ICC seeks arrest of Taliban leaders over persecution of women
ICC judges said in a statement that there were 'reasonable grounds' to suspect Mr Akhundzada and Chief Justice Abdul Hakim Haqqani 'have committed … the crime against humanity of persecution … on gender grounds'.
'While the Taliban have imposed certain rules and prohibitions on the population as a whole, they have specifically targeted girls and women by reason of their gender, depriving them of fundamental rights and freedoms,' the court said. The court said the alleged crimes had been committed between August 15, 2021 – when the Taliban seized power – and continued until at least January 20 this year.
The Taliban had 'severely deprived' girls and women of the rights to education, privacy and family life and the freedoms of movement, expression, thought, conscience and religion, ICC judges said. 'In addition, other persons were targeted because certain expressions of sexuality and/or gender identity were regarded as inconsistent with the Taliban's policy on gender.'
The ICC, based in The Hague, was set up to rule on the world's worst crimes such as war crimes and crimes against humanity. It has no police force of its own and relies on its member states to enforce its arrest warrants – with mixed results. In theory this means that anyone subject to an ICC arrest warrant cannot travel to a member state for fear of being detained.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Filipino Times
4 hours ago
- Filipino Times
Palace on Cayetano's house arrest proposal for Duterte: 'Noted'
Malacañang offered a brief response to a Senate resolution proposing the interim release and house arrest of former President Rodrigo Duterte, saying only that the recommendation has been 'noted.' At a press briefing on Friday, Palace Press Officer Claire Castro declined to elaborate on Sen. Alan Peter Cayetano's proposal. 'Secretary of Justice Boying Remulla has already spoken about the interim release. And if there are such suggestions from Sen. Alan Cayetano, they are noted,' she said. Cayetano on Thursday filed an unnumbered resolution urging the Philippine government to negotiate with the International Criminal Court (ICC) for Duterte's temporary release and transfer to a Philippine embassy for house arrest, citing the former president's deteriorating health and advanced age. 'To grant this for the former president would be beneficial to his health, all while presenting no risk to the integrity of the ongoing trial,' Cayetano said in his resolution. However, Justice Secretary Remulla earlier rejected the request for interim release filed by Duterte's legal team. Duterte, who was arrested and extradited to The Hague in March, remains in custody at the ICC's detention facility at the Scheveningen prison complex as he awaits trial over alleged crimes committed during his administration's controversial war on drugs.
Arabian Post
6 hours ago
- Arabian Post
U.S. Tariffs Surge Above 20% as Trump Tests Market Limits
U. S. consumers now contend with an effective tariff rate exceeding 20%, marking the steepest level observed since the early 1900s, according to estimates by the International Chamber of Commerce following the latest round of import levies introduced under President Trump's administration. This escalation stems from a newly implemented baseline tariff of 10%, supplemented by selective duties—up to 50% on copper and 200% on pharmaceuticals—pushing the overall rate to unprecedented heights. Andrew Wilson, deputy secretary-general of the ICC, explained that the administration appears to be calibrating tariff levels to maximise revenue without triggering a full-scale market meltdown. Despite wide-ranging rates, Wall Street has shown remarkable composure, a stark contrast to the sharp sell-off experienced in April when the initial import duties were announced. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent confirmed that customs collections have reached approximately $100 billion so far, with projections forecasting up to $300 billion by year-end. Legal and legislative challenges are emerging in response. A federal appeals court struck down the 'Liberation Day' tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, declaring the move exceeded executive authority, though the ruling is presently stayed pending appeal. Meanwhile, Congress is contemplating legislation aimed at curbing unilateral tariff powers, and trade negotiations with major trading partners—namely Japan, the EU, the U. K. and Canada—could moderate or delay certain duties. ADVERTISEMENT Since April, the U. S. has extended tariffs to a broad array of countries. Canada faces a general increase from 25% to 35% on non‑USMCA imports beginning 1 August, with additional duties on steel and aluminium already in place. Meanwhile, Brazil has been targeted with a 50% tariff, linked in part to political tensions, and levels between 25% and 40% are set for nations including Japan, South Korea, Thailand, Malaysia, the Philippines, Sri Lanka, South Africa and others. A hold‑and‑test strategy allows a window until August 1 for targeted trade deals. Market participants have noted this restrained approach: a 10% baseline is broadly absorbed, but steeper duties serve as leverage. The administration appears comfortable testing thresholds before escalating further. Economists caution that importers and consumers will bear the brunt of these changes. A Yale Budget Lab analysis determined that U. S. tariffs to date equate to a 24.6 percentage‑point rise in the average effective rate—potentially reaching 27% absent substitution effects. These duties could elevate consumer prices by roughly 2.9%, reducing household purchasing power by about $4,700 annually. Substitution toward non‑Chinese suppliers later moderates the rate to approximately 18.5%, the highest since 1933. A Harvard Business School study corroborates these dynamics: between March and June, import prices rose ~3%, and domestically produced goods competing with imports increased by ~2% due to elevated component costs and altered supply chains. Similarly, U. S. apparel imports from China fell to the lowest in 22 years in May, as buyers shifted to suppliers in Southeast Asia and Latin America. While equities appear resilient—with the S&P 500 near record highs—analysts warn that bond and currency markets may signal latent stress. UBS expects household and business inventories to help absorb short‑term shocks, but flags a possible 0.7 percentage‑point drag on GDP growth in 2025 if tensions persist. Businesses represented by the ICC, covering some 45 million firms, have voiced concern: 60% of respondents to an ICC pulse survey consider the tariffs negatively, citing cost inflation, supply chain uncertainty and the risk of retaliation as principal worries. Despite this, the ICC insists negotiators must prioritise de‑escalation and multilateral engagement. Secretary‑General John Denton called the policy shift 'a watershed moment in American trade policy' that could inflict systemic harm on the global economy, noting the effective U. S. tariff rate now eclipses levels last seen during the Smoot–Hawley era of the 1930s.
UAE Moments
9 hours ago
- UAE Moments
US Sanctions Francesca Albanese for Her Advocacy for Gaza
In a significant escalation of tensions, the United States under the Trump administration has imposed targeted sanctions on Francesca Albanese, the United Nations Special Rapporteur for human rights in the occupied Palestinian territories, including Gaza and the West Bank. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced punitive measures on Wednesday, July 9. Albanese has also received a designation as a 'Specially Designated National', barring U.S. individuals and organizations from doing business with her. Trump's ICC decree includes a sset freezes and a U.S. entry ban for the individuals and their immediate family. Authorities assert the sanctions stem from Albanese's advocacy at the International Criminal Court (ICC) urging investigations of Israeli and U.S. officials, which they deemed a threat to national sovereignty and a campaign of political and economic aggression. Albanese firmly rejected the sanctions, likening the action to 'mafia-style intimidation techniques' directed at silencing human rights scrutiny. She re-emphasized, "I stand firmly and convincingly on the side of justice, as I have always done.' United Nations officials, including Human Rights Council President Jürg Lauber and OHCHR chief Volker Türk, condemned the sanctions, calling them a dangerous precedent that undermines the independence of UN mandate holders and international human rights systems. Amnesty International's Secretary-General Agnès Callamard condemned the move as a 'shameless and transparent attack on the fundamental principles of international justice.' She urged member states to mobilize diplomatically to reverse the sanctions and protect UN mechanisms. This article was previously published on omanmoments. To see the original article, click here
