logo
Judge Shoots Down Trump's New Plot to Keep Foreign Students Out of Harvard

Judge Shoots Down Trump's New Plot to Keep Foreign Students Out of Harvard

Yahoo06-06-2025
A federal judge has blocked President Trump's latest effort to prevent international students from studying at Harvard University.
The president's latest move in his war against the Ivy League school saw him sign a proclamation that claimed that letting foreign nationals study at Harvard is 'detrimental to the interests of the United States,' because 'Harvard's conduct has rendered it an unsuitable destination for foreign students and researchers.'
Hours after Harvard's lawyers filed a complaint against the proclamation Thursday, U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs issued a temporary order which blocked anyone from 'implementing, instituting, maintaining, enforcing, or giving force or effect to the Presidential Proclamation,' after agreeing with Harvard that it would cause 'immediate and irreparable injury' to the university before courts could properly review the case.
Last month, Burroughs issued a similar order that blocked the Trump administration's previous attempt to ban foreign students from enrolling at Harvard, which was also extended after the university claimed the president's latest proclamation was an attempt to illegally bypass the judge's earlier ruling.
'The Proclamation denies thousands of Harvard's students the right to come to this country to pursue their education and follow their dreams, and it denies Harvard the right to teach them. Without its international students, Harvard is not Harvard,' the university claimed in its legal filing.
Harvard President Alan Garber claimed the move was retaliation from Trump after the university refused to allow the government to control the curriculum, governance, and ideology of its students and faculty members. Garber previously claimed the institution will never stray from its 'core, legally-protected principles,' even if ordered to by the federal government.
'International students and scholars make outstanding contributions inside and outside of our classrooms and laboratories, fulfilling our mission of excellence in countless ways,' he added in a letter to the student body on Thursday night. 'We will celebrate them, support them, and defend their interests as we continue to assert our Constitutional rights.'
In a statement on Thursday, White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson called Harvard 'a hotbed of anti-American, anti-Semitic, pro-terrorist agitators.'
'Harvard's behavior has jeopardized the integrity of the entire U.S. student and exchange visitor visa system and risks compromising national security,' she added, Reuters reports. 'Now it must face the consequences of its actions.'
Harvard has denied the claims.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bipartisan senators push for Trump to keep portions of Biden-era AI rule
Bipartisan senators push for Trump to keep portions of Biden-era AI rule

The Hill

time3 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Bipartisan senators push for Trump to keep portions of Biden-era AI rule

Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Mike Rounds (R-S.D.) urged the Trump administration Thursday to maintain some parts of an artificial intelligence (AI) chip export framework laid out by former President Biden. In a letter to Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, the bipartisan duo called for the administration to keep provisions incentivizing companies to maintain most of their computing infrastructure for leading AI models in the U.S. and mandating 'robust' guardrails on data centers abroad. 'While the Diffusion Rule was rightfully criticized for being overly complicated and burdensome, it is essential that the Administration issues a replacement that keeps the center of gravity for AI infrastructure in the United States and imposes strong, robust security requirements on overseas facilities,' the pair wrote. Biden released the AI diffusion rule in his final days in office. The rule, which placed caps on chip sales to most countries other than a select few U.S. allies, faced sharp pushback from the semiconductor industry. The Trump administration rescinded the rule shortly before it was set to go into effect in May, arguing it would 'have stifled American innovation and saddled companies with burdensome new regulatory requirements.' Several months later, the administration has yet to offer a replacement. A group of Republican House members urged Lutnick earlier this month to provide a 'stable exporting structure' to take the place of the diffusion rule. However, a new framework may not be coming. Semafor reported Tuesday that the administration is weighing whether to scrap efforts to replace the rule. This comes after Trump unveiled his AI Action Plan last week, which underscored a shift in policy toward China, focusing less on export restrictions and more on boosting the adoption of American technology abroad. Seemingly in line with this approach, the Trump administration is allowing Nvidia to sell its H20 chips to China once again. After initially placing new restrictions on H20 sales in May, the administration gave the chipmaker the green light earlier this month. The decision has faced pushback from multiple fronts, with former national security officials, several Democratic lawmakers and at least one Republican member voicing concerns about the decision.

