Sheikh that owns Qatari jet gifted to Trump embroiled in $20M luxury hotel spat
A Boeing 747-8 jet that has been dubbed a 'flying palace' is owned by the Qatari royal family.
It still carries the initials of one of its leading members — Qatar's former prime minister Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim, also known as HBJ, in its tail number, aviation records show.
Advertisement
8 President Donald Trump was in Qatar on Wednesday where he felt heat for agreeing to accept a donated Qatari plane to become the next Air Force One presidential jet.
APAImages/Shutterstock
The 66-year-old royal — worth an estimated $4 billion according to Forbes — has been branded the 'Thief of Doha' by a Washington think tank, and allegedly brought senior members of Hamas to the Qatari capital.
He was accused by the DOJ of presiding over bribery and corruption when he led the bid to bring the 2022 World Cup to Qatar.
HBJ also drew controversy last year over an antisemitic tirade in an interview with Kuwati media outlet Al-Qabas.
Advertisement
'Imagine oil was sold by some Jews…what would be the price of a barrel oil? It would be the most expensive thing in the world,' the former Qatari PM was quoted as saying.
Meanwhile, HBJ is now facing a fresh lawsuit from Irish property developer Paddy McKillen, who owns the Church of Oak whiskey distillery 40 miles southwest of Dublin with Irish rock legend Bono of U2.
The Belfast-born hotelier has accused the Gulf state's monarchy in Los Angeles federal court of 'a lawless plot' to rip him off after he masterminded the expansion of a string of five-star hotels.
Advertisement
The complaint, filed late last month, focuses on a claim that three Qatari royals led by HBJ tricked McKillen and his firm Hume Street Management Consultants (HSMC) into spending 'significant resources' under 'false pretenses' to upgrade four upmarket properties.
The civil suit for $20 million in damages and interest is being brought under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, or RICO, anti-Mafia legislation drawn up in 1970 under President Richard Nixon.
8 Britain's Guardian newspaper once dubbed HBJ, seen here with ex-UK PM David Cameron, as 'the man who bought London' after Qatar's sovereign wealth fund snapped up Harrods, London's Olympic Village and the Shard.
Reuters
8 The plane, owned by the Qatari royal family, has been dubbed 'a flying palace,' and its tail number carries the initials of HBJ, the ex-PM of the Gulf Nation.
YouTube/Spotti Flight
Advertisement
Once a project had been completed, the lawsuit alleges that HBJ and his two relatives, Qatar's former Emir, Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa and the current Emir's sister, Sheikha Lulwah bint Hamad Al Thani, refused to pay up.
It said the royal trio 'systematically stonewalled Mr. McKillen and HSMC, refusing to compensate them for many millions of dollars in services in bad faith.'
The Post reached out to the Qatari government for comment.
8 This image, posted in 2020, shows the ornate and lavish decor that appears to have caught teh commander-in-chief's eye as he looks to replace the ageing Air Force One plane that the White House currently uses.
YouTube/Spotti Flight
Michael Gottlieb, a partner at Willkie Farr & Gallagher law firm, who is representing the hotelier, accused the Qatari royals of believing 'they were above the law because of their wealth and power.'
'Mr. McKillen will not be cowed, and will pursue this suit until the defendants pay what his company rightfully earned,' he told The Post.
McKillen sold his majority stake in the Maybourne Hotel Group in 2015 to a company controlled by the ex-PM, the lawsuit states, but he stayed on in a property development role with the firm.
The court documents claim that McKillen would continue to receive a 'deferred payment' for 'any net increase in the value of the Maybourne Hotel Group' over a period ending in April 2022.
Advertisement
8 McKillen is a business partner of Bono, the Irish rockstar and U2 frontman.
PA Images via Getty Images
8 McKillen and U2 frontman Bono own a whiskey distillery near Dublin, Ireland.
Eric Kowalsky / MEGA
They allege that McKillen 'continued to manage and redevelop the Maybourne hotels, at the direction of the Qatari Royals' and even developed an entirely new property, The Emory, an all-suite hotel close to the British capital's Hyde Park that features designs from artist Damien Hirst, according to the same source.
