To Berlin's Relief, Musk — Not Merz — Got Slammed during White House Visit
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz attends a meeting in the Oval Office on Thursday
BERLIN – German Chancellor Friedrich Merz went to the White House on Thursday to talk about trade, war, peace and the future of the Western alliance – a high-stakes meeting for which his top advisers made painstaking preparations.
President Donald Trump had something he wanted to say, too. About Elon Musk.
Sitting next to Merz in the Oval Office, Trump told reporters he was 'very disappointed' in his former adviser. Musk returned fire, and the two ex-besties were off on a wild, hours-long breakup that dominated the day's news cycle at home and abroad.
But see things from the Germans' side.
What they felt was … palpable relief.
Under the headline 'New Best Friends?' a political commentator for Germany's BR broadcaster wrote: 'It could hardly have gone better for the chancellor. His meeting with the U.S. president in the Oval Office, sometimes a scene of public humiliation, was extremely polite and almost harmonious.'
Germans, including Merz and his delegation, seemed thankful that Trump's trademark rage had been directed elsewhere during the meeting and was nothing like the president's public castigations of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and South African President Cyril Ramaphosa during their visits to the White House
'You are smiling,' Sen. Chris Coons (D-Delaware) told Merz as he gathered with a gaggle of senators following the White House meeting. 'That's a very good sign.'
'Still standing!' added Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina), to laughter.
Merz told the German broadcaster ZDF that he was 'very satisfied' with the meeting. Displaying no worry or concern about the visit being overshadowed, he added: 'I expected us to get along well. And that's exactly what happened.'
It did not escape German commentators, however, that on camera the leader of the European Union's most populous country, and the third-largest economy in the world, only got to speak for about four minutes in the meeting as Trump mostly held forth with the press.
But global leaders appear to be learning how to manage their encounters with Trump, or at least survive them.
'The team behind Merz prepared meticulously for this visit, and it showed. Phone calls between Merz and Trump prior to the visit helped pave the way for a smooth meeting,' said Sudha David-Wilp, a senior fellow at the German Marshall Fund. 'Both leaders felt comfortable with each other and President Trump was in a positive mood yesterday, but many hurdles and summits are ahead. The challenge is to concentrate on the shared interest and channel out the noise.'
Like others before him, Merz also came bearing gifts. But were they the right gifts?
Trump was presented with a gold-framed copy of his German grandfather's birth certificate.
Gold is always good with Trump. But the president's reaction appeared a little tepid – though he did look up at the wall and joke that maybe he could find a place for it there. He seemed more enthusiastic about a golf club engraved with the U.S. and German flags. Merz is a fellow golfer and later posted on Instagram a picture of Trump with the club.
Merz will soon have the opportunity to see how the partnership fares on German soil. The chancellor told German broadcaster ARD that Trump had accepted an invitation to visit Germany. Merz said last month that he plans to include a trip to the small wine-growing town Kallstadt – the hometown of Trump's grandfather – during the president's anticipated visit.
Free from the baggage of his predecessors – including Olaf Scholz, who worked closely with President Joe Biden, and Angela Merkel, whom Trump repeatedly berated for her open-door migration policy at the height of Europe's migration crisis a decade ago – Merz's blank sheet going into the Oval Office was evidently advantageous.
'The whole world now knows: Trump has nothing against this German; he likes him,' German daily the Süddeutsche Zeitung wrote. 'Perhaps the most important reason for this: Friedrich Merz is not Angela Merkel.'
Following a question about the sweeping travel restrictions on 19 countries that Trump announced Wednesday, the president criticized Merkel's migration policy. 'We want to keep bad people out of our country. … Of course, you have a little problem, too, with some of the people that were allowed into your country,' Trump said to Merz.
'It's not your fault. … It shouldn't have happened. I told her it shouldn't have happened, but it did,' Trump said, without naming Merkel.
Merz didn't respond.
Merz appeared to handle Trump more smoothly than he did British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and French President Emmanuel Macron, though he had fewer speaking lines. Perhaps less was more.
Merz mostly went out of his way to praise and flatter Trump, but he also remained assertive – insisting, for instance, that Russia alone was to blame for civilian deaths following the 2022 invasion of Ukraine. For the most part, Merz had Trump nodding along – except when Merz mentioned the children in war-torn Ukraine, at which point Trump stopped nodding and froze.
'Under normal diplomatic practice, Donald Trump's monologue would be an affront to the chancellor,' German publication Focus wrote. Instead, Merz took it in stride and used his small amount of speaking time wisely, the magazine wrote.
There were some noteworthy exchanges, including one about Nazis.
