logo
Witness to the Unheard: Remembering K.M. Salimkumar

Witness to the Unheard: Remembering K.M. Salimkumar

The Wire8 hours ago

It feels as though it happened just yesterday – the long, winding bus ride to Thodupuzha, a serene town in Kerala's Idukki district. We were en route to release Caste and the Politics of the Land (2008), a powerful work by K.M. Salimkumar. Sitting beside me was the man himself – a relentless voice for Dalit and Adivasi rights, an activist, thinker, and writer who had spent decades challenging the status quo. He passed away on June 29, after a lifetime of confronting dominant narratives with a clarity that few dared to match.
During that trip, Salimkumar spoke with thoughtful determination about his political path – from early activism with the Communist Party of India (Marxist–Leninist) Liberation to his eventual estrangement from a Left movement that, in his view, skirted around the issue of caste. His words weren't bitter or sentimental, they were sharp. He argued that caste, as a deeply entrenched system of oppression in Indian society, often vanished beneath class-based rhetoric. For him, the revolutionary struggle had failed to acknowledge the lived experiences of those most marginalised. That journey wasn't just about a book, it offered a glimpse into the principled world he inhabited.
Born in 1949, in a tribal family in Velliammattom panchayat in Idukki, Salimkumar rose to become a formidable voice for social justice in Kerala. His early years were shaped by Marxist liberation politics, and he was incarcerated for 17 months during the Emergency. But unlike others who moderated their stance afterward, Salimkumar intensified his critique, especially of the movements he once served. He questioned why caste was so often left out of revolutionary discourse and why land struggles didn't prioritise those without land, Dalits and Adivasis.
His involvement in building political and grassroots networks was extensive. As a founder of the Dalit Unity Committee in 1999 and editor of publications like Raktapataka and Dalit Aikyashabdam, he gave platform to marginalised voices. His activism focused not on charity, but on dignity, autonomy, and rightful assertion.
Salimkumar was part of a generation of leaders who re-evaluated their ideological roots, transitioning from strict Marxist lines to a framework informed by Ambedkarite thought. While many Left parties in Kerala treated caste as a secondary issue to class, Salimkumar argued it was a primary axis of oppression. He frequently reminded people that caste is not a relic of the past but a system that defines everything – from land rights to social boundaries.
He openly criticised symbolic gestures like renaming Dalit colonies with sanitised, Sanskrit-inspired names. For him, such acts were attempts to cover up deeper inequalities. 'Changing names doesn't change realities,' he wrote. 'The trauma, the exclusion, the inherited shame – they all remain.'
'Negritude', K.M. Salimkumar.
His collection of columns under the title Negritude reflected this radical clarity. In them, he explored themes such as Ambedkar's democratic philosophy, the erasure of tribal identity, and the contradictions in Kerala's progressive self-image. By drawing connections between caste-based and racial oppression, he built a body of work that was more than literature – it was a political statement.
Salimkumar also centred B.R. Ambedkar in his vision of India's democratic future. He didn't see Ambedkar merely as a constitutional architect, but as a radical critic of social inequality and a prophet of structural reform. He cited Ambedkar's assertion that while Hindu privilege maintained Brahminical rule, true democracy meant Dalits must have full participation.
He was especially vocal about the contradictions in Kerala's development model. Though the state is praised for its human development indicators, he pointed out how Dalits and Adivasis continued to face displacement and marginalisation in the name of progress. During protests like the Muthanga agitation, albeit his reservations about the struggle itself, he challenged the hypocrisy of governments that claimed to be for the people while undermining the very communities they displaced.
His published works – including Dalit Ideology and Communalisation (2008), Dalit Democratic Thought (2018), Reservation in a Dalit Perspective (2018), and The Subtleties of Casteism (2021) – offer critical insights into how casteism adapts to survive even in secular and progressive settings. His critique extended beyond the obvious culprits. He held the liberal elite and even self-proclaimed progressives accountable for sustaining caste structures.
In his later years, Salimkumar emphasised the importance of cultural memory and literature in political struggle. He believed that writing was an act of reclaiming identity, that memory could resist erasure, and that telling one's story was itself revolutionary.
He didn't aspire to lead in the conventional sense. He wanted to bear witness—to name what others avoided, to stay rooted in difficult truths, and to never allow silence to replace justice. In an age when even dissent is being curated and softened, KM Salimkumar's legacy stands as a reminder that the fight for equality requires more than slogans—it demands unflinching truth.
K.M. Seethi is Director, Inter University Centre for Social Science Research and Extension (IUCSSRE), Mahatma Gandhi University (MGU), Kerala, India. Seethi also served as Senior Professor of International Relations, Dean of Social Sciences at MGU and ICSSR Senior Fellow.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Clashes erupt in Bhognadih between police and Sido-Kanhu descendants on Hul Diwas
Clashes erupt in Bhognadih between police and Sido-Kanhu descendants on Hul Diwas

United News of India

timean hour ago

  • United News of India

Clashes erupt in Bhognadih between police and Sido-Kanhu descendants on Hul Diwas

