logo
Canada Project Reclaims 'Foul' Industrial Area To Contain Floods

Canada Project Reclaims 'Foul' Industrial Area To Contain Floods

The spur to build Toronto's billion-dollar-plus flood prevention project dates back to a devastating hurricane in 1954, but planners say its urgency was reinforced by the recent tragic flooding in Texas.
The Port Lands project has, in part, reversed a consequence of industrialization by reconnecting Lake Ontario with the Don River, more than a century after they were severed to create an industrial area.
Chris Glaisek, chief planning officer at the municipal body Waterfront Toronto, said the idea was to "heal the land from the way it was repurposed 100 years ago," with a focus on "flood protection and naturalization."
The complex project -- one of the largest in Toronto's history with a cost of Can$1.4 billion (US$1 billion) -- included digging a river valley and the creation of two new river outlets, with wetlands and marshes to absorb excess water during extreme storms.
The mouth of the Don River was once the Great Lakes system's largest fresh water marsh, a rich habitat and vital food resource for Indigenous people before colonization.
But Toronto, like many North American cities, saw industrial growth in the late 19th Century.
Much of the marsh was drained and filled in to make room for a port industrial area, while the river was re-routed into a man-made channel.
The Port Lands never thrived as an industrial area, leaving a vast stretch of eastern downtown under-used, and the Don River became polluted.
"It was really dirty, it was foul, it was terrible," Toronto Mayor Olivia Chow said recently.
On October 15, 1954 Hurricane Hazel hit Toronto, after hammering parts of the Caribbean and eastern United States.
It killed 81 people across the Greater Toronto Area and served as catalyst for the city to get serious about flood protection.
Hazel flooded the Humber River, in western Toronto, but Glaisek said "it was understood at the time that that same amount of rainfall, had it landed on the (eastern) Don, would have done a comparable amount of damage."
He called Hazel an initial "impetus" to re-naturalize the Port Lands, but rising awareness over the past two decades about the causal link between climate change and extreme floods helped advance the project.
To reclaim the Port Lands, Toronto partnered with the US-based landscape architecture firm Michael Van Valkenburgh Associates, which has worked on the Brooklyn Bridge Park and the Obama Presidential Center in Chicago.
Laura Solano, the lead designer, said the project was "duty bound to address catastrophic flooding," but stressed it offered "much more."
Because the area has been reformed to cope with flood waters, parts have been declared safe for new housing -- an urgent need in the expensive metropolis.
There is also a new park, trails and people can canoe or kayak through the rehabilitated Don.
Solano stressed Toronto's initial decision to alter the area was consistent with the times, when North American cities moved to "industrialize their waters...to raise their economic position."
But now, "every city is looking to reclaim their waters," she told AFP.
The Port Lands "shows the world that it's possible to fix the past and turn deficit and remnant industrial lands into living and breathing infrastructure."
As Glaisek described the project, he stood on a bank that would, by design, be under water during a major storm.
"It's all planned so that it can flood, the water level can rise, the river can get about three, maybe four times wider than it is now, absorb all of that volume of water," he said.
"When the storm event subsides, it will shrink back down to this."
It's a planning approach that recognizes "we're seeing more and more of these events."
"Like in Texas, you see very tragic outcomes when you haven't really tried to plan for nature," he told AFP, referring to flash floods in early July that killed at least 135 people.
He urged planners to "reposition" their relationship to nature and ditch the mindset that "humans (can) control everything."
"Let's acknowledge the river is going to flood. Let's build the space for it." The mouth of the Don River was once the Great Lakes system's largest fresh water marsh, a rich habitat and vital food resource for Indigenous people before colonization AFP The Port Lands never thrived as an industrial area, leaving a vast stretch of eastern downtown under-used, and the Don River became polluted AFP The Manitou Mkwa Signers perform a song along the banks of Don River in Toronto's Port Lands Flood Protection Project AFP
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why are the US and Pakistan making an oil deal? – DW – 08/01/2025
Why are the US and Pakistan making an oil deal? – DW – 08/01/2025

