Quarter of adults pay little or no attention to how their data is used, survey finds
A quarter of Irish adults pay little or no attention to how their personal data is used by organisations, according to a survey.
Fewer than one in five people said they pay close attention to how their data is used, with just 7 per cent of 18–24s saying they pay serious attention to the use of their data.
Advertisement
The State's data protection watchdog published its first public attitudes survey on Thursday as it launched its annual report.
The online survey of 1,034 adults was carried out by FleishmanHillard and Empathy Research in May.
It indicated that there was a 'significant level of concern' about how children's personal data is being shared and used online, with 77 per cent of respondents reporting being quite/very concerned.
The second highest concern was over personal data being used to create a digital profile of you, which is shared with, traded or sold to others (76 per cent).
Advertisement
A further 61 per cent said they were quite or very concerned about the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and how it is applied.
There was a slightly lower level of concern about social media and tech companies creating profiles to personalise content, and personal data being used for targeted ads (59 per cent and 58 per cent respectively).
Fewer than one in five people reported paying close attention to how their personal data is used by organisations, with around a quarter admitting to hardly any or no attention at all.
'Most people occupy a middle ground of passive awareness, and levels of engagement vary by region and social class,' the research said.
Advertisement
'This suggests that, despite growing concerns over data privacy, public attention to data use by organisations remains shallow, highlighting the need for greater education and engagement efforts.'
Almost three in four adults said it was either quite or very important that organisations comply with data protection requirements, even if this causes a slight delay in releasing the product or service.
Just under half of respondents said they were either very or quite knowledgeable on data protection.
The Data Protection Commission's annual report for 2024 showed an 11 per cent increase in data breaches last year.
Advertisement
Of notified data breaches, half were due to correspondence being sent to the wrong recipient.
The Data Protection Commission said among the issues featuring 'prominently' was correspondence sent to incorrect recipients because of poor operational practices and human error – for example, the wrong document in an envelope addressed to an unrelated third party.
The DPC said it received 7,781 valid data breaches in 2024, of which 7,346 were General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) notifications.
The GDPR total was made up of 3,958 reports about the private sector, 3,137 about the public sector, and 251 from the voluntary and charity sector.
Advertisement
GDPR, a major part of the EU's data protection and privacy laws, regulates how people's personal data is used, stored and transferred.
Ireland
Data Protection Commission asked for extra €4m in...
Read More
Public sector bodies and banks accounted for the 'top 10' organisations with the highest number of breach notifications, while insurance and telecom companies featured prominently in the top 20.
Dr Des Hogan, chairman of the Data Protection Commission, said: 'The protection of our personal data is more important than ever as our daily transactions now routinely occur through technologies.
'The DPC's wide range of activities during the last year points to how fair, consistent regulation can lead to individuals across Europe trusting that their personal data is being used in a lawful and safe manner and that they have control over their data.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
3 hours ago
- Reuters
ASL Strategic Value Fund targets Avadel board over Lumryz drug mismanagement, WSJ reports
June 29 (Reuters) - ASL Strategic Value Fund plans to push shareholders of drugmaker Avadel Pharmaceuticals (AVDL.O), opens new tab to vote to remove the company's board, citing mismanagement in the launch of its flagship sleep disorder drug, the Wall Street Journal reported on Sunday. The fund, which holds shares worth about $15 million in Avadel, plans to publish an open letter arguing that the mismanagement in the launch of the drug called Lumryz resulted in the company missing out on hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue, the report said, citing a copy of the letter. The investment firm also reiterated a call to the Ireland-based drugmaker to hire an investment bank and explore alternatives including a sale, the report added. Reuters could not independently establish the veracity of the report. Avadel and ASL did not immediately respond to Reuters' requests for comment. Last year, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved Lumryz for children aged 7 years and older who presented with sudden muscle weakness, called cataplexy, or excessive daytime sleepiness, both symptoms of the sleep disorder called narcolepsy. Narcolepsy is a chronic neurological disorder that impacts the brain's ability to regulate sleep and wake cycles, with 70% of patients also experiencing cataplexy.