Ranchi, June 30 (UNI) Violence erupted in Bhognadih, Sahibganj in Jharkhand, on the occasion of Hul Diwas as tensions flared between police forces and descendants of Sido and Kanhu Murmu, tribal leaders who led the Santhal Rebellion against British rule in 1855. The situation turned chaotic when security personnel used tear gas shells to disperse a crowd protesting the district administration's refusal to allow traditional rituals. In retaliation, the mob reportedly hurled stones and shot arrows, leading to injuries among at least three to four police personnel. The area remains tense, with heavy police deployment in place. Hul Diwas, observed annually on June 30, marks the tribal uprising against British rule initiated in 1855 by Sido and Kanhu in Bhognadih. The day is commemorated with a state programme, alongside traditional observances led by the martyrs' descendants. Every year, under the banner of the Sido Kanhu Hul Foundation and Atu Manjhi Baisi, the family of Mandal Murmu—descendant of Sido—performs rituals at the memorial site before the formal programme begins. However, this year the administration barred them from conducting the puja during regular hours, citing security concerns. The family was instructed to perform rituals only before 10 a.m. or after 4 p.m., sparking anger and allegations of discrimination. Protests began over the weekend, with Mandal Murmu and his supporters locking the gates of the Sido-Kanhu Park and halting preparations for the state function. On Monday morning, as the police attempted to reopen the site, tensions escalated. Tear gas was fired to control the crowd, which responded with stone-pelting and traditional weapon attacks. The injured personnel were sent for medical care, and reinforcements were deployed to restore order. The conflict is seen to have a political dimension, as Mandal Murmu recently joined the BJP and had invited senior party leaders, including former Chief Minister Champai Soren and former Boriya MLA Lobin Hembrom, to attend the programme under a separate banner. The administration reportedly viewed this as a potential disruption to the official event and withheld permission for parallel activities. Earlier, 13 labourers involved in erecting the private pandal were taken into custody, further fuelling discontent among the tribal community. Following protests and negotiations, the workers were released, and oral permission was granted for rituals. However, the confrontation resumed on Monday. Leader of the Opposition and Jharkhand BJP president Babulal Marandi condemned the incident, calling it the result of the government's 'authoritarian attitude.' He said, 'This is not merely a law-and-order issue. The government's refusal to let the descendants of our tribal martyrs carry out traditional worship on Hul Diwas in their own village is an insult to the Adivasi identity and history. This reflects the political insecurity of the ruling regime.' Despite official claims that the government event proceeded without disruption, the atmosphere in Bhognadih remains strained. Tribal organisations have expressed deep hurt over what they see as a marginalisation of their role in their own legacy. The administration, meanwhile, continues to monitor the situation, wary of further escalation. UNI XC ARN RN

‘Not a decision that required a political stance': P. Jayarajan backs Kerala govt's DGP pick Ravada amid Koothuparamba firing row
‘Not a decision that required a political stance': P. Jayarajan backs Kerala govt's DGP pick Ravada amid Koothuparamba firing row

The Hindu

time3 hours ago

  • The Hindu

‘Not a decision that required a political stance': P. Jayarajan backs Kerala govt's DGP pick Ravada amid Koothuparamba firing row

Amid political chatter over the appointment of Ravada A. Chandrasekhar as the Kerala State Police Chief, senior Communist Party of India (Marxist) [CPI(M)] leader P. Jayarajan on Monday (June 30, 2025) said the decision was 'not one that required a political stance, though the government should explain its rationale.' He said the appointment was made based on merit and that it was the government's 'prerogative.' Mr. Chandrasekhar was one of the accused in 1994 Koothuparamba firing case but was acquitted in 2012. Mr. Jayarajan acknowledged Mr. Chandrasekhar's presence during the incident but clarified that he was part of a group of officers who jointly acted on the day of the firing, and 'not the sole person responsible.' 'From a political standpoint, many police officers have taken action at various times that were seen as antagonistic to the CPI(M) and the Left movement,' Mr. Jayarajan told the media in Kannur. He said the then Minister M.V. Raghavan had reached Koothuparamba under the protection of police officers, including DySP Hakim Bathery, and the firing took place after tensions escalated. Mr. Jayarajan also recalled another controversial figure in the running for the DGP post – Nitin Agarwal – against whom the CPI(M) had pursued legal action. He was accused of custodial violence against M. Sukumaran, now the party's area secretary, during a CPI(M)-RSS clash years ago. 'We took strong action against such behaviour in the past,' Mr. Jayarajan said. Govindan defends appointment CPI(M) State secretary M.V. Govindan defended the appointment stating that Mr. Chandrasekhar had joined duty only days before the incident and was fresh out of IPS training. The court had exonerated him based on the findings of the inquiry commission, he noted. 'A person cannot be punished merely for being named in a case,' Mr. Govindan said, adding that the party supports the government's decision. He also downplayed Mr. Jayarajan's remark, saying this should not be seen as criticism but as 'a call for clarity.' The government reportedly considered three names for the top post, ultimately selecting Mr. Chandrasekhar based on professional credentials, he added. Mr. Govindan said efforts to stir a controversy were 'typical of the right-wing media', adding that the matter should not be politicised.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store