Surging Canadian pride in face of Trump's insults sags after Canada's federal election, poll finds
Article content
Last year — in May and again in November — 80 per cent of Canadians said they were proud to be Canadian in opinion polls, but patriotism surged this spring, climbing to 86 per cent in early March, during the lead-up to April's federal election call.
Article content
Article content
Article content
In the month following the election of Mark Carney and the Liberal Party to a minority government, however, Canadian patriotic fervour has slipped back to its pre-election level, according to a new poll.
Article content
Article content
The national opinion survey, conducted by Leger Marketing for the Association for Canadian Studies and provided to Postmedia, also reveals significant regional differences in expressing Canadian patriotism.
Article content
'The boost in pride in being Canadian arising from the U.S. threat of annexation appears to have worn off, and the level of pride has returned to its pre-campaign levels,' said Jack Jedwab, president of the Montreal-based Association for Canadian Studies.
'The most important swings in pride were in Quebec and Alberta, where election spikes in pride have returned to lower levels post-election, and that is especially the case in Alberta,' he said.
Article content
Atlantic Canada displayed the most patriotism in the past, with 93 per cent of respondents saying they were proud to be Canadian a year ago. That was the highest level in the country at any time in the last year of polling.
Article content
With the approach of a federal election — called after the resignation of unpopular prime minister Justin Trudeau — patriotic support in the Atlantic provinces dipped to 91 per cent. In the new poll, it deflated even further, down to 83 per cent.
Article content
Article content
British Columbia expressed the least Canadian patriotism a year ago, with 71 per cent saying they were proud to be Canadian, but that level shot up before the election, reaching 90 per cent in early March. For poll respondents in B.C., patriotism had staying power after the election.
Article content
Ontario was the only other region that retained a higher level of patriotism now than last year. In May 2024, 80 per cent in Ontario said they were proud to be Canadian. That rose to a high of 87 per cent this March and has settled in the recent poll at 83 per cent.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Ottawa Citizen
2 hours ago
- Ottawa Citizen
Today's letters: NIMBYism is hurting Lowertown and vulnerable people
Article content This is a classic Canadian government own-goal. The estimated repair costs would buy 4,000 new rifles of established provenance at $2,500 each. Doing the repairs may again turn out to be an attempt to save face by throwing good money after bad. Article content I believe that Mark Carney DOES have a choice and that is to say no to Donald Trump's demands to drop supply management. The terms of this clause in the USMCA do not impact the US as exports to Canada have never reached the level where the tariff kicks in. If Canada blinks at this one, you can be sure Trump will follow up with a never-ending list of demands that will eventually destroy Canada. Article content Trump cannot be trusted to keep his word, ever. Besides power and money, winning at whatever challenge comes his way is the only thing he cares about. I greatly fear that his end game is to make us the 51st state by any means necessary. I've been afraid of what he might do since he started campaigning in 2016; he has destroyed and corrupted, stoked hated and fear and spread lies far more than my worst-case-scenario mind could ever have imagined. Article content Article content It is certainly noteworthy to ponder the prime minister's winking behaviour and to speculate on its meaning. But, hey who would know except himself, and furthermore, how does it affect his leadership performance? Article content It could be understood in the context of his demonstrated desire and effort to communicate with people and to connect with those of us who appreciate being considered important enough to feel part of a community worth reaching. There is a familiarity to the use of winks and that is achieved by this presentation. Article content It may be an issue that troubles some skeptics but it challenges our trust to accept it at, pardon the pun, face value. Article content Celia M. Carter, Brockville Article content Summer travel season is upon us. The Canadian government has issued a warning: 'Exercise a high degree of caution' when travelling to these countries: Mexico, Cuba, Thailand, Qatar (watch out for the $400-million jet that might hit you en route to Mar-a-Lago), Panama, Peru, India, Germany, Costa Rica. Article content Article content And then this. USA: 'Take normal safety precautions.' OK, don't go to L.A.; might run into some problems there. Don't have any anti-Orange Head crap on your phone at the border. Also beware the high rate of firearm violence and mass shootings (even if tourists are not typically targeted). I think a 'high degree of caution' is advised for the U.S. too. Article content Does the Canadian government issue a summer travel warning for Canadians travelling inside Canada? 'Take normal safety precautions': seatbelts, bike helmets, sun screen. Article content The other day, I locked my keys in my car in the Kanata Staples parking lot. I eventually spotted a booth set up for windshield repairs and approached the young person manning it to ask if he had a piece of wire with which I might reach the keys through the partially open window. He didn't, but immediately offered to help and accompanied me back to my car. He found a stick in the nearby bushes and, after many tries, managed to open the car door.