Times
a day ago
- Times
Banks criticised for failing SMEs with automated loan rejections
Banks are failing small firms and have created a 'void' in their services by ditching relationship managers and relying on automation to manage loan applications, according to the state body Credit Review. In a stinging report published last week, Credit Review also said that banks needed to reinvest in human expertise to offset the shrinking availability of credit in the market and compensate for tighter lending criteria in recent years. 'Bank balance sheets have shrunk and shrunk since the financial crisis but the question now is what's actually happening between banks and borrowers,' said Catherine Collins, head of the service and author of the report. 'For those it works for, automation is great. The problem we see is that for those with a more complicated business structure or model, they need some human interaction.' The report said that in many cases that came before Credit Review, which judges credit appeals brought by small businesses to loan rejections, 'considerable expertise' was required to find the appropriate solution for borrowers but banks were shifting that burden on to customers. 'There is a cost to the SME borrower of acquiring that expertise that has now been passed across by the bank who are no longer providing it to certain segments of the SME market (typically smaller borrowers),' the report said. It noted that credit advanced to non-property SMEs had fallen by 18 per cent from its pre-Covid level, due in part to the exits of Ulster Bank and KBC and the resulting lack of competition in the market. But the proportion of small businesses applying for finance each year had also fallen from more than one in three to just one in five. The lack of credit flow to indigenous small businesses has been flagged by Department of Finance officials as a potential problem for maintaining domestic demand in an economy facing grave risks from disruption in international trade and investment. Credit Review blamed the decline in the market on shortcomings in the credit application process, especially in terms of accessing expertise, how banks communicate, timeliness and flexibility. 'The responses that I see issued on bank credit decline letters remain generic, high level and unhelpful to many of the borrowers using our services,' Collins wrote. The average loan decision turnaround time of 24 days was also inhibiting small businesses from seeking bank finance, Collins said. The regulatory requirement for SME lenders is 15 days. The lack of standardisation between banks and the difficulty of switching from one to another was also a problem that limited competition and choice, she said. As a result, many businesses were now turning to alternative sources of credit from non-bank debt providers, such as invoice discounters or crowdfunders, which were in some cases subject to different regulatory requirements to banks. This segment of lenders has grown to make up more than a third of the market. Just under 60 per cent of the appeals brought to Credit Review since it was established by the Department of Finance in 2010 have been upheld. But Collins said not enough businesses were using its services, which can help firms to navigate the tricky process of accessing bank finance. 'SMEs are tricky, they require judgment calls,' she said. 'At the end of the day, you need to talk to someone. The pain is worth the gain.'
Times
a day ago
- Times
Just how rich is Leinster Rugby — and should it win more?