DW

time2 days ago

  • DW

Why are the US and Pakistan making an oil deal? – DW – 08/01/2025

Pakistan is not known to have "massive" oil reserves like those lauded by Donald Trump. But by expanding agreements on trade, and energy, Washington and Islamabad are laying the groundwork for closer geopolitical ties. US President Donald Trump on Wednesday announced a new agreement for the joint development of Pakistan's oil reserves, as both countries work on expanding trade and economic ties. "We have just concluded a deal with the country of Pakistan, whereby Pakistan and the United States will work together on developing their massive oil reserves," Trump posted on his Truth Social platform. It wasn't immediately clear what "massive" oil reserves Trump was referring to. Oil is Pakistan's largest import item, accounting for nearly 20% of Pakistan's total import bill, according to central bank data. Most of that oil comes from the Middle East. Nevertheless, Trump's called the deal "a significant beginning" to a potential long-term energy partnership. The energy partnership was unveiled by Trump before the White House on Thursday announced a broader trade agreement with Pakistan, and soon thereafter a 19% tariff rate on Pakistani imports to the US. This is lower than the previous rate of 29% Both countries also hailed the US-Pakistan trade agreement. Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif called it a "landmark deal" that would "enhance our growing cooperation." The Finance Ministry said the deal marked the "beginning of a new era of economic collaboration especially in energy, mines and minerals, IT, cryptocurrency and other sectors," On Friday, Pakistan welcomed the new, lowered, tariff rate, with the Finance Ministry calling it a " balanced and forward-looking approach" from the US. "This development marks an intriguing shift in Pakistan–US relations; from a traditionally geopolitical and strategic partnership toward a more economically focused cooperation," Azeem Khalid, a New York based international affairs expert, told DW. Pakistan's tariff rate is also lower than the 25% imposed on arch-rival neighbor India. In announcing the oil deal, Trump took a jab at New Delhi, quipping that India could one day buy Pakistani oil. "Who knows, maybe they'll be selling oil to India someday!" To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video However, it seems that as of now, oil is flowing in the opposite direction. On Friday, Reuters news agency reported that Pakistan's largest oil refiner, Cnergyico, said it would import 1 million barrels of US crude oil in October via its trading partner, Vitol, a Dutch energy and commodity trading company. "If it is commercially viable and available, we could import at least one cargo per month," Cnergyico's Vice Chairman Usama Qureshi told Reuters. As for Pakistani oil, before this deal, Pakistan made several unsuccessful attempts at offshore exploration in the offshore Indus basin. Estimates of Pakistan's proven recoverable conventional crude oil reserves range from 234 million to 353 million barrels, positioning the country approximately 50th in the world in terms of oil reserves. Untapped oil reserves are believed to be located in Balochistan, with additional prospects in Sindh, Punjab, and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. As the center of an armed insurgent movement that frequently carries out attacks, developing resources in Balochistan presents security problems. Baloch insurgents perceive resource extraction as a form of economic exploitation by Pakistan's federal government and frequently target these kind of projects with attacks. According to trade law expert Osama Malik, extraction of oil from Balochistan could further alienate a population that is already disgruntled at the exploration of the province's mineral resources by China. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Experts have expressed cautious optimism about the recent deal, as it may attract investment, introduce advanced extraction technologies, and facilitate new field surveys. However, actual extraction of petroleum products remains uncertain without confirmed reserves and the necessary infrastructure in place. "When American companies establish a presence in Balochistan, it is anticipated that the insurgency will not be at its peak," Qamar Cheema, a security analyst, told DW. "As support for these groups diminishes it will lead to a reduction or potential elimination of the insurgency," he added. The US has strategic interests in Balochistan due to its proximity to Iran and Afghanistan. "Washington is focused on establishing a presence in Balochistan, which is rich in minerals and holds significant strategic value due to its proximity to Iran," Cheema said. Washington views Balochistan as a potential monitoring and pressure point for Iranian activities, particularly amid ongoing tensions regarding Iran's nuclear program and its regional influence. The agreement also carries potential implications as Washington aims to reduce Pakistan's growing reliance on China. "Islamabad will also have to balance between the considerable Chinese investment in the energy and mineral sector and future investment by the US," said trade law expert Malik. China is investing billions into developing rail and road links in Pakistan. The $65 billion China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) project is intended for shipping Chinese goods via the Xinjiang region across the mountain border through Pakistan and into the Arabian Sea at Balochistan's Gwadar port. "From China's perspective, the entry of US companies into Pakistan's resource exploration sector presents a competitive challenge to Chinese oil and mineral firms. Yet, considering the historical depth of Pakistan–China relations, this situation may serve as a diplomatic bridge rather than a point of contention," said international affairs expert Azeem Khalid. Security expert Cheema, believes Pakistan relies on China for military equipment and on the United States for macroeconomic stability, particularly through the IMF. "This deal is likely to strengthen the economic partnership between Pakistan and the US. Additionally, the US seeks to establish an alternative ally in the region other than India," said Cheema.

