Government toughens trespassing laws
Photo:
RNZ / Mark Papalii
The maximum length of time someone can be trespassed from a business, as well as the maximum fines, are set to increase, under proposed changes announced by the government.
But how retailers will be supported to issue trespass notices is still to be worked through.
The proposed changes to the Trespass Act include:
Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith said before the legislation is introduced, the government would explore how best to support retailers when distributing notices to those who refused to engage.
He said New Zealand's trespass laws were no longer fit for purpose.
"They're difficult to enforce and often criminals take no notice. They return with impunity and just continue to rob businesses of their livelihoods."
The policy is the latest in a series of law and order announcements the government has made over the past week.
It also plans to introduce stronger penalties for shoplifting, increase maximum sentences for those who assault first responders or prison officers, and introduce legislation to make coward punching a specific offence.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
5 hours ago
- RNZ News
Rereamanu Ronaki-Wihapi named as murderer who twice ran down Taku Manu Paul in Te Puke
By Ric Stevens, Open Justice reporter of Rereamanu Ronaki-Wihapi was found guilty of murder for the death of his mother's partner, Taku Manu Paul, on Boxing Day 2022. Photo: NZ Herald / Belinda Feek A teenager who ran down his mother's partner with a car and killed him can now be named as Rereamanu Ronaki-Wihapi. Ronaki-Wihapi is serving a 17-year prison sentence for murdering Taku Manu Paul, with no prospect of parole for seven years. He was just 17 at the time and sitting next to his mother Ephron Ronaki, who was Paul's partner and arguing with him on the phone about missing Christmas money. Ronaki-Wihapi was sentenced in October last year but can only now be named and identified as Ronaki's son, after the release of a Court of Appeal decision. The ruling turned down his lawyer's attempt to win him permanent name suppression and quashed one of his two convictions. Ronaki-Wihapi and his mother went looking for Paul on Boxing Day 2022 because she believed her partner had taken $500, which had been a Christmas present to her. The teenager was driving because Ronaki was very drunk. They spotted Paul on a Te Puke street and, with his mother initially egging him on, Ronaki-Wihapi ran into Paul, then turned around and deliberately drove over him as he lay on the ground. In an unusual result which was due to a charging error, Ronaki-Wihapi received two different convictions for culpable homicide - one for murder and one for manslaughter - in relation to the same victim. The Court of Appeal has now quashed the manslaughter count, saying the two convictions cannot stand together. Ronaki-Wipahi, now 20, had no criminal history before the night he killed Paul. However, court documents say that he had a history of post-traumatic stress disorder and depression. At trial, his defence counsel, Ron Mansfield KC, said he had been "a traumatised teen put in a situation of extreme stress". The trial was told that Ronaki told her son to "hit him, do it now, run him over" when they spotted Paul. The teenager hit Paul with the car twice, the first time on the left side with such force that Paul was thrown on to the windscreen before landing on the road. With chaos breaking out among the people in the vehicle, Ronaki-Wihapi then did a U-turn and aimed the Nissan Teana directly at Paul as he was lying on the road, driving over his chest, and away from the scene at speed. Ronaki-Wihapi said he was "in the moment" when he lined up on the prone man's head "and just boosted it", as his mother reached across and grabbed the steering wheel in an unsuccessful attempt to alter his course. Pathologists could not say for sure which of the two strikes, which could have been as little as 13 seconds apart, killed Paul. The whole incident, including the two impacts, was over within a minute and 14 seconds. Ronaki-Wihapi was charged with murder separately for each impact. At a jury trial, he was found not guilty of murder but guilty of manslaughter for the first hit, and guilty of murder for the second strike. He was sentenced to 17 years' imprisonment with no parole for seven years on the murder charge, and a lesser concurrent sentence for manslaughter. His mother was sent to prison for four years and three months after being convicted of manslaughter for her part in Paul's death. She was also convicted of attempting to pervert the course of justice by claiming she had been the driver. Mansfield appealed Ronaki-Wihapi's murder conviction to the Court of Appeal, along with the High Court's refusal to grant his young client permanent name suppression. Before hearing the matter, the Court of Appeal advised him that it believed Ronaki-Wihapi could not be convicted twice of a culpable homicide relating to the same victim. Ephron Ronaki (centre) was sentenced to four years and three months for manslaughter of her part in the death of her partner, Taku Manu Paul. Photo: NZ Herald / Belinda Feek In its decision, it held that Ronaki-Wihapi should have either faced a single charge to cover both impacts, or two charges laid in the alternative. "The short point is that there was a charging error in this case," the Court of Appeal justices said. "Mr Ronaki-Wihapi should not have faced two cumulative charges of murder for the death of Mr Paul. "He should either have faced a single charge, particularised in a way that alleged that it was satisfied either by the first impact or alternatively by the second impact, or two charges of murder advanced in the alternative," the appeal court decision said. "The verdicts of manslaughter and murder cannot stand together." The appeal court determined that as the jury found Paul was still alive at the moment of the second impact, the manslaughter conviction should not stand in relation to the first hit. The murder conviction, which related to the second impact, was upheld. The Court of Appeal decision also said the threshold that an offender would suffer "extreme hardship" if his identity was published was not met in relation to name suppression. There was no presumption in favour of suppression outside the Youth Court, youth was not a particularly relevant factor in this case, and any effect on Ronaki-Wihapi's future employment prospects would be a consequence of the conviction, not the publication of his name. There was also a high public interest in identifying those convicted of murder, the Court of Appeal said. * This story originally appeared in the New Zealand Herald .
