Now nurses and GPs threaten to strike as NHS braces for winter chaos
The Royal College of Nursing (RCN) has warned its members feel 'deeply undervalued' and will be balloted on industrial action if the government fails to increase its current pay offer of 3.6 per cent.
It comes as GPs have also threatened to strike, warning minister Stephen Kinnock that the government must action its list of demands to 'avoid a future dispute'.
GPs, represented by the British Medical Association, are also set to hold a meeting in September where they will decide on holding further ballots over strike action. Last year, GPs took part in 'collective action' over contract funding.
The fresh threats come after a five-day walkout by resident doctors ended on Wednesday, with thousands of staff walking out over the government's refusal to meet their demands for a 29 per cent pay rise.
The Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) said the government 'hugely' values the work of nurses, but stressed the profession has had 'two above-inflation pay rises'.
On Wednesday, Health Secretary Wes Streeting issued a warning to leaders at the British Medical Association (BMA), saying he is willing to resume talks in their ongoing dispute over pay and working conditions.
But he warned: 'It should be clear to the BMA by now that it will lose a war with this government. It's not too late for us both to win the peace.'
Professor Nicola Ranger, general secretary and chief executive of the RCN, said nurses feel 'deeply undervalued'.
According to the union, 91 per cent of members voted to reject the pay award on a 56 per cent turnout, with more than 170,000 staff taking part.
It warned that the profession faces widespread vacancies, stunted career progression and years of pay erosion, and urged ministers to use the summer to agree an investment plan or face a ballot on industrial action.
Meanwhile, Unison, which represents other healthcare workers such as ambulance staff and porters, is consulting members on possible action in response to the 3.6 per cent pay award.
On Wednesday, The Independent reported that vital cancer operations were cancelled due to the resident doctors' strikes. But the full scale of the walkouts is yet to be revealed, with NHS England due to publish data on how many operations and appointments were shelved this week.
However, it is expected that fewer patients were affected compared to previous strikes after hospitals were ordered to press ahead with as much pre-planned care as possible. In previous walkouts, the majority of non-urgent care was postponed.
The latest threat of action from nurses comes after they led the way on strike action over pay in 2022 and 2023, that quickly saw other public sectors, such as train drivers and teachers follow.
Announcing the results of the RCN's consultation, Professor Ranger said: 'My profession feels deeply undervalued and that is why record numbers are telling the government to wake up, sense the urgency here and do what's right by them and by patients.
'Record numbers have delivered this verdict on a broken system that holds back nursing pay and careers and hampers the NHS. As a safety-critical profession, keeping hold of experienced nursing staff is fundamentally a safety issue and key to the government's own vision for the NHS.
'Long-overdue reforms to nursing career progression and the NHS pay structure aren't just about fairness and equity but are critical for patient safety.'
Following the doctors' strike on pay, the BMA is now in dispute with the government over the number of resident doctors who are unable to get speciality training jobs. It claims that around 30,000 resident doctors have to compete for 10,000 specialist posts each year.
A DHSC spokesperson added in response to the RCN: 'This government is clear we can't move any further on headline pay but will work with the RCN to improve their major concerns, including pay structure reform, concerns on career progression and wider working conditions.'
☕ Need to wake up your brain?
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
'Horrific' Photo Made This Dad Lose Half His Weight in a Year without Medication. He's Since Dropped 220 Lbs.
NEED TO KNOW A U.K. dad of two was inspired to change his diet and start exercising after he saw his wedding photos, saying he looked 'horrific' in the images Dale Forrest, 38, first limited his calories before walking 10,000 steps a day — and within three months, had lost nearly 100 lbs. He said he didn't turn to GLP-1 medication to lose weight because he wanted to see what could be done 'naturally'A father of two lost more than 220 lbs. — without using medication — after his 'horrific' wedding photo inspired him to change his diet and begin exercising. For Dale Forrest, 36, weight has always been a struggle. Ten years ago, he lost nearly 200 lbs. by giving up alcohol and watching what he ate, according to the Daily Mail. However, the weight piled back on, he said, as he struggled with declining mental health and self-confidence. 'I was living alone in a studio apartment. All my mates had girlfriends, wives and kids and I was just lonely,' Forrest, who hails from the English town of Bolton, said. 'I also didn't like my job at the time. As soon as I put a little weight back on, everything just spiraled.' His mental health improved after met his now-wife, Kat, in 2021, and they welcomed two sons, Bailey, 3, and Tate, 1. But the weight stayed on — until September 2024, when Forrest saw the pictures from his wedding. 'I thought I looked horrific,' Forrest said, per the Daily Mail. 'The first thing I said to my wife was, 'I need to make a change.' ' At the time, Forrest started his day with three pasties — a savory meat-filled turnover — and ended it with pizza and beer. But after seeing the photos, Forrest said he threw away all the snacks in the house 'so they weren't there to tempt me,' and limited his caloric intake. The goal, he said, was to lose enough weight to begin exercising. 