More than half of Discovery's medical aid plans saw declines in members last year
Two of the largest plans, Classic Comprehensive and income-limited KeyCare Plus, saw year-on-year declines of 7% and 11% respectively. Picture: Moneyweb
A full nine of the 16 core Discovery Health Medical Scheme (DHMS) medical plan options saw declines in members in 2024 from 2023. This is according to the scheme's annual report, which was released ahead of its AGM at the end of June.
Seven of its core plans saw increases, but one of these was for the new Classic Smart Comprehensive plan which was launched in 2023 (it removed its Essential Comprehensive plan in 2023).
The 16 core plans exclude any 'efficiency' discount options, such as Delta and Regional plans, which provide cover at specific networks of hospitals.
Overall, DHMS saw a net membership decrease of 1.05% in the 2024 calendar year and a net beneficiary decrease of 1.9%.
It ended the year on 1.359 million members and 2.735 million beneficiaries. Between December 2024 and January 2025, 94.89% of members did not change plans, while 2.89% were upgraded and 2.23% were downgraded.
ALSO READ: Discovery has a massive medical scheme problem
Four plans saw year-on-year declines in excess of 5%, with two of its largest plans, Classic Comprehensive and income-limited KeyCare Plus, seeing year-on-year declines of 7% and 11% respectively. Its Classic Comprehensive has seen declines in members and beneficiaries for a number of years now.
As a measure, in the Covid-19-hit 2020, it ended the year with 111 632 members on Classic Comprehensive. That means it has lost 26% of the member base on that plan in four years.
The average age of DHMS members has crept up to 37.59 (from 37). It says 'an increase of less than one year per annum is favourable as this indicates that young people are joining the Scheme'. This is a major looming problem for the scheme.
Practically, its only growth over the last decade has been from taking on the administration of restricted schemes, like Bankmed and Sasolmed.
DHMS says 'consistent with the stagnant South African economy, the medical scheme industry has also remained stagnant over the past decade, with a slight increase in membership of 0.98% in 2023 compared to 2022'.
This means that, structurally, the industry and DHMS as the largest scheme have a looming problem: members are ageing.
In the last 16 years, the average age of lives covered by DHMS has jumped from 32.3 to 37.6.
ALSO READ: Discovery Group records profit, thanks to Discovery Bank
Targeting young professionals
In an effort to address this, it launched a new Active Smart Plan with a contribution of R1 350 per month, specifically to target young professionals.
It says this is the most affordable option in the open scheme market.
Research by Discovery Health shows that 'for members aged 20-29, approximately 7% of their income goes toward medical scheme contributions, whereas for older working adults approximately 4% or lower of their monthly income goes toward medical scheme contributions'.
It estimates that 109 000 uncovered young professionals would take up medical scheme cover if there was an affordable option and where contributions amount to roughly 5% of their income.
Its Smart plans, which target young professionals (mostly) with young families, remain the fastest-growing plans across its portfolio. Classic Smart grew members by 10% last year, while Essential Smart grew by 26%. Both plans ended 2023 with around 72 000 members, making them larger (by members) than all but four other Discovery medical aid plans (excluding the income-linked KeyCare Plus plan).
ALSO READ: Higher medical aid premiums on the horizon following RAF's legal victory?
Contributions
DHMS contends that its contributions are 12.7% 'more affordable than the next seven largest open schemes across all plan categories in 2025'.
On extensive day-to-day plans, its contributions are 8.2% lower and on limited day-to-day plans, they are 16.5% lower.
It says it continues to 'provide exceptional claims cover for members'.
In 2022, DHMS paid 96% of in-hospital claims versus 91% for all other open schemes. Detailed data for 2023 has not yet been released by the Council for Medical Schemes.
Source: DHMS
DHMS notes that utilisation rates have returned to pre-Covid 19 levels. It saw a 7.48% increase in net claims.
Source: DHMS
It says 'claiming patterns are influenced by a changing burden of disease, demographics and benefit design'.
'Based on an analysis of the Scheme's claims experience, cardiovascular remains the disease episode with the highest risk spend, accounting for the highest proportion of the Scheme's overall claims cost.
'While tumours have surpassed musculoskeletal claims (which have remained proportionally consistent from 2022 to 2024), increase in the former is partially driven by benefit availability.'
