Ex-Planned Parenthood director celebrates closure of Houston facilities: 'Not shocking'
By Landon Mion
Published July 30, 2025
EXCLUSIVE: Former Planned Parenthood clinic director turned pro-life activist Abby Johnson said the organization's announcement that two of its facilities in Houston, Texas, will be shutting down this fall represents a "symbolic victory" for the pro-life movement.
Johnson, who resigned in 2009, told Fox News Digital in an exclusive interview that she believes the pro-life movement secured a key win with the facility closures, which includes a 78,000-square-foot clinic that was once the largest abortion facility in the Western Hemisphere before Texas' abortion ban.
"I think it's a victory, I think more than anything it's certainly taking ground for the pro-life movement," Johnson said. "As far as being a victory in saving babies, it's more of a symbolic victory in that way, because women aren't walking into that building to get abortions anymore. Abortions in the state of Texas are happening online."
Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast — which runs six clinics in the Houston area and two in Louisiana — will close its Prevention Park and Southwest centers on Sept. 30, while the other Houston facilities will be acquired by the organization's largest Texas affiliate.
PRO-LIFE GROUP 'ELATED' AFTER PLANNED PARENTHOOD SHUTTERS HOUSTON FACILITIES: 'TREMENDOUS VICTORY'
Facilities in GOP-led states with abortion restrictions, including Texas , have been forced to cease procedures following the 2022 Supreme Court decision that overturned Roe V. Wade and returned power to make laws regarding abortion back to the states.
Johnson, who worked for eight years at a clinic in Bryan, Texas, that was run by Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast, recalled the celebration among her former colleagues when plans for the Houston mega-facility were unveiled, although she resigned from the organization before it was opened in 2010.
"I was in the room on the day that they unveiled the plans. I was in the room on the day that they unveiled the model of that building. Everyone was so excited that we were going to have this 78,000-square-foot abortion facility," Johnson said. "I remember the capacity that they were going to be able to see, the capacity of patients, the excitement of being able to perform 75 abortions every day, six days a week."
"So the fact that this facility is no longer even going to be an option, even if surgical abortion was reinstated here in the state of Texas, that facility is no longer going to be operational," she continued. "It's no longer going to be able to be used as an abortion facility. That in itself is a victory."
The company cited rising costs, staffing shortages and low reimbursement rates as the reasons for closing the two Houston facilities. State GOP officials in recent years have made repeated attempts to shut down Planned Parenthood even after nearly all abortions were banned under Texas law.
The closings in Houston come amid several closures of Planned Parenthood facilities in various states, including New York, where the organization is selling its only Manhattan health center building for $39 million.
Johnson, who now runs a pro-life ministry, said mergers were already happening when she worked for Planned Parenthood, including with the facility she worked for, and she expects mergers to continue as more facilities close across the country.
"When I first began working for Planned Parenthood, there were almost 100 affiliates. That number has more than halved since I left Planned Parenthood. Affiliates are merging, clinics are closing and they are losing staff. They're having to lay off staff because of clinic closures and mergers," she said, adding that "morale is low" and the work environment is not happy.
She said Planned Parenthood wanted to be the "big guy" and essentially close down independent abortion providers to create a monopoly, which she said seems like it will not end up happening.
"Many of the independent providers are closing as well. Planned Parenthood facilities are also closing at a very rapid rate," she said.
Johnson also said she believes the shuttering of the facility is "incredibly demoralizing" and likely "humiliating" for Planned Parenthood and the pro-choice lobby.
"That was a trophy for Planned Parenthood to operate the largest Planned Parenthood in the country," she said. "And for the largest Planned Parenthood to have to close, I think it's incredibly demoralizing and probably humiliating for them as well."
Addressing Planned Parenthood's claim that abortions make up only 3% of its services, Johnson said that has been proven false given that facilities in states with abortion bans have had to close.