When the final whistle blew in Croke Park last Saturday, crowning Leinster as the United Rugby Championship winners in front of 46,000 fans, the natural celebration was palpably tinged with relief. The team had developed a frustrating habit of falling short at critical moments, losing three European finals in a row in 2022, 2023 and last year to French opposition. There was a similar trend in the United Rugby Championship. It led Donncha O'Callaghan, the former Munster and Ireland player, to remark — perhaps mischievously — that 'Leinster are up there with the national children's hospital, in terms of return on investment'. Throughout the season, commentators in England and France liberally attributed budgets to the club that backed up his assessment. Ordinarily Irish rugby treats finances like the third secret of Fatima. Yet Shane Nolan, chief executive of Leinster Rugby, is a new broom at the club. A former Google Ireland executive, he is somewhat exasperated by the misinformation circulating around the club's finances. According to Nolan, Leinster's revenue falls into three buckets, very broadly speaking: ticket sales, commercial revenue and the Irish Rugby Football Union (IRFU). 'Typically we'd be running on about €8 million or €9 million of ticketing revenue, but that'll be above €10 million this year,' he said, which was a consequence of being able to sell more tickets at the Aviva Stadium than the RDS Arena. In previous seasons the club attracted 15,000 for a normal league match in the RDS, but that has risen to 18,000 or so in Lansdowne Road. Season ticket sales surged from 12,000 in previous seasons to 15,000 this season, a 25 per cent increase. While they still haven't counted the revenue from the past three weeks, which included a quarter-final, semi-final and final — about 25 per cent of the gate from which goes to Leinster — it likely means the club has hit a record for ticket revenue this year. Sponsorship and commercial income — from jersey sponsorship, match-day hoardings, merchandising and other sources — grew to about €10 million this year, which brings the province's self-generated revenue for last season to about €20 million. The third source of money is where things get a little complicated. The IRFU distributes revenue from the Six Nations, television contracts and competition income from the URC and the European Rugby Champions Cup. It provides support in a complicated array of direct grants and other supports, and all get treated differently by the provinces for accounting purposes, making comparisons difficult. Broadly speaking, the value of total IRFU supports, according to sources familiar with the matter, works out at between €11 million and €12 million annually for each of the provinces. This brings Leinster's budget this year to slightly more than €30 million. Munster, for example, declared this month that its revenues were up last year from €18 million to €20 million, though it is not clear how much of that was from ticket sales and commercial revenue, and how much of the IRFU's financial supports were included in that figure. The all-in figure for Munster is likely to be higher, though still short of Leinster's. Ulster Rugby is the only club that publishes a set of financial accounts, These date back to 2023, when the province had income of £12 million and expenditure of £12.9 million, running a loss of about £900,000. That figure was made up of £4.6 million in grants, £2.7 million in sponsorship and £3 million in match-day income. There is a significant sum of IRFU support not reflected in those accounts, meaning that for comparison purposes Ulster's annual budget is likely higher than that. • Ulster have the stadium and the fanbase… where is the talent? Connacht doesn't publish financial accounts but does disclose figures at its annual meetings. According to sources familiar with those figures, the province earns somewhere between €5 million and €6 million in self-generated commercial revenues, including ticketing, sponsorship and other sources combined. Adding the rough figure of €11 million in IRFU supports gives Connacht a budget of about €16 million. Even allowing for the difficulty of comparing apples with oranges, Leinster is clearly the healthiest Irish province, yet Nolan is quick to point out that some of the chatter about it being 'the best resourced club in the world' is wildly off base, especially compared with clubs in France and Japan. A recent report by the French Professional Championship Control Commission, which oversees the finances of its clubs in the Top 14 and the Pro D2, shows that many French clubs have substantially bigger budgets than Leinster. That report put Toulouse's budget at €62.5 million, while Stade Francais had €46.1 million, Toulon €42.3 million, and La Rochelle and Bordeaux Bègles €40.8 million each. Three of the last four winners of the European Rugby Champions Cup — two of them Leinster's conquerors — have budgets at least a third bigger than Leinster's. An independent review carried out in England in September last year showed that in the 2022-23 season, the best-funded clubs were Harlequins and Saracens, which had budgets of £26.8 million and £23.2 million respectively. Northampton, which beat Leinster this season in the semi-finals of the European Rugby Champions Cup, had a budget of £21.9 million. But a budget is only half the story — what really matters is how the clubs spend their money, and that has been a big part of the debate around Leinster's last four years. A great deal of the club's budget is spent on the ordinary