Taiyo to decide on delisting as early as August, president says
The Japanese chemical manufacturer will decide on the proposals in August at the earliest, Sato said in an interview. The company is reviewing formal proposals for capital alliances, including privatization, from fewer than five private equity funds, and a special committee is examining whether the acquisition terms are fair, he said.
Taiyo is set to hold its annual shareholders' meeting on Saturday, and the conference may become heated.
DIC, the company's largest stockholder and capital alliance partner, has said it intends to vote against the reappointment of Sato as a board director. It cited insufficient responses from Sato and the board of directors to various proposals, including delisting, as the reason behind its decision.
"We were not informed of DIC's announcement and were surprised,' Sato said. He said that the formal privatization proposals were received in February and were presented in a timely manner. It was reported in May that Taiyo received acquisition proposals from U.S. investment fund KKR and the Japan Industrial Promotion Organization.
At least one of the plans was to delist the company through a tender offer at a premium. Taiyo's market value has climbed about ¥50 billion ($347 million) to around ¥350 billion in about two weeks since the plans were reported. The proposals come as Japanese companies face pressure from the Tokyo Stock Exchange to boost their value to stay listed.
DIC, which holds about 19% of Taiyo's shares, isn't alone in seeking Sato's departure at the shareholders' meeting.
Oasis Management, a Hong Kong-based hedge fund with about an 11% stake, is also opposed to his reappointment, citing governance issues.
Taiyo's founding family, which is estimated to hold about 10% of the shares, has also solidified its intention to vote against Sato staying on as a director, according to a report by Tokyo Shoko Research. In effect, this is an unusual situation in which the top three shareholders have all expressed opposition to the president staying on.
Sato said that while he expects more acquisition proposals in the future, Taiyo will suspend consideration of any new proposals until after the shareholders' meeting due to the current situation.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yomiuri Shimbun
27 minutes ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Lack of Japan-U.S. Trade Deal Document Causes Worry; 2 Govts Put Differing Spins on Details of Agreement
Concerns are mounting after it became apparent that there is no joint document outlining the tariff agreement between Japan and the United States that was reached in negotiations with the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump. The Japanese government has stated that it does not plan to create such a document in the future. However, the absence of such a document has already revealed discrepancies in explanations and perceptions between Japan and the United States, potentially fueling future disputes. At a press conference on Tuesday, economic revitalization minister Ryosei Akazawa, who led the Japanese delegation in the Japan-U.S. trade negotiations, emphasized, 'We want to see tariff reductions implemented quickly, rather than focusing on creating an agreement document.' His comment stems from concerns that a lengthy process to create a formal agreement document could delay the implementation of the Japan-U.S. accord. Fearing the agreement's terms could be overturned — particularly the auto tariff reductions Trump had already approved — a Japanese government official stated: 'If we were to create a document, we would need President Trump's approval. Japan might also face new demands, and that would open a whole new can of worms.' However, the United States has agreed to a trade deal with the United Kingdom and is expected to issue a joint statement over trade agreements with the European Union. In contrast, with no formal agreement document, Japan and the United States each released their own summaries, which revealed discrepancies in their explanations and understandings of the agreement. Trump asserted that Japan would invest $550 billion (about ¥81 trillion) in the United States, and the United States would retain 90% of the profits from this investment. Meanwhile, Japan clarified that this sum represents merely a 'framework' encompassing investments, loans and loan guarantees by government-affiliated financial institutions. Akazawa further specified that direct equity investment would account for only 'about 1%-2% of the $550 billion,' suggesting that the investment risk for Japan is minimal. Regarding auto tariffs, a key Japanese priority in the tariff negotiations, Japan emphasizes the reduction from 25% to 15%. However, this reduction is not explicitly stated in the public documents released by the United States. The United States also explicitly stated that Japan would purchase 100 Boeing aircraft, as well as make additional annual purchases of U.S. defense equipment, totaling billions of dollars. However, a Japanese government official countered, 'Many of these purchases are already planned, so there are almost no new ones.' 'We plan to introduce them, taking into account the airlines' existing purchase plans,' said Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism Minister Hiromasa Nakano at a press conference after the Cabinet meeting on Tuesday. In reality, both Japan and the United States are offering explanations that favor their own countries, which has raised concerns among observers about the absence of a formal document. 'It is unthinkable not to create a document during negotiations,' asserted Meisei University Prof. Masahiko Hosokawa. The former Economy, Trade and Industry Ministry official, who has experience with U.S. negotiations, added: 'If Japan leaves the U.S. side's self-serving interpretations, such as those concerning investment in the United States, unchallenged, it will be taken as tacit acceptance, which could lead to future friction and risks.' Takahide Kiuchi, an executive economist at Nomura Research Institute Ltd., emphasized the importance of a formal document for transparency, citing the risk of compromising national interests. 'Even if clarifying the detailed framework reveals discrepancies between the two countries that could lead to the collapse of the agreement, a formal document should still be created,' he said.
