The one question about Australia's plans for China that Trump wants answered - as Anthony Albanese touches down in Shanghai
Prime Minister Albanese and fiancé Jodie Haydon touched down in the Chinese financial hub of Shanghai on Saturday, ahead of a week-long visit that includes a meeting with Chinese Communist Party leader President Xi Jinping.
While the Australian leader is set to discuss lighter topics, like trade and tourism campaigns, US President Donald Trump 's team on Saturday demanded answers on whether Australia would back America in a war against China.
The US has been largely ambiguous about what its response would be to a Chinese invasion of Taiwan, which China has long claimed territorial rights over.
Nevertheless, a report by the Financial Times on Saturday claimed US defence undersecretary Elbridge Colby had questioned Japan and Australia over its positions.
The outlet cited five sources who all recalled the topic of the countries' response to a conflict in the Indo-Pacific being raised during meetings.
Colby responded to the report on X, formerly Twitter, on Sunday, Australian time.
'As the department has made abundantly and consistently clear, we at Department of Defence are focused on implementing the President's 'America First', common sense agenda of restoring deterrence and achieving peace through strength,' he said.
The senior defence official claimed the America First approach was already working.
'This has been a hallmark of President Trump's strategy - in Asia as in Europe where it has already been tremendously successful.'
He also suggested several American allies were seeing the 'urgent need to step up' and 'are doing so'.
'President Trump has shown the approach and the formula - and we will not be deterred from advancing his agenda,' he said.
In response to questions about Australia's hypothetical response to conflict in the Indo-Pacific, Albanese said 'we have our AUKUS arrangements in place'.
'We'll continue to work through all of these issues,' he said.
'Our alliance with the United States is a very important one for Australia so we'll continue to engage constructively in a coherent, stable, orderly way.
'That's the way I conduct this government.'
As for his position on Taiwan, Albanese simply said Australia supports the 'status quo'.
'I think it's important that we have a consistent position, which Australia has had for a long period of time,' he said.
'We support the status quo when it comes to Taiwan. We don't support any unilateral action there. We have a clear position and we have been consistent about that.'
Reports on Thursday claimed the US believed Australia should voice its direct support of the US by stating it would use American-made nuclear submarines should a conflict with China arise.
However, the production of those submarines was called into question earlier this year by Colby himself, who is leading a review into the AUKUS pact under which the submarine deal was made.
Albanese also addressed pressure to make a public statement on Sunday, noting tactical conversations between it and Australia would remain 'private'.
'You don't take private comments to a media conference. By definition, that's in private,' he said. 'We engage in a mature way. That's the way that we deal with our relationships.'
Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy on Sunday was more blunt in telling the US it would not dictate Australia's military decisions.
'The sole power to commit Australia to war, or to allow our territory to be used for conflict, is the elected government of the day,' he told the ABC.
'That is our position. Sovereignty will always be prioritised and that will continue to be our position.'
Albanese's upcoming sit-down with Xi will be the second time he's met with the Chinese leader, following his excursion to China in November 2023.
He is yet to meet with Trump after the president left Canada's G7 summit early in June citing urgent developments in the Middle East.
Albanese has faced criticism for meeting with Xi before the leader of one of Australia's biggest allies.
However, it's not the first time an Australian leader has met with Xi before the US president. Tony Abbott pulled the same move by meeting with Xi in the weeks after taking office in 2013, before he met with Barack Obama.
Tensions between Australia and China have grown since the Asian superpower began ramping up efforts to grow influence over the Indo-Pacific since the 2010s.
That included the creation of armed artificial islands in the South China Sea.
The Chinese Communist Party's intent to shift from a diplomatic player to a strategist became clear in 2019 with Kiribati and the Solomon Islands both switching its policies regarding Taiwan to side with China.
Since then the Chinese People's Liberation Army has extended its presence in international waters, including an excursion down Australia's east coast by three Chinese People's Liberation Army Navy ships.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
22 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Sydney furniture companies collapse with $500k in undelivered orders
Up to $500,000 worth of orders from a Sydney furniture firm remain undelivered after the company entered voluntary administration. Customers of Inventis furniture brands may be left in limbo after five companies, including Bassett Furniture, Gregory Commercial Furniture, and Workstations, went into voluntary administration in late June. The ASX-listed group owes nearly $30million, according to ASIC documents. The furniture companies operated out of Inventis' premises in Arndell Park, 35km west of Sydney's CBD. However, the companies were locked out of their headquarters in mid-June due to unpaid rent. Administrators Simon Cathro and Andrew Blundell from Cathro and Partners wrote in a report that the landlord issued a termination notice effective June 30. Trading was halted when administrators were appointed to prevent further losses. The Inventis Group is estimated to owe $2.6million to the Australian Tax Office, with the ATO issuing a director's penalty notice in June. The notice, addressed to the company's managing director, Anthony Mankarios, was for $1.4million in unpaid PAYG withholding tax dating back to August 2020. About $1.6million is owed to the company's staff, with the amount excluding the outstanding severance pay for the terminated employees. Inventis HR Services, one of the companies that was plunged into administration, has the largest outstanding debts. The firm, which employed the 55 staff members working throughout the group, owes $18.5million to creditors. An estimated $14.1million of the total debts relate to other groups within the company, such as the Inventis Technology division. About $4.4million in debts to creditors was owed by Inventis Properties, $5.6million owed by Gregory Commercial Furniture, $715,752 owed by Workstations, while Bassett Furniture owed $490,650 in total debts. The administrators explained the company had tried to restructure and cut costs after a drop in sales, but the measures failed to address the company's underlying issues. In the past two years, sales across Bassett, Gregory and Workstations had more than halved, plunging from $10.1million in 2023 to just $4million in 2025. Manufacturing at the Arndell Park site was halted in May after a storm caused leaking and unsafe work conditions, delaying $200,000 worth of orders. The group also incurred $321,000 in termination-related costs in March. In their report, the administrators wrote that the group's companies had potentially been trading since insolvent since June 2024. The administrators have urged creditors to vote in favour of liquidation at a meeting on Friday. If the company is put into liquidation, creditors will are unlikely to recover any of the debts owed. Company directors had told the administrators they were seeking asset realisations; the process of converting assets into cash or cash equivalents. The asset realisation could potentially include a co-investment, which, if successful would result in creditors and staff being paid. The administrators' report explained the businesses and assets were also up for sale. Three offers to purchase the companies have since been submitted, with one offer under negotiation. The sale, however, is only for the business and its assets, and would not include the transfer of employees, the administrators' report said.
