
The High Environmental Costs of Unilever's Shampoo Sachets and Other Plastic Packaging in India
हिंदी తెలుగు اردو
Home Politics Economy World Security Law Science Society Culture Editor's Pick Opinion
Support independent journalism. Donate Now
Top Stories
The High Environmental Costs of Unilever's Shampoo Sachets and Other Plastic Packaging in India
Saabira Chaudhuri
36 minutes ago
Sachets – as with so many other convenience-led products – had spiralled well beyond what its corporate parents had originally imagined.
Illustration via Canva.
Real journalism holds power accountable
Since 2015, The Wire has done just that.
But we can continue only with your support.
Contribute now
The following is an excerpt from Saabira Chaudhuri's Consumed: How Big Brands Got Us Hooked on Plastic published by Harper Collins.
In 2001, the Lucknow Times published an explosive article quoting a cow shelter owner who said 100 cows a day were dying from eating plastic bags in Lucknow alone. 'The affected animal will have a skeletal body but abnormally bloated stomach. It will very eagerly wobble to the trough but would only sniff at the fodder, unable to eat anything,' wrote the reporter. 'They gradually become weak due to starvation and then finally become immobile.'
Saabira Chaudhuri's
Consumed: How Big Brands Got Us Hooked on Plastic
Harper Collins (2025)
By now the sight of cows munching on dumped plastic was far from unusual. The early 1990s post-liberalisation boom in consumer goods had translated into a sea of plastic waste. Over a few years, India was deluged by bags, bottles, cutlery, cups, diapers, sanitary pads and, of course, sachets. India, like other parts of Asia, was also taking huge volumes of allegedly recyclable waste from the US and other developed countries. The plastic bottles that could be extracted for recycling were removed. Much of what remained was dumped or burned. Between 1990 and 1993, India imported 19 million kilograms of plastic waste, all of which the exporting countries smugly logged as having been 'recycled'.
By now the vast majority of Unilever's shampoo sales in India were made in sachets. The tiny plastic packages were widely littered. 'This stuff, it began to show up in landfills and nature with our brands on it and that was ghastly,' says Nihal Kaviratne, Unilever's Indonesia chairman in the late 1990s and early 2000s. 'We were embarrassed because it could be traced right back to us.'
The cows' plight got people talking. For the first time, consumer goods executives began to worry about a broad crackdown on plastic waste that could include sachets. 'Knowing the importance of the cow in Indian culture, we knew this could at some stage become a hot potato for us to handle,' says M.K. Sharma, who worked as vice chairman and general counsel of Hindustan Lever at the time.
Sharma and Shiv Shivakumar, Hindustan Lever's shampoo marketing head, flew to Singapore to meet regional Unilever executives to discuss ways to cut down on sachet waste. They considered incentivising consumers to bring empty sachets back to stores but quickly abandoned the idea given the mess and hassle shopkeepers would incur in keeping millions of old sticky sachets in their small stores. 'The cost was not commensurate with the benefits we would derive,' remembers Sharma. Plus, it was unlikely many consumers, even if incentivised, would bring sachets back. 'People washed their hair in ponds, wells or running streams and for someone to bring back a 2-inch by 1-inch sachet was seen as a virtually impossible task,' he says.
Years earlier, Unilever had tried to sell products unpackaged, asking shopkeepers to dole out small quantities of margarine and laundry detergent from larger barrels into shoppers' reusable containers. The effort was short-lived. Kaviratne, who worked as Hindustan Lever's marketing manager for personal care in the early 1970s, says eliminating the packaging commodified Unilever's products and erased its most valuable assets: its brands.
Also read: 'If Only the Government Worked as Hard as Waste Pickers'
Despite India's poor waste collection infrastructure, recycling rates for items like plastic bottles and newspapers were high. Thanks to the country's army of waste pickers, items that had any resale value were quickly snapped up. The shampoo sachets had none. They were too small and complex to recycle, so waste pickers ignored them.
Sharma suggested that Unilever, over time, move to paper sachets which, even if littered, would break down. But tests Unilever did on paper revealed major flaws. For one thing, paper didn't hold up against India's high temperatures and humidity. For another, the colourful, high-lustre sachets strung up at storefronts acted as advertisements for Unilever's brands. By contrast, paper sachets were dull, hard to print on and 25 per cent more expensive.