"Now we're being proven right because all of these facilities that don't provide abortions are being forced to shut down," Johnson said. "Because abortion is an overwhelming part of what they do, so all of these clinics that do not do abortions are being forced to close."
She said she was not shocked to see that the mega-facility was closing since it can no longer bring in money from performing abortions and can now only offer its other services.
"You've got a seven-story, 78,000-square-foot building that's only doing birth control and STD testing. It's not shocking that it closed down because you don't have any significant revenue coming into the facility. There are no abortions going on. That's their primary source of revenue," she said.
Large facilities in some Democrat-led states are not experiencing the same setbacks because they are able to continue performing abortions and have money flowing in because of it, Johnson said.
FEDERAL JUDGE BLOCKS TRUMP ADMINISTRATION FROM DEFUNDING SOME PLANNED PARENTHOOD FACILITIES
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
"I think Texas, Louisiana, the southern states, we could have a unique opportunity here because we don't have abortion," she said. "We don't have legal abortion here in the state and we don't have state and federal money pouring into these facilities."
She also noted that places, like California, allowing access to surgical abortion are completely overrun with patients who travel for the procedure since it is banned in GOP-led states.
Johnson emphasized that despite the victory in Houston, the pro-life movement still has a lot of work to do, pointing to data showing that abortion numbers in Texas have remained about the same since the state banned surgical abortions.
"Even though abortion is technically illegal in the state of Texas, women are having abortions at the same exact rate as it was when it was legal," she said. "These women are going online, they're getting abortions from online abortion providers."
Abortion pills are "very easy to obtain," she highlighted. Print Close
URL
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ex-planned-parenthood-director-celebrates-closure-houston-facilities-not-shocking
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Trendy coffee choice sparks controversy when allergic child nearly takes a sip
A teenager's innocent coffee choice recently sparked an online debate after it nearly exposed a severely allergic child to a nut allergen. In a Reddit post, an 18-year-old wrote that the trouble began after she carried a hazelnut coffee to her friend's house for a study session. Advertisement She claimed the drink was only for her — but her cup of joe caused a stir. 'After a while, I got up to go to the toilet,' the student recalled. 'When my back was turned, my friend's little sister (8), who is allergic to hazelnut, tried to drink my coffee.' The Redditor's boyfriend quickly intervened, telling the 8-year-old girl that she couldn't sip the drink, according to the post. 'When I explained to her that the coffee has hazelnut, my friend got very upset at me, saying I shouldn't bring over something that could endanger his sister,' the young woman added. Advertisement A hazelnut allergy is one of the most common types of known tree nut allergies, according to For individuals with tree nut allergies, beverages made with real hazelnut extract can be life-threatening, according to WebMD. A hazelnut allergy is one of the most common types of known tree nut allergies, according to New Africa – The most severe reaction, anaphylaxis, can cause the body to go into shock and may be fatal without immediate treatment like an Epinephrine injection, as Fox News Digital has previously reported. Advertisement The 18-year-old admitted that the thought of an allergic reaction didn't occur to her when she got the drink. 'I just didn't think it would happen since she's always asked before eating any of my sweets and candies,' she said. On Reddit, people were split over the sticky situation, though most of the commenters took the teen's side. Advertisement 'The 8-year-old should not be sipping other people's drinks at all,' one person wrote. 'Especially if she has a serious food allergy. Who was supervising her?' 'Why is an 8yo drinking coffee (also without asking)?' another person asked. 'Assuming from your story that she is only affected by ingesting nuts (as opposed to airborne).' Others felt the original poster overstepped by bringing a nutty beverage into the child's home in the first place. 'It's generally considered a bad idea to bring something that someone is allergic to into their home – even if you thought they wouldn't eat it/touch it,' one user said. 'Cross contamination is real and dangerous.' 