His legal team alleges that the Qataris then 'refused to compensate Mr. McKillen or HSMC for nearly all their efforts and absconded with their vision and hard work, essentially free of charge.'
Advertisement
The two sides fell out, the lawsuit alleges, when McKillen was 'removed, without warning or reason, from Maybourne Hotels Limited's board of directors on April 1, 2022.'
'These schemes to defraud their business partner and his company for, put crudely, free labor are part of a years-long pattern of illegal racketeering orchestrated by the Qatari Royals, and are in line with a history of illicit, lawless actions,' the lawsuit states.
8 Beverly Hills City Councilmember John A. Mirisch, a former mayor of the city, was the first politician to hit out at Maybourne owner Hamad bin Jassim's anti-semitic remarks.
McKillen alleges that he was drafted in by the Qataris to overhaul the Maybourne Riviera hotel in 2018 in Roquebrune-Cap-Martin, France, close to Monaco, and a five-story, $47 million Manhattan mansion owned by HBJ.
Advertisement
The former Qatari prime minister bought the 22,000 square-foot townhouse on East 71st Street in 2012 from the billionaire real estate tycoon Aby Rosen.
The following year, his attorneys claim, they asked him to work on the redevelopment of the historic Parisian Îlot Saint-Germain building, which is set to open as a Maybourne hotel in 2027, and the Maybourne Beverly Hills hotel in 2019.
8 McKillen also worked on top London hotels, including the Connaught in the British capital's upmarket neighborhood of Mayfair.
SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images
McKillen also worked on two properties in London's upmarket neighborhood of Mayfair: the Connaught and Claridge's, where penthouse suites can go for nearly $80,000 a night.
Advertisement
Claridge's is a hotspot for the British elite as it is where the late Queen Elizabeth II hosted a wedding reception for the then-Prince Charles and Princess Diana in 1981.
Work done on those properties does not feature in the Los Angeles legal complaint, but the millionaire investor has also filed claims in the UK and France.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
22 minutes ago
- CNBC
Trump inaugural impersonators scammed donors out of crypto, feds say
Scammers impersonating the President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance Inaugural Committee fraudulently stole hundreds of thousands of dollars in cryptocurrency, according to a complaint filed by the U.S. on Wednesday. The perpetrators used phony email addresses made to look like they belonged to the inaugural committee to " trick or coerce victims into providing them money," according to the filing. Using email addresses that end in "@ with a lowercase "l" as opposed to "@ with a lowercase "i," the scammers duped victims into sending them more than 250,300 in USDT stablecoin, or about $250,300. Court Watch reported the filing on Thursday. The emails sent in December claimed to be from Steve Witkoff, then the co-chair of the Trump-Vance Inaugural Committee. "The victim believed they were contributing a donation to the Trump- Vance Inaugural Committee through a false email address," the filing reads. Of the stolen funds, the U.S. government is seeking to permanently seize nearly 40,400 USDT "to punish and deter criminal activity by depriving criminals of property used in or acquired through illegal activities" and "to recover assets that may be used to compensate victims." About half of the USDT was recovered from a Binance account in the name of Ehiremen Aigbokhan, with an address in Nigeria, per the complaint. Within 24 hours of the victim transferring the cryptocurrency, 215,000 in USDT was transferred "to numerous other cryptocurrency addresses," according to the filing. Binance provided records and voluntarily complied with a freeze request, according to the filing.