'I was so unhealthy to the extent that I couldn't walk 100 meters [0.06 miles] before feeling tired,' he said. 'I knew I wouldn't be able to exercise until I had lost some initial weight.' A month later, he'd lost nearly 30 lbs., and began walking, aiming for 10,000 steps a day. By December 2024 — three months after he first saw the wedding photos — he'd lost nearly 100 lbs., and began hitting the gym, something he described as 'terrifying.' 'I thought everyone was looking at me thinking, 'Why is this guy here?' ' he shared. 'I was self-conscious of my body, but especially my legs.' Nearly a year after he started his fitness journey, Forrest is training for a charity boxing match, and now weighs about 210 lbs. — half of what he weighed in September 2024. Although he said he 'did this the hard way,' he explained that he didn't pursue a GLP-1 medication because "I wanted to see what I could do naturally and what was possible.' He now shares his continued fitness journey on TikTok, where he said in one video that his sons are "my reason for living, getting healthier, and improving my quality of life." Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. 'Good old fashioned exercise and diet got me here,' he said, per the Daily Mail. And here, Forrest said, is a place where he 'can now play with my children. Before I [lost the weight], I used to tell them to play with their mom.' He added, 'It's nice when they ask, 'Daddy, can you put me on your shoulders?' and I can be there for them. It's the best decision I have ever made." Read the original article on People
Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
Ozzy Osbourne died of a heart attack, report says, citing death certificate
LONDON — Ozzy Osbourne died of a heart attack and had coronary artery disease in addition to suffering from Parkinson's disease for years, his death certificate said. The singer had suffered from coronary artery disease as well as Parkinson's, according to the certificate filed at a register office in London and obtained by The New York Times on Tuesday. Osbourne died on July 22 at 76 .
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Prince Harry and others criticised by charity watchdog for letting ‘damaging' Sentebale dispute play out in public
A watchdog has cleared Prince Harry of 'over-reach' at the charity he co-founded – but says a string of failures amounted to mismanagement in its administration. Regulator the Charity Commission, which investigated Sentebale for four months, has condemned 'all parties to the dispute for allowing it to play out publicly'. The commission also says the then trustees' failure to resolve disputes internally severely affected the charity's reputation and risked undermining public trust in charities more generally. Pointing to 'a lack of clarity around role descriptions and internal policies' as the key cause for weaknesses in the management, the watchdog says the confusion inflamed tensions, which culminated in a row and mass resignations of trustees and both founding patrons, the commission found. In March, Prince Harry and Prince Seeiso of Lesotho, the co-founder, quit as patrons, saying the move was in support of the trustees – who also resigned – in a dispute with chairwoman Sophie Chandauka. 'It is devastating that the relationship between the charity's trustees and the chair of the board broke down beyond repair, creating an untenable situation,' the princes said at the time. Dr Chandauka said she had reported Sentebale's trustees to the Charity Commission and had taken legal steps to prevent her removal. She also made claims of misconduct. Prince Seeiso and Prince Harry founded the organisation in 2006 in honour of Harry's mother, Diana, to help young people and children in southern Africa, particularly those with HIV and Aids. The watchdog said the row began after 2023, when Sentebale's then trustees tried to implement a new fundraising strategy in the United States. A serious dispute then emerged between Dr Chandauka, some trustees and the Duke of Sussex. Members of the regulator said that after conducting interviews and reviewing evidence, they found the delegation of certain powers to the chair, including consideration of an executive chair role, was a 'confusing, convoluted and poorly governed' process, with a lack of clearly defined delegations. The watchdog said the then trustees failed to have proper processes and policies to investigate internal complaints. 'More generally, a lack of clear policies contributed to the failure to resolve disputes,' they concluded. And the commission said public statements made to the media and criticism made in television interviews, did not serve the charity's best interests. It found no evidence of widespread or systemic bullying or harassment, including misogyny or racism, but acknowledged 'the strong perception of ill treatment felt by a number of parties to the dispute and the impact this may have had on them personally'. Nor was there evidence of 'over-reach' by either the chair or the Duke of Sussex, it said. But the regulator concluded: 'The failure to clarify delegations within the charity to the chair, and the failure to have proper processes for internal complaints, both amount to mismanagement in the administration of the charity.' The commission has issued Sentebale with a regulatory action plan, saying the charity should have a clearly defined patron role set out in writing. The plan also includes improving complaints and whistleblowing procedures. The watchdog said all the charity's then trustees contributed to a missed opportunity to resolve issues that led to the dispute. Financial difficulties following the Covid-19 pandemic contributed to tensions, it added. David Holdsworth, chief executive of the Charity Commission, said: 'Sentebale's problems played out in the public eye, enabling a damaging dispute to harm the charity's reputation, risk overshadowing its many achievements, and jeopardising the charity's ability to deliver for the very beneficiaries it was created to serve.'
