Ferry fares under review but no decision on RET, says minister
The Scottish government is reviewing west coast ferry fares, but insisted that no decisions have been made on the future of cheaper rates.It invests about £25m every year to reduce the cost of fares on CalMac crossings under a scheme called road equivalent tariff (RET).RET applies to both islanders and visitors, and is available on Clyde and Hebrides Ferry Services (CHFS) - including the Western Isles, and Arran-Ardrossan-Campbeltown.Asked if it could be scrapped for non-islanders, Connectivity Minister Jim Fairlie told BBC Naidheachdan that all options had to be "on the table and then ruled out one by one".
He said fares were being looked at as part of a wider review of the resilience of CalMac's fleet.Mr Fairlie added: "We are going to look at everything. There are no decisions made on anything at this stage."
What is RET?
RET is a distance-based fares structure and was introduced by the SNP on a trial basis in 2008 on routes to the Western Isles, Coll and Tiree.It was rolled out across the remaining CHFS routes by 2015.On the Stornoway-Ullapool route, RET means a single fare for a foot passenger costs £12.30 and £66.75 for cars.Without the scheme, they would cost £25.75 and £128.70, according to Transport Scotland.It said single fares on the Oban-Tiree route without RET would cost £22.60 for foot passengers and £135.60 for cars.Under RET, they are £13.70 and £74.75.
'Supporting islanders'
Mr Fairlie said the review would look at how more revenue could be raised to improve the resilience of CalMac's fleet.He said: "I think people are wise enough to understand that governments have to look at every possible option."Mr Fairlie said the Scottish government was committed to supporting island communities.Transport Scotland said that, under the Islands Connectivity Plan, it was working towards implementing islander and non-islander fares across CHFS and Northern Isles networks. A spokesperson said: "No final decisions have been taken on the detail of this and there will be engagement with stakeholders in due course."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
12 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
As Sir Rod Stewart prepares to play Glasto, the veteran rocker says the country is 'fed up' with Labour and the Tories and should 'give Nigel Farage a chance'
He didn't quite say he'd found a Reason To Believe in Nigel Farage. But when Sir Rod Stewart steps on to Glastonbury 's Pyramid Stage tomorrow afternoon, fans may ponder his plea to 'give Farage a chance'. The 80-year-old singer's teatime set comes the day after he claimed the country was 'fed up' with the Tories and that Labour was trying to ditch Brexit. He accused Prime Minister Keir Starmer of giving Scottish fishing rights 'back to the EU', although the Government insists it has simply renewed an existing deal for European boats. His views represent a second volte-face given that he appeared to support Labour at last year's election – despite previously backing the Conservatives. Asked where Britain's political future now lay, he told The Times: 'It's hard for me because I'm extremely wealthy, and I deserve to be, so a lot of it doesn't really touch me. 'But that doesn't mean I'm out of touch. For instance, I've read about Starmer cutting off the fishing in Scotland and giving it back to the EU. That hasn't made him popular. 'We're fed up with the Tories. We've got to give Farage a chance. He's coming across well. What options have we got? I know some of his family, I know his brother, and I quite like him.' Asked what Mr Farage stands for aside from Brexit, tighter immigration and controversial economic promises he replied: 'Yeah, yeah. But Starmer's all about getting us out of Brexit and I don't know how he's going to do that. 'Still, the country will survive. It could be worse. We could be in the Gaza Strip.' Sir Rod also seemed unconvinced that Sir Keir was going to fully address one of his personal pet hates. Three years ago, the singer donned a hi-vis jacket and rang around friends asking for help filling in potholes outside his Essex house. 'I took me Ferrari out. Nearly lost the f***ing wheel,' he said. 'And before I did in the Ferrari, I saw an ambulance that couldn't move, the wheel stuck right in there. 'So I took me mates out, and we knew what to do because I had builders in the house. 'We filled in a considerable length of the road, actually.' He added that potholes were still present 'all over Britain' in contrast to Europe.