The Guardian
22 minutes ago
- The Guardian
AI firms ‘unprepared' for dangers of building human-level systems, report warns
Artificial intelligence companies are 'fundamentally unprepared' for the consequences of creating systems with human-level intellectual performance, according to a leading AI safety group. The Future of Life Institute (FLI) said none of the firms on its AI safety index scored higher than a D for 'existential safety planning'. One of the five reviewers of the FLI's report said that, despite aiming to develop artificial general intelligence (AGI), none of the companies scrutinised had 'anything like a coherent, actionable plan' to ensure the systems remained safe and controllable. AGI refers to a theoretical stage of AI development at which a system is capable of matching a human in carrying out any intellectual task. OpenAI, the developer of ChatGPT, has said its mission is to ensure AGI 'benefits all of humanity'. Safety campaigners have warned that AGI could pose an existential threat by evading human control and triggering a catastrophic event. The FLI's report said: 'The industry is fundamentally unprepared for its own stated goals. Companies claim they will achieve artificial general intelligence (AGI) within the decade, yet none scored above D in existential safety planning.' The index evaluates seven AI developers – Google DeepMind, OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, xAI and China's Zhipu AI and DeepSeek – across six areas including 'current harms' and 'existential safety'. Anthropic received the highest overall safety score with a C+, followed by OpenAI with a C and Google DeepMind with a C-. The FLI is a US-based non-profit that campaigns for safer use of cutting-edge technology and is able to operate independently due to an 'unconditional' donation from crypto entrepreneur Vitalik Buterin. SaferAI, another safety-focused non-profit, also released a report on Thursday warning that advanced AI companies have 'weak to very weak risk management practices' and labelled their current approach 'unacceptable'. The FLI safety grades were assigned and reviewed by a panel of AI experts, including British computer scientist Stuart Russell, and Sneha Revanur, founder of AI regulation campaign group Encode Justice. Max Tegmark, a co-founder of FLI and a professor at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, said it was 'pretty jarring' that cutting-edge AI firms were aiming to build super-intelligent systems without publishing plans to deal with the consequences. He said: 'It's as if someone is building a gigantic nuclear power plant in New York City and it is going to open next week – but there is no plan to prevent it having a meltdown.' Tegmark said the technology was continuing to outpace expectations, citing a previously held belief that experts would have decades to address the challenges of AGI. 'Now the companies themselves are saying it's a few years away,' he said. He added that progress in AI capabilities had been 'remarkable' since the global AI summit in Paris in February, with new models such as xAI's Grok 4, Google's Gemini 2.5, and its video generator Veo3, all showing improvements on their forebears. A Google DeepMind spokesperson said the reports did not take into account 'all of Google DeepMind's AI safety efforts'. They added: 'Our comprehensive approach to AI safety and security extends well beyond what's captured.' OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, xAI, Zhipu AI and DeepSeek have also been approached for comment.
Telegraph
22 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Beijing warns Labour over EV grants
Beijing has warned Labour that it will 'resolutely safeguard' its electric car industry after it emerged that the Government will block Chinese electric cars from a new grant scheme. A spokesman for the Chinese embassy called on the UK to follow World Trade Organisation (WTO) rules and create a 'non-discriminatory environment for investment'. WTO rules stipulate that members must not give favourable treatment to one country over another when it comes to trading goods and services. Department for Transport (DfT) officials intend to reject Chinese applications for the £650m Electric Car Grant (ECG) scheme, which will reduce the purchase price of a new electric vehicle (EV) by as much as £3,750 for vehicles costing up to £37,000. The scheme will reject applications from nations with poor sustainability records or high carbon emissions. China's electric car manufacturing and battery production industries are reliant on fossil fuels, barring them from the discounts. Lilian Greenwood, the transport minister, told the BBC's Today programme on Wednesday: 'We don't expect any cars that are assembled in China to be eligible for this scheme. 'The grant is restricted to those manufacturers that reach minimum environmental standards. And, frankly, if you generate a lot of the electricity that powers your factory through coal power stations, then you are not going to be able to access this grant.' However, the restrictions have prompted a backlash from Chinese officials at a time when manufacturers are battling intense competition in the country while trying to gain a foothold in the West.