Trump Unveils Slew Of New Tariffs, Punishes Canada
Trump Unveils Slew Of New Tariffs, Punishes Canada

Int'l Business Times

time2 days ago

  • Int'l Business Times

Trump Unveils Slew Of New Tariffs, Punishes Canada

President Donald Trump unveiled new tariffs Thursday on nearly 70 countries -- including a blistering 35 percent on neighbor Canada -- as he seeks to reshape global trade to benefit the US economy. However, in a minor reprieve that opens the door to further negotiations, the White House said the measures will take effect in a week for most countries, not Friday as previously expected. The tariffs are a demonstration of raw economic power that Trump sees putting US exporters in a stronger position while encouraging domestic manufacturing by keeping out foreign imports. But the muscular approach has raised fears of inflation and other economic fallout in the world's biggest economy. Trump raised duties on nearly 70 economies, from a current 10 percent level imposed in April when he unleashed "reciprocal" tariffs citing unfair trade practices. The new, steeper levels listed in an executive order vary by trading partner and go as high as 41 percent. Any goods "transshipped" through other jurisdictions to avoid US duties would be hit with an additional 40-percent tariff, the order said. The American leader separately hiked tariffs on Canadian goods from 25 percent to 35 percent -- starting Friday. He had warned of trade consequences for Canada after Prime Minister Mark Carney announced plans to recognize a Palestinian state at the UN General Assembly in September. "Wow! Canada has just announced that it is backing statehood for Palestine," Trump wrote on Truth Social ahead of the announcement. "That will make it very hard for us to make a Trade Deal with them." But Trump gave more time to neighbor and major trading partner Mexico, delaying for 90 days a threat to increase tariffs from 25 percent to 30 percent, after holding talks with President Claudia Sheinbaum. Canada and Mexico face a separate US tariff regime. Exemptions remain, however, for imports entering the United States under a North American trade pact. With questions hanging over the effectiveness of bilateral trade deals already struck -- including with the European Union and Japan -- the outcome of Trump's overall plan remained uncertain. "No doubt about it -- the executive order and related agreements concluded over the past few months tears up the trade rule book that has governed international trade since World War II," said Wendy Cutler, senior vice president of the Asia Society Policy Institute. "Whether our partners can preserve it without the United States is an open question," she added. The elevated duties come after Washington twice postponed their implementation amid a frantic series of negotiations, alongside announcements of new duties and deals with partners. The 79-year-old Republican has made tariffs core to his protectionist brand of hard-right politics. On Thursday, he claimed the US economy had "no chance of survival or success" without tariffs. But the latest salvo came amid legal challenges against Trump's use of emergency economic powers. After a lower court said the president exceeded his authority, the US Court of Appeals heard arguments Thursday in cases against Trump's blanket tariffs targeting different countries. While the president has touted a surge in customs revenues this year, economists warn the duties could fuel inflation. Proponents of his policy argue their impact will be one-off, but analysts are awaiting further data to gauge for more persistent effects. Those who managed to strike deals with Washington to avert steeper threatened levies included Vietnam, Japan, Indonesia, the Philippines, South Korea and the European Union. Among other tariff levels adjusted in Trump's latest order, Switzerland now faces a higher 39 percent duty. The tariff on Taiwanese products was revised down to 20 percent from 32 percent, but its President Lai Ching-te vowed to seek an even lower level. In Southeast Asia, Phnom Penh and Bangkok welcomed news that they each face a 19-percent tariff -- down from initial threatened levels of 49 percent on Cambodia and 36 percent on Thailand. Britain also reached a pact with the United States, although it was not originally targeted by higher "reciprocal" tariffs. Notably excluded from the drama was China, which faces an August 12 deadline instead, when duties could bounce back to higher levels. Washington and Beijing at one point brought tit-for-tat tariffs to triple-digit levels, but both countries have agreed to temporarily lower these duties and are working to extend their truce. President Donald Trump is expanding his trade war around the world in a bid to use US economic muscle to reshape global trade AFP This US cowboy boot factory faces upheaval from new tariffs on South Africa, where most of the ostrich leather used is produced AFP Chinese and US negotiators met this week in Stockholm to try and avoid deepening the trade dispute between the two leading economies AFP