Merz began noting that June 6 was the anniversary of D-Day, when the Allied Forces landed on the beaches of Normandy, 'when the Americans ended a war in Europe.' That day in 1944 was the symbolic start of Europe's liberation in World War II.
Trump jumped in: 'That was not a pleasant day for you? This is not a great day.'
Merz answered: 'No, in the long run, this was the liberation of my country from Nazi dictatorship.'
Vice President JD Vance appeared again on his spot on the sofa as the president's wing man. But he did not pounce – and Merz made sure to say thank you.
'We owe the Americans a lot,' the chancellor said. 'We will never forget about them.' Turning toward the president, he continued, 'so with your German provenance, I think this is a very good basis for close cooperation between America and Germany.'
It was unclear exactly what Merz and Germany might get out of the meeting, other than future encounters minus any awkward baggage.
After Merz took a firm stand on Russia's responsibility for the war in Ukraine, Trump suggested that Russia and Ukraine be treated as two children fighting on a playground who should simply be left to battle it out.
Asked by the press about Trump's comparison of the war to a playground tussle, Merz didn't take the bait. 'I think we both agree on this war and how terrible this war is going on,' he said. 'We are both looking for ways to stop it very soon.'
Booth reported from London.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Japan Times
39 minutes ago
- Japan Times
NATO's Donald Trump dilemma
NATO's just-completed summit in The Hague came at a time of extraordinary tension. Since returning to the White House, Donald Trump has repeatedly accused Europe of free riding on U.S. defense spending, raising serious concerns about the health of the Atlantic alliance. His decision to bomb Iran's nuclear facilities just three days before the summit — in coordination with Israel and without informing America's NATO allies — has only intensified those fears. Trump's strikes against Iran evoked memories of the post-9/11 interventions in Afghanistan and Iraq, when NATO expanded its role beyond addressing conventional military threats to include counter-terrorism operations. While the alliance supported the U.S.-led war in Afghanistan, the invasion of Iraq was far more divisive, owing to the lack of convincing evidence that Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction and the absence of an explicit United Nations Security Council mandate. The resulting rift prompted then-U.S. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld to draw a controversial distinction between 'Old Europe' and 'New Europe.' But the current situation is even more alarming. Unlike in 2003, when the United States at least made an effort to consult its allies, Trump now keeps them in the dark. He provided no credible evidence to justify the attack on Iran and International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Director-General Rafael Grossi contradicted his claims of an imminent nuclear threat, stating just days earlier that there was no proof of a 'systematic' Iranian effort to develop nuclear weapons. Strikingly, many NATO leaders were informed of the attack only after it had been carried out. By sidelining NATO, Trump has effectively reduced the alliance to a passive observer, undermining its core principles and signaling a dangerous shift in global diplomacy. Imagine if Iran had retaliated by targeting U.S. bases in Turkey, potentially dragging my country into war. And if a nuclear leak had occurred, endangering Turkish civilians, who would have borne responsibility? Although Israel and Iran accepted Trump's announcement of a ceasefire, NATO members had been thrust into a dangerous situation without warning. This was particularly worrisome for Turkey, which shares a border with Iran and is highly vulnerable to the consequences of regional escalation. Trump's behavior has jeopardized NATO's collective security. After all, there is no guarantee that Israel will not violate the ceasefire, as it did in Gaza in March. NATO members must now confront a fundamental question: Can the alliance survive if member states may launch unilateral military action that puts others at risk? The U.S. may have legitimate evidence that Iran violated the Non-Proliferation Treaty or was just about to do so. But if that were the case, the proper course would have been to present the evidence to the IAEA and pursue a coordinated response through the U.N. Security Council. Alternatively, the U.S. may have assumed that Iran would not retaliate and saw the attack as a way to force the Iranians back to the negotiating table. But talks between the two countries were already set to resume before Israel's intervention derailed them. A third explanation is more cynical but may be true: the attack was meant to divert attention from Israel's brutal war in Gaza. Whichever explanation proves true, Trump's actions could have far-reaching consequences for NATO and the alliance's future could depend on how its leaders respond. Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, for example, must clearly outline the risks that regional instability poses to NATO's collective defense posture — especially given Turkey's proximity to Iran. As leaders of countries with permanent seats on the U.N. Security Council, French President Emmanuel Macron and U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer could play a vital role in strengthening coordination between NATO and the U.N. Likewise, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz will be instrumental in shaping NATO-EU relations, while Norwegian President Jonas Gahr Store and his Finnish counterpart, Alexander Stubb, could help reinvigorate diplomacy and restore the alliance's moral compass. Ultimately, NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte's effectiveness will largely depend on leaders' commitment to pursuing rational, law-abiding security policies. Even beyond the immediate Iran crisis, NATO finds itself at a crossroads. The Hague summit may ultimately be seen as a defining moment — one that will determine whether the alliance can remain the world's most powerful defense organization, grounded in its members' shared concerns and contributions, or is destined to become a mere instrument of U.S.