
Health Plans Brace For Cell And Gene Therapy Costs
More than 70% of employers and health plans expect affordability of gene therapy for their health plan members and workers will be a 'moderate or major challenge' over the next 2 to 3 years, according to a report released Monday at Asembia ASX25 in Las Vegas by Pharmaceutical Strategies Group (PSG). The analysis was based on responses from more than 230 health benefits executives from health plans, employers and unions.
The report comes with up to a dozen new cell and gene therapies expected to launch on the U.S. market this year, PSG's report said. Such therapies, which can 'prevent or treat a disease by adding, replacing, or turning off genes,' come with high prices such as $475,000 for a treatment for acute lymphoblastic leukemia or more than $3 million for a treatment for hemophilia B.
Yet despite the headline-grabbing costs of some of these new treatments, those picking up the tab for the bulk of the costs aren't prepared for potential expenses to their budgets for healthcare.
Even though 73% of plans expect cell and gene therapies to 'pose a moderate or major financial challenge in the next 2–3 years, most express low confidence in their understanding of the financial impact,' PSG said in a statement accompanying its report. 'What's more, nearly 40% don't currently use any financial protection product to manage their financial risk related to cell and gene therapies.'
'These therapies aren't one-size-fits-all,' said Renee Rayburg, vice president of clinical strategy at PSG. 'Not only do gene therapies present financial challenges, they're also complex in terms of which patients are eligible as well as the treatment process, and demand is higher for some gene therapies than others. Payers need expert analysis that considers their population, pipeline exposure, and vendor ecosystem.'
Specialty drugs already account for well more than half of the total prescription spending any health plan, employer or government health program manages. Employer clients tell benefits consultants specialty costs easily account for 60% or more of their total drug spending, particularly as more Americans flock to anti-obesity GLP-1 medicines, prescriptions hailed for their ability to help people lose weight.
But the PSG report says employers are increasingly finding ways to deal with specialty drugs.
Take Humira, for example, an expensive rheumatoid arthritis drug derived from biotechnology that at its peak generated more than $20 billion in annual sales as the world's top selling drug for its maker, Abbvie. Humira costs more than $50,00o a patient.
But increasingly health plans and employers are covering less expensive biosimilar versions of Humira in a 'preferred position' in their preferred list of drugs known as formularies. The PSG report said '65% of plans have implemented a preferred drug strategy for one or more Humira biosimilars.'
'Leaders are eager to try new approaches to address costs while preserving access to drugs that their members need,' said PSG's chief operating officer, Rebekah Gregg. 'Yet many benefit leaders lack the data, infrastructure, and confidence to fully implement those strategies. Transparency and clear, data- driven insights will be vital to adapt to the pressures payers face.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
HS market forecast to reach $7.8bn across 7MM by 2034
The hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) market across the seven major pharmaceutical markets (7MM: US, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, UK, and Japan) is forecast to grow from $1.84bn in 2024 to $7.83bn in 2034, according to GlobalData. This 15.6% compound annual growth rate (CAGR) is largely attributed to the launch of novel biologics and small molecules targeting multiple inflammatory pathways beyond TNF-alpha inhibition. Currently, only three biologics are approved for HS: AbbVie's Humira (adalimumab), Novartis' Cosentyx (secukinumab), and UCB's Bimzelx (bimekizumab). While Humira, the first approved biologic, remains the market leader, it is widely viewed by KOLs as having limited efficacy, with response rates near 25%–30% and high rates of treatment fatigue. In contrast, the newer IL-17 inhibitors have demonstrated more robust outcomes. In pivotal trials (BE HEARD I/II), Bimzelx achieved hidradenitis suppurativa clinical response (HiSCR) rates of up to 64%, with a faster onset and more durable effect than Cosentyx, despite being a second-line biologic. However, candidiasis risk and high cost may temper uptake. The landscape is now shifting further with a maturing pipeline with varying mechanisms of action. MoonLake Immunotherapeutics' sonelokimab, a tri-specific nanobody targeting IL-17A/F and albumin, is anticipated to be a best-in-class agent based on its deeper tissue penetration and strong Phase II performance. Similarly, Incyte's JAK1 inhibitor povorcitinib is advancing through late-stage development, showing promise particularly in pain reduction and quality-of-life improvement metrics. GlobalData forecasts that by 2034, pipeline products, including sonelokimab and povorcitinib will represent 47.3% of the total HS market. A defining challenge in HS care remains the heterogeneity of disease severity and the high unmet need in both early- and late-stage disease. Diagnostic delays, averaging 7–10 years, often result in irreversible structural damage by the time patients reach speciality care. Furthermore, current treatments target