'There should be special attention given to any food that is out [and available] when a child has a serious allergy.' Another wrote, 'The child shouldn't have [taken a drink of] your coffee, sure, but what if you had spilled it somewhere communal or something and exposed the child that way?' Diane Gottsman, a Texas-based etiquette expert, weighed in on the debate. Gottsman, who owns the etiquette-focused Protocol School of Texas, called the situation 'unfortunate.' Advertisement She told Fox News Digital, 'If the person bringing in the hazelnut coffee knew there was an allergy, they should not have brought the coffee in.' 'But often the person bringing in the allergen does not know unless they are alerted by the family member.' Speaking from personal experience, Gottsman said that her own adult daughter has a serious nut allergy and takes precautions. Advertisement Others felt the original poster overstepped by bringing a nutty beverage into the child's home in the first place. JCM – Ultimately, children don't reason the same way adults do, which is why adult supervision matters. 'A parent can teach a child to not share foods or drink without permission … [but] when it comes to a child, they are young and do not have the same type of reasoning skills,' she said. 'While the person who brought in the hazelnut did not do it intentionally, it could have still been dangerous.' Advertisement At 18 years old, the Redditor is still learning the ropes of adulthood – and Gottsman chalked up the error as a simple accident, though it could have had serious consequences. 'There should be special attention given to any food that is out when a child has a serious allergy,' she concluded. 'While the person who brought in the hazelnut did not do it intentionally, it could have still been dangerous.'
Fox News
5 hours ago
- Fox News
Democrats escalate anti-Trump lawfare by targeting Congress in Planned Parenthood funding fight
Abortion providers and Democrat-led states are bringing lawsuits over the Trump administration's decision to defund Planned Parenthood, a legal fight that raises the stakes by challenging the will of both Congress and the president. Planned Parenthood and several blue states have sued over the provision in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act that strips Medicaid funding from certain abortion providers for one year. The bill was passed by Congress and signed by the president in July. The legislation advances the pro-life movement's longtime goal of defunding Planned Parenthood, the nation's largest abortion provider, but a federal judge in Massachusetts has temporarily blocked the Trump Health and Human Services Department from carrying it out. Derek Muller, a professor at Notre Dame Law School, told Fox News Digital that taking on two branches of government sets this litigation apart from many of the hundreds of other lawsuits targeting the Trump administration. "Congress has the power of the purse," Muller said. "Congress has a lot of discretion [over] how it wants to spend its money, and this is not an instance where the executive has been engaged in overreach or doubtful conduct. … This is ordinary legislation, and when it comes to ordinary legislation, there's more deference given to Congress, and certainly more in how it chooses to subsidize things, where it wants to give money or where it doesn't want to give money." The judge's decision to temporarily block the funding cuts stemmed from a lawsuit brought by Planned Parenthood, a nonprofit with hundreds of facilities across the country that provide abortions and other reproductive health services. Planned Parenthood's attorneys alleged in court papers that the provision was unconstitutional, arguing it would deprive the nonprofit of millions of dollars in Medicaid reimbursements, causing it to lose half of its patients and forcing it to shutter up to one-third of its facilities. Katie Daniel, counsel at SBA Pro-Life America, told Fox News Digital Planned Parenthood was making a "desperate argument" that "totally undermines Congress' ability to determine how taxpayer dollars are spent." It also signals that Planned Parenthood was not a solvent business, she said. "It's a business that really can't keep itself afloat without getting hundreds of millions in taxpayer dollars," Daniel said. Planned Parenthood's attorneys noted that Medicaid does not typically cover abortions and that the funding cuts would affect other services. Cancer and sexually transmitted infections would go undetected, especially for low-income people, and more unplanned pregnancies would occur because of a lack of contraception access, the attorneys said. "The adverse public health consequences of the Defund Provision will be grave," the attorneys wrote. Daniel said the Medicaid marketplace includes other options for clinics and that those options "outnumber Planned Parenthood nationally 15 to one." Judge Indira Talwani, an Obama appointee, said she was inclined to agree with Planned Parenthood that the legislation violated several provisions in the Constitution and granted a preliminary