House budget writer: Make Senate find $38M to boost payments to hospitals
'This is the wrong venue, time and method for this bill,' said House Finance Committee Vice Chairman Dan McGuire, R-Epsom.
'It will cost the state $19 million a year, which isn't in either the governor's budget or the House budget. That is a $38 million drain on the Rainy Day Fund in the biennium which should be unacceptable.'
Meanwhile, Steve Ahnen, the president and CEO of the New Hampshire Hospital Association, called the state Senate-passed bill (SB 249) providing those hospitals more reimbursement money a 'great, first step forward,' but added more is needed to reduce the harm done to some institutions.
'Hospitals will still lose money, we are simply trying to lose less and do so in a fair and reasonable way,' Ahnen told the House Ways and Means Committee Tuesday. "It (Senate bill) needs to do a little bit better."
In 1991, the state imposed the Medicaid Enhancement Tax on hospitals to qualify the state for bonus matching grants from the federal government. Under the legal maneuver, the state pays back the hospitals for nearly all that they paid out in taxes, often on the same day.
Under the arrangement, the state received more than $300 million in annual reimbursements from Washington that it must spend on the federal/state Medicaid program.
The Biden administration ordered New Hampshire and all states to change those hospital tax and payment arrangements that critics here always called a legal "scam."
Federal officials are requiring states to make direct payments to the hospitals to receive the qualifying federal help, rather than impose a tax on hospitals and then pay them back.
Since a 2018 lawsuit settlement, hospitals, in the aggregate, had received 91% back of what they paid the state in MET.
Former Gov. Chris Sununu last summer directed state officials to lower that reimbursement to 80% and to direct more grants to mental health, substance abuse and federally qualified health care centers that were financially beleaguered.
Hospitals sued
In her two-year state budget plan offered last February, Ayotte stuck with the 80% model for 2026-27.
Ahnen said this will give the state $137 million more than it receives currently, while the hospitals will receive $70 million less than they do now.
The state's 11 largest hospitals as a group would lose $100 million, Ahnen said.
That's why the biggest hospital group, Dartmouth Health, joined the New Hampshire Hospital Association in suing the state for the third time in the past decade over the issue.
Matthew Houde, Dartmouth Health's system vice president of government relations, said it would lose $31 million under the plan and if it stands, service reductions would be unavoidable.
Through nine months, Dartmouth Health operated at a 1.4% profit margin which totals $35 million, Houde said.
In response to the suit, Ayotte accused hospitals of being solely focused on 'playing political games and misleading the public.'
'Unfortunately, the plaintiffs are only focused on driving more money to billion-dollar corporations and have resorted to playing political games and misleading the public,' she said. 'They should return to the table and come to an agreement that benefits all Granite Staters.'
Last month, the Senate amended its bill to restore the 91% reimbursement rate which is what former Senate President Jeb Bradley, R-Wolfeboro, tried but failed to get Sununu's support for last spring.
'Now that we have been sued, what happens will be anyone's guess,' said Senate Majority Leader Regina Birdsell, R-Hampstead, the bill's prime author.
McGuire urged the House panel kill or retain Birdsell's bill and force budget writers to find the $38 million in additional reimbursement to the hospitals as it produces an alternative state budget plan next month.
But Houde pointed out Dartmouth Health and other providers have withheld MET payments that were due to the state on April 15.
This threatens the state's ability to obtain all that bonus federal money in the coming weeks if a deal isn't reached soon.
'There is a timeliness component here with regards to getting the match from the federal government,' Houde said.