only moderate-to-severe HS, leaving early-stage (Hurley stage I) patients without effective interventions. As highlighted by GlobalData's analysis, products that can safely intervene earlier in disease progression represent a significant commercial opportunity. KOLs also emphasised that clinical endpoints such as HiSCR50 do not fully capture the burden of disease, particularly in tunnel-dominant or refractory cases. As a result, next-generation trials are adopting stricter endpoints such as HiSCR75, and increasingly incorporating patient-reported outcomes such as dermatology life quality index (DLQI) and numerical rating scale-30 (NRS-30). This evolution in trial design aligns with payer and physician expectations for more meaningful, real-world benefits. Market growth will be led by the US, which accounted for over 70% of HS sales in 2024 due to a larger diagnosed population, broader biologic access, and premium pricing. While biosimilar entry may moderate TNF-alpha sales, the expansion of high-cost IL-17 and JAK pathway inhibitors is expected to intensify market competition and drive overall market prices upward due to the premium pricing of these agents. Barriers to market growth include safety monitoring requirements for JAK inhibitors, competition among newer biologics, and access challenges in countries with tighter reimbursement frameworks. However, if emerging therapies show consistent improvements in flare reduction, pain control, and psychosocial burden, as seen with Bimzelx and sonelokimab, they could reshape the treatment algorithm and expand biologic usage to earlier disease stages. With nearly 33 agents in active clinical development and multiple first-in-class mechanisms poised to enter the market, HS is undergoing a therapeutic transformation. GlobalData expects this evolution to redefine the standard of care for a historically underserved patient population. "HS market forecast to reach $7.8bn across 7MM by 2034" was originally created and published by Pharmaceutical Technology, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.


CNBC
2 hours ago
- CNBC
Healthy Returns: Medicare, Medicaid will reportedly pilot covering obesity drugs – a potential win for drugmakers
For once, the Trump administration may be giving some drugmakers a reason to celebrate. The Trump administration is planning to experiment with covering costly weight loss drugs under Medicare and Medicaid, the Washington Post reported on Friday. That plan could expand access to millions of Americans with obesity who can't currently afford Novo Nordisk's Wegovy and Eli Lilly's Zepbound, blockbuster GLP-1 drugs that cost around $1,000 per month before insurance. In a statement to CNBC about the plan, the Department of Health and Human Services said all drug coverages undergo a "cost-benefit review." The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services "does not comment on potential models or coverage," the department added. The reported plan – if it ultimately takes effect – would be a huge win for Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk and many Americans. Spotty insurance coverage of obesity drugs remains the biggest barrier to access for patients – and it's choking broader uptake and revenue growth for the two pharmaceutical giants. Many health plans, including Medicare, cover GLP-1s for treatment of diabetes, but not obesity. Medicaid coverage of obesity drugs is limited and varies by state, according to health policy research organization KFF. But it's important to remember that this plan isn't exactly new. In November, the Biden administration proposed having Medicare and Medicaid cover obesity treatments, which would have extended access to roughly 3.4 million Medicare beneficiaries and about 4 million Medicaid recipients. The proposal was controversial at the time, as it would cost taxpayers as much as $35 billion over the next decade, a congressional analysis found. The Trump administration dropped that proposal in April, but said it could reconsider coverage of those drugs in the future. Let's get into what the newest reported iteration of the plan looks like. Under the Trump administration's reported pilot plan, state Medicaid programs and Medicare Part D plans would be able to voluntarily choose to cover Ozempic, Wegovy, Mounjaro and Zepbound for patients for "weight management" purposes. That's according to several Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services documents obtained by the Post. The plan is expected to start in April 2026 for Medicaid and January 2027 for Medicare plans, the Post reported. It's unclear how exactly the plan will play out, Jared Holz, Mizuho health care equity strategist, said in a note to clients on Friday. Holz said he expects the government to put some coverage parameters in place related to factors like age, body weight, body mass index and other comorbidities, or coexisting chronic health conditions. He also said the pricing of the drugs will be a "major consideration." Holz said he expects the government to pay less than the current list prices of drugs. But having that coverage would expand access and could help drive higher sales volumes, he noted. Another factor to consider is how much the government is willing to crack down on so-called compounding pharmacies, which are allowed in rare cases to sell cheaper, unapproved versions of GLP-1s. The pharmaceutical industry fiercely opposes those knock-off GLP-1s, as their safety and efficacy aren't vetted