Climate Liberation Aotearoa protesters hunker down in aerial coal bucket in the rain
By
Sharon Davis
*
Two Climate Liberation Aotearoa protesters used the aerial rope way down to Ngakawau to access a coal bucket for a sit-in protest.
Photo:
Supplied
The two climate change activists hunkered down under tarpaulins in an aerial coal bucket at Stockton say they're in good spirits.
On Sunday, Climate Liberation Aotearoa protesters used the ropeway cable to access a coal bucket in a remote area high off the ground, effectively stopping coal transport from Stockton down to the rail link at Ngakawau.
Their aim is to get Bathurst Resources Limited to withdraw a fast-track application to extend its mining operations on the Stockton and Denniston plateaux.
Despite persistent rain today, protester Rach Andrews said they had woken up "pretty dry and cozy" this morning and planned to stay "a bit longer".
She said they had created a water-tight shelter, and the fact they were not in a huge space helped to keep them warm.
They might not be getting the best night's sleep, but they were getting some sleep.
Andrews said police negotiators had been in contact with Climate Liberation Aotearoa's police liaison for a few chats, but she had not had personal contact from the police or the mine staff - and the protest was set to continue.
"We're not coming down today. While Bathurst continues to endanger the beautiful life on Denniston there's going to be opposition. We're here to show strong opposition."
Andrews said they were eating energy bars and delicious homemade dehydrated meals that she had prepared for the protest.
She said the mine had sirens going "the entire time" for the April protest but they hadn't been used for this protest yet.
She knew she would be facing legal consequences but was not sure exactly what they entailed. She was among nine protesters charged with trespass following the April protest. Seven of them, including Andrews, have pleaded not guilty.
Climate protesters should not have to face criminal charges while the government limited the public's right to give input, Andrews said.
"If a charge and having to go to court is the consequence - it's worth taking to reduce the harm for future generations and life on the planet."
Andrews said the next protest on 8 August would target at least seven ANZ branches. She said ANZ was the last bank in New Zealand with no plan to move away from servicing businesses involved in fossil fuels.
Bathurst Resources chief executive Richard Tacon said the company's primary concern was for the safety of the protesters.
Bathurst had become aware of people trespassing on Stockton Mine infrastructure at Ngakawau on Monday and notified the police, WorkSafe, and the Department of Conservation as the landowner, Tacon said.
The trespassers had entered the mine illegally and might not be aware of the hazards at the mine.
"Bathurst is working with police on the next steps to secure as soon as possible the safety of the trespassers. When we have more information, we will provide an update," he said.
Bathurst Resources employs about 675 people in New Zealand and operates mines in the Waikato, the West Coast, and Southland. Stockton mine employs about 350 people plus 75 full-time contractors. It produces high-quality metallurgical coal for export to key steel making customers in Japan, India and South Korea.
Bathurst is preparing an environmental assessment for the Buller Plateaux Continuation Project, as part of its application under the Fast Track Approvals Act 2024. If approved the project will extend mining operations at the Stockton mine by another 25 years.
*This story originally appeared in the
Westport News.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
21 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Letters to Editor: health, voting, 1080
Today's letters to the editor include a plea to save the Roxburgh Medical Centre, debate around changes to voting, and 1080 in New Zealand. I read with major concern this week that the viability of the Roxburgh Medical Centre is at risk. The report stated that "a significant proportion of the Teviot Valley's rural health funding will be withdrawn from January 2026." How on earth did this happen? I worked as the nurse manager and Prime nurse at the medical centre for many years and know how busy it can be, how vital it is to provide the care needed for the valley. This practice is a one and a-half doctor practice. It serves a wide variety of people, from elderly to young families, orchardists, farmers etc. Don't let anyone tell you "but you can travel to Alexandra for your care." This is totally impractical for a lot of folks, especially the elderly. The practice area goes from Raes Junction to Shingle Creek, including outlying farms. Roxburgh locals, you cannot allow this to happen. You must stand up for what this district deserves. If you lose services you will never get them back. Marg Eckhoff Alexandra It's so right Pete Hodgson has said it well in his letter (31.7.25): the disenfranchised should be heard with their votes. That some do not vote is entirely predictable, despite David Seymour's "drop kick" comments. He is not struggling from day to day to survive in the present climate. His world is "sorted" and there is a totalitarian theme in there somewhere. Likewise our prime minister says he is going to "smash" the gangs. This is Trumpian speech and he really has no idea about managing a group of people who have an immutable sense of belonging and supporting each other. His words show his false sense of status to the detriment of many. The changing of the writing on passports is a similar, dare I say it "racist," move couched in ambiguity and evasion. Aotearoa-New Zealand means a lot more than New Zealand-Aotearoa. The entry of te reo into our vocabulary is to be celebrated as it is establishing our identity as many of us want it to be. Peter Strang Dunedin It's nonsense According to Pete