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
House Republicans give Trump a ‘Big Beautiful' July 4 by passing Medicaid-slashing megabill despite GOP rift
The House of Representatives on Thursday passed President Donald Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill,' which features sweeping cuts to Medicaid and nutrition assistance programs, after a whirlwind 24 hours of last-minute arm twisting of holdout Republicans — and a record-breaking floor speech from Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries. The final vote was a narrow margin of 218-214, with every Democrat and two Republicans —Kentucky Rep. Thomas Massie and Pennsylvania Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick — voting against the measure. After Jeffries wrapped his eight-hour and 44-minute delaying tactic — which surpassed former GOP Speaker Kevin McCarthy's 'magic minute' speech record of eight hours and 32 minutes, set in 2021 when the House passed President Joe Biden's 'Build Back Better Act' — the House finally commenced its vote on Trump's bill. The "magic minute" procedure grants members unlimited time to speak after debate on a bill has concluded. 'We have a big job to finish,' said House Speaker Mike Johnson of Louisiana. 'With one big beautiful bill we are going to make this country stronger, safer and more prosperous than ever before.' The bill will now be sent to Trump by the July 4 deadline he'd insisted upon with congressional Republicans in the House and Senate. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters after its passage that Trump would be signing the legislation at 5 pm on Friday in what she described as 'a big, beautiful signing ceremony' at the White House.' Leavitt said the bill's passage marked a 'victorious day for the American people' and predicted that the legislation would 'create an economic boom for the United States of America.' 'We're going to continue to bring in revenue, drive down our deficit, and we'll have more money back into the pockets of the American people. And this bill is an encapsulation of all of the policies that the president campaigned on and the American people voted on on Nov. 5 and entrusted the president, and Republicans, to enact. She called it 'a great day for our country and for the American people.' A senior White House official who worked on pushing the bill through Congress called the tax cut and spending package 'a historic achievement for the Republican Party and for President Trump' because the voluminous bill 'satisfies virtually every major campaign promise that President Trump made' during his 2024 campaign. 'It represents his keeping of his commitments to the American people, everything that we talked about, no tax on tips, no tax on overtime pay, no tax on seniors' Social Security, to securing the border, rebuilding our military. It's all in this bill,' said the official, who added that the stock markets appeared to be 'loving' the legislation because they were closing at all-time highs ahead of the July 4 holiday. It all came to a head after a day of grumbling from a handful of conservative Republicans who criticized the Senate version of the bill that was handed back to the House for passage just in time to meet Trump's July 4 deadline. But after meeting with the president and receiving promises from the White House — and an all-caps threat from Trump on Truth Social overnight — members of the hardline House Freedom Caucus, voted to push the bill through. Throughout the process, the group of rabble-rousers has often held out their votes, only to fold after speaking with Trump. Still, Rep. Ralph Norman of South Carolina, a member of the Freedom Caucus, insisted this was not a concession. 'The reason we have credibility, they know we'll vote 'no,'' Norman told The Independent. Norman said that he was disappointed that wind and solar tax credits or the $7,5000 tax credit for electric vehicles from the Inflation Reduction Act, the signature climate law signed by Joe Biden, were not completely phased out in the legislation. 'With that being said, we had enough assurance that the president was going to deal with them in his own way,' Norman said. 'I feel perfectly comfortable with that, which I wasn't before.' House members scrambled to make it to Washington after severe thunderstorms and inclement weather delayed travel for many from both parties. Some members drove to D.C. while Democrats held digital town halls to criticize the legislation. The vote came after the Senate spent a marathon 27 hours in the two days beforehand voting on amendments before the measure was tied at 50-50. Vice President JD Vance came in to cast the deciding tie-breaker. House Speaker Mike Johnson limited the number of amendments to get the bill to the president's desk. The bill's passage did not come easy, though. In the afternoon, the House held a vote to amend the rules for passage of the bill, which turned out to be the longest in the chamber's history. But Republicans soldiered on. Speaker Johnson called into Fox News in between whipping votes to reassure people the bill could pass by the July 4 deadline imposed by Trump. The rule vote finally passed at around 3.30am on Wednesday morning 219-213, with Pennsylvania Republican Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick the only member of the GOP to break ranks as the rest of the party's holdouts were persuaded to fall in line to set up a final floor vote. 