US citizen granted Russian passport after spying for the Kremlin in Ukraine
Daniel Martindale, with a trim beard and dressed in a suit and tie, smiled as he received his new documents, as seen during a Russian state television broadcast a report on Tuesday.
"I, Daniel Richard Martindale, voluntarily and consciously accepting the citizenship of the Russian Federation, swear to observe the constitution," he said in Russian.
"The belief that Russia is not just my home, but also my family – I am extremely glad that this is not only in my heart, but also by law.'
Martindale grew up on farms in upstate New York and Indiana, the child of missionaries who later moved to rural China, according to a Wall Street Journal report.
A brief trip over the border into Russia's Far East during the family's time in China sparked Martindale's interest in Russia.
In 2018, Martindale, now in his early 30s, moved to Vladivostok, a Russian port city on the Pacific, where he studied Russian and taught English, before being deported a year later for violating labour laws, the Journal said.
He moved to southern Poland, but was keen to return to Russia, the Journal said.
In 2022, Martindale entered Ukraine just days before President Vladimir Putin ordered thousands of troops into Ukraine.
Martindale told reporters at a press conference last November that he established contact with pro-Russian forces via Telegram and passed them information on Ukrainian military facilities from the Donetsk region in the country's east.
Reuters was not able to contact Martindale to ask about his motivation for helping Russia.
A spokesperson for the U.S. State Department declined to comment.
On Tuesday, Denis Pushilin, the Moscow-installed leader of the Russian-controlled part of Donetsk region, presented Martindale with his Russian documents, which he said were awarded by a decree from Putin.
Pushilin expressed gratitude to Martindale, saying some of the information he had shared formed the basis for Russian planning to seize Kurakhove, a town near the key Ukrainian logistics hub of Pokrovsk.
Martindale "has long since proven with his loyalty and actions that he is one of us."
"For us, this (the Russian passport) is a sign of respect and a sign of gratitude for what Daniel has done."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Trump isn't a reliable ally – but Nato dollars can be more persuasive than Putin's propaganda
Before Donald Trump was a politician he was a property tycoon. Naturally, he thought he could fix the Ukraine war with a real-estate deal. In exchange for a ceasefire, Vladimir Putin would get to keep territory he had already seized. But before Putin was a politician he was a KGB agent who mourned the collapse of the Soviet Union. His idea of a fair solution begins with Ukraine's total submission to an imperial Russian motherland. There is no evidence that Trump was ever appalled by that ambition or by atrocities committed in pursuit of it. But he does now declare himself 'very unhappy' with the Russian president for intensifying hostilities in defiance of White House efforts to end the fighting. It isn't the killing that upsets the US president, but the ingratitude. Trump was offering Putin a hefty slice of Ukraine (not that the land was his to give away) and all he wanted in return was grounds to boast of his credentials as a peacemaker. Russian refusal to trade on those terms makes the White House look impotent, which is a good way to rile a prickly potentate. The manifestation of that pique is an agreement to supply Ukraine with vital anti-missile defence systems and a threat to impose 'severe' tariffs on Moscow if a ceasefire isn't forthcoming within 50 days. That is long enough for Trump to revert to his old habit of indulging the Kremlin. Also, his deadlines are famously elastic. It would be premature to celebrate the US president's recognition that Putin has been 'bullshitting' him as a symptom of strategic enlightenment, still less an affirmation of solidarity with Ukraine. The president who this week spoke of Kyiv's right to self-defence is the same one who only five months ago scorned Volodymyr Zelenskyy as the author of his nation's misfortune and a trickster who beguiled Joe Biden into handing over precious US resources to a lost military cause. Favour denied and then bestowed can be withdrawn again. Such is the Trump way. The current position may be temporary. That doesn't mean it lacks substance. The crucial change is that Zelenskyy and his European allies have convinced Trump that they are footing the bill for the war; that Ukrainian independence isn't a rip-off. The first stage of that persuasion was the creation of a co-owned investment fund for the exploitation of minerals, oil and gas in postwar Ukraine. Washington's 50% notional share of those resources was presented as 'repayment' for military aid. Then came the commitment by Nato members to raise their annual defence budgets to 5% of national income