RNZ News
8 hours ago
- RNZ News
Massey University aviation student Marc Dmello accused of sharing child abuse videos from campus
By Jeremy Wilkinson, Open Justice reporter of Marc Dmello is an aspiring pilot and was studying a Bachelor of Aviation before transferring to Aviation Management. Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone A Massey University student and aspiring pilot has been accused of sharing videos on social media of children being sexually abused. Until now, aviation student Marc Dmello, 20, hasn't been able to be named. While he was on the Palmerston North campus, Dmello is accused of using five separate accounts on an overseas-based platform to send the videos to other site users. The website detected the activity and filed reports with the National Centre for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC), a non-governmental organisation based in the United States, which forwarded the reports to the New Zealand Customs Service. Customs then identified that the alleged offending had occurred at Massey University in Palmerston North. A warrant was executed in December last year at Dmello's home, and a forensic examination of his laptop and mobile phone was conducted. Dmello is now facing five representative charges of exporting an objectionable publication and five representative charges of distributing objectionable publications. He unsuccessfully sought name suppression during a hearing in the Palmerston North District Court but appealed that decision to the High Court. The High Court dismissed his appeal on 5 June and the appeal period for that ruling has now expired, meaning that NZME can now name him. According to Justice Karen Grau's ruling, Dmello is an aspiring pilot and was studying a Bachelor of Aviation before transferring to Aviation Management. The ruling notes that due to family circumstances back in India he began drinking more than usual and missed classes, which caused him to fail three papers. If he failed more papers he would not be able to continue studying which would have breached his visa conditions, so he transferred courses which he described as a "longer, but cheaper and easier route to gain an education in the field of aviation". Dmello likened his situation to medical students who study an undergraduate degree in science in an attempt to gain postgraduate admission to medical school. He said this route would set him back eight years and disadvantage him professionally, as he said that airlines prefer to hire younger pilots. Dmello fought to keep his name suppressed to avoid employment issues when he finished his studies. After his arrest, he was remanded in custody as his flatmates refused to have him near their children due to the allegations. While he has elected trial by jury, the charges remain as allegations, which Dmello emphasised in his submissions to the court seeking suppression. He said the way his flatmates reacted was of significant concern. "This is exactly the attitude I expect employers will have if they find out about these allegations," he told the court. As part of his submissions, Dmello said he believed that if his name was published, it was "almost certain" he would never be hired by an airline. Defence lawyer Josh Harvey argued commercial airlines will not hire Dmello if there are public articles naming him, even if he's acquitted of those charges at trial. Harvey provided evidence from the New Zealand Airline Pilots Association, the country's largest pilot union, that said if Dmello lost name suppression, it would effectively render him unemployable. However, Justice Grau said Dmello was still in a very early stage of his training and any effect on his career was too speculative to meet the test for continued name suppression. "Should Mr Dmello be successful in obtaining his qualification as a pilot, he will be subject to a "fit and proper person" test," Justice Grau said. "Notwithstanding the evidence provided, I am unable to accept that, if Mr Dmello was eventually acquitted, a potential employer would inevitably go beyond that test and take into account publication of these allegations, at least without seeking comment." In her judgment, Justice Grau said that by the time Dmello graduated, he would be 28 years old, and the allegations - if they did not proceed to a conviction - would not necessarily prevent him from becoming a pilot as long as he met all of the other requirements. * This story originally appeared in the New Zealand Herald .
RNZ News
9 hours ago
- RNZ News
The Panel with Andie McCombs and Heather Roy Part 1
Tonight on The Panel, Wallace Chapman is joined by panellists Andie McCombs and Heather Roy. They discuss the expansion of the FamilyBoost scheme, with 16,000 more families to be eligible for daycare fee reimbursments. They also look at whether the new citizens arrest rules should apply to children. To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following: See terms of use.
