Kartal proud in defeat at Wimbledon women's singles
Taking down the seeded Jelena Ostapenko, making a first appearance on Centre Court, leaving the All England Club with a ranking inside the world's top 50 and swelling her bank account by £240,000 — it has been an honest week's work in SW19.
'I've proved to myself I can go deep into Slams and beat some of the best players on tour,' said Kartal, who took to the court with her knee heavily strapped but insisted it was not a major issue.
'I'll take a little rest for a week or two, but this gives me a lot of motivation. It's not easy coming out on Centre Court as a British player, but I think I handled that well.
'I'm pretty devastated not to get the win. People were saying the draw had opened up, but she played like a seed from the very first point. I made a few mistakes at not ideal times and that was the only difference.
'It's my first fourth round at a Slam, so I can be super proud about that when I take some time to reflect — because I'm playing some of my best tennis.'
Wimbledon's decision to scrap the 147-year-old tradition of line judges in favour of Hawk-Eye technology has raised plenty of eyebrows, with British number ones Jack Draper and Emma Raducanu both questioning its reliability.
Pavlyuchenkova was serving at 4–4, advantage, when a Kartal shot landed well beyond the baseline. However, umpire Nico Helwerth refused to overrule the clearly incorrect call, insisting the point be replayed as the technology had failed.
Kartal went on to break her opponent's serve.
'You took the game away from me,' fumed the former French Open finalist at the changeover. 'You've stolen it.'
How's that for a first time Centre Court entrance?! 🌩️
A thunderous atmosphere for Sonay Kartal's fourth round showdown
🎥 @Wimbledon
pic.twitter.com/WUhd0d2tMD — LTA (@the_LTA) July 6, 2025
To her credit, Pavlyuchenkova showed remarkable restraint, ultimately winning the set — rightly hers — on a tie-break, her British rival paying the price for converting only three of ten break-point opportunities.
There are certainly questions to answer about how Hawk-Eye is being implemented. If an umpire cannot overrule a clearly bad call, they might as well be replaced too.
'I just thought also the chair umpire could take initiative. That's why he's sitting on the chair. He also saw it out — he told me after the match.
'They said the system was down, it was a human error and I understand that. It's such a big match, a big event. I think since we already have automatic line calling and so much invested into this, we should probably look into something else to make it better.'
In the end, it was all immaterial. Pavlyuchenkova, a former world No 11 who has slipped outside the top 50, drew on her decade-plus of experience to end the home women's singles challenge for another year.
For the latest action on the British summer grass court season, check out the LTA website.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
26 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Cameron Norrie sinks Jarry in five-set Wimbledon epic to set up Alcaraz quarter-final
Cameron Norrie was desperately fighting for his survival by the final set of an agonising duel over four hours and 27 minutes on his beloved No 1 Court. As he watched ace after ace fly past him from one of the world's most destructive servers, Norrie's momentum had disappeared along with his two-set lead and match point. The Briton has been on a purposeful journey over the past few years and, after enduring one of the most difficult periods of his career, he has rebounded with even greater courage and self-belief. He drew upon those qualities in the final moments of one of the most significant wins of his career as he held his nerve to close out a 6-3, 7-6 (4), 6-7 (7), 6-7 (5), 6-3 win over the qualifier Nicolás Jarry. The victory marks Norrie's second grand slam quarter-final, having reached his first en route to the semi-finals at the All England Club in 2022. Despite the greater attention that other players receive, he is again the last British player standing at Wimbledon. After spending such a long time watching his lead shrink against an opponent who fired down 46 aces, Norrie dragged himself over the line, using his supreme competitive spirit and composure to hold on. Next he will face Carlos Alcaraz, the two-time defending champion and second seed, after he defeated the 14th seed Andrey Rublev 6-7 (5), 6-3, 6-4, 6-4, on Tuesday. The recent trajectory of Norrie's career has been fascinating. Having already been struggling with his form in 2024, a left biceps injury compounded his misery. From his career high ranking of No 8, he fell as low as 91st in May. Norrie is an extremely ambitious person and at his lowest point, as he compared his frustrating level to his form when he reached the top 10, he was weighed down by his own expectations. He has found his way by focusing solely on his enjoyment of the sport, finding happiness and satisfaction in every single workout, practice and match, regardless of the result. Now, on the biggest stages, his results are also a source of joy again. This was always likely to be a significant challenge. Having climbed as high as No 16 last year, Jarry has fallen to a ranking of No 143 in large part due to a severe case of vestibular neuritis, an ear condition that has affected his balance, perception and vision, leading to spells of dizziness. The Chilean