within a decade. The alliance's annual summit last month was choreographed almost exclusively to frame that pledge as a personal tribute to Trump. It wasn't an edifying spectacle. Mark Rutte, the Nato secretary general, didn't dignify his office by calling the US president 'daddy'. But the show seems to have impressed its target audience. At his post-summit press conference, Trump spoke of European resolve with unusual warmth. That fondness was on display again this week in a broadcast from the White House, where Trump, with Rutte at his side, declared that 'having a strong Europe is a very good thing'. He referred back to the 'very successful' Nato summit, the 5% pledge and a new arrangement whereby missile defences badly needed by Ukraine – the uniquely effective Patriot system – will be bought on Kyiv's behalf by its continental allies. Trump's point was not that the cause is just but that the price is paid by someone else. (The shift in posture reflects a judgment that Europe is a better client than the Kremlin.) Nato dollars beat Putin's bullshit. For now. That is a relief for Ukraine, but not much more. Patriots help provide cover for cities that have come under ferocious Russian bombardment, but they won't much alter the balance of power on the wider battlefield. The Kremlin continues to eke out territorial gains at huge cost in casualties. Ukrainian forces continue to mount a heroic defence and sometimes pull off bravura feats of counterattack, but panache cannot resist sheer weight of population indefinitely. Putin's plan is more arithmetic than strategy. He intends to keep feeding soldiers into the 'meat-grinder', as Russians call the front, until there aren't enough Ukrainians left with the strength or weapons to fight back. That is why the economic front – especially sanctions that target Moscow's ability to raise revenue from oil and gas exports – is so vital, and why Trump's readiness to reinforce that effort, if sincere, would be truly significant. Putin might reasonably assume it is a bluff, or a passing whim. But the Russian president may also have overplayed his hand. He has less control over events than his biggest fans and most anxious detractors imagine. Kremlin propaganda cultivates the myth of the great and visionary leader bestriding history. That image is refracted through foreign lenses as the shadow of an omnipotent puppeteer, tugging at strings that pull down western democracies. The truth is still sinister but more banal. Putin is the boss of bosses in a gangster kleptocracy where the security services are the paramount clan. Ultranationalist ideology and a personality cult around the president are embedded in all public discourse as tests of loyalty. Who really believes what is hard to know when the penalties for saying the wrong thing are severe. The economy is geared for total war from top to bottom, from industries that churn out munitions to the signing-on fees for volunteers and compensation payments to bereaved families that sustain remote regions where soldiering is the only work. Putin has repeatedly told Russians they are engaged in an existential struggle with the west, equivalent to resistance against Nazi invasion in 1941. If he now stopped the war in exchange for a percentage of eastern Ukraine, it wouldn't be the victory he has promised. He has mobilised patriotic fervour to silence doubt about the wisdom of the struggle and the implicit payback is national glory. If the fighting ends on more desultory terms, he will face angry mothers whose sons died in vain. He will have to find civilian jobs for disillusioned veterans. Those are problems he would rather defer. It is easier to keep riding the conveyor of death than step off it for a deal like the one Trump has in mind – a deal, it must be emphasised, that is still grotesquely generous in rewarding unprovoked aggression. Putin's reluctance to take that option is not the choice of a strategic mastermind, but nor was the full-scale invasion in February 2022. Plan A was to overrun Ukraine within days. The Russian president badly underestimated his adversary then. Plan B is slow butchery and patience, hoping the other side runs out of ammunition and will. Stringing Trump along may prove to have been another grave error of judgment. Ukraine and its more dependable allies must hope so, and press the advantage hard while it lasts. Rafael Behr is a Guardian columnist
Daily Record
an hour ago
- Daily Record
Ukraine hails 'Agent Melania' after Trump admits First Lady explained Putin's lies