Ahnen reminded that two past superior court judges found the MET tax to be unconstitutional because it's not levied on 'similar' providers such as ambulatory surgery centers or rehab hospitals. Losing again would deny the state more than $400 million in federal reimbursement, he warned
klandrigan@unionleader.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
25 minutes ago
- The Hill
What a GOP bill banning central digital currency means for consumer banking
A proposed GOP ban on a central bank digital currency (CBDC) could pump the brakes on grand visions to reshape electronic payment access around the Federal Reserve. Republican lawmakers pushed the ban through the House on Thursday over concerns the government could use a CBDC to surveil Americans' financial transactions. The banking industry has also lobbied against the currency, arguing the public already has sufficient access to easily usable and safe digital money. 'Nobody yet knows whether a CBDC is a good idea or not,' Rep. Jim Himes (D-Conn.), who has pushed for the government to explore a CBDC, said following the House's vote. 'There is potential for abuse and corruption, but also for extraordinary modernization that could serve unbanked communities, support the primacy of the U.S. dollar, and much more,' he added. Fed floated idea in 2022 white paper In 2022, the Federal Reserve issued a study of CBDCs that outlined their risks and benefits. 'All options for private digital money, including stablecoins and other cryptocurrencies, require mechanisms to reduce liquidity risk and credit risk. But all these mechanisms are imperfect,' the report notes. A traditional bank account is backed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, which guarantees individual deposits up to $250,000 in the event a bank fails. But there are also riskier forms of digital financial services. In 2024, a financial technology company called Synapse collapsed and left customers unable to access some $265 million in deposits. A CBDC, backed with the full faith and credit of the U.S. government, would be the safest possible digital asset. The Fed paper said that a CBDC could make cross-border payments easier and potentially improve access to banking for low-income households. A 2022 study by Himes, the Connecticut Democrat, proposed that CBDCs could be used for depositing paychecks or even be integrated into federal programs like Social Security. A more ambitious version of a CBDC could allow Americans to hold digital dollars at a bank account with the Fed, enabling them to make digital payments without an account at a traditional bank. That could, as the Fed paper noted, 'fundamentally change the structure of the U.S. financial system, altering the roles and responsibilities of the private sector and the central bank.' A government-backed digital dollar — especially one that could bear interest — could also drive consumers away from traditional commercial bank accounts. A CBDC still would require significant study, from the impacts on the banking system to the technology that it would run on. A hypothetical CBDC could use existing technology, or it could be distributed on a blockchain, similar to how Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies are issued. In 2022, former Federal Reserve Vice Chair Lael Brainard estimated that it would take ' a long time ' — at least five years, she said — to launch a digital currency if Congress decided to do so. Fed Chair Jerome Powell said in February that the bank would not develop a CBDC under his tenure. His term expires in May 2026. The bill, which now heads to the Senate, would bar the Fed from directly or indirectly issuing a CBDC or studying the issue. Other federal agencies are already barred from studying a CBDC due to a January executive order from President Trump. Republicans cite privacy concerns Privacy is the biggest concern about CBDCs aired by Republican lawmakers. House Majority Whip Tom Emmer (R-Minn.), who led the CBDC ban through the House, said on the floor that a digital dollar would be tantamount to government surveillance. 'It is government-controlled programmable money that, if designed without the privacy protections of cash, this could give the federal government the ability to surveil and restrict Americans' transactions and monitor every aspect of our daily lives,' he said. In contrast to cash, which is essentially untraceable, a CBDC would likely leave a digital record of some form. If the government pursued a CBDC, it would have to balance concerns about privacy with safeguards to curb its use in money laundering or other illegal activities. Many lawmakers have cited China's digital yuan as a worrying example. Tech and China experts, as reported by WIRED, have raised concerns that the Chinese government could use its digital currency to track individual transactions or otherwise scoop up tranches of consumer data. Other Republicans have issued starker warnings about CBDCs. 'CBDC is an existential threat to Western civilization,' Rep. Warren Davidson (R-Ohio) wrote on the social platform X. Banking, crypto lobbies strongly oppose Banking and cryptocurrency lobbying groups are staunchly against a centrally issued digital currency. In a letter to Emmer in April, the American Banking Association argued that Americans already had sufficient access to digital payments. Alongside other digital transfer systems pioneered in the private sector, the Fed launched FedNow, an instant payment system that can operate 24/7, in 2023. Banks have to opt in to using the service, whose major clients include JPMorganChase and Wells Fargo. More broadly, the bank lobby argued that a CBDC would undercut the role banks play in the country's economic system. 'For example, a CBDC would be an advantaged competitor to retail bank deposits that would move money away from banks and into accounts at the Federal Reserve, severely limiting the ability of commercial banks to make loans that power economic growth in communities across the country,' the group wrote. A CBDC could also dampen hopes that cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin or privately developed stablecoins — cryptocurrencies whose value is pegged to a reference asset like the U.S. dollar — could become the primary form of digital money. 'You wouldn't need stablecoins; you wouldn't need cryptocurrencies, if you had a digital U.S. currency,' Powell said at a congressional hearing in 2021. 'I think that's one of the stronger arguments in its favor.'