by regulators and they are, in some cases, illegally sold at scale. Holz said the industry's complaints to the government about compounded GLP-1s have so far "not been met with a widespread shut-down." But overall, Holz said the Trump administration's reported willingness to consider covering obesity drugs is "a slight positive as far as industry sentiment." It's definitely a breath of fresh air for Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk and other drugmakers – including Amgen, Roche, AstraZeneca and Pfizer – that are hoping to bring their own obesity drugs to market. The last six months have been anything but smooth for the broader industry: The Trump administration has ratcheted up calls for drugmakers to lower U.S. drug prices, overhauled federal health agencies and could impose sweeping tariffs on pharmaceuticals imported into the country any day now. We'll keep watching to see whether this plan gets implemented, so stay tuned for our coverage! Feel free to send any tips, suggestions, story ideas and data to Annika at After reporting its second straight earnings miss and guidance cut, UnitedHealth Group completed its executive sweep by replacing CFO John Rex. Executives on the earnings call admitted to mis-execution in Medicare Advantage and pledged to get back to profitability and win back investor trust. Nearly two years ago it was CVS Health under pressure, after profits in the company's Aetna health insurance division were torpedoed by low Medicare Advantage Star quality ratings. This week, CVS beat and raised its outlook on the strength of its MA program. CEO David Joyner, now one year into the job, told me he feels good about the turnaround at Aetna and its Medicare business. On top of that, the company saw market share gains in its stores, thanks in part to winning over Rite Aid customers. Humana, similarly, has seen progress on its turnaround, but CFO Celeste Mellet told me that all insurers are grappling with pricing plans for next year amid high medical costs. One big cost driver right now, Mellet told CNBC, is oncology drugs, as some expensive therapies are now being used in combination. The next moment of truth for the Medicare Advantage players will come over the next six weeks – when they'll learn the fate of their Star ratings for 2026 plans. Long-time health-care executive Dr. Marc Harrison has stepped down as CEO of General Catalyst's Health Assurance Transformation Company, or HATCo, and has moved into a strategic advisor role, CNBC has confirmed. The venture capital firm brought in Harrison and announced the formation of HATCo in 2023. In a release at the time, General Catalyst said the company would work closely with health system partners, and that it would eventually acquire and operate its own health system. Months later, HATCo announced its plans to buy Summa Health, a nonprofit integrated health system in northeast Ohio. Under its new structure, Summa would become a for-profit organization, and General Catalyst said it would introduce new tech-enabled solutions that aim to make care more accessible and affordable. Buying a health system is an unprecedented move in the venture industry, and the deal wasn't well received by some members of the Ohio community. Hundreds signed a petition urging Summa to remain a nonprofit and to halt negotiations with HATCo. Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost conditionally approved the deal in June, though he outlined a number of "enforceable commitments" as part of the agreement. HATCo will have to notify the Attorney General of transactions that could trigger antitrust concerns for 10 years after the deal closes, for instance. Harrison went to medical school in the late 1980s and has spent most of his career within health systems, most recently as CEO of Intermountain Healthcare. General Catalyst told CNBC that Harrison will continue to provide the firm's CEO, Hemant Taneja, with clinical insights and will remain connected to its ecosystem in his new role. "It became increasingly clear to both Marc and to us that Marc's role would best be accomplished as a strategic advisor to Hemant Taneja as we bring that ambition and vision to life," a General Catalyst spokesperson said. Daryl Tol, the head of General Catalyst's Health Assurance Ecosystem, was promoted to president of HATCo, the spokesperson said. He will spearhead the firm's day-to-day- work with Summa Health leadership. General Catalyst has also appointed Kate Walsh, the former Massachusetts Secretary of Health and Human Services, to HATCo's board. In addition, she will serve as the chair of the board at Summa Health once the transaction closes. "We are grateful for Marc's leadership and collaboration as co-founder and CEO to help get us to this point in the evolution of HATCo, and we look forward to leveraging his invaluable perspective as we continue to progress," the spokesperson said.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
INSP Stock Plunges Despite Q2 Earnings Beat, Gross Margin Contracts