Ukrainians have hailed Melania Trump as an unlikely 'undercover agent' after explaining Vladimir Putin's lies to the US President Ukrainians have lauded Melania Trump as an unexpected "undercover agent" after the US President disclosed that it was his wife who persuaded him to change his stance on Vladimir Putin. Following another collapse in US-Russia peace negotiations, Donald Trump openly acknowledged that it was the First Lady who consistently revealed Putin's deceit, leading to his stark change of attitude towards Moscow. "I go home, I tell the First Lady: I spoke with Vladimir today. We had a wonderful conversation," Trump recounted. "She said: Really? Another city was just hit." The US President will meet Keir Starmer in Scotland later this month to discuss, among other things, Ukraine peace talks. He continued: "We thought we had a deal numerous times. I get home, I'd say, 'First Lady, I had the most wonderful talk with Vladimir. I think we're finished.' And then I'd turn on the television or she'll say to me one time, 'Well that's strange because they just bombed a nursing home.'" These comments, interpreted by many as evidence of Trump's mounting irritation with Putin, have generated a flurry of commendation for Melania on pro-Ukrainian social media platforms, reports the Mirror US. Subsequent to the president's statement, a user on platform X circulated a doctored image of "Agent Melania Trumpenko" donning a wide-brimmed hat and a military-style jacket adorned with the Ukrainian Armed Forces badge. "Plenty of affection for Melania Trump across Ukrainian social media this evening," shared the publication Business Ukraine, accompanied by a meme depicting three cartoon figures ceremoniously placing a traditional Ukrainian hat upon her head. "Melania single-handedly doing more for Ukraine than the entire GOP," remarked user Ernő Buzás. On Monday, Trump caught a seasoned BBC journalist off guard with an unexpected late-night telephone call that nearly resulted in him missing the interview because he was fast asleep. The US president conducted an unplanned interview from the White House that covered topics ranging from Vladimir Putin to the NATO alliance, plus the assassination attempt that almost claimed his life. Respected Gary O'Donoghue, the BBC's Chief North America political correspondent, had spent several days pursuing a potential interview to commemorate a year since the shooting at a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania. However, after no call materialised, he had abandoned hope until his telephone rang whilst he slumbered. Discussing Trump's tendency to ring journalists unexpectedly, O'Donoghue revealed: "On Monday evening, it was my turn. And I'll be frank with you - I was asleep when the White House rang. "I'd spent the best part of five days believing there was an outside chance I would get an interview with him, to mark a year since the attempt on his life in Butler, Pennsylvania." O'Donoghue then recounted the call. "Hi, Gary, I'm here with the president. Here you go," said Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt. During the candid 20-minute chat, Trump displayed a rare introspective mood when questioned about whether the shooting had altered him. "I don't like dwelling on it because if I did, it would be, you know, might be life-changing," he remarked. "I like the power of positive thinking, or the power of positive non-thinking."
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Russia may hope to use Trump's 50-day window to wear down Ukraine, but quick gains seem unlikely
President Donald Trump's ultimatum to Russia to accept a peace deal in Ukraine within 50 days or face bruising sanctions on its energy exports has given the Kremlin extra time to pursue its summer offensive. The dogged Ukrainian resistance, however, makes it unlikely that the Russian military will make any quick gains. President Vladimir Putin has declared repeatedly that any peace deal should see Ukraine withdraw from the four regions that Russia illegally annexed in September 2022 but never fully captured. He also wants Ukraine to renounce its bid to join NATO and accept strict limits on its armed forces -– demands Kyiv and its Western allies have rejected. A chronic shortage of manpower and ammunition has forced Ukrainian forces to focus on holding ground rather than launching counteroffensives. But despite a renewed Russian push — and an onslaught of aerial attacks on Kyiv and other cities in recent weeks — Ukrainian officials and analysts say it remains unlikely that Moscow can achieve any territorial breakthrough significant enough in 50 days to force Ukraine into accepting the Kremlin's terms anytime soon. Russia's main targets Since spring, Russian troops have accelerated their land gains, capturing the most territory in eastern Ukraine since the opening stages of Moscow's full-scale invasion in 2022. Russian forces are closing in on the eastern strongholds of Pokrovsk and Kostyantynivka in the Donetsk region, methodically capturing villages near both cities to try to cut key supply routes and envelop their defenders — a slow offensive that has unfolded for months. Capturing those strongholds would allow Russia to push toward Slovyansk and Kramatorsk, setting the stage for the seizure of the entire Donetsk region. If Russian troops seize those last strongholds, it would open the way