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Texas Governor Says He'll Introduce Flood Items at Special Session
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Texas Governor Greg Abbott announced on Sunday that flood-related legislation will be a priority during the upcoming Legislative Special Session beginning Monday. Abbott added four flood preparedness items to the session agenda following flooding over the Fourth of July weekend that killed at least 135 people across the Lone Star State. Newsweek has reached out to Abbott's office via email on Sunday for comment. Why It Matters The devastating floods exposed critical gaps in Texas's disaster preparedness infrastructure, particularly in the Hill Country region where many communities lack adequate warning systems. Kerr County, which suffered the majority of casualties, does not have a flood warning system despite missed opportunities over the past decade to finance one. The legislative response could fundamentally reshape how Texas prepares for and responds to natural disasters, potentially saving lives in future extreme weather events. President Donald Trump later announced on Truth Social that he had approved a "Major Disaster Declaration" for the deadly floods. What To Know The special session will address flood warning systems, emergency communications, relief funding for Hill Country floods, and natural disaster preparation and recovery. Most deaths occurred along the Guadalupe River in Kerr County, about 60 miles northwest of San Antonio, where the Hill Country's dry, dirt-packed soil cannot absorb heavy rainfall. Camp Mystic, a century-old Christian summer camp for girls, lost at least 27 campers and counselors in the flooding. The state's House and Senate have formed special committees on flooding and disaster preparedness, planning a July 31 visit to Kerrville to hear from residents. Texas state Representative Don McLaughlin, a Republican, has already introduced legislation requiring the state's top public health official to set building standards for youth camps in 100-year floodplains. The committees will begin with a joint hearing Wednesday examining the state's response, flood planning, infrastructure management, and first responder communications. Abbott initially called the special session to address other issues, including THC product regulation and congressional redistricting at Trump's request. The 30-day session now includes 17 total agenda items beyond the flood-related measures. Special session begins tomorrow. I included 4 items to address flood preparedness and recovery: Flood warning systems Flood emergency communications Relief funding Natural disaster prep & recovery We must ensure better preparation in the — Greg Abbott (@GregAbbott_TX) July 20, 2025 What People Are Saying Texas Governor Greg Abott wrote on X, formerly Twitter, on Sunday: "Special session begins tomorrow. I included 4 items to address flood preparedness and recovery: Flood warning systems, Flood emergency communications, Relief funding, Natural disaster prep & recovery We must ensure better preparation in the future." Dalton Rice, Kerrville City Manager, said in a statement: "We are profoundly grateful to the more than 1,000 local, state, and federal authorities who have worked tirelessly in the wake of the devastating flood that struck our community. Thanks to their extraordinary efforts, the number of individuals previously listed as missing has dropped from over 160 to three." Rice continued: "This remarkable progress reflects countless hours of coordinated search and rescue operations, careful investigative work, and an unwavering commitment to bringing clarity and hope to families during an unimaginably difficult time." Rob Kelly, Kerr County Judge, said in a statement: "To every member of law enforcement, fire and rescue, emergency management, and supporting agencies — thank you. Your dedication, professionalism, and compassion have brought comfort and answers to so many." Reporting from the Associated Press contributed to this article.
Los Angeles Times
an hour ago
- Los Angeles Times
Texas Republicans aim to redraw House districts at Trump's urging, but there's a risk
AUSTIN, Texas — U.S. Rep. Vicente Gonzalez, a Texas Democrat who represents a slice of the Rio Grande Valley along the border with Mexico, won his last congressional election by just over 5,000 votes. That makes him a tempting target for Republicans, who are poised to redraw the state's congressional maps this week and devise five new winnable seats for the GOP that would help the party avoid losing House control in next year's midterm elections. Adjusting the lines of Gonzalez's district to bring in a few thousand more Republican voters, while shifting some Democratic ones out, could flip his seat. Gonzalez said he is not worried. Those Democratic voters will have to end up in one of the Republican districts that flank Gonzalez's current one, making those districts more competitive — possibly enough so it could flip the seats to Democrats. 'Get ready for some pickup opportunities,' Gonzalez said, adding that his party is already recruiting challengers to Republicans whose districts they expect to be destabilized by the process. 