'The bill is going to pass, they're going to vote for it, they're not opposed to the bill,' House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Jason Smith told The Independent. 'Don't allow perfection to get in the way of greatness,' he said. 'And that is why they will vote for this bill, and that is why the president will be signed into law on July 4 and record that. See if I'm right.' The bill is one of the most sweeping pieces of Republican domestic policy legislation in history. Not only does it extend the 2017 tax cuts that Trump signed in his first presidency; it also includes money to hire 10,000 new agents for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and 3,000 Border Patrol agents, a core tenet of Trump's promise to conduct 'mass deportations' of undocumented immigrants. It also includes money to construct the barrier along the U.S.-Mexico border. The legislation further allows for more oil exploration and a massive increase in military spending. At its core, the package's priority is $4.5 trillion in tax breaks enacted in 2017 during Trump's first term that would expire if Congress failed to act, along with new ones. This includes allowing workers to deduct tips and overtime pay, and a $6,000 deduction for most older adults earning less than $75,000 a year. There's also a hefty investment, some $350 billion, in national security and Trump's deportation agenda and to help develop the 'Golden Dome' defensive system over the U.S. To help offset the lost tax revenue, the package includes $1.2 trillion in cutbacks to the Medicaid health care and food stamps, largely by imposing new work requirements, including for some parents and older people, and a major rollback of green energy tax credits. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates the package will add $3.3 trillion to the deficit over the decade and 11.8 million more people will go without health coverage. The bill would require able-bodied adults without dependent children to work for Medicaid benefits and, in the coming years, would cap the level at which states can tax medical providers such as hospitals and nursing homes. The American Hospital Association warned it could lead to the closing of rural hospitals, which serve many Republican congressional districts. The act also imposes work requirements for SNAP recipients for able-bodied adults without dependent children. But it lowers the age at which children are considered dependent to 14 years old and would require states with high rates of overpayment or underpayment to shoulder part of the cost of administering SNAP. The legislation remains wildly unpopular, with polling showing a large amount of Americans disapprove of it. Rep. Vicente Gonzalez Jr., a Democrat who represents a district that also voted for Trump in 2024, said his district would be hit hard by the legislation. 'But I still feel, unfortunately, that people don't react until they feel the pain, and they're going to feel it pretty quick for this with this bill,' he told The Independent. Democrats will likely campaign against the bill in the coming months ahead of the midterm election, hoping to criticize the GOP for taking away healthcare benefits as a way to extend tax cuts. Republicans for their part already do not want to talk about the unpopular parts of the bill. When The Independent asked Rep. Nick Begich of Alaska about the side deal brokered by his Sen. Lisa Murkowski to shield the state from many of the provisions for SNAP and Medicaid during the rule vote, he did not speak and bolted onto the House floor. A second White House official credited Trump with being 'deeply involved' in both crafting the bill and helping move it through a narrowly-divided House and Senate along with help from his economic team. The official called Trump 'the motive force behind this legislation' based on his 'unique and powerful relationship with lawmakers' going back to the transition period after he won last year's election, during which he spent 'dinner after dinner' engaging with members. 'The President's focus on relationships carried us through in kind of a cascade here, when it came to be crunch time and the President was asking people to take tough votes, to come together, to unify, and ultimately, through late night phone calls,' they said. 'He is the omnipresent force behind this legislation, obviously.' The official added that Vice President JD Vance had been a 'key player' as well, including by 'working behind the scenes constantly in the Senate, hearing from senators, understanding their concerns, [and] making sure that the White House was responsive to them.'
