logo
War deadens the soul, kills spirituality

War deadens the soul, kills spirituality

Time of Indiaa day ago
The most likely outcome of war is more war. As Nietzsche has pointed out in Human, All Too Human, what no govt admits is that it keeps an army to satisfy occasionally the desire for conquest.
Every govt is supposedly armed only for defence, but this presupposes one's cause as just and the neighbour's as unjust. And then what happens? Fighting monsters carries the danger of becoming a monster. Gaze long enough into the abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you.
End Of Empathy
In the ideology of war, the suffering of the Other is somehow no suffering. But as hatred of the enemy becomes indifference to his bleeding wounds, it takes a toll on the self too.
In the Israeli psychological thriller TV series Blackspace, centred on a school shooting, students are shown to be deeply marked by the idea of necessary war. An extreme dehumanisation of the enemy demanded of them, brings other disconnections as well.
This hardening is supposedly a survival strategy, but it also shuts down parts of the self that are most essentially human. Killing empathy is a betrayal of our own nature.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
An engineer reveals: One simple trick to get internet without a subscription
Techno Mag
Learn More
Undo
We are wired for connection, cooperation and recognising ourselves in others.
Crisis Of The Soul
War provides the narrative arc of
Mahabharata. Philosophically, however, its laying of corpses, captured in harrowing detail over tens of thousands of verses, is supposed to make us think about the cosmic meaninglessness of mass killing. Yudhishthira himself says he doesn't want the throne of Hastinapura that's been won with so much bloodshed: 'Since we slaughtered our own, what good can possibly come from ruling? Damn the ways of kings! Damn might makes right! Damn the turmoil that brought us to this disaster!'
The Waste Land by TS Eliot has been called a PTSD poem wrought by WW-1.
In putting an end to that kind of close-quarters combat, advanced weaponry had promised less barbaric wars. That was a cruel lie. New technologies have only increased the facelessness of those killed, and the indifference of those doing the killing. This is humanity staring into the abyss on an exponentially bigger scale.
'God Is Dead'
There are the supposedly just causes, and then there are the excesses of brutality.
From the mass rapes during Bangladesh's Liberation War to the mass children's graves in Gaza...wasn't it in relation to savageries of this kind that Nietzsche said 'God is dead'? Persons exposed to such events feel both a collapse of civilisation and a spiritual crisis.
For the ancient Greeks, the opposite of the sacred was 'miasma', the kind of pollution associated with bloodletting that is against the natural order. For many veterans, it's a lifelong feeling, that they left some core part of themselves behind with the bodies. Their wounded soul seems to almost be visible under their skin. But its ripples of trauma also touch their families and their societies. Drip, drip, it poisons the capacity for trust and tenderness.
Unless, as Hannah Arendt wrote in The Human Condition, the birth of 'new men' constructs new beginnings.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Andhra Pradesh government seeks 3 months time to implement high court orders on promotions
Andhra Pradesh government seeks 3 months time to implement high court orders on promotions

Time of India

time25 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Andhra Pradesh government seeks 3 months time to implement high court orders on promotions

1 2 3 Vijayawada: The state govt on Monday sought three months time to implement Andhra Pradesh high court's orders given in 2018, in a batch of petitions filed contending that they incurred losses due to improper application of reservations in promotions. Advocate general Dammalapati Srinivas submitted on behalf of the state govt that the court's orders would be implemented in three months. A batch of petitions was filed before the high court in 2016 and 2017, challenging the promotions given by the state govt to some employees without considering the petitioners eligibility for the same. The court, after hearing the petitions, found fault with the govt for implementing reservations in promotions without properly evaluating the eligibility criteria and directed to consider the case of petitioners in determining the eligibility for promotion besides reviewing all promotions that were already given. As the orders of the high court were not implemented since 2018, the Secretariat BC and OC Employees Association and some others filed contempt petitions. The counsels for the petitioners raised objections to the request of the advocate general seeking time. They said the state govt is making the issue more complicated by appointing committee after committee. They further submitted that the govt appointed the committee to look into the promotions of secretariat employees only and did not take any steps to review the promotions in 31 govt depts. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Is it legal? How to get Internet without paying a subscription? Techno Mag Learn More Undo The HC bench, comprising of Justices R Raghunandan Rao and Sumati Jagadam, observed that they are ready to hold the officials responsible for the delay liable for contempt of court. However, the petitioners also did not pursue the contempt petitions for the last six years. Observing that the creation of supernumerary posts is not a small thing, the bench said they cannot deny the request of the advocate general for time to implement the high court's orders. Granting time to the govt, the court posted the matter for further hearing to Sep 1.