Japan Times
27 minutes ago
- Japan Times
Ruling and opposition parties agree to scrap provisional gas tax by year-end
The ruling and opposition parties agreed Wednesday to abolish the provisional gasoline tax as early as possible this year. The agreement was reached at a meeting of parliamentary affairs chiefs of the ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), its coalition partner Komeito, the main opposition Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan, as well as Nippon Ishin no Kai, the Democratic Party for the People and the Japanese Communist Party in the opposition bloc. The parties aim to enact a bill to scrap the provisional gas tax at an extraordinary session of parliament expected to be convened in autumn. Based on the agreement, the ruling and opposition parties will set up a related forum of dialogue among their working-level officials during a separate extraordinary Diet, or parliament, session set to start Friday. The parties will continue talks after the end of the session, focusing on issues such as finding an alternative source of revenue. After Wednesday's meeting, LDP Diet affairs chief Tetsushi Sakamoto told reporters that the parties hope to discuss and enact the legislation to scrap the add-on tax at the extra parliamentary session that is likely to be convened in autumn. "The will of the people was clearly shown" in the July 20 election for the House of Councilors, the upper chamber of parliament, Sakamoto said, adding, "We'll formulate policies according to the will of the people." Following the six-party agreement, the steering committee of the House of Representatives, the lower chamber, decided at a meeting of senior members that the extra parliamentary session starting Friday will run for five days until Tuesday next week.
Japan Times
36 minutes ago
- Japan Times
Varied sales channels may have triggered rice price surge
The diversification of rice sales channels may have contributed to the surge in prices of the staple since last summer, according to a survey released by the agriculture ministry Wednesday. The amount of 2024 rice shipped from producers to major buyers dealing with farmers fell by 340,000 metric tons from the previous year, while shipments through other channels, such as direct sales, increased by 490,000 tons, according to estimates as of the end of June. The ministry believes that the increase in rice distributed through new channels with higher transaction prices is one of the factors behind the rice price surge. Demand for 2024 rice intended primarily for direct human consumption is estimated to reach 7.11 million tons, up by 370,000 tons from an estimate as of May, the ministry also said. The results of the survey were presented at a meeting to discuss agricultural policies. "We will reflect what was discussed in the results of the assessment" of soaring rice prices and other issues, agriculture minister Shinjiro Koizumi said. The main distribution channels for rice have traditionally been through major buyers, such as the National Federation of Agricultural Cooperative Associations, or Zen-Noh. According to the survey, producers' direct rice sales and transactions with other traders totaled 2.95 million tons, compared with 2.91 million tons through traditional channels. Milling yields of brown rice harvested in 2024 fell by 0.8% from the average for rice harvested between 2020 and 2022, according to the survey. The decrease may be attributed to factors such as high temperatures, resulting in an additional 60,000 tons of brown rice being required to maintain the same amount of polished rice.
