Opinion: Japan needs anti-SLAPP laws as journalist sued by Unification Church affiliates
In October 2023, the Japan branch of the Universal Peace Federation (UPF), a friendly organization of the Unification Church, filed a defamation lawsuit against Suzuki, claiming damages for statements made on social media. The Tokyo District Court dismissed UPF's claim seeking 11 million yen (about $76,100) on May 14.
The posts in question alleged that money was paid to former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe for sending a video message to an event hosted by the UPF and others but did not specifically name the "UPF Japan branch" as the subject. Suzuki argued that the lawsuit was a "classic SLAPP aimed at suppressing free speech."
A SLAPP, which stands for "strategic lawsuit against public participation," is a suit filed with the intent to harass and silence citizens who speak out. The term SLAPP is a play on the word "slap."
In February 2022, the United Nations' Working Group on Business and Human Rights identified SLAPP cases as a global issue, warning that they drain citizens' time and energy and violate various human rights, including freedom of expression, assembly and association.
According to the group's research, at least 355 SLAPP cases were filed worldwide between January 2015 and May 2021. Latin America accounted for the highest percentage at 39%, followed by Asia-Pacific at 25%. North America, where countermeasures are more advanced, accounted for 9%. In the United States, 32 states have enacted anti-SLAPP laws, and some provinces in Canada have also implemented them.
The U.N. working group calls on governments to enact anti-SLAPP laws to prevent harm. It also urges the legal community to thoroughly implement countermeasures and advises companies to refrain from seeking exorbitant damages. However, Japan has taken few measures against SLAPP cases.
According to Suzuki, three SLAPPs have been filed against him by Unification Church affiliates. The latest case was one of them, and the UPF plans to appeal. A prolonged legal battle seems inevitable.
When asked for his thoughts on the district court victory, Suzuki smirked and said, "It served them right." He emphasized that SLAPPs are "used as tools by those with malicious intent." He also noted, "I'm fortunate to have supporters, but some may give up the fight," while advocating for institutional support and the enactment of anti-SLAPP laws.
As for his resolve for the ongoing legal battle, he commented, "I will go all the way. Be prepared."
(Japanese original by Tomoko Ohji, Expert Writer)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
an hour ago
Ishiba Remark on Reducing Dependence on U.S. Not Problem: Rubio
News from Japan Jul 12, 2025 13:17 (JST) Kuala Lumpur, July 12 (Jiji Press)--U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has said that he does not take issue with Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba's recent remark citing the need for his country to make efforts to reduce its dependence on the United States. "I don't think that that's a negative comment per se," Rubio told reporters in Kuala Lumpur on Friday. "We obviously have very strong commitments and an alliance with Japan," he said. "We continue to cooperate very closely with them." Rubio also said the idea that Japan would be able to develop its self-defense capabilities is "not something that we find offensive," adding, "It's something we'd be supportive of, obviously within the confines of their constitutional system." He said that Washington's call for Japan to increase its defense spending is not a "demand" but rather an encouragement to "invest in certain capabilities." The amount of money is not important, he indicated. "We have a very strong and very good relationship with Japan, and that's not going to change" even if there are differences in opinion, Rubio continued. [Copyright The Jiji Press, Ltd.] Jiji Press
Asahi Shimbun
3 hours ago
- Asahi Shimbun
VOX POPULI: Symbolism of a woman's ‘hanko' that bears only her given name
The Lower House Committee on Judicial Affairs held discussions June 13 on multiple opposition party bills that would allow married couples to have different surnames. The bills were not voted on and will be discussed again at a special session of the Diet scheduled for the fall. (Asahi Shimbun file photo) Before I left home to go to university, my mother presented me with a small gift. Nestled in a small, glossy scarlet case was a 'hanko' personal seal that is commonly used in Japan to serve as an official signature. The seal was engraved with my given name only. No surname. My mother explained, 'I want you to be able to keep using this even if you get married.' Probably because I was rebelling against everything back then, I mentally rolled my eyes at what I felt was my mother's overreaction. About 10 years later, I got together with my mother for the first time in a while. She started the conversation with these words: 'I have been wanting to apologize for a long time.' Her formal demeanor made me brace myself for what might follow. But it quickly became clear she was referring to the hanko she gifted me. Here's the gist of what she told me: When she got married, she took her husband's surname as a matter of course. After I was born, she simply assumed that I, her daughter, would do the same upon marriage. And when the time came for me to leave home, she thought hard about what present to choose for me, and ultimately decided on that hanko that bore only my given name, so I could use it for the rest of my life. But after gifting it to me, my mother recalled, she became aware of the unhappiness of women who didn't want to part with their own surname after marriage. My mother felt terrible, she said, that by giving me that hanko, she could have forced her thinking on me: that it's for the woman to change her surname upon marriage. I told her simply then, 'No worries.' Afterward, when I was alone, I opened the hanko case. The message I saw there was, 'It's perfectly OK to live freely.' And I also started wondering: When I realize that my 'common sense' or 'goodwill' might have hurt someone, would I be capable of acting as my mother did? I imagine that it took countless repetitions of 'small voices' to change the thinking of people of my mother's generation. Today, over 60 percent of Japanese people agree that married couples should be allowed the freedom to have different surnames. And yet, the Diet keeps dragging its feet on what to decide. My hanko with no surname is still sleeping in the back of my desk drawer. It has become my treasure. --The Asahi Shimbun, July 12 * * * Vox Populi, Vox Dei is a popular daily column that takes up a wide range of topics, including culture, arts and social trends and developments. Written by veteran Asahi Shimbun writers, the column provides useful perspectives on and insights into contemporary Japan and its culture.