injunction, which the Department of Justice is now appealing. That lawsuit has been joined by two others challenging the bill. A coalition of 21 states with Democratic attorneys general, along with the District of Columbia and Democratic Gov. Josh Shapiro of Pennsylvania, brought one of them on Monday. Maine Family Planning, which operates 18 health facilities in the Pine Tree State, has also sued over the legislation. While lawmakers have touted that the bill defunds Planned Parenthood, it was written to include other entities, including Maine Family Planning, as a way to pass parliamentarian scrutiny. Daniel told Fox News Digital she anticipates the higher courts will rule in favor of the Trump administration but that the bill's one-year limit on the funding cuts works in Planned Parenthood's favor. "At this point for Planned Parenthood, it's really about running out the clock," Daniel said. "The defund provision is for one year, so every single day that they can keep getting money. … That's existential to them." If the Trump administration ultimately wins the court fight, it could attempt to claw back the Medicaid funds it lost while Talwani's injunction was in place. Daniel noted, however, that "it's incredibly difficult, it's time-consuming, it's costly, and Planned Parenthood is relying on all of that." Among Planned Parenthood's allegations was a longshot claim that Congress's bill violates the Constitution's bill of attainder clause because it singles out and punishes Planned Parenthood without a trial. Bills of attainder are pieces of legislation that serve to bypass the role of judges and punish people or entities. The Constitution prohibits bills of attainder because they infringe on the function of the courts. Muller told Fox News Digital he believed the bill of attainder argument was a "nonstarter." "People have tried to argue that certain things that Congress does, singling out or targeting individuals, could rise to a bill of attainder," Muller said. "This has gotten some traction in lower courts. It has never really gotten traction in the courts of appeal because it is far afield from the original meaning of the Constitution on this topic."
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Aging hits a dramatic turning point at one specific number, scientists discover
Aging seems to occur in a linear fashion throughout the human lifespan, from childhood to the "golden years," but a new study has revealed one specific turning point when aging starts to accelerate in the body. Researchers in China discovered that at around age 50, tissues and organs begin to age at a faster pace. 'Body Clock' Could Determine Biological Age And Longevity, Researchers Say The findings were based on a study of 516 samples taken from 13 human tissues spanning five decades. The analysis revealed a surge at around 50 years old, led by blood vessels that are "markedly susceptible" to aging. To understand how individual organs age, researchers also collected tissue samples from 76 Chinese organ donors between 14 and 68 years old, all of whom suffered from accidental traumatic brain injuries. Read On The Fox News App The samples covered seven systems, including cardiovascular, digestive, immune, endocrine, respiratory, integumentary (skin) and musculoskeletal, as well as blood samples. The researchers found that between the ages of 45 and 55, many tissues undergo "substantial proteomic remodeling" (major changes in proteins), particularly in the aorta (main heart artery), making them more susceptible to aging. "Together, our findings lay the groundwork for a systems-level understanding of human aging through the lens of proteins," the researchers summarized. Study co-author Guanghui Liu, a researcher at the Beijing Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, discussed the study findings in an interview with Fox News Digital. Click Here To Sign Up For Our Health Newsletter Although aging involves a "multi-organ decline," Lui said, the study aimed to determine whether organs age at a "single rhythm." Certain substances in the blood — called "senokines" — function as a sort of clock that tracks aging and then speeds it up, according to the expert. The blood vessels are among the first parts of the body to show signs of aging, according to the researcher, as they release proteins that can influence how the entire body ages. Rather than something that happens to one organ at a time, the findings suggest that aging should be regarded as a whole-body process. For more Health articles, visit Liu suggested that linking tissue and plasma profiles in the human body could allow for "non-invasive" age assessments based on blood samples. This could help enable early, targeted interventions to counter accelerated organ aging and reduce disease risk, he article source: Aging hits a dramatic turning point at one specific number, scientists discover Solve the daily Crossword