When tactical successes don't translate to peace
When tactical successes don't translate to peace

Deccan Herald

time25 minutes ago

  • Deccan Herald

When tactical successes don't translate to peace

On June 13, Israel launched Operation Rising Lion with a spectacular attack targeting Iran's top military commanders and nuclear scientists. In the currently popular Indian parlance, it would be called ghar mein ghus ke maarna (roughly translated as 'hitting the enemy in his den') – a policy that has all along evoked admiration among a section of opinion in India and an urge to emulate in May, India had put up its best yet publicised performance of the above policy by launching Operation Sindoor targeting top symbols of Pakistan's brazen terror. Both attacks were followed by an aerial war. However, barring a key aspect examined at the end of this essay, the similarity between the two situations ends Israel has lived in a perennial state of conflict and spends around 9% of its GDP on defence. In contrast, India spends barely 2%, admittedly with a larger GDP, but also much larger security challenges. Second, there is no parallel between the two situations from the moral and international law angle. India's legitimate fight has been against Pakistan's attempts from its inception to change the territorial status quo and destabilise India through overt and covert warfare. On the other hand, Israel's policy, especially in respect of the Palestinians, has violated all norms of international Israel is up against militarily far weaker adversaries and at best a nuclear threshold state in Iran, but one that is no match for the technological superiority of the US-supplied Israeli war machine. India, on the other hand, faces two nuclear-armed neighbours. Pakistan's war machine is not much inferior to India's and its backer – China – possesses formidable military power. This imposes limitations on India's ability to the Israeli attacks, combined with the US bombardment of key nuclear facilities, caused considerable damage in Iran after its air defences were largely neutralised. The damage caused by India to Pakistan's military installations was no match. According to the information from official sources, India was able to neutralise Pakistan's air defences sufficiently to be able to successfully attack airbases in the early hours of May 10. Our official discourse also maintains that Pakistan was chastened enough by this stage to ask for a ceasefire. Why India did not press home this advantage remains unclear. In raising this aspect, I have in mind further degradation of Pakistan's war machine and not unrealistic expectations generated by our political and strategic discourse, such as taking back PoK or Haji Pir etc. that were voiced in the wake of the in the UN debates and voting on resolutions, Israel appears isolated. But it is militarily the most powerful country in its region and no longer faces any meaningful opposition from the Arab world. It enjoys solid US backing. Other Western countries may disagree with it on Palestine, but share its goal of preventing Iran from going contrast, we are now pretty much on our own in dealing with the security challenge from Pakistan. While there was widespread condemnation of the Pahalgam terror attack, no country named Pakistan as the perpetrator, and there were multiple calls for restraint from the international community wary of a wider war between two nuclear-armed countries. China's support for Pakistan was palpable during the conflict, and India's bugbear Field Marshal Asim Munir was the toast of the White House not too long China's iron brother Pakistan continues to be valuable to Washington too, albeit transactionally, because of its geographic location. Further, if we are aiming at reviving the level of international focus on terrorism that prevailed for a decade plus after 9/11, we may be in for disappointment. The global agenda has moved on. While robust deterrence and coercion are indispensable in dealing with Pakistan, the foregoing provides a reality check for those with the desire to emulate Israel..A measured over the years, Israel has notched up several brilliant tactical successes against its adversaries, but has no peace. The Palestinian problem continues to fester, and estimates of a setback to Iran's nuclear programme range from a few months to a few years. Most credible observers believe that only diplomacy can achieve its enduring capping. Israel has shunned diplomacy in dealing with its adversaries for several years now and has followed a policy, euphemistically described as mowing the grass, to degrade their military capabilities our case, notwithstanding the brilliant tactical success of Operation Sindoor, we are nowhere close to putting an end to Pakistan's terror, much less resolving our larger Pakistan problem. Pakistan's terror infrastructure is largely intact. Asim Munir's position has strengthened, at least for now. Following the Mumbai terror attack, we progressively abandoned bilateral diplomacy with Pakistan, castigating it for having failed to change the conduct of the Pakistani state. Pakistan's hardline posture under Asim Munir, combined with the justified anger of the Indian public at Pakistan's conduct and Pakistan's salience in our electoral politics, makes its resumption extremely security-centric approach over the last few years has also failed to achieve the above goal. But for want of any other instrumentality, we cannot afford to dilute it. Therefore, we too may be faced with the need to mow the grass periodically, albeit in a field strewn with nuclear weapons. This is integral to the new normal announced by Prime Minister Modi on May 12..(The writer is a former High Commissioner to Pakistan and author of India's Pakistan Conundrum: Managing a Complex Relationship)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store