Inspire Medical Systems, Inc. INSP delivered an earnings per share (EPS) of 45 cents in second-quarter 2025, up 40.6% year over year. The figure topped the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 104.6%. INSP's Revenues in Detail Inspire Medical registered revenues of $217.1 million in the second quarter, up 10.8% year over year. The figure beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 0.9%. Per management, the overall revenue growth was primarily driven by increased market penetration and increased physician and patient awareness of the Inspire system. However, this was partially offset by ENT surgeon capacity constraints and some U.S. patients and physicians delaying Inspire therapy until Inspire V is available at their location or while they trial GLP-1 medications. Shares of this company lost nearly 24.9% in today's pre-market trading. Inspire Medical's Segment Details Inspire Medical's operations consist of two geographic regions — the United States and All other countries. In the quarter under review, U.S. revenues of $207.2 million reflected an increase of 10.3% from the year-ago quarter on a reported basis. As of June 30, 2025, Inspire Medical had 348 U.S. sales territories and 259 field clinical representatives compared with 335 and 230, respectively, as of Dec. 31, 2024. Revenues from All other countries totaled $9.9 million, up 23% year over year on a reported basis. Inspire Medical Systems, Inc. Price, Consensus and EPS Surprise Inspire Medical Systems, Inc. price-consensus-eps-surprise-chart | Inspire Medical Systems, Inc. Quote INSP's Margin Analysis In the second quarter, Inspire Medical's gross profit increased 9.9% year over year to $182.4 million. However, the gross margin contracted 74 basis points (bps) to 84%. Selling, general and administrative expenses jumped 20.8% year over year to $159.5 million. Research and development expenses decreased 9.2% year over year to $26.2 million. Operating expenses of $185.7 million increased 15.4% year over year. Operating loss totaled $3.3 million against the prior-year quarter's operating profit of $5.1 million. Inspire Medical's Financial Position Inspire Medical exited second-quarter 2025 with cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments of $300.9 million compared with $369.2 million at the first-quarter end. Cumulative net cash used in operating activities at the end of second-quarter 2025 was $4 million, against net cash provided by operating activities of $8.8 million a year ago. INSP's Outlook Inspire Medical has lowered its revenue and EPS outlook for 2025. The company now projects revenues in the range of $900 million-$910 million (representing growth of 12-13% from 2024 levels), lowered from the prior outlook of $940 million-$955 million (representing growth of 17-19% from 2024 levels). The Zacks Consensus Estimate is pegged at $949.1 million. The company now expects its EPS for 2025 to be between 40 cents and 50 cents, lowered from the prior outlook of $2.20-$2.30. The Zacks Consensus Estimate is pegged at $2.26. Our Take on Inspire Medical Inspire Medical exited the second quarter of 2025 with better-than-expected results. The robust improvement of the top and bottom lines was impressive. Strength in year-over-year geographical revenues was promising. The increased market penetration and increased physician and patient awareness of the Inspire system during the reported quarter were encouraging. However, the gross margin contracted due to rising product costs. This does not bode well for the stock. Also, management's confirmation about the slower-than-expected progress of the U.S. commercial launch of Inspire V is worrying. Per management, this has resulted in the pushing forward of the timeline to complete the full transition to Inspire V, which will impact financial results for the year. INSP's Zacks Rank and Key Picks Inspire Medical currently carries a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). Some better-ranked stocks in the broader medical space that have announced quarterly results are GE HealthCare Technologies Inc. GEHC, West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. WST and Boston Scientific Corporation BSX. GE HealthCare, sporting a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy), reported second-quarter 2025 adjusted EPS of $1.06, beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 16.5%. Revenues of $5.01 billion outpaced the consensus mark by 0.7%. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank stocks here. GE HealthCare has a long-term estimated growth rate of 5.8%. GEHC's earnings surpassed estimates in each of the trailing four quarters, the average surprise being 12.5%. West Pharmaceutical reported second-quarter 2025 adjusted EPS of $1.84, beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 21.9%. Revenues of $766.5 million surpassed the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 5.4%. It currently flaunts a Zacks Rank #1. West Pharmaceutical has a long-term estimated growth rate of 8.4%. WST's earnings surpassed estimates in each of the trailing four quarters, the average surprise being 16.8%. Boston Scientific reported second-quarter 2025 adjusted EPS of 75 cents, beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 4.2%. Revenues of $5.06 billion surpassed the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 3.5%. It currently carries a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy). Boston Scientific has a long-term estimated growth rate of 14%. BSX's earnings surpassed estimates in each of the trailing four quarters, the average surprise being 8.1%. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX) : Free Stock Analysis Report West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. (WST) : Free Stock Analysis Report Inspire Medical Systems, Inc. (INSP) : Free Stock Analysis Report GE HealthCare Technologies Inc. (GEHC) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data