CBC
2 hours ago
- CBC
Critics warn Ontario bill to crack down on misbehaving politicians 'fatally flawed'
The Ford government is taking its proposed bill to crack down on negligent and misbehaving municipal politicians on the road this summer with plans to have it in place before 2026 civic elections. But critics say the new rules are "fatally flawed" and will be ineffective. Committee hearings on Bill 9, dubbed the Municipal Accountability Act, began last week in London and Niagara Falls to gather feedback on the Progressive Conservative plan. It would see the process to handle misconduct standardized across all 444 municipalities in the province and give councils the ability to remove one of their peers from office. Municipal Affairs Minister Rob Flack told the committee that the government is open to feedback, but aims to pass the bill in the fall. That would mean it would come into force ahead of 2026 municipal elections, he said. "We all know and understand what's at stake with this legislation," Flack told the all-party committee last week. "We know that accountability is not optional, it's essential." WATCH | Ford government reviewing municipal code of conduct amid Pickering council dispute: Ford government reviewing municipal code of conduct amid Pickering council dispute 11 months ago Duration 3:18 The mayor of Pickering and city council members are asking the province to legislate stricter sanctions for councillors after their colleague appeared on a podcast where the host labelled them pedophiles, Nazis and fascists. As CBC's Chris Glover explains, the Doug Ford government confirmed a review of the Municipal Act is now underway. PCs re-introduced bill to address misconduct in May The government re-introduced the legislation in May after it died on the order paper when the snap election was called earlier this year. This is the third attempt by the PCs to introduce legislation aimed at addressing serious misconduct by municipal councillors. They're responding to years of requests from municipal politicians and staff who have asked for tools to deal with allegations of sexual harassment, discrimination and ethics abuses. Flack said the current process is not uniform and gives councillors the ability only to suspend pay, even in the most serious of instances. It undermines the public's view of fairness and accountability on municipal councils, he said. "This current system, simply put, does not work as intended and has produced challenges right across Ontario," he said. The new bill would require a local integrity commissioner to investigate misconduct allegations. If that person believed a breach of the code of conduct warranted a politician's removal, the case would be passed on to Ontario's Integrity Commissioner for review. If that watchdog also recommends removal, the case would be passed back to the local council for a decision within 30 days. A councillor could only be removed by a unanimous vote of all the council members who are not the subject of the complaint. Bar is too high for removal of a misbehaving councillor, critics say Municipal lawyer John Mascarin said leaving the final decision in the hands of politicians will ensure the law is never used. Leaving the final call to the courts would de-politicize the process and ensure fairness, he said. "I think the bill is incredibly flawed, fatally flawed," said Mascarin, who is a partner at the firm Aird and Berlis. "Are you going to tell me that on a large council of 16, 20, 25 members ... you're not going to find one member that's going to betray their good conscience and their fiduciary obligations?" Liberal municipal affairs critic Stephen Blais has introduced three private members bills trying to give municipal integrity commissioners enhanced powers. Those bills would have allowed the watchdogs to refer the most egregious code of conduct violations to court. A judge would then determine if a politician should be removed from office and barred from running in subsequent elections. Each time, the bills have stalled in Queen's Park's legislative process or been rejected by Premier Doug Ford's government. Blais said he thinks the standard in this bill for removing a councillor is too high. "I think the government has overshot the mark. I think it's not just high, I think it's kind of in outer space," he said. NDP municipal affairs critic Jeff Burch, who is also a former city councillor, said the government has acquiesced to years of demands for this legislation, but it's made it ineffective. "This bar is far too high," he said. "Why should politicians, who should be held to a higher standard, have such a lower standard and be able to keep their jobs in situations that make other people feel unsafe?" Municipalities want more tools for 'progressive discipline', AMO says The president of the Association of Municipalities of Ontario says that group is happy government is moving ahead with the legislation. But Robin Jones, who is also the mayor Westport, Ont., says amendments would make it more effective. AMO previously advocated for cases involving potential ejection from council to head to the courts. Lowering the bar from all of council to a two-thirds majority vote for removal would address some concerns, she said. "We think a super-majority should be enough," she said. "We understand that it may need to be more than a simple majority." Jones said councils also want more middle-ground built into the legislation to give them options for other sanctions. Pay suspension isn't much of a motivator on many smaller councils where salaries are small for what's considered part-time work. The new bill would add removal from council as the next, and only other, penalty available to councils. "We really do think that there should be sort of a progressive discipline opportunity," she said. At the hearings, Flack defended the government's position on the full majority of a council being required to remove a peer. The PCs want to avoid the process being "weaponized," he said. "By the time you get to a vote there should be little doubt that removal or disqualification, if it's being recommended, be done," he said. A spokesperson for Flack said in a statement that a high bar is required for any vote to remove a sitting politician. "Removal from office is a serious measure, reserved for the most extreme code of conduct violations, and safeguarded by a high threshold and thorough review to ensure it is never taken lightly," Alexandra Sanita said.