stands at 6ft 7in and at its best, his serve is untouchable. As Jarry fired down aces at will, shutting his opponent out of his service games for much of the match, Norrie took care of his own service games brilliantly, winning all 25 and courageously saving all eight break points he faced throughout the match. The pair would combine to work through 38 consecutive service holds in the match. After establishing a two-set lead, Norrie held a match point on his serve in the third set tie-break at 6-5, but Jarry took the racket out of Norrie's hand with his relentless attack and serving as he forced a fourth set. More than an hour later, Jarry's flawless serving performance and bold, relentless aggression allowed him to force a fifth set in another tie-break. As Norrie desperately tried to land returns, to chase down every ball and offer his opponent no free points, he was rewarded for his doggedness as the Chilean opened the set with a poor service game, allowing the Briton to seal the decisive break. Sign up to The Recap The best of our sports journalism from the past seven days and a heads-up on the weekend's action after newsletter promotion Norrie brilliantly held on to his serve throughout the final set, saving three break points as he closed out a monumental win that further re-establishes him at the top of the men's game. As Norrie sealed the match with a running forehand passing shot, a grand slam quarter-finalist once more, he tossed his racket into the air and rolled on the grass in glee. 'Honestly, I don't know. I think credit to Nico, he did an unbelievable job staying with me,' said Norrie. 'He played better than me in both tie-breaks. I didn't want to let his gamestyle bother me so I just kept fighting.' The shifting scoreline was not the only source of drama on No 1 court. Jarry had complained to the umpire Eva Asderaki about Norrie's ball bouncing between first and second serves. Then, as they convened for the handshake, Jarry expressed his displeasure with Norrie's tendency to cheer loudly after almost every successful point. Although their extended discussion prompted boos from the crowd, Norrie and Jarry eventually shook hands and the Briton applauded his beaten foe as Jarry departed: 'He said I was a little bit vocal and I think: 'That's my energy,'' Norrie said. 'I just said: 'Man, you competed so well, you hung in there so well.' It was an amazing, competitive match and I loved it.'
Rhyl Journal
an hour ago
- Rhyl Journal
Cameron Norrie survives fiery Nicolas Jarry clash to reach Wimbledon quarters
Norrie is the last British player standing after taking down the towering Chilean qualifier 6-3 7-6 (4) 6-7 (7) 6-7 (5) 6-3 in four hours and 27 minutes. The 29-year-old led by two sets and had a match point in the third, but was pegged back to a fifth with Jarry firing down 46 aces among 103 winners. But Norrie, who did not drop serve all day, converted his second match point – more than two hours after his first before dropping to the ground in celebration. Jarry had complained to the umpire about the time Norrie was taking between first and second serves, and at one point seemed to mimic his opponent by stopping and starting his service action. It backfired, though, as the South American sent his serve too long and double-faulted. When quizzed about Norrie's excessive bouncing of the ball, Jarry kept his cards close to his chest. He said: 'He's very competitive, so he knows how to make the most of the important games, the important part of the match.' Norrie said he was unaware the 6ft 7in giant from Santiago was making a point – or giving one away as it turned out. 'I thought he was maybe a little bit tight on that second serve,' he said. 'I actually didn't even notice he was upset with that. I want to settle before I hit my second serve. I don't want to rush into it and hit a quick double.' The pair had words at the handshake, and their conversation continued for some time under the umpire's chair. Norrie said: 'I think it's a big match for both of us, we really wanted to win. It was obviously frustrating for him to lose. 'I just told him 'man, that was unbelievable level. You competed so well, and I loved the way you kind of responded'. 'I think he just said I was being a little bit too vocal, but I was aiming directly at my team and pulling from the crowd. The atmosphere was so, so good. WHAT A WAY TO FINISH IT OFF! 🤩 Cameron Norrie is into the quarter-finals of #Wimbledon after being forced to a decider by Nicolas Jarry, but he gets it done by winning 6-3, 7-6(4), 6-7(7), 6-7(5), 6-3 🇬🇧 Just look at what it means 😁 — Wimbledon (@Wimbledon) July 6, 2025 'Honestly, nothing but credit to Nico for his performance. And to see him not only playing at that level, you know, seeing him enjoying his tennis and coming through quallies so easily and dropping guys, so I wish him all the best.' Jarry's charge through qualifying to the fourth round has been one of the stories of the Championships, his ranking having plummeted from 16 this time last year to 143 due to a health issue which has affected his vision and balance. But Norrie's achievement is quite something, too, for a player who had slipped from eight in the world to 91 after a tough couple of years, and who is now on the verge of a return to the top 50. He will have his work cut out to get much further, though, with two-time defending champion Carlos Alcaraz awaiting in the quarter-final.