for them to forge westward to the Dnipropetrovsk region. The regional capital of Dnipro, a major industrial hub of nearly 1 million, is about 150 kilometers (just over 90 miles) west of Russian positions. The spread of fighting to Dnipropetrovsk could damage Ukrainian morale and give the Kremlin more leverage in any negotiations. In the neighboring Luhansk region, Ukrainian troops control a small sliver of land, but Moscow has not seemed to prioritize its capture. The other two Moscow-annexed regions — Kherson and Zaporizhzhia — seem far from being totally overtaken by Russia. Early in the war, Russia quickly overran the Kherson region but pulled back from large swaths of it in November 2022, retreating to the eastern bank of the Dnieper River. A new attempt to cross the waterway to seize the rest of the region would involve massive challenges, and Moscow doesn't seem to have the capability to mount such an operation. Fully capturing the Zaporizhzhia region appears equally challenging. Russian attempts to establish a 'buffer zone' Moscow's forces captured several villages in northeastern Ukraine's Sumy region after reclaiming chunks of Russia's Kursk region from Ukrainian troops who staged a surprise incursion in August 2024. Ukraine says its forces have stopped Russia's offensive and maintain a presence on the fringe of the Kursk region, where they are still tying down as many as 10,000 Russian troops. Putin recently described the offensive into the Sumy region as part of efforts to carve a 'buffer zone' to protect Russian territory from Ukrainian attacks. The regional capital of Sumy, a city of 268,000, is about 30 kilometers (less than 20 miles) from the border. Putin said Moscow doesn't plan to capture the city for now but doesn't exclude it. Military analysts, however, say Russian forces in the area clearly lack the strength to capture it. Russian forces also have pushed an offensive in the neighboring Kharkiv region, but they haven't made much progress against fierce Ukrainian resistance. Some commentators say Russia may hope to use its gains in the Sumy and Kharkiv regions as bargaining chips in negotiations, trading them for parts of the Donetsk region under Ukrainian control. 'A scenario of territorial swaps as part of the talks is quite realistic,' said Mikhail Karyagin, a Kremlin-friendly political expert, in a commentary, Wearing down Ukraine with slow pressure Ukrainian commanders say the scale and pace of Russian operations suggest that any game-changing gains are out of reach, with Moscow's troops advancing slowly at a tremendous cost to its own forces. While exhausted Ukrainian forces are feeling outnumbered and outgunned, they are relying on drones to stymie Moscow's slow offensive. Significant movements of troops and weapons are easily spotted by drones that are so prolific that both sides use them to track and attack even individual soldiers within minutes. Russian military commentators recognize that Ukraine's drone proficiency makes any quick gains by Moscow unlikely. They say Russia aims to bleed Ukraine dry with a strategy of 'a thousand cuts,' using relentless pressure on many sectors of the front and steadily increasing long-range aerial attacks against key infrastructure. 'The Russian army aims to exhaust the enemy to such an extent that it will not be able to hold the defense, and make multiple advances merge into one or several successes on a strategic scale that will determine the outcome of the war,' Moscow-based military analyst Sergei Poletayev wrote in an analysis. 'It's not that important where and at what speed to advance: the target is not the capture of this or that line; the target is the enemy army as such.' Western supplies are essential for Ukraine Ukrainian troops on the front express exasperation and anger about delays and uncertainty about U.S. weapons shipments. Delays in U.S. military assistance have forced Kyiv's troops to ration ammunition and scale back operations as Russia intensifies its attacks, Ukrainian soldiers in eastern Ukraine told The Associated Press. The United States will sell weapons to its NATO allies in Europe so they can provide them to Ukraine, according to Trump and U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio. Included are Patriot air defense systems, a top priority for Ukraine. Speeded-up weapons shipments from European allies are crucial to allowing Ukraine to stem the Russian attacks, according to analysts. 'The rate of Russian advance is accelerating, and Russia's summer offensive is likely to put the armed forces of Ukraine under intense pressure,' Jack Watling of the Royal United Services Institute in London said in a commentary. But most of the capabilities that Ukraine needs — from drones to artillery systems — can be provided by NATO allies in Europe, he said. 'In the short-term, Europe can cover most of Ukraine's needs so long as it can purchase some critical weapons types from the U.S.,' Watling said. ___