Daily Mail
12 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Two profoundly deaf children refused access to vital help by Labour-run local authority because they are privately educated... their outraged mother calls the move 'divisive' and 'discriminatory'
An outraged mother has revealed how her two profoundly deaf children have been refused access to vital help because they are privately educated. She was astonished to be told by her local council who fund specialist help for deaf children that private schoolchildren had 'opted out' of it because of their choice of school. The Labour-run council even went on to admit it would also refuse services to blind children if they went to private schools. The mum from Edinburgh was later told her daughters could only receive help if she paid £120 an hour for it or if their school funded it. She said both children needed extra support from a teacher of the deaf because otherwise 'general development and academic progress really suffers'. This was provided free to her first daughter, now 8, when she was at her current private school's nursery but, two years later, when her second daughter started the same nursery, the support was denied. At the same time Edinburgh City Council, who the family pay council tax to, also refused to continue the service on their eldest daughter as she moved into primary. Complaining to the council last summer and asking them why their policy had clearly changed, the mother was told by the council Head of Education (Inclusion) Lynne Binnie, in an email seen by The Mail on Sunday, that the council's service was now only provided to children in state schools. Ms Binnie said: 'Essentially, when a parent makes a decision to educate their child in an independent school, they opt out of central education resources such as the Deaf Support Team.' She also admitted the council would not provide services for blind and visually impaired children or children who needed educational psychology services if they went to private schools. The mum told the Mail on Sunday: 'Obviously, a child has a right to receive appropriate interventions irrespective of which school they are at! To be told this is not the case is shocking. 'It felt very discriminatory to direct resources to a specific subset of the overall population of children while withdrawing it entirely for the other group.' The mum says she was later tipped off that even the option to pay for the service had only been opened up because of 'parental pressure'. 'I was told it would cost £120 an hour which is outrageous.' The mum said she expected her children to have ongoing support with school as well as technical support with their cochlear implants, all of which she had been told by the NHS would be provided by the council's deaf service. She added: 'It makes me so angry that that is the situation. I hate the divisive behaviour that is going on where councils can withdraw services that children need. It is just not fair.' Criticising the council's policy as discriminatory, Lorraine Davidson from the Scottish Council of Independent Schools said: 'Support for deaf children should be a universal service and there should be no discrimination based on a child's school.' Craig Hoy MSP called for 'this shocking discrimination to be urgently addressed by the Scottish Government', adding: 'If councils will not provide these essential lifeline services to all children who need them then ministers must step in to ensure every child, regardless of where they are educated, gets the support they need.' But Councillor James Dalgleish, Education, Children and Families Convener said: 'Independent schools have a responsibility to comply with the Equality Act 2010 and the Education (Additional Support for Learning) (Scotland) Act 2004 which includes provision of specialist support to children and young people enrolled at their school who require it.' The Mail on Sunday's previous revelations that the same council refused free hospital tuition to sick children on cancer wards if they went to private schools sparked political outrage and ongoing calls to scrap the policy. And last week, the Principal of George Watson's College in Edinburgh, one of the UK's largest private schools, said the city council saved millions a year because so many school children were educated privately. Lisa Kerr, formerly Head of Gordonstoun, famously attended by King Charles, said: 'By educating nearly 2500 pupils in 2024, our school saved the public purse a staggering £18.9m with £15.7m of this directly relating to savings made by City of Edinburgh Council from us educating pupils in this area.'