'We're talking to some veterans, we're talking to some former law enforcement.' Texas has 38 seats in the House. Republicans now hold 25 and Democrats 12, with one seat vacant after Democratic Rep. Sylvester Turner, a former Houston mayor, died in March. Gonzalez's district — and what happens to the neighboring GOP-held ones — is at the crux of President Trump's high-risk, high-reward push to get Texas Republicans to redraw their political map. Trump is seeking to avoid the traditional midterm letdown that most incumbent presidents endure and hold onto the House, which the GOP narrowly controls. Trump's push comes as there are numerous political danger signs for his presidency, both in the recent turmoil over his administration's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case and in new polling. Surveys from the Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research show most U.S. adults think that his policies have not helped them and that his tax cut and spending bill will only help the wealthy. The fear of accidentally creating unsafe seats is one reason Texas Republicans drew their lines cautiously in 2021, when the constitutionally mandated redistricting process kicked off in all 50 states. Mapmakers — in most states, it's the party that controls the Legislature — must adjust congressional and state legislative lines after every 10-year census to ensure that districts have about the same number of residents. That is a golden opportunity for one party to rig the map against the other, a tactic known as gerrymandering. But there is a term, too, for so aggressively redrawing a map that it puts that party's own seats at risk: a 'dummymander.' The Texas GOP knows the risk. In the 2010s, the Republican-controlled Legislature drew political lines that helped pad the GOP's House majority. That lasted until 2018, when a backlash against Trump in his first term led Democrats to flip two seats in Texas that Republicans had thought safe. In 2021, with Republicans still comfortably in charge of the Texas Legislature, the party was cautious, opting for a map that mainly shored up their incumbents rather than targeted Democrats. Still, plenty of Republicans believe their Texas counterparts can safely go on offense. 'Smart map-drawing can yield pickup opportunities while not putting our incumbents in jeopardy,' said Adam Kincaid, executive director of the National Republican Redistricting Trust, which helps coordinate mapmaking for the party nationally. Republican Gov. Greg Abbott called a special session of the Legislature, which starts Monday, to comply with Trump's request to redraw the congressional maps and to address the flooding in Texas Hill Country that killed at least 135 people this month. Democratic state lawmakers are talking about staying away from the Capitol to deny the Legislature the minimum number needed to convene. Republican Atty. Gen. Ken Paxton posted that any Democrats who did that should be arrested. Lawmakers can be fined up to $500 a day for breaking a quorum after the House changed its rules when Democrats initiated a walkout in 2021. Despite the new penalties, Democratic state Rep. Trey Martinez Fischer, who led the walkout in 2021, left open the possibility of another. 'I don't think anybody should underestimate the will of Texas Democrats,' he said. Texas is not the only Republican state engaged in mid-decade redistricting. After staving off a ballot measure to expand the power of a mapmaking commission last election, Ohio Republicans hope to redraw their congressional map from a 10-5 one favoring the GOP to one as lopsided as 13 to 2, in a state Trump won last year with 55% of the vote. Some Democratic leaders have suggested that states where their party is in control should counter the expected redraw in Texas. 'We have to be absolutely ruthless about getting back in power,' former Texas Rep. Beto O'Rourke said Sunday on CNN. But Democrats have fewer options. More of the states their party controls do not allow elected partisans to draw maps and entrust independent commissions to draw fair lines. Among them is California, where Gov. Gavin Newsom has floated the long-shot idea of working around the state's commission. The few Democratic-controlled states that do allow elected officials to draw the lines, such as Illinois, have already seen Democrats max out their advantages. Trump and his allies have been rallying Texas Republicans to ignore whatever fears they may have and to go big. On Tuesday, the president posted on his social media site a reminder of his record in the state in the November election: 'Won by one and a half million Votes, and almost 14%. Also, won all of the Border Counties along Mexico, something which has never happened before. I keep hearing about Texas 'going Blue,' but it is just another Democrat LIE.' Texas has long been eyed as a state trending Democratic because of its growing nonwhite population. But those communities swung right last year and helped Trump expand his margin to nearly 14 percentage points, a significant improvement on his 5½-point win in 2020. Michael Li, a Texas native and longtime watcher of the state at the Brennan Center for Justice in New York, said there's no way to know whether that trend will continue in next year's elections or whether the state will shift back toward Democrats. 'Anyone who can tell you what the politics of Texas looks like for the balance of the decade has a better crystal ball than I do,' Li said. One region of the state where Republican gains have been steady is the Rio Grande Valley, which runs from the Gulf of Mexico along much of the state's southern border. The heavily Latino region, where many Border Patrol officers live, has rallied around Trump's anti-immigration message and policies. As a result, Gonzalez and the area's other Democratic congressman, Henry Cuellar, have seen their reelection campaigns get steadily tighter. They are widely speculated to be the two top targets of the new map. The GOP is expected to look to the state's three biggest cities to find its other Democratic targets. If mapmakers scatter Democratic voters from districts in the Houston, Dallas and Austin areas, they could get to five additional seats. But in doing so, Republicans face a legal risk on top of their electoral one: that they break up districts required by the Voting Rights Act to have a critical amount of certain minority groups. The goal of the federal law is to enable those communities to elect representatives of their choosing. The Texas GOP already is facing a lawsuit from civil rights groups alleging its initial 2021 map did this. If this year's redistricting is too aggressive, it could trigger a second complaint. 'It's politically and legally risky,' Li said of the redistricting strategy. 'It's throwing caution to the winds.' Riccardi and Lathan write for the Associated Press and reported from Denver and Austin, respectively.
