logo
The High Environmental Costs of Unilever's Shampoo Sachets and Other Plastic Packaging in India

The High Environmental Costs of Unilever's Shampoo Sachets and Other Plastic Packaging in India

The Wire29-05-2025
Menu
हिंदी తెలుగు اردو
Home Politics Economy World Security Law Science Society Culture Editor's Pick Opinion
Support independent journalism. Donate Now
Top Stories
The High Environmental Costs of Unilever's Shampoo Sachets and Other Plastic Packaging in India
Saabira Chaudhuri
36 minutes ago
Sachets – as with so many other convenience-led products – had spiralled well beyond what its corporate parents had originally imagined.
Illustration via Canva.
Real journalism holds power accountable
Since 2015, The Wire has done just that.
But we can continue only with your support.
Contribute now
The following is an excerpt from Saabira Chaudhuri's Consumed: How Big Brands Got Us Hooked on Plastic published by Harper Collins.
In 2001, the Lucknow Times published an explosive article quoting a cow shelter owner who said 100 cows a day were dying from eating plastic bags in Lucknow alone. 'The affected animal will have a skeletal body but abnormally bloated stomach. It will very eagerly wobble to the trough but would only sniff at the fodder, unable to eat anything,' wrote the reporter. 'They gradually become weak due to starvation and then finally become immobile.'
Saabira Chaudhuri's
Consumed: How Big Brands Got Us Hooked on Plastic
Harper Collins (2025)
By now the sight of cows munching on dumped plastic was far from unusual. The early 1990s post-liberalisation boom in consumer goods had translated into a sea of plastic waste. Over a few years, India was deluged by bags, bottles, cutlery, cups, diapers, sanitary pads and, of course, sachets. India, like other parts of Asia, was also taking huge volumes of allegedly recyclable waste from the US and other developed countries. The plastic bottles that could be extracted for recycling were removed. Much of what remained was dumped or burned. Between 1990 and 1993, India imported 19 million kilograms of plastic waste, all of which the exporting countries smugly logged as having been 'recycled'.
By now the vast majority of Unilever's shampoo sales in India were made in sachets. The tiny plastic packages were widely littered. 'This stuff, it began to show up in landfills and nature with our brands on it and that was ghastly,' says Nihal Kaviratne, Unilever's Indonesia chairman in the late 1990s and early 2000s. 'We were embarrassed because it could be traced right back to us.'
The cows' plight got people talking. For the first time, consumer goods executives began to worry about a broad crackdown on plastic waste that could include sachets. 'Knowing the importance of the cow in Indian culture, we knew this could at some stage become a hot potato for us to handle,' says M.K. Sharma, who worked as vice chairman and general counsel of Hindustan Lever at the time.
Sharma and Shiv Shivakumar, Hindustan Lever's shampoo marketing head, flew to Singapore to meet regional Unilever executives to discuss ways to cut down on sachet waste. They considered incentivising consumers to bring empty sachets back to stores but quickly abandoned the idea given the mess and hassle shopkeepers would incur in keeping millions of old sticky sachets in their small stores. 'The cost was not commensurate with the benefits we would derive,' remembers Sharma. Plus, it was unlikely many consumers, even if incentivised, would bring sachets back. 'People washed their hair in ponds, wells or running streams and for someone to bring back a 2-inch by 1-inch sachet was seen as a virtually impossible task,' he says.
Years earlier, Unilever had tried to sell products unpackaged, asking shopkeepers to dole out small quantities of margarine and laundry detergent from larger barrels into shoppers' reusable containers. The effort was short-lived. Kaviratne, who worked as Hindustan Lever's marketing manager for personal care in the early 1970s, says eliminating the packaging commodified Unilever's products and erased its most valuable assets: its brands.
Also read: 'If Only the Government Worked as Hard as Waste Pickers'
Despite India's poor waste collection infrastructure, recycling rates for items like plastic bottles and newspapers were high. Thanks to the country's army of waste pickers, items that had any resale value were quickly snapped up. The shampoo sachets had none. They were too small and complex to recycle, so waste pickers ignored them.
Sharma suggested that Unilever, over time, move to paper sachets which, even if littered, would break down. But tests Unilever did on paper revealed major flaws. For one thing, paper didn't hold up against India's high temperatures and humidity. For another, the colourful, high-lustre sachets strung up at storefronts acted as advertisements for Unilever's brands. By contrast, paper sachets were dull, hard to print on and 25 per cent more expensive.