Harris to give Colbert her first interview since 2024 election
Harris to give Colbert her first interview since 2024 election

The Hill

time3 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Harris to give Colbert her first interview since 2024 election

Former Vice President Kamala Harris will return to 'The Late Show' with Stephen Colbert on Thursday for her first post-election interview since her November loss to President Trump. The appearance comes days after Harris announced she would not run for California governor next year and also as she promotes her new book, ' 107 days ' detailing her short time as a presidential candidate after the withdrawal of then-President Biden. She'll be in conversation with Colbert, whose show is ending next year following his vocal criticism of both Trump and his network CBS's parent company Paramount's settlement of a lawsuit Trump brought against '60 Minutes' over its editing of an interview with Harris. Before his cancellation, Colbert had described the $16 million settlement as a 'big fat bribe' following the president's similar agreements with ABC and other media outlets. CBS insisted that canceling 'The Late Show' was a purely financial decision, but shortly after it was announced, Trump's Federal Communications Commission approved Paramount's desired merger with Skydance. Harris, who like Biden attended Trump's inauguration in January, has been relatively quiet in regards to his accusations about the 2024 campaign trail, although he's alleged she purchased endorsement from celebrities and should be prosecuted. Last month, she did, however, address Trump's move to deploy the military to Los Angeles amid his immigration crackdown. 'Deploying the National Guard is a dangerous escalation meant to provoke chaos,' she said on social media. 'In addition to the recent ICE raids in Southern California and across our nation, it is part of the Trump Administration's cruel, calculated agenda to spread panic and division.' 'This Administration's actions are not about public safety — they're about stoking fear,' Harris added. 'Fear of a community demanding dignity and due process.'

Democrats blast Bessent over Trump baby accounts ‘backdoor for privatizing Social Security' remarks
Democrats blast Bessent over Trump baby accounts ‘backdoor for privatizing Social Security' remarks

The Hill

time3 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Democrats blast Bessent over Trump baby accounts ‘backdoor for privatizing Social Security' remarks

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is facing heavy backlash from Democrats over a Wednesday remark in which he talked about 'a backdoor for privatizing Social Security.' 'In a way, it is a backdoor for privatizing Social Security,' Bessent said Wednesday during an event with Breitbart News, discussing 'Trump accounts.' These are savings accounts the Trump administration has proposed for kids born between 2024 and 2028 in which the government will put $1,000. It was a part of President Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' that he signed into law earlier this year. Social Security has long been a third rail in politics, and Democrats were quick to accuse Bessent of suggesting he and the administration saw the accounts as a future replacement for Social Security. Sen. Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.) said in a post on the social platform X Wednesday that Bessent was 'saying the quiet part out loud.' ''In a way, it is a backdoor for privatizing Social Security.' – Scott Bessent,' Luján said in his post, which featured a clip of Bessent's comments. 'That means gutting the promise our seniors earned and dismantling Social Security as we know it.' In his own post on X Wednesday, Sen. Jack Reed (D-R.I.) offered an opinion similar to Luján's. 'Trump Treasury Sec. Scott Bessent said the quiet part out loud: Trump-Republicans want to privatize Social Security, turning it from a dependable safety net to a risky profit center for moneyed special interests at the expense of everyday Americans,' Reed said in his post. Rep. Richard Neal (D-Mass.) said on X that 'Republicans' ultimate goal is to privatize Social Security.' 'And we know that there isn't a backdoor they won't try to make Wall Street's dream a reality,' he added. Later on Wednesday, Bessent sought to clean up his remarks by arguing the new accounts would bolster Social Security. He said in a post on X that 'Trump Baby Accounts are an additive benefit for future generations, which will supplement the sanctity of Social Security's guaranteed payments.' 'This is not an either-or question: our Administration is committed to protecting Social Security and to making sure seniors have more money,' he added. In an appearance on CNBC's 'Squawk Box' Thursday, Bessent said he was 'I was giving an interview, and I was talking about the $1,000 baby bonds that every American citizen, every newborn, is going to get.' 'The Democrats hate this program because the — it brings capitalism and markets to every American, not just their constituents at the upper end, and over time, the compounding is going to be an incredible supplement to Social Security, not a replacement. It is a compliment,' he added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store