Hodgson's thinking, the electoral changes are voter suppression. Or maybe he is just worried that those affected would most likely vote for the opposition parties but are not capable of enrolling in time. To say it is voter suppression is nonsense. These people have a choice (apart from a few who will have to wait until the next election) to enrol or not. This change is no worse than the election bribe that Labour introduced in 2018 in an attempt to get students on side, and their desire to lower the voting age to allow children to vote. David Tordoff Dunedin What goes around April 1633: Pope Urban VIII bans scientist Galileo Galilei's book Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems on the grounds that it argues that the Earth revolves around the sun. The Pope and the Church hope that this scientific truth will just go away. It doesn't, but it takes 359 years for the Church to acknowledge it was wrong. July 2025: President Trump revokes the scientific declaration on the dangers of greenhouse gases, undermining the United States' work to control emissions. He and his supporters hope that the scientific truth of climate change will go away. Unfortunately, it won't, and unless we do something now there will be no-one around in 359 years' time to point this out. John Drummond Dunedin Shaking one's head at volume of false rhetoric Concerning Tony Vink's remarks (28.7.25) re Israel and its supposed non aggression. I was wondering what planet Mr Vink is from? The sheer volume of the false rhetoric is hard to believe in this day and age. To think there are still people in the world who think like this is beyond my comprehension. Is it any wonder the world is in the mess we are now. Y Palmer West Harbour On the other hand The upshot of Mr Peters' statement, and that of the other foreign ministers, is that it reinforces Hamas' belief that it is winning the war: this is because international opinion is with them, and that they are being recognised (but not for the terrorists they are). The above action by Mr Peters et al, has led to Hamas winding back the latest attempt at ceasefire talks, and Hamas increasing its demands to the point where it was obvious that any agreement was, and is impossible. Israel is being forced to negotiate with Hamas, rather than just deal with them. Hamas has taken this as them being legitimised as a representative of Gaza rather than the cancer that they are. Kevin Rogers Andersons Bay Hunters and all of us should be worried re 1080 After reading the ODT article (26.7.25) "Concern 1080 will lower deer numbers" hunters — indeed the public — should be concerned as the first part of the planned eradication of predators on 6000ha of Stewart Island was only a trial. Two drops of pre-feed to get animals used to feeding on baits were to be followed up by two drops of toxic bait, the first which has been carried out the second yet to come. The use of deer repellent is no guarantee. For that matter where is the guarantee that deer repellent, if it works, was actually used? Besides, how effective is deer repellent? Deaths of white-tail deer after the trial run raise that question. The poison is not authorised to be used on deer, yet in 1980-81 a formal study on the impact of 1080 on white-tail deer occurred on Stewart Island where a gel formulation containing 1080 poison was applied to broadleaf leaves for the control of white-tail deer, the end results being "this method was found to be very efficient at substantially reducing deer numbers". Although 1080 is not used to target deer, DOC seem more than happy: it does reduce deer numbers dramatically. Besides 1080 is an indiscriminate poison which also kills deer, birds and insects, i.e. any creature which ingests it. In addition a 1080 killed creature's body remains toxic and lethal to anything that scavenges it. A lot could be learned from the Fiordland Wapiti Foundation's trapping programme to protect blue duck in Fiordland. In some areas this has increased numbers considerably without using poisons. I think the estimated cost of $90 million to poison Stewart Island predators would go a long way to control them. Use of trapping and other ground control methods without poisoning non-target species is far more preferable. Extermination is impossible and I say "control", as making Stewart Island, along with mainland New Zealand, predator-free is impossible. Lewis Hore Oamaru
RNZ News
a day ago
- RNZ News
Electoral Commission rejects claims of Māori roll tampering
Photo: Getty Images / Hagen Hopkins The Chief Electoral Officer is adamant his commission is not changing people's enrolment details without their consent and is pleading with people struggling to access their enrolment details to get in touch. His comments come amidst a flood of claims on social media from Māori who allege their enrolment details have been changed, or erased, without their knowledge. Te Pāti Māori are seeking an explanation and has advised Crown Law it wants to look into the reports as part of a two-pronged legal action against the Electoral Commission. Chief Electoral Officer Karl Le Quesne. File photo. Photo: RNZ / Angus Dreaver Speaking to RNZ, the commission's top officer, Karl Le Quesne, said they have not and would not change anyone's details without their consent. "I can give you an assurance that we are not moving people from the Māori roll to the General roll or the other way, unless they're requesting that we do that," he said. The commission had been monitoring their online enrolment system "really" closely this week and had so far received 30,554 enrolments and updates - 92 percent of them made online. "We understand some people are having some trouble, so if you are, we really encourage you to call us on 0800 36 76 56 and we'll help you resolve it." Le Quesne said. It was likely those who could not find their details online were on the dormant roll, he said, echoing comments made by the commission's deputy chief