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The House just passed Donald Trump's ‘One Big, Beautiful Bill.' Here's what that means for you
The GOP's budget package is on its way to President Donald Trump's desk after Speaker Mike Johnson called his colleagues' bluffs and put the Senate's package on the floor for a vote Thursday afternoon. It passed with a thin but steady 218-214 margin after conservatives in the chamber who were upset with changes made to the bill by the Senate folded one last time. So too did all the various Republicans who drew lines in the sand regarding cuts to Medicaid benefits or eligibility standards. The bill was passed through the budget reconciliation process in the Senate, meaning that it required only a simple majority to pass. That process also barred the bill from containing explicit policy provisions — though money itself is policy, and this legislation still provides plenty of funding for the president's political priorities. Here's a look at what made it in the final version, and how it could mean real changes for millions of Americans: At its core, the package's priority is $4.5 trillion in tax breaks enacted in 2017 during Trump's first term that would expire if Congress failed to act, along with new ones. That includes allowing workers to deduct tips and overtime pay, and a $6,000 deduction for most older adults earning less than $75,000 a year. The first and most expensive provision of the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act,' it is actually an extension of the biggest piece of legislation to pass during Trump's first presidency. Then, after a failed bid to repeal the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare), Trump and his Republican allies turned to a more politically appealing target: tax cuts. The result was a tax bill passed by the House and Senate before the end of 2017, notable for its changes to the corporate tax rate (setting a flat rate at 21%) and lowering individual income taxes, though the cuts were found by analysts to favor wealthier households. Republicans, at the time, projected that it would not add to the federal debt, though it did. Sound familiar? The insistences from GOP leaders today that the OBBA won't add to the national debt were the same promises made by Republicans in 2017, who claimed that resurgent economic growth spurred on by Donald Trump's magic touch would make up the gap. Now, GOP leaders have the ironic task of selling that argument when the most expensive part of the OBBA is an extension of the deficit-swelling Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. This time around, Republicans upped the game by temporarily expanding the child tax credit and removing taxes on some tipped wages. There's also a hiked cap on state and local tax deductions (SALT), part of a deal cut to get Republicans from blue states on board. The cap was boosted from the current $10,000 a year to $40,000, though it will revert in 2030. Somebody's gotta pay for all of this — or at least part of it. That's where Medicaid and SNAP, formerly known as food stamps, come in. Both programs will be subject to new work requirements under the law, with Medicaid spending alone estimated to fall by just over $1 trillion over the next decade in the latest analysis from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO). For Americans on the program, that means new reporting requirements and paperwork. Individual eligibility checks will still be handled by state-level agencies, which will set their own guidelines for determining whether recipients are in compliance. SNAP benefits will now be withheld from adults with children who do not return to work, if their youngest child is 14 years or older. The legislation also requires state governments to pick up some of the tab for SNAP payments if their in-state payment error rate is above a certain threshold. Another carve-out in the bill, this time to secure the vote of Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski, delays this provision in her state. The closest thing to a true policy provision in the GOP bill and one of the least-reported aspects, this section would turn America's immigration enforcement division into one of the most well-funded law enforcement organizations in the entire world. The bill delivers an absolutely massive increase in funding meant to transform the size and scope of immigration enforcement in the United States. Among the provisions: $46.6 billion for completion of the border fencing Trump demanded during his first term; $29.9 billion for ICE enforcement operations including the hiring of up to 10,000 new agents; $45 billion for the construction of new detention facilities. Put simply, the Trump administration is set to have the resources it needs for a massive upscaling in the daily number of arrests and raids that ICE agents are carrying out across the country. Utterly villainized by the right (to a questionable degree of success) after it was introduced by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Sen. Ed Markey, the 'Green New Deal' never actually became law in any form. That doesn't stop Republicans from insisting otherwise, however, and many have latched on to the phrase as they pushed to roll back electric vehicle tax credits passed as part of the Inflation Reduction Act under Joe Biden's presidency. Those provisions originated in Biden's signature 'Build Back Better' legislation, which failed early into the Democratic president's term thanks to an inability of Democrats to pull two centrist members of their Senate caucus into line. The OBBB strips tax incentives for wind, solar and other renewable energy projects by 2027 and gives developers stringent requirements to claim them. And electric vehicle makers like Elon Musk will also be hit because the bill ends EV tax credits of up to $7,500 at the end of September that had been scheduled to last through 2032. That was a big incentive for potential electric car buyers This part of the bill is a gift to two people: Mike Johnson and John Thune. The GOP leaders have watched members in both chambers balk against raising the debt limit time and time again, causing headaches for congressional leadership and sapping the time and political capital of the entire Legislative Branch. The just-passed legislation raises the debt ceiling by $5t trillion, averting at least one deadline later this summer. There's also a hefty investment, some $350 billion, in national security and Trump's deportation agenda and to help develop the Israeli Iron Dome-like 'Golden Dome' defensive system over the U.S. It's part of a $150bn surge in defense spending in the package described as a 'one-time' boost to help the Pentagon fund shipbuilding, munitions acquisition and other priorities.