costs of running a professional rugby team, and several million more is spent on grassroots rugby throughout the province. Yet in truth, only one number matters at Leinster: what is spent on players. The root of the perception is that Leinster has an unfair and disproportionate advantage over not just its Irish peers but also its French and English rivals. That stems from the IRFU central contracting structure, which takes a large chunk of the cost of star players off a province's balance sheet and into the national team budget. Were the number of central contracts equally distributed, that perhaps would not be an issue, but Leinster has 11 central contracts while the other provinces only have three between them. Ulster has none. For 11 of its first-team players, Leinster must pay only 30 per cent of their wages — though this will rise to 40 per cent next year. It allows Leinster, the critics say, to go out and boost its squad with superstars of the game, including New Zealand's Jordie Barrett, South Africa's RG Snyman and the French prop Rabah Slimani. This year it will welcome another galactico, Rieko Ioane. Leinster fans argue that the club has less control over centrally contracted players, causing huge disruptions around Six Nations time. This summer, the club will have about two dozen players away on international duty with Ireland and the Lions. Fans of provincial rivals argue that this is a high-class problem, especially with the kind of money that can buy in world-class players to smooth over those bumps. So just how big a budget for player salaries does Leinster have, when you include the IRFU contribution? In May this year The Daily Telegraph newspaper claimed that 'one informed source proposed a figure as high as €17 million'. Nolan refused to be drawn on the precise value of the playing budget for Leinster, yet based on conversations with several people familiar with the matter, the club's total salary bill is somewhere north of €12 million. That is considerably higher than for Leinster's provincial peers. Ulster's playing bill is said to be about £6.5 million, which has been significantly trimmed down from £7.5 million in previous seasons. Munster has also been trimming its wages, and according to informed sources its total bill today is only slightly higher than Ulster's. Some figures for Connacht have put its playing bill at between €5 million and €6 million. Meanwhile, English clubs have to operate within a salary cap of £6.4 million, though they are allowed some freedom to spend on marquee players, up to £7.8 million. That independent review of English clubs showed that the entire wage bill for England's top three clubs was quite high — Harlequins (£15.1 million), Saracens (£14.9 million) and Bath (£14.8 million), but that included every member of staff at the club. A report by the Professional Championship Control Commission this year put the player bill for Toulouse at €13.4 million, La Rochelle had €12.3 million, Racing 92 €12.1 million and Bordeaux Bègles €11 million. Leinster clearly sits at the top table, far above its provincial rivals, and at least on a par with the teams in France that it regards as its true rivals. Moreover, its financial wherewithal is expected to grow in the coming years, as the capacity of a redeveloped RDS grows to nearly 21,000. Nolan believes the number of season tickets, one of the main bedrocks of any sports team's finances, can grow. 'We still have massive upside, I think,' he said. 'We're moving into a 21,000-seater stadium and we want that to be sold out every match.' He points to Leinster's arch nemesis, La Rochelle. 'They have a 16,000-seater stadium and a seven-year waiting list for a season ticket. It's the hottest ticket in town and that's what we want the RDS to be for us. There is clearly demand we can tap into.' Nolan also believes there is room to grow the commercial and sponsorship revenue significantly. John Feehan, former chief executive of the Six Nations, now boss of Basketball Ireland, does not buy into the 'expensive failure' narrative. 'Fans have incredible expectations, but it doesn't matter how much money you've got, you can't just expect to win everything in sight,' he said. 'The reality is that but for a dropkick being a foot or two closer to the goals, or a penalty being taken, Leinster could have two more European cups. 'Money doesn't guarantee success — all it guarantees is to get to the place where you should be at least contending.' James Downey, a former professional rugby player turned agent, who has turned out in Ireland, England and Italy, says a whole season cannot be defined by a single game, no matter how good or bad. 'Leinster still won 26 games, lost two games in the URC and had one bad game against Northampton,' he said. 'You've got 12 Irish Lions and the majority are Leinster players. Is it a success? I think it is.'Yet Leinster fans and players want one thing above all else: that fifth European star on their jersey. 'If they'd lost the URC and won Europe, everyone would be much happier,' Downey said. 'Winning is a habit, and so is losing. For a lot of these players, they won't have won anything with Leinster before. This year has got to be a success in terms of getting over that line and getting that trophy.' Munster legend O'Callaghan's characterisation sticks in the craw for many Leinster fans precisely because it is rooted in an undeniable truth. The national children's hospital is slated to open in 2026, which will give Leinster one more crack at shaking off those comparisons by landing European success.