By 2004, sachets accounted for 90 per cent of shampoo sales in rural India and 70 per cent of sales in cities. The tiny plastic packets had also metastasised well beyond shampoo, sparking what the industry's executives proudly called a 'sachet revolution'. Sachets were being used to sell deodorant, toothpaste, face cream, jam, pickle, perfume, ketchup, hair oil, hair dye, pain-relieving balm, hair removal cream, powdered drinks, butter, mosquito repellent, shaving lotion and digestive pills, among other products.
Sachets – as with so many other convenience-led products – had spiralled well beyond what its corporate parents had originally imagined. Just as plastic trash bags were once intended to be used mainly by Canadian hospitals, and disposable diapers were dreamed up for weekends away at grandma's, the sachets were conceived of as a way to introduce low-income people to shampoo brands. The idea was that, as incomes climbed, consumers would naturally shift to using bottles. But similar to how trash bags were adopted by everyone and disposable diapers became everyday fixtures for children, the sachets were embraced by Indians of all income levels in both rural and urban areas.
Many Unilever executives I interviewed acknowledge the environmental costs of sachets but justify these by weighing them against the perceived social benefit – that sachets make brands affordable to poor people. The flip side, of course, is that poor people are the ones most impacted by the negative externalities of plastic. Studies show that plastic production and disposal facilities – including dumpsites – are invariably located near low-income communities. At the time, few were talking about microplastics, but we know now that littered sachets break down into tiny plastic particles that spread widely through ecosystems and end up in both animal and human bodies.
It's also worth remembering that the demand Unilever and other consumer goods companies fulfil with their brands didn't develop organically. It was meticulously created through millions of dollars ploughed into advertisements designed to convince Indians to abandon their age-old reliance on homemade concoctions using reetha (soap berries) and amla (gooseberries) and opt for packaged shampoo instead.
In the years that followed, Unilever made other attempts to find solutions to sachet waste across the globe. It encouraged consumers to bring their own containers to refill machines that dispensed detergent, and invested in a door-to-door electric tricycle in Chile that brought the machines to people's homes. The refill projects never scaled. The company ran a trial in Indonesia to recycle sachets through a solvent-based process that separates out polyethylene, the main plastic used to make the sachets. The trial showed that recycling the multilayer sachets was technically possible. But the costs of collecting the used sachets were far higher than any revenue derived from selling the recycled plastic, which made the operation economically unfeasible.
'We knew that sachets are the cheapest way to take products to the consumer, but also the most polluting way,' reflects Shivakumar. 'We started looking at solutions in 2001 and until now there is no answer.'
Ultimately, after years of failing to find a solution, Unilever pivoted to publicising its efforts to collect bottles, milk pouches and other 'more viable' plastic waste. On a 2019 reporting trip in which I spent time with waste pickers and walked the streets of Bangalore with Unilever's India executives, I learned that the multilayer plastic Unilever was paying to have collected in order to meet regulatory requirements consisted mainly of larger packets for potato chips and biscuits rather than sachets. Much of what was collected was trucked long distances to be burned at cement kilns, a practice activists decry as dangerous and environmentally unsound.
Unilever has since told me that it is no longer 'directly' sending plastic waste to cement kilns. It says it complies with India's regulations and that collected waste is managed in accordance with local guidelines. It didn't address my questions about how sachets specifically are collected or what happens to these.
In 2021, nearly 41 billion shampoo packages were sold in India. Of these, 99 per cent were sachets.
Make a contribution to Independent Journalism
Related News
Whose PET Is It Anyway?
Another Round, No Results: India–US Carrier Talks Remain Stuck in Symbolism
Organisation of Indian Origin People in the US Objects to Proposed Tax on Immigrants' Remittance
Trump's Drive for Ocean Bed Mining Threatens Law of the Sea
A Star Has Faded: Remembering the Astrophysicist Jayant Vishnu Narlikar
US Targets Indian Travel Agents with Visa Bans as Part of Immigration Policy
All Retired HC Judges Entitled to Equal Pension, Says Supreme Court
Five Questions That Indian MPs May Have to Face Abroad
Jaanne Bhi Do Yaaro | India's Data Blackout – From Census to Covid Deaths
View in Desktop Mode
About Us
Contact Us
Support Us
© Copyright. All Rights Reserved.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