Rhyl Journal
an hour ago
- Rhyl Journal
Wimbledon officials apologise after line-calling tech is turned off in error
After an investigation, organisers have admitted the technology was turned off in error on a section of the court for a game, with the mistake only becoming apparent when a shot from Kartal that clearly missed the baseline was not called out. Had the call been correct, it would have given Pavlyuchenkova a 5-4 lead in the first set, but instead umpire Nico Helwerth ruled the point should be replayed, with Kartal going on to win the game. Intriguing scenes! Pavlyuchenkova thinks Kartal has put her forehand long and stops before the Brit slams back a winner. The umpire checks and confirms the electronic line calling system was unable to track the point, which leads to the point being replayed.#Wimbledon — BBC Sport (@BBCSport) July 6, 2025 The Russian accused the official of home bias, saying: 'Because she is local, they can say whatever. You took the game away from me.' In a statement, a Wimbledon spokesman said: 'It is now clear that the live ELC system, which was working optimally, was deactivated in error on part of the server's side of the court for one game by those operating the system. 'In that time, there were three calls not picked up by live ELC on the affected part of the court. Two of these were called by the chair umpire, who was not made aware that the system had been deactivated. 'Following the third, the chair umpire stopped the match and consulted with the review official. It was determined that the point should be replayed. The chair umpire followed the established process. We have apologised to the players involved.' Pavlyuchenkova discussed the matter with Helwerth after the match, and she said: 'It was very confusing in the beginning because the ball looked very long to me. 'It was a very crucial moment in the match. I expected a different decision. I just thought also the chair umpire could take the initiative. That's why he's there sitting on the chair. He also saw it out, he told me after the match. I don't know if it's something to do because she's local. 'I think we are losing a little bit of the charm of actually having human beings. Like during Covid, we didn't have ball boys. It just becomes a little bit weird and robot sort of orientated. 'They're very good at giving fines, though, and code violations. This they don't miss because every time any little thing, they are just right there on it. I would prefer they looked at the lines and call the errors better.' Kartal, who insisted she did not know if the ball was in or out, defended Helwerth's handling of the situation. 'That situation is a rarity,' she said. 'I don't think it's really ever happened. It's tough luck. What can you do? The umpire is trying his best in that situation. I think he handled it fine. I think the fairest way was what he did, to replay the point.' Pavlyuchenkova regrouped well after the incident, saving a Kartal set point and going on to claim a 7-6 (3) 6-4 victory and a place in the quarter-finals. Asked how she would have felt had she lost, the 34-year-old joked: 'I would just say that I hate Wimbledon and never come back here.' The incident is hugely embarrassing for Wimbledon, with organisers having staunchly defended the innovation amid controversy over the removal of line judges. Britain's leading duo Jack Draper and Emma Raducanu have both complained about the accuracy of the system, which is now widely used on the tour, this week. After her defeat by Aryna Sabalenka on Friday, Raducanu said: 'It's kind of disappointing, the tournament here, that the calls can be so wrong.' The Wimbledon spokesman added: 'We continue to have full confidence in the accuracy of the ball-tracking technology. 'The live ELC system relies on the Hawk-Eye operators, the review official and the technology to work in harmony. This did not happen. In this instance there was a human error and as a consequence we have fully reviewed our processes and made the appropriate changes.'