This article was republished from Moneyweb. Read the original here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
11 hours ago
- The Citizen
More incidents of unexplained debit order activity
Clients need to be 'super alert' at all times. Think twice before sharing your banking details with anyone for any reason. Picture: Sebastian Gollnow/AFP/Getty Images South African bank clients continue to report confusing and unresolved cases involving debit orders they say they did not authorise. Following Moneyweb's recent article on disputed DebiCheck transactions, an Absa customer said she recently received a DebiCheck notification on her banking app for R8 812, which she rejected. After taking a screenshot and logging off, the notification vanished entirely. The request turned out to originate from a mobile service provider and referenced her existing contract number. Neither the bank nor the service provider had any record of the DebiCheck request. 'Ultimately, a customer has to be super alert at all times, which is exhausting to say the least,' she says. ALSO READ: Mystery debit orders leave bank client without answers 'Holistic fraud strategy' In response to Moneyweb's query, Absa notes that its fraud team performs ongoing monitoring and blocks suspicious activity. 'We have also incorporated dark web monitoring into our holistic fraud strategy.' The bank maintains that complaint volumes involving DebiCheck debit orders have remained stable. DebiCheck, introduced in 2017 to curb debit order fraud, requires customers to authorise a debit order mandate before the first collection. Once authorised, transactions should match the original mandate, and customers can dispute unauthorised deductions. Absa says it assists customers in recovering funds if disputes are found to be valid. ALSO READ: DebiCheck will protect you from unauthorised debit orders come 1 May Incident at FNB Another Moneyweb reader reported an incident involving his wife's FNB account, which was debited by a mobile service provider without her prior authorisation. 'There was no record of her ever signing such a debit order, nor was she asked by FNB to verify or authorise the transaction,' he says. Ravi Shunmugam, CEO of FNB EFT, told Moneyweb there have been instances where customers raised concerns about unauthorised debit orders. 'However, in these circumstances, we found that the customer's information had been compromised outside of the banking environment.' ALSO READ: Reserve bank teaches customers about AC DebiCheck He stressed that FNB takes these matters seriously and conducts a full investigation. The bank assists customers in disputing the debit order and placing a 'stop payment' on the account. The matter is then escalated to the sponsoring bank and the service provider. Customers can also report fraud directly via the FNB app by uploading an affidavit, a copy of their ID, and a bank statement reflecting the disputed debit order. 'DebiCheck has many validation and compliance requirements prior to the debit order being processed and [it] is always checked against the mandate that the customer has authorised prior to the debit order being processed.' Shunmugam says FNB has not recorded any incidents of internal fraud involving debit orders and customer accounts to date. 'We perform all relevant due diligence and compliance checks.' ALSO READ: Mystery R99 debit hits SA accounts 'Questionable' sales processes Shunmugam cautions that the problem may lie with service providers when the origination process takes place in a 'sales environment outside of the bank'. 'These sales or contracting processes can be questionable.' Moneyweb has seen consumer reports on social media alleging that third-party sales agents – often for products such as insurance – asked them to swipe their bank cards and enter their PINs at point-of-sale devices under the pretext of 'affordability checks'. Some later discovered they had unintentionally authorised a debit order, which proved difficult to cancel. Shunmugam encourages clients to remain vigilant and carefully evaluate what they are agreeing to before sharing their banking details. He adds that debit order compromises likely occur during the sales or contracting process – when clients share their details with third parties – rather than through the bank or payment system. This article was republished from Moneyweb. Read the original here.
The Citizen
a day ago
- The Citizen
Nersa's mistakes will hit you hard
Eskom gave a presentation to Nersa, proposing the number of tariffs be reduced from 10 to three. The courts have ruled in favour of Eskom in almost all of its applications against Nersa, and the trend looks set to continue. Picture: Shutterstock Moneyweb has learnt that consumers will have to cough up at least R40 billion more for Eskom following a settlement between the utility and the energy regulator Nersa. This pertains to mistakes Nersa's made in several decisions regarding Eskom's revenue and tariffs. This amount may increase as Eskom has launched a fresh challenge to Nersa's latest decisions regarding the utility's revenue and tariffs for the current and the next two financial years. Eskom's court application is the latest in a string of challenges to Nersa decisions, almost all ruled in favour of Eskom. Moneyweb has learnt that several such applications were settled between the two parties in May. This was not widely communicated at the time. The settlement, which was made an order of the court, pertains to clawbacks spanning the financial years 2015 to 2021. ALSO READ: Ekurhuleni metro and Nersa lock horns over electricity tariff discrepancy Clawbacks The clawback mechanism is designed to retrospectively compensate either the utility or its customers for variations in the assumptions underlying the revenue determination, such as sales volumes. The compensation is done by adjusting electricity tariffs in following years. Eskom disputed the amount Nersa decided it was entitled to claw back in each year from 2015 to 2021. Following the settlement Eskom is entitled to recover in total R40 billion more from