Kyodo News
3 hours ago
- Kyodo News
FOCUS: Cut to foreign PhD student support deals blow to Japanese academia
TOKYO - The Japanese government's plan to end financial support for foreign doctoral students has drawn criticism from students and academics who have labeled the step unjust and counterproductive to fostering a diverse, inclusive and thriving academic environment. Before the change proposed late June, the government offered up to 2.4 million yen ($16,400) as a living allowance annually to PhD students. Now, however, the education ministry plans to extend the support only to Japanese nationals, with the change likely taking effect as early as fiscal 2027, if approved by a ministry committee. "It is unacceptable that suddenly a line is drawn between the students based on nationality when both Japanese and foreigners have bonded and studied together daily. It is unthinkable that the students will be treated differently," said Emi Omuro, a Japanese third-year PhD student at Ochanomizu University. Omuro organized a rally in front of JR Ikebukuro Station in Tokyo in early July, with approximately 20 mostly-Japanese university students holding up placards saying, "Don't discriminate," "Nationality clause will shake the foundation of Japanese academia," and "Academia has no borders." The issue of payments to foreign students entered the political discussion during a parliamentary debate in March when Liberal Democratic Party lawmaker Haruko Arimura stated that over a third of those who have received the money were foreign nationals. Arimura singled out Chinese students, saying the "government should not just stand by" and watch doctorate programs become dependent on Chinese students "from the perspective of national economic security." "The program cannot win the support of the public without clearly stipulating that it is designed to support Japanese nationals," Arimura said. Of the 10,564 people who received the subsidies in fiscal 2024, 39 percent were foreigners, with Chinese nationals accounting for 76 percent of the non-Japanese cohort at 3,151, according to the ministry. The number of foreign students at high-level institutions such as universities and vocational colleges as of May 2024 surged 21.7 percent from the previous year to 229,467, including 20,015 enrolled in PhD programs. The decision to withdraw support for foreign students comes in stark contrast to the government's stated goal of increasing the number of PhD candidates from overseas. It set a target to raise the ratio of international students in doctoral programs to 33 percent by 2033 over 10 years, up from 21 percent in 2023. "The (funding withdrawal) plan shows the government is only looking at one aspect of a person, their role as a researcher, when they are living human beings that need to make a living," Omuro said, adding that most would have to cut back on their study time to instead work to survive. Azusa Karashi, another Japanese doctorate student, said, "I am extremely angry at the government for creating a division between students, who improve knowledge and research by exchanging views and through communication. The measure suppresses people with diverse backgrounds." In addition to affecting the student experience, the loss of PhD students will deal a blow to the universities' research capabilities. Norihiro Nihei, professor at the Graduate School of Education at the University of Tokyo, warned that excluding and discriminating based on nationality will lead to a "steady decline in the level of academia in Japan over the medium to long term." "I have felt up close how many foreign students with highly specialized expertise have generated significant ideas and knowledge while studying at Japanese universities and raised the level of academia," Nihei said in a comment posted on an online petition against the changes. Demonstrating this brain drain, a Chinese graduate school student at the University of Tokyo said she would abandon plans to advance to a doctoral course because of the new measure, arguing it is unfair. "I was thinking of applying for (the program) next year. But given the inflation in the price of daily goods, I will give up advancing to a PhD program if I can't get financial support and look for a job instead," she said at the student rally in Ikebukuro. The government program was launched in fiscal 2021 to provide support for PhD students, offering 1.8 million yen to 2.4 million yen in living support, with the aid also covering research and other fees totaling up to 2.9 million yen. Foreign students will remain eligible for research expenses. Yusuke Kazama, lecturer at Nara Prefectural University, said the policy is a reflection of the recent increase in xenophobia in Japan, characterized by the "Japanese First" platform promoted by Sanseito, a new populist right-wing party that campaigns on anti-immigrant policies. "I fear that foreigners, who are in the minority, are being scapegoated" in this social phenomenon, Kazama said, stressing, "International students who have come to Japan with a desire to learn and who have chosen to study here should never be excluded."