Times
an hour ago
- Times
SNP's ‘student politicians' snub submarine welding centre
Sir Keir Starmer's government is expected to step in to fund an ambitious defence facility on the Clyde after the SNP's 'student union' politicians refused grant funding on ideological grounds. A £2.5 million grant from Scottish Enterprise, the national economic development agency, for a submarine welding centre was withheld due to a party ban on 'munitions' funding. Rolls-Royce, which is ready to support the project by providing £11 million worth of specialist equipment, expressed 'dismay' at the news last week. It said the project had been classified as a 'munitions' scheme solely on the basis that it would 'support the construction of naval vessels'. • SNP ban on 'munitions' funds puts Scottish shipbuilding on the line In a letter seen by The Times, Steve Carlier, president of submarines at Rolls-Royce, warned John Swinney, the first minister, that the project 'cannot continue' without the public funding and was at risk of being formally cancelled within days. The funding, which Scottish Enterprise said had not been formally applied for, is believed to have been rejected as the Scottish government's definition of 'weapons or ammunition' would include a 'military submarine', rather than directly relating to any arms. Rolls-Royce has disputed that it is a 'munitions' company. All UK military submarines are powered by nuclear propulsion, regardless of whether or not they have the capacity to carry nuclear weapons, and Rolls-Royce technology is not used for firing warheads. John Healey, the UK defence secretary, told The Sunday Show, on BBC1 that he could 'hardly believe' a Scottish nationalist government would stand in the way of skills development in Scotland. He said: 'We have a long-term partnership with Rolls-Royce who are central to some of the military equipment that keep us all safe. Rolls-Royce want to set up a new welding skills centre, not just to support its munitions business but also to support Scotland's shipyards [to offer] essential skills, new opportunities for young people. 'If the Scottish SNP government won't step up to support skills and the future of jobs in Scotland then we will. It really strikes me as student union politics. This is not a serious government concerned about the opportunities for young people in the future or the skills base for Scotland, or indeed the industry and innovation for the future.' The SNP also has an ambition to rid Scotland of nuclear weapons, which are based at Faslane naval base on the Clyde. Healey added: 'This is a deterrent that for over 70 years has been our guarantor of security in the UK. It is what Putin fears most and the UK is the only country that commits its nuclear deterrent in full to the defence of our Nato allies. Strong deterrence is required and vital to keep people safe in the future.' • Most Scots want to keep UK's nuclear deterrent, poll shows Britain is also engaged in highly sensitive talks to purchase fighter jets capable of firing tactical nuclear weapons, in a major expansion of the deterrent intended to counter the growing threat posed by Russia. The move would represent the biggest development in the UK's deterrent since the Cold War and a recognition that the world has entered a more dangerous nuclear era. Healey would not reveal where the new fighters would be based but the prospect of nuclear-armed jets being deployed from RAF Lossiemouth, or on manoeuvres at the air force's ancillary training and support bases in Scotland, will incense the SNP and its core anti-nuclear supporters. Mairi Gougeon, the Scottish rural affairs secretary, told the BBC that the welding centre was never eligible for funding thanks to the 'long-standing' policy of the SNP government. She said: 'I think the key difference here between ourselves and the UK government is that when we have principles, we stick to them.' Gougeon said Scottish ministers 'completely understand' the 'really unprecedented threats' the UK faced on the world stage and confirmed the SNP supported the increased defence spending announced by the prime minister. She added: 'That doesn't mean that we can't also still maintain the policy positions that we've had for quite a long time and have been long standing within our party, that we don't support the use of public finance for the manufacture of munitions and neither do we support that for nuclear weapons.' A Scottish government spokesman said: 'We are committed to ensuring Scotland is the home of manufacturing innovation, but the Scottish government's long-standing policy position is that it does not use public money to support the manufacture of munitions. 'We recognise the important role of the aerospace, defence, security and space sectors in the Scottish economy and we regularly engage with a range of companies, alongside ADS Scotland as the industry body. 'We are investing up to £2 million to develop engineering skills in the Glasgow city region, designed by the Clyde Maritime Cluster in partnership with Skills Development Scotland. 'The Scottish government has yet to see the detail of the Defence Spending Review, but we remain firmly opposed to the threat, use and basing of nuclear weapons as a deterrent in Scotland.'