Trump Orders Tariffs On Dozens Of Countries In Push To Reshape Global Trade
Trump Orders Tariffs On Dozens Of Countries In Push To Reshape Global Trade

Int'l Business Times

time2 days ago

  • Int'l Business Times

Trump Orders Tariffs On Dozens Of Countries In Push To Reshape Global Trade

President Donald Trump ordered the reimposition of tariffs on dozens of trading partners Thursday -- his cornerstone strategy for reshaping global trade to benefit the US economy. However in a minor reprieve, the White House said the measures will take effect in a week, not this Friday as previously expected. The tariffs are a demonstration of raw economic power that Trump says will put US exporters in a stronger position while encouraging domestic manufacturing by keeping out foreign imports. But the muscular approach has raised fears of inflation and other economic fallout in the world's biggest economy. And with questions hanging over the effectiveness of bilateral trade deals already struck -- including by the European Union and Japan -- the outcome of Trump's plan remained uncertain. Trump's new measures in an executive order raised duties on dozens of economies up to a 41 percent rate. Most of these new tariff hikes were first announced in April when Trump slapped a minimum 10 percent levy on goods from almost every country in the world, citing unfair trade practices and US deficits. However, Washington then postponed implementation, amid frantic series of negotiations, alongside announcements of new duties and deals with some partners. Just Thursday, Trump announced he was delaying a tariff hike on products from the major US trading partner Mexico. The postponement by 90 days came after talks with his counterpart Claudia Sheinbaum. The 79-year-old Republican has made tariffs core to his protectionist brand of hard-right politics. On Thursday, he claimed that the US economy had "no chance of survival or success" without tariffs. But the latest salvo came amid legal challenges against Trump's use of emergency economic powers. On Thursday, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit heard arguments in cases brought against Trump's blanket tariffs targeting different countries. And questions linger over the effectiveness of Trump's grand plans, or even whether he will hold firm on his most drastic threats. While Trump has touted a surge in customs revenues since the start of the year, economists warn the duties could fuel inflation. Proponents of his policy argue that their impact will be one-off, but analysts are awaiting further economic data to gauge for more persistent effects. Among those who managed to strike deals with Washington were Vietnam, Japan, Indonesia, the Philippines, South Korea and the European Union. Britain also reached a pact with the United States, although it was not originally targeted by higher "reciprocal" tariffs. Washington did not finalize a deal with neighboring Canada, but Trump reached agreement with Mexico to maintain an existing 25 percent duty on its products. Canada, however, was slapped with duties of 35 percent in the Trump executive order. An exemption for goods entering the country under a North American trade pact remained in place, according to the White House. But transshipped goods to evade the 35 percent duty would face even higher levels. Canada's trade relations with the United States came under renewed threat after Prime Minister Mark Carney announced plans to recognize a Palestinian state at the UN General Assembly in September. Notably excluded from the latest drama was China, which faces an August 12 deadline instead, when duties could bounce back to higher levels. Washington and Beijing had slapped tit-for-tat tariffs on each other's goods, bringing them to triple-digit levels before both countries reached agreement in May to temporarily lower these duties. The superpowers are now working towards extending their truce. President Donald Trump is expanding his trade war around the world in a bid to use US economic muscle to reshape global trade AFP This US cowboy boot factory faces upheaval from new tariffs on South Africa, where most of the ostrich leather used is produced AFP Chinese and US negotiators met this week in Stockholm to try and avoid deepening the trade dispute between the two leading economies AFP

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store