By 2004, sachets accounted for 90 per cent of shampoo sales in rural India and 70 per cent of sales in cities. The tiny plastic packets had also metastasised well beyond shampoo, sparking what the industry's executives proudly called a 'sachet revolution'. Sachets were being used to sell deodorant, toothpaste, face cream, jam, pickle, perfume, ketchup, hair oil, hair dye, pain-relieving balm, hair removal cream, powdered drinks, butter, mosquito repellent, shaving lotion and digestive pills, among other products.
Sachets – as with so many other convenience-led products – had spiralled well beyond what its corporate parents had originally imagined. Just as plastic trash bags were once intended to be used mainly by Canadian hospitals, and disposable diapers were dreamed up for weekends away at grandma's, the sachets were conceived of as a way to introduce low-income people to shampoo brands. The idea was that, as incomes climbed, consumers would naturally shift to using bottles. But similar to how trash bags were adopted by everyone and disposable diapers became everyday fixtures for children, the sachets were embraced by Indians of all income levels in both rural and urban areas.
Many Unilever executives I interviewed acknowledge the environmental costs of sachets but justify these by weighing them against the perceived social benefit – that sachets make brands affordable to poor people. The flip side, of course, is that poor people are the ones most impacted by the negative externalities of plastic. Studies show that plastic production and disposal facilities – including dumpsites – are invariably located near low-income communities. At the time, few were talking about microplastics, but we know now that littered sachets break down into tiny plastic particles that spread widely through ecosystems and end up in both animal and human bodies.
It's also worth remembering that the demand Unilever and other consumer goods companies fulfil with their brands didn't develop organically. It was meticulously created through millions of dollars ploughed into advertisements designed to convince Indians to abandon their age-old reliance on homemade concoctions using reetha (soap berries) and amla (gooseberries) and opt for packaged shampoo instead.
In the years that followed, Unilever made other attempts to find solutions to sachet waste across the globe. It encouraged consumers to bring their own containers to refill machines that dispensed detergent, and invested in a door-to-door electric tricycle in Chile that brought the machines to people's homes. The refill projects never scaled. The company ran a trial in Indonesia to recycle sachets through a solvent-based process that separates out polyethylene, the main plastic used to make the sachets. The trial showed that recycling the multilayer sachets was technically possible. But the costs of collecting the used sachets were far higher than any revenue derived from selling the recycled plastic, which made the operation economically unfeasible.
'We knew that sachets are the cheapest way to take products to the consumer, but also the most polluting way,' reflects Shivakumar. 'We started looking at solutions in 2001 and until now there is no answer.'
Ultimately, after years of failing to find a solution, Unilever pivoted to publicising its efforts to collect bottles, milk pouches and other 'more viable' plastic waste. On a 2019 reporting trip in which I spent time with waste pickers and walked the streets of Bangalore with Unilever's India executives, I learned that the multilayer plastic Unilever was paying to have collected in order to meet regulatory requirements consisted mainly of larger packets for potato chips and biscuits rather than sachets. Much of what was collected was trucked long distances to be burned at cement kilns, a practice activists decry as dangerous and environmentally unsound.
Unilever has since told me that it is no longer 'directly' sending plastic waste to cement kilns. It says it complies with India's regulations and that collected waste is managed in accordance with local guidelines. It didn't address my questions about how sachets specifically are collected or what happens to these.
In 2021, nearly 41 billion shampoo packages were sold in India. Of these, 99 per cent were sachets.
Make a contribution to Independent Journalism
Related News
Whose PET Is It Anyway?
