The Citizen
Why South Africa must act fast after Trump's tariff blow
While the 30% tariff is a tough pill to swallow, South Africa must stop reacting to global trade shocks and start preparing for them. US President Donald Trump holds a signed executive order after delivering remarks on reciprocal tariffs during an event in the Rose Garden entitled 'Make America Wealthy Again' at the White House in Washington, DC, on April 2, 2025. Picture: Saul Loeb / AFP The decision by US President Donald Trump to impose a 30% tariff on certain South African imports is more than a trade technicality – it's a blow to an already fragile economic relationship. For many South Africans, especially those in agriculture, manufacturing and mining, this move feels like a punch to the gut. But while the tariff hike – which takes effect on 1 August – is a setback, it should also serve as a wake-up call for South Africa to reassess its global trade strategy and take decisive, calculated action. Let's be clear: the US is within its rights to protect its industries, but the rationale behind this tariff is not clear. Some say it's about trade imbalances; others suggest it's tied to South Africa's non-aligned stance on global conflicts, especially the Russia-Ukraine war, as well as its affiliation with the BricsPlus bloc. Others say this action is less about trade and more about a show of power by the Trump administration. Whatever the reason, the implications are real. Jobs are on the line, exports are at risk and investor confidence is under pressure. In practical terms, South African goods entering the US market are now significantly more expensive. That citrus farmer in Limpopo or the steel manufacturer in Gauteng suddenly find themselves priced out of a crucial market. ALSO READ: Where Trump's tariffs will hurt most For a country with already high unemployment and limited fiscal space, this couldn't have come at a worse time. But despair is not a strategy. South Africa has options – and it must act fast. The global reality is that the aggressive US tariff policy is creating a fragmented world trading system that further elevates economic uncertainty. While there is a great deal of fear psychology about just now, South Africa is not without remedies. First, Pretoria must reopen immediate diplomatic channels with Washington. This is not the time for pride or passive commentary. South Africa must make the case that it remains a vital, responsible economic partner and deserves reconsideration or at least clarification. As a small open economy, it remains essential that bilateral negotiations must continue to stabilise and consolidate future US-SA investment and trade relations. Second, the government should not hesitate to take the matter to the World Trade Organisation if the tariffs appear to violate established trade norms. We can't let precedent be set without challenge. Third, this is a golden opportunity to double down on the African Continental Free Trade Area. By boosting trade within Africa, South Africa can reduce its dependence on volatile external partners. ALSO READ: Wait-and-see to Trump's hardline Why fight for crumbs at someone else's table when we can help set our own? We also need to diversify aggressively. Our overreliance on Western markets, especially the US, leaves South Africa vulnerable. South Africa should strengthen ties with Europe, Asia, the Middle East and fellow Brics countries. New trade deals, expanded market access and regional value chains must become central to our economic diplomacy. Lastly, government support is essential. Industries directly hit by the tariff hike must not be left to weather the storm alone. Targeted relief, export incentives and skills development programmes can cushion the blow and maintain momentum. Collaboration between government and the private sector to accelerate the identification of alternative markets must continue. The 30% tariff is a tough pill to swallow, but it also offers a moment of clarity. South Africa must stop reacting to global trade shocks and start preparing for them. In doing so, we can turn a trade crisis into a turning point for a smarter, more resilient economic future. NOW READ: Ramaphosa disputes Trump's 30% tariff claim as 'not accurate'
Daily Maverick
4 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Russian drones bear down on Ukrainian capital, up to three injured
Russian drones bore down on the Ukrainian capital Kyiv early on Thursday, with officials reporting fires in apartment and non-residential buildings a day after a record number of drones targeted the country. The head of Kyiv's military administration, Tymur Tkachenko, said three people had suffered shrapnel wounds. Tkachenko said six city districts had been hit, with fires breaking out in various buildings, storage areas and cars and drone fragments falling to the ground in different parts of the city. 'The enemy attack is continuing,' he wrote. 'The defence forces are taking on enemy targets.' Ukraine's military issued warnings on the Telegram messaging app that the city could also be subject to a missile attack. Reuters witnesses reported a series of loud explosions. Kyiv Mayor Vitali Klitschko said emergency crews were at an apartment building in the central Shevchenkivskyi district, where falling drone fragments had triggered a fire on the top floor. Another fire was being tackled, also in the city centre. Klitschko put the number of injured at two people in hospital. On Tuesday night, Russian forces unleashed their largest drone attack on Ukraine since the start of the now 40-month-old war, with 728 drones targeting widely separated regions, including western Ukraine. That attack took place hours after U.S. President Donald Trump pledged to send more defensive weapons to Kyiv and aimed unusually sharp criticism at Russian President Vladimir Putin.