executive of operations, Anusha Guler, earlier this week. "When we check today, we've got 114,451 people on the dormant role." According to the Electoral Commission 2023 General Election Report , the dormant roll contains voters who have been removed from the main roll for their electorate because they no longer live at an address and have not updated their enrolment details. At the election, there were 96,406 people on the dormant roll, and of those, 86 percent were on the general dormant roll while 14 percent were on the Māori dormant roll. Le Quesne said being on the dormant roll did not mean people had been taken off their main roll. "We don't switch roles for them when they go on the dormant role. We just need an address from them so we can update their enrollment." He said the system was designed to protect people's information, and getting your details "exact" was really important. The "auto-fill" feature on some people's mobile phones and laptops could be messing with an online entry. "We're really encouraging people to either turn off that auto-fill, or when it auto-fills, you delete it and try and find your address from the drop-down box, because that'll find the address that matches your enrollment record. "I tried myself this morning, and the auto-fill on my phone put in one address, but it wasn't exactly the address that I was enrolled under." People can go online to to enrol, check or update their details, or call 0800 36 76 56. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
a day ago
- RNZ News
'System just sucks': Political scientist says Māori being deterred from voting
Photo: RNZ / Sarah Robson A Māori political scientist says reports people have been removed from the electoral roll or shifted off the Māori roll could discourage some Māori from voting. Political scientist at Victoria University Lara Greaves was blunt in her assessment of New Zealand's voting system, calling it difficult to navigate, particularly when it comes to updating or changing enrolment details. "This system just sucks," she said. Past surveys have shown that a significant minority of people don't have a good understanding of the electoral system at all, she said. "So I think this whole system is set up in a way that is quite confusing, quite hōhā and quite bureaucratic and a bit annoying overall." Over the last several days social media has been awash with people checking their voter details only to find they are no longer enrolled or that they cannot find their enrolment details. Lloyd is a voter on the general roll, he checked his enrolment status on Thursday was unable to find his details and had to reenrol. He told RNZ it was like there was no record of him at all. "It just seemed very inflexible considering you want everyone to vote ... I hope they get on [and] start advertising and telling people 'please just go and check and you may have to do this from scratch and we're sorry' or something." Lloyd said he has been voting for about 30 years and last checked his voting details prior to the last election in 2023. Adding extra steps to the enrolment process just makes it that much harder, he said. "I just think they should fix the system so it's a little bit smarter and easier." Lloyd's kōrero follows that of Taryn Utiger, who told RNZ she had been put on the dormant roll despite updating her enrolment details three weeks prior. "They were like, yup ka pai you're on the Māori electorate roll, everything's good to go you will be able to vote in the local body elections and the referendum. I was like cool, thought that was the end of it, everything confirmed. Then I logged in last night and nothing." Lara Greaves. Photo: Supplied Greaves said there are realistic barriers between Māori enrolling to vote, including a lack of knowledge among poll workers about the Māori roll and a legacy of colonisation that has discouraged Māori from participating in the electoral system. "We know that there are barriers out there, and the barriers and perception of barriers do cause lower trust, lower trust in democracy. We go back decades and we can see that there have been a lot of barriers for Māori voters," she said. "All of this is contributing to a culture where people think 'hey why would I even bother voting they don't want my vote.'" Greaves said as the facilitator of New Zealand's democracy the Electoral Commission needs to be sufficiently staffed, especially in its IT department. "Could we just invest in an IT system, could we invest in a computer system, could we invest in more people on the ground and get better results. Democracy does need money, it does need investment, it does need personnel to run it and that doesn't seem to be the case at the moment." When a system has inequities those inequities tend to affect Māori, Pacific people and migrant communities more, she said. The Electoral Commission have said there were no technical issues with their online system. Its deputy chief executive of operation Anusha Guler said it was likely some people had been moved to the "dormant roll" because they had not got in contact with the commission for sometime. According to the Electoral Commission 2023 General Election Report, the dormant roll contains voters who have been removed from the main roll for their electorate because they no longer live at an address and have not updated their enrolment details. At the election, there were 96,406 people on the dormant roll and of those, 86 percent were on the general dormant roll while 14 percent were on the Māori dormant roll. Between 31 July and the 2023 election day, just under 78,000 people moved from dormant rolls to the main roll. Speaking to media yesterday, Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith said he was also concerned but the Electoral Commission had said there was no issue and if people were experiencing them, they should contact the commission directly. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