Another Round, No Results: India–US Carrier Talks Remain Stuck in Symbolism
Organisation of Indian Origin People in the US Objects to Proposed Tax on Immigrants' Remittance
Trump's Drive for Ocean Bed Mining Threatens Law of the Sea
A Star Has Faded: Remembering the Astrophysicist Jayant Vishnu Narlikar
US Targets Indian Travel Agents with Visa Bans as Part of Immigration Policy
All Retired HC Judges Entitled to Equal Pension, Says Supreme Court
Five Questions That Indian MPs May Have to Face Abroad
Jaanne Bhi Do Yaaro | India's Data Blackout – From Census to Covid Deaths
View in Desktop Mode
About Us
Contact Us
Support Us
© Copyright. All Rights Reserved.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


News18
an hour ago
- News18
Indian Man Applauds Dutch Officials' Response To Minor Road Bumps: ‘Wish Every Country Cared Like This'
An Indian man's video praising the Dutch government's quick fix of minor road bumps has gone viral. An Indian man living in the Netherlands has gone viral for praising how the local authorities responded quickly to fix even the smallest road bumps. Prabhu Visha shared a video on Instagram and captioned it: 'Coming from India, this honestly felt so beautiful to me." Why Is The Video Gaining Traction In the video, Prabhu Visha is seen skating smoothly down the road, barely noticing any disturbance. On the clip, a statement reads: 'This is why I believe the Netherlands truly cares for its people." Further in his post, Prabhu Visha explained what made the incident so special. 'Near my home in the Netherlands, there were some small bumps on the road. For me, the road was already perfect. But then we got a letter from the government explaining they will fix it, with details of why, when, where, and how. It's possible some people complained about it, and that's why they're fixing it. But still, it's amazing that they listen and act," the post read. He added, 'Even small bumps matter here, for pregnant women, people biking with kids or the elderly. Seriously, hats off to this government for their inclusion and communication." He ended his post by saying, 'I wish every country cared for its people like this." Here's How The Internet Reacted The video was posted on July 23 and quickly gained over 3 lakh views. Many users praised the Dutch government's attentiveness and quick action, especially for such a minor issue. It also sparked comparisons with civic systems in other countries. A user commented, 'I agree, yes, the taxes are high, but when you realise little things like this. It makes it so worth it." Another joked, 'Bro, don't lie, the road is perfect, I am from India." 'Proud to be part of this beautiful country," an individual said. Another shared, 'Netherlands also cares for its animals. You won't see a single street dog because they made a strict policy to sterilise and vaccinate them. Adoption is supported, heavy tax on breeding and strict animal laws." Prabhu Visha's post reminded people how good governance, clear communication and attention to detail, even in the smallest things, can make a big difference. First Published: July 28, 2025, 13:53 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.


Fashion Value Chain
an hour ago
- Fashion Value Chain
Weaving Traditions: The Cultural Tapestry of Indian Handlooms
Ms. Ananya Tiwari, Post-Graduate Academic Scholar in Fashion Management, National Institute of Fashion Technology, Ministry of Textiles, Daman campus Abstract Boasting a rich history and vibrant culture woven into its textile traditions, it is confirmed that India is indeed a land of handlooms. The handloom sector in India has a long tradition of outstanding artisanship that represents and preserves vibrant Indian culture. It is one of the largest cottage industries with over 2.8 million looms. This sector has the advantage of being eco-friendly and having less power consumption. In this article, we will go through a glimpse of two such handlooms from the states of Uttar Pradesh and Gujarat. Introduction First, we will go through Varanasi in Uttar Pradesh. Cross-pollinated by trade and commerce, its long history has been interwined with its textile roots it is one of the renowned centres for zari and brocade weaving. These fabrics have a long and continuous tradition in our cultural history. The weavers of Varanasi are masters of many complex weaving techniques. From the Kadwa and Fekua to Cutwork and Urtu, each technique is individual and distinct. In each category, there are variations and adaptations. All woven on indigenously made looms, a wide range of fibres is used, from the finest cotton yarns to the coarsest, from wide silks to the most refined. Brocade work can be traced back to the Middle Ages. Due to its complex and intricate design, it would usually be worn by royal families across countries like Japan, Korea, China, and Greece. Brocade refers to those textiles where patterns are created on the loom itself, which means it is the process of weaving by transfixing the pattern thread between the warp. This highly delicate work uses gold, silk, silver, or cotton threads with extra weft patterning. This gives the motif an embossed appearance over a regular fabric that increases its ornamentation. The Jangla is a literal jungle pattern, which is inspired by nature that spreads across the textile field like a jal/ net. It is represented with the imagery of the royal