SC junks plea for use of indigenous cow milk for Tirumala rituals
SC junks plea for use of indigenous cow milk for Tirumala rituals

Hans India

time2 hours ago

  • Hans India

SC junks plea for use of indigenous cow milk for Tirumala rituals

Tirupati: Hearing a petition that sought exclusive use of indigenous cow milk for rituals at the famed Sri Venkateswara Swamy temple in Tirumala, the Supreme Court declined to intervene, remarking that matters of devotion should not be confined by breed distinctions and urging the petitioner to approach the appropriate High Court instead. The petition was filed by Yuga Thulasi Foundation and others against TTD and others. A bench comprising Justices M M Sundaresh and N Kotiswar Singh, while hearing the matter, guided the petitioner to approach the respective High Court instead. 'A cow is a cow,' remarked Justice Sundaresh, underlining that distinctions based on cow breeds, languages, or regions are human constructs. 'God belongs to everyone. Can we then claim that God prefers only local cow milk?' he said, cautioning against injecting divisive interpretations into religious practices. The petitioner's counsel had argued that the Agama Shastras prescribe the use of milk from native Indian breeds in temple rituals and pointed out that TTD itself had previously passed a resolution supporting such practices. The plea, the lawyer insisted, was aimed at enforcing TTD's own stated commitment. However, the bench queried whether there was any binding legal framework backing such a demand. Upon being referred to prior constitutional judgments, the court was not convinced to admit the case and declined to interfere. 'Shall we also then ask whether Tirupati laddus should be made exclusively from indigenous ingredients?' Justice Sundaresh remarked in a lighter vein, before allowing the petitioner to withdraw the plea with the liberty to move the High Court. Justice Sundaresh said that devotion must manifest through compassion for all life forms rather than by creating artificial divides. 'Many pressing issues demand the court's attention. My observations were made with utmost respect to religious sentiments', he added. Meanwhile, it was learnt that the temple's cattle shelters house over 3,000 indigenous cows of breeds like Ongole, Gir, and Sahiwal. These cows already supply milk for rituals such as the sacred Abhishekam performed for the deity.

SC junks plea for use of indigenous cow milk at Tirumala rituals
SC junks plea for use of indigenous cow milk at Tirumala rituals

Hans India

time2 hours ago

  • Hans India

SC junks plea for use of indigenous cow milk at Tirumala rituals

Tirupati: Hearing a petition that sought exclusive use of indigenous cow milk for rituals at the famed Sri Venkateswara Swamy temple in Tirumala, the Supreme Court declined to intervene, remarking that matters of devotion should not be confined by breed distinctions and urging the petitioner to approach the appropriate High Court instead. The petition was filed by Yuga Thulasi Foundation and others against TTD and others. A bench comprising Justices MM Sundaresh and N Kotiswar Singh, while hearing the matter, guided the petitioner to approach the respective High Court instead. 'A cow is a cow,' remarked Justice Sundaresh, underlining that distinctions based on cow breeds, languages, or regions are human constructs. 'God belongs to everyone. Can we then claim that God prefers only local cow milk?' he asked, cautioning against injecting divisive interpretations into religious practices. The petitioner's counsel had argued that the Agama Shastras prescribe the use of milk from native Indian breeds in temple rituals and pointed out that TTD itself had previously passed a resolution supporting such practices. The plea, the lawyer insisted, was aimed at enforcing TTD's own stated commitment. However, the bench queried whether there was any binding legal framework backing such a demand. Upon being referred to prior constitutional judgments, the court was not convinced to admit the case and declined to interfere. 'Shall we also then ask whether Tirupati laddus should be made exclusively from indigenous ingredients?' Justice Sundaresh remarked in a lighter vein, before allowing the petitioner to withdraw the plea with the liberty to move the High Court. Justice Sundaresh said that devotion must manifest through compassion for all life forms rather than by creating artificial divides. 'Many pressing issues demand the court's attention. My observations were made with utmost respect to religious sentiments', he added. Meanwhile, it was learnt that the temple's cattle shelters house over 3,000 indigenous cows of breeds like Ongole, Gir, and Sahiwal. These cows already supply milk for rituals such as the sacred Abhishekam performed for the deity.