consumers for underrecovery over the period due to mistakes made by Nersa. In terms of the order, Nersa will decide on the timing of this recovery. ALSO READ: Nersa's municipal tariff process flawed, says Sapoa Nersa still making mistakes? Eskom now alleges that Nersa's latest revenue and tariff determination for the current and next two financial years is also flawed. This will be on the agenda of Nersa's electricity subcommittee during a special meeting on Wednesday (16 July). It follows an application by Eskom to the Gauteng Division of the High Court to have the decision reviewed and set aside. Nersa announced in January that it had approved revenues of R384.6 billion for Eskom for the current financial year, which translated to an average percentage increase of 12.74%. This took effect on 1 April. ALSO READ: The silent 77.5% rise of your electricity bill The allowable revenue approved for 2026/7 is R409.5 billion, which translates to an average increase of 5.36% and for 2027/8 it is R435.8 billion, which translates to an average increase of 6.19%. This is considerably lower than the amounts Eskom applied for, which would have meant increases of 36.15%, 11.81%, and 9.1% in the three consecutive years. Following Nersa's publication of the reason for its decision early last month, Eskom filed an application to have the decision reviewed and set aside specifically regarding Nersa's treatment of the Regulatory Asset Base (RAB). Moneyweb has reliably learnt that Nersa has not yet indicated whether it will oppose the application. Presumably the meeting on Wednesday will make a recommendation to the electricity regulator, which will then take a final decision. The formulation of the agenda point however indicates that Nersa may have accepted Eskom's argument and is open to settling the matter. It reads: 'Correction of error on the Eskom sixth multi-year price determination decision (MYPD6) Regulatory Asset Base section and proposed settlement.' ALSO READ: Nersa approves 12.7% electricity tariff hike for Eskom Eskom's arguments In an affidavit supporting its court application, Eskom CFO Calib Cassim sets out in detail – some of it quite technical – the mistakes that Eskom contends Nersa has made. This includes attaching a zero value to several operational power stations, including Koeberg. He shows that the value attached to the RAB is key to determining the returns Eskom is entitled to – and that Nersa's downward adjustments of the RAB in each of the three years dealt with in the tariff application cost the utility about R30 billion in total. Cassim says that Nersa, in taking the decision, exceeded its powers and acted inconsistently with its own methodology and with an earlier court order dealing with the same subject. ALSO READ: 30% electricity tariff increase is a reality, says Erasa He states that Nersa's decision is irrational and unreasonable. Cassim points out that Nersa's flawed approach to the RAB only applies to the application by Eskom's generation business. Those of the National Transmission Company of South Africa, a wholly owned subsidiary dealing with transmission, and the distribution business, were dealt with correctly, in Eskom's view. In addition, there are discrepancies between some of the numbers in the press release Nersa issued in January announcing its decision and those in the document issued in June setting out the reasons for its decision. ALSO READ: Eskom proposes further tariff restructuring to ensure 'transparency and fairness' Cassim further argues that the condition Nersa set for its approval of the utility's revenue – that it submit a revaluation of its RAB, with the first clawback application following the 2025/6 financial year – is unrealistic and impossible. Such a revaluation takes at least 30 months and is an expensive exercise, according to Cassim. Any adjustments in Eskom's favour will be reflected in future increases in electricity tariffs. This comes against the backdrop of widespread concern about the affordability of electricity, with Minister of Electricity and Energy Kgosientso Ramokgopa saying that South Africans must increasingly choose between buying food and buying electricity. He said even middle-class South Africans are battling to afford electricity. This article was republished from Moneyweb. Read the original here.
The Citizen
07-07-2025
- The Citizen
City of Tshwane clamps down on illegal land use
More than 713 property owners to be slammed with penalty rates. Ensuring compliance is 'crucial for maintaining the integrity of the city's development plans and ensuring sustainable growth'. Picture: Supplied The Tshwane city council has approved the implementation of penalty rates on 713 property owners identified by the administration for illegal land use and failure to take remedial action. This includes some illegal developments as well as individual properties spread all over the city that are being used for purposes in contravention of the current zoning. These properties will now be recategorised for rates purposes as 'unpermitted use' and the owners compelled to pay penalty rates. Ben Espach, director at Rates Watch, previously said the rates for a residential property valued at R1 million amount to R1 016 per month, before applying any rebates. If the same property is classified as non-permitted use, this would increase to R7 628 per month (based on 2023/24 tariffs). ALSO READ: Tshwane to consider demolishing houses in illegal developments Missing out on billions in property rates Republican Conference of Tshwane councillor Lex Middelberg calculated that the cash-strapped metro is missing out on more than R3 billion in property rates by failing to impose penalty rates on around 20 identified illegal developments comprising almost 20 000 'erven'. The current Tshwane administration has seemingly taken this to heart and has resolved to act. Executive mayor Dr Nasipho Moya recently appointed a sub-committee to develop a response to the increasing illegal developments. A report by the sub-committee that Moneyweb has seen, which is expected to serve before council later this month, acknowledges penalty rates as one option, but seems hesitant in this regard. One of the other options it proposes is to demolish illegal structures, which may affect more than 10 000 houses. Member of the mayoral committee for economic development and spatial planning Sarah Mabotsa has in the meantime taken action and obtained council approval for imposing penalty rates on 713 non-compliant property owners. ALSO READ: Kleinfontein is not an illegal township, maintains CEO Severe implications 'The non-permitted land use activities range from unauthorised commercial activities in residential zones, through to illegal construction and land encroachments,' says Mabotsa in a statement. 