-Israeli strategic interests. If I were in office today, I would use the summit to highlight Israel's growing aggression and the security risks facing Turkey as the only NATO member in the region. I would ask Trump whether, in his 'America First' hierarchy, NATO allies now rank below nonmember Israel. Any leader willing to pose that question would take a principled stand against reckless military adventurism — and might just help save the alliance itself. Before the Iraq War, French President Jacques Chirac and German Chancellor Gerhard Schroder were dismissed as representatives of 'Old Europe' for opposing U.S. intervention. Had their warnings been heeded, the catastrophic costs of the war might have been avoided and Iran's regional influence would likely not be as significant as it is now. History has shown that wars launched before exhausting every diplomatic avenue lead to ruin for all involved. Russia's miscalculations in Ukraine serve as a grim reminder that while starting a war is easy, ending one is far more difficult. Today, as Trump's actions threaten further erosion of hard-won international laws, European leaders must push back. If NATO fails to uphold the rule of law, it risks forfeiting its role as the cornerstone of global security. The alliance's fate — and the future of global stability — will hinge on whether its leaders insist on pursuing peace rather than confrontation. Ahmet Davutoglu is a former prime minister (2014-2016) and foreign minister (2009-2014) of Turkey. © Project Syndicate, 2025
The Mainichi
an hour ago
- The Mainichi
Japan seeks 8th round of tariffs talks in U.S. amid Trump impasse
TOKYO (Kyodo) -- The Japanese government has informed the United States that its chief negotiator intends to conduct an eighth round of ministerial-level talks in Washington early next week, a source close to the matter said Thursday. With President Donald Trump appearing to harden his stance ahead of next Wednesday's deadline for his administration's 90-day pause on country-specific tariffs, Japan's last-ditch effort will hinge on whether Ryosei Akazawa can secure a deal that includes a reduced tariff rate on cars, the source said. In rounds of talks since April, the United States has been reluctant to accept Tokyo's request to withdraw or reduce the additional 25 percent tariff on cars. Amid the stalemate, Japan is seeking an extension of the tariff suspension deadline to allow talks to continue. Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba on Thursday expressed confidence that bilateral tariff negotiations with the United States are making steady progress. "We need to cover a wide range of areas, including nontariff barriers. But we are steadily and certainly making progress on each of them," Ishiba told a program on public broadcaster NHK. "Japan is the largest investor in the United States and the biggest contributor in terms of creating jobs. Our hope is that this will be taken into consideration," he said, underscoring the need for Washington to focus on investment rather than tariffs. His remarks came as Trump on Tuesday floated the idea of raising tariffs on imports from Japan to as high as 30 percent or 35 percent, while complaining about Japan's purchases of American rice and cars. "I'm not sure we're going to make a deal. I doubt it," Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One, calling Japan "very tough" and "very spoiled." The dispute over auto tariffs has been a key obstacle to a deal, with Washington also pressuring its Asian security ally to boost imports of U.S. farm products, including rice, cars and oil, to help reduce its large trade deficit. In return, Japan has highlighted its contributions to the U.S. economy and proposed a package deal that includes increased investment in the United States and cooperation on economic security, the source said. Without an extension to the 90-day pause on part of the so-called reciprocal tariffs, Japan will face an additional 14 percent country-specific tariff on top of the 10 percent baseline duty the United States has imposed on imports from all countries. The Wall Street Journal reported earlier this week that the United States warned Japanese officials during talks in late May that it might demand a cap on the number of vehicles Japan could export to the United States -- a policy known as a voluntary export restriction, citing people familiar with the matter. But Japanese officials held firm, telling their U.S. counterparts they would not accept any deal that preserves Trump's 25 percent automotive tariff, resulting in a deadlock in the negotiations, the U.S. newspaper said.
Nikkei Asia
an hour ago
- Nikkei Asia
Uniqlo hopes for breathing room under US-Vietnam tariff deal
Uniqlo parent Fast Retailing had predicted a 2%-to-3% hit to operating profits due to Trump's tariffs. (Photo by Hiroki Endo) TAKESHI SHIRAISHI TOKYO -- The tariff reductions announced by the U.S. and Vietnam are expected to provide relief for companies like casualwear retailer Uniqlo, which depends on the Southeast Asian nation for a large portion of its supply chain. U.S. President Donald Trump said Wednesday that U.S. imports from Vietnam will face a 20% tariff, down from the 46% originally proposed. The Vietnamese side did not say what level of tariffs had been agreed on.