CBC
2 hours ago
- CBC
Her autistic son gets help from school support staff. Quebec's budget cuts could take it away
Social Sharing When Karine Desruisseaux's son was diagnosed with autism and ADHD earlier this year, she said his school's support staff was crucial in giving him the help he needed to thrive. "She takes care of the whole school when kids have issues they need to walk through," Desruisseaux said of the educational specialist who's been helping her seven-year-old son, Ben. Now, she worries the province's cuts to education could take that away. Two weeks before the end of the school year, at a time when school boards and school service centres are normally finalizing their budgets, administrators were told by the Education Ministry to reduce their spending by $570 million. While most administrators said it was too soon to give a breakdown of where and how the cuts would be applied, they warned of devastating consequences and said parents are right to be worried. Last year, the English Montreal (EMSB) and Lester B. Pearson (LBPSB) school boards, who together serve around 60,000 students on the island of Montreal, adopted balanced budgets of $438 million and $402 million, respectively. WATCH l Parents fear cuts to education will impact most vulnerable kids: Quebec parents fear budget cuts will hit special needs students hardest 7 minutes ago Duration 2:20 Parents of children with disabilities are sounding the alarm as Quebec trims $570 million from its education budget. They fear cuts to specialists and support staff will deeply impact vulnerable students. Under the new government directive, the EMSB and the LBPSB are each expected to slash about $30 to $32 million from their annual budgets, according to Joe Ortona, president of the Quebec English School Boards Association. "That is an enormous amount," said LBPSB chairperson Judy Kelley. "The way that we're being asked to cut is really beyond anything that we've ever imagined the government would ask us to do." 'We just don't have that money,' school board says Kelley explained that school boards usually have to invest more than what the government earmarks for support services for students with special needs. "So that is where we would have to say, 'look, we just don't have that money, we don't have that discretionary spending,'" she said. In an email to CBC, the Centre de services scolaire de Montréal (CSSDM), the largest service centre in the province, said it was still in discussions with the government but that it would respect its 2025-26 workforce plan, which confirms regular positions for the coming year. "However, until further notice, positions left vacant following their posting will remain unfilled, absences will not be replaced, and project positions will be terminated," the email reads in French. Meanwhile, the Fédération des employées et employés de services publics (FEESP–CSN), which is made up of 37 unions representing around 35,000 support workers, painted a dire picture for the upcoming school year. The FEESP-CSN said that before the cuts were announced, the EMSB, for example, would have seen a net increase in the number of attendants for students with disabilities and special education technicians (TES). Now, it says the staffing plan calls for the elimination of 15 attendant positions against the creation of one new position, and the elimination of 16 TES positions against the creation of six. Cuts to support staff will impact all students According to Desruisseaux, any cuts to these services in terms of hours or positions not being filled would have ripple effects and impact everyone. For Ben, who has been learning to read by spending one-on-one time with a special aide and whose educational specialist has helped him regulate when overstimulated, it would mean potentially falling behind in his learnings and being more distracted and disruptive in the classroom. "Even if your child doesn't have special needs, the teacher needs those specialists to be able to do their job in class," Desruisseaux said. "And if you're thinking, 'well, I don't have any kids, I don't care.' Well, those kids will take care of you in the future." Danielle Desrosiers, another parent, is concerned about her daughter Carly. At age 10, she was diagnosed with nonverbal learning disorder and now, at 23, attends the Wagar Adult Education Centre, part of the EMSB. Her hope for Carly is that she will be able to find long-term employment and not have to rely on social assistance for the rest of her life. Desrosiers reiterated the same fears expressed by Desruisseaux and worried how a lack of funding often impedes vulnerable students from becoming contributors to society. For her part, Kelley said under the current scenario, the cuts could also affect sports programs, extracurriculars, enrichment programs and other programs aimed at keeping kids in school. "You have students who don't necessarily have academic concerns, but they may have engagement concerns," Kelley said. If those programs are cut, "then where are they left?" Calls growing for government to backtrack The office of Quebec's Education Ministry did not respond to CBC's request for comment but the minister has remained steadfast in his demand for school boards to meet their budgets. Still, some hope there's time to change the province's mind. A petition launched at the National Assembly is calling for the province to cancel the cuts. Meanwhile, two unions representing school support staff have filed a joint complaint with the Quebec ombudsman. In a news release, the unions state that cuts to the education system over the last year "have caused a major disruption in the system's ability to meet its legal obligations to students."