'The implications of these violations on the city and its residents are significant, as they can lead to loss of revenue, inability to access critical servitudes, offer unfair land use activity and commercial advantages to transgressors, increase the costs of policing for the city, and can have potential safety and legal liabilities. 'The suburbs where these illegal land use activities have been identified are literally an 'A to Z' – Arcadia to Zwavelpoort – of the City of Tshwane,' she adds. The areas or farms include Alphenpark, Annlin, Arcadia, Ashlea Gardens, Atteridgeville, Bon Accord, Booysens, Brooklyn, Capital Park, De Onderstepoort, Derdepoort, Die Wilgers, Eersterust, Elandsfontein, Eldoraigne, Ga-Rankuwa, Garsfontein, Haakdoornboom, Hartebeesfontein, Hazelwood, Kameeldrift, Kleinfontein, Kudube, Laudium, Magalieskruin, Montana, Moreleta Park, Olievenhoutbosch, Onderstepoort, Pretoria Central, Pretoria North, Silverton, Sinoville, Soshanguve, Sunnyside, The Reeds, The Willows, Waterkloof, Witfontein and Zwavelpoort. While several large illegal township developments are included in this list – for example those occurring on one or two large properties at Elandsfontein, Haakdoornboom, Kleinfontein, Kudube, and Onderstepoort – non-permitted land use activities have also been identified several individual smaller properties in Pretoria Central, Pretoria North, Sunnyside, Sinoville, Witfontein and Silverton. Mabotsa says the 713 properties have a combined municipal value of R1.3 billion, with the average property value being R1.9 million. She notes that the city's department of economic development and spatial planning receives numerous complaints related to contraventions of zoning, national building regulations and its outdoor advertising by-law. ALSO READ: Opposition in Tshwane offers 'solution' for Kleinfontein rates problem Proactive and reactive measures 'The recommendation to implement non-permitted land use rates is one mechanism we use to encourage landowners engaged in non-[compliant] land use activities to correct their actions,' says Mabotsa. 'To identify illegal land use activities, law enforcement officials in Tshwane utilise a combination of proactive and reactive measures. 'Proactive measures include regular inspections and patrolling, as well as satellite imagery to detect unauthorised activities. Reactive measures involve responding to complaints and reports from the public.' Once an illegal activity is confirmed, contravention notices are served to the owners of the property to rectify the contraventions. If the contraventions are not rectified, the matter may be referred to the courts for criminal prosecution. ALSO READ: 'Obvious sore point'- EFF to march to exclusive Afrikaner township Kleinfontein Land use contraventions, if not corrected, are referred to city's finance department to implement rates and taxes for non-permitted land use. After the landowner has addressed the illegal activity, the economic development and spatial planning department informs the city's property valuation section so that the finance department can reverse or terminate the tariff for that owner, Mabotsa explains. 'Ensuring more compliant land use activities is crucial for maintaining the integrity of the City of Tshwane's development plans and ensuring sustainable growth,' she adds. 'By implementing the non-permitted land use policies, the city can better manage land use violations, protect its financial interests, and promote a more orderly and compliant, equitable development environment for all its residents.' ALSO READ: WATCH: 'Apartheid and Kleinfontein can't be mentioned in the same sentence' says Afrikaner community after MK party visit Preventing chaotic urban sprawl The economic development and spatial planning department has indicated that the implementation of the non-permitted land use rates and taxes, in terms of the Municipal Property Rates Act and bylaws, is currently by far the most powerful and successful manner used to force the discontinuation of illegal land uses, according to Matsopa. 'Township establishment laws are designed to prevent chaotic urban sprawl and ensure that city infrastructure keeps pace with development. 'For example, when an estate is established legally, the developers contribute to the cost of expanding roads, water, sewage and electricity services. Those costs that are then passed on to property purchasers.' When a development happens illegally, developer contributions could unfairly be expected to be paid for by all other ratepayers. ALSO READ: Tshwane municipality issues warning to landlords illegally subdividing apartments 'Illegal developments can also place too much strain on available electricity or other services in an area,' says Mabotsa. 'Legal development processes also protect homeowners and residents. The processes ensure that homes are built on stable land and not in environmentally vulnerable areas. 'In some illegal estates, there has also been no formal subdivision of the land. 'This means that purchasers in illegal estates may not actually own the land that they live on,' she points out. 'From a broader sustainability perspective, allowing illegal developments to flourish risks destroying prime agricultural land or biodiversity hotspots, weakening both food security and ecological resilience.' This article was republished from Moneyweb. Read the original here.