hunt. Tigers, deer, birds, and horses are all intermingling in a forest of floral motifs. This Jangla and Shikargah represent the mastery of Varanasi weavers who depicted the favoured pastime of ruling princes and aristocracy. Gyasar comes under the different types of Varanasi brocades. The design, pattern, colours, and theme are based on the auspicious Buddhist symbols and floral imagery. The Gyasar weave has been used for centuries for ceremonial dress as an offering. The clients for this weave include the Royal family of Bhutan and other followers of Buddhism across the world. This heavy brocade in silk with gold and silver zari is woven on the pitloom with a width of 23', and a weaver can produce just a few inches in a day. Coming to the western part of India, we will now be talking about the Patola of Gujarat, the double Ikat silk fabric made in Patan was a popular item of Indian export to Indonesia around the 13th century, where Indian, Portuguese, Dutch, and other merchants used them to barter for spices. The name Patola is derived from the Sanskrit word 'pattakulla', and is the plural form of the word patolu. Dynamic geometric grid patterns and intricate motifs combine to form the double ikat textiles of India. The precise placement of the closely woven motifs, combined with rich colours, provides the patolu (weaver) of Gujarat a mosaic-like appearance. Pattern drawn on a graph sheet Patolas are manufactured by the resist-dyeing technique. The essential block-like quality of these textiles comes from the reference to the double ikat technique. In this process, sets of identical marked threads are tied and dyed at regular intervals. When woven, it forms networks of stepped motifs or patterns. Precision is the main goal of a patolu weaver. This is a Panch Ful Bhat silk Patola sari using the techniques of Double Ikat, where five flowers are shown in full bloom as a motif. Cotton is rarely used, especially for ikat sections. With a few exceptions, the Patola is traditionally used as a rectangular cloth. In Jain and Hindu communities, double ikat saris with entire design of parrots, flowers, elephants, and dancing figures are generally used, whereas in Muslim communities, saris with geometric designs and flower patterns are used, being worn mostly for weddings and other special occasions. Conclusion Handloom is not just about weaving the fabric, but it also represents our human creativity and cultural continuity. It showcases the patience and skill of artisans who transform these regular-looking threads into textiles, which gives us the meaning and heritage of our country. As power looms are giving us speed in this industrial revolution, the handloom stands as a reminder that beautiful things can emerge from slowness, where traditions are preserved and coexist with progress.


Hindustan Times
3 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Indian migrant helps rescue woman from massive sinkhole in Singapore, earns praise
An Indian migrant worker has earned praise for his quick-thinking after he helped rescue a woman who fell into a sinkhole in Singapore. The sinkhole, filled with water, suddenly opened up a section of Tanjong Katong Road South on Saturday evening and swallowed a car. A car plunged into a large, water-filled sinkhole in Singapore on July 26. Singapore's National Water Agency, known as PUB (Public Utilities Board), said the road collapse happened near one of its active worksites. (Also read: Giant, water-filled sinkhole swallows car in Singapore, woman pulled out alive in dramatic rescue) Indian migrant worker saves a life Site foreman Pitchai Udaiyappan Subbiah was among the first to notice that a car had plunged into the sinkhole. He immediately rushed to help the car's occupant. Subbiah, a 46-year-old site foreman with Ohin Construction, said he heard a sudden sound and saw the sinkhole forming. Realising that a car had gone down the hole, he instructed three of his workers to toss down a nylon rope. The woman opened the door of her car and reached for the rope. Workers then pulled her up until she was close enough to the edge to be lifted out. She was immediately rushed to Raffles Hospital. According to a Channel News Asia report, Subbiah is from India and has worked in Singapore for the last 22 years. Asked how he felt during the rescue, the 46-year-old said, 'I was scared, but every feeling was that this woman must be rescued first. (At the end of everything), I felt thankful that we had saved a life.' 'To me, the fact that someone had fallen in - no matter what happened, we had to rescue her as quickly as possible. That was our thinking, and that was the determination and urgency with which we rescued her,' he explained. Rescue earns applause Subbiah has earned plaudits for his presence of mind that potentially helped save a woman's life. 'Not sure if he qualifies for Permanent Residence but Pitchai surely deserves to be offered,' wrote one person on Reddit. 'Should get a medal and an honorary citizenship that allows him to dual-wield with presumably-existing Republic of India citizenship. He has done more for this country's people than anybody working in CBP and MBFC,' another said. The Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF) has also said it will be reaching out to the workers who helped in the rescue to 'commend them for their bravery and prompt action in saving a life.'