Prosthesis helps flamingo stand, may help it fly again
Prosthesis helps flamingo stand, may help it fly again

Time of India

time4 hours ago

  • Time of India

Prosthesis helps flamingo stand, may help it fly again

Navi Mumbai: This is no flight of fancy. A Greater flamingo found injured in Nerul's NRI wetland and whose left leg had to be amputated could soon take to the skies again. Makarand Saraf, a lecturer from Mumbai's All India Institute of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, and his team have successfully fitted a prosthesis on the adolescent bird. However, since the artificial leg only enables it to walk, not fly, next on the team's agenda is an improvised prosthesis that will help it take wing, reports Umesh K Parida. The bird, which is suspected to have got its leg entangled in a fishing net or nylon fishing line, was first spotted by wildlife photographer Abhijit Chattopadhyay, who alerted forest officials led by Vikas Bairagi. After initial treatment, it was released back in the wetland on May 15. But with it hovering around the same spot, the team decided to give it a prosthetic leg that would help it move around. You Can Also Check: Mumbai AQI | Weather in Mumbai | Bank Holidays in Mumbai | Public Holidays in Mumbai An adolescent Greater flamingo, whose left leg had to be amputated due to an injury, has been given a prosthetic leg. With the director of All India Institute of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Dr Anil Kumar Gaur green-signalling the project after the bird was found hovering around the same place it was released after initial treatment, AIIPMR lecturer Makarand Saraf, along with photographer Abhijit Chattopadhyay and Vikas Bairagi, took measurements for the fabrication of the bird's prosthesis on May 17 in the form of a plaster of Paris cast, but abandoned the idea of taking a foam impression after finding the bird distressed due to the human contact. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like People Aged 50-85 With No Life Insurance Could Get This Reassured Get Quote Undo Then stepped in two companies, including a German firm's Indian arm. Amit Mukerji, director-special projects, at Otto Bock Healthcare India Pvt Ltd, provided prosthesis fabrication support, while the inner lining material for the prosthesis was provided by Rushabh Shah of Podiapro India Pvt Ltd, with technical support from Bhoomiksha Rathore. With the team facing challenges with the prosthetic leg's buoyancy due to its closed foot design, it was redesigned to a single toe open foot with side support, and fitted on the bird on July 6. The artificial leg has improved the bird's balance, mobility and chances of its survival in the wild. No fitment or skin problems were observed when the Greater flamingo underwent a check on July 19. The bird's progress has come as a huge boost to the team which has now decided to work on a new prosthesis that will help it fly. Saraf said, "The carbon fibre impregnated with a matrix of acrylic resin (carbon fibre used in manufacture of aeroplane parts and Formula 1 racing cars) helped keep the prosthesis light, strong, waterproof, and durable — suitable for a wading bird's lifestyle. " The other members of the team that has helped the bird stand on its two legs were Urmila Naukudkar, and prosthetics-orthotics students Sachin Kawankar, Kashish Malhotra, Chailsi Pareek, Mohit Mujumdar and Amruta Dhakate. The Otto Bock team of Santosh Rout, Jemin Chauhan and Katyayan Sharma had made the prosthesis.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store