Build a Gaming PC for Under $450 : High Performance, Low Cost
ETA Prime reveals how to assemble a low-cost, high-performance gaming PC that rivals pricier setups. From selecting the right hardware—like the versatile AMD Ryzen 7 5700G processor and Radeon RX6600 graphics card—to installing Steam OS for a seamless gaming experience, this guide will walk you through every step. You'll also discover how this compact build excels in practicality, offering quiet operation, efficient cooling, and the ability to handle tasks beyond gaming. Whether you're a seasoned PC builder or a curious beginner, this project promises to redefine what's possible on a budget. Could this be the perfect fusion of affordability and performance? Let's find out. Budget Steam OS Gaming PC Key Components for Your Build
Choosing the right components is essential for balancing performance and affordability. A small form factor case, such as MiniITX or MicroATX, is ideal for creating a compact and space-saving design. Below is a breakdown of the essential hardware: Processor: The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G offers excellent processing power with integrated graphics, making it a versatile choice for gaming and multitasking.
The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G offers excellent processing power with integrated graphics, making it a versatile choice for gaming and multitasking. Graphics Card: The AMD Radeon RX6600 provides reliable gaming performance at 1080p and 1440p resolutions, making sure smooth gameplay for modern titles.
The AMD Radeon RX6600 provides reliable gaming performance at 1080p and 1440p resolutions, making sure smooth gameplay for modern titles. Memory: Opt for 16GB of DDR4 RAM for a cost-effective build, or upgrade to 32GB if your budget allows for enhanced multitasking and future-proofing.
Opt for 16GB of DDR4 RAM for a cost-effective build, or upgrade to 32GB if your budget allows for enhanced multitasking and future-proofing. Storage: A 1TB M.2 SSD ensures fast load times and ample storage space for games, applications, and media files.
A 1TB M.2 SSD ensures fast load times and ample storage space for games, applications, and media files. Power Supply: A 550W PSU delivers stable and efficient energy, supporting the system's components without overloading.
This configuration strikes a balance between affordability and performance, making it suitable for gaming, streaming, and general desktop tasks. Its compact design also makes it an excellent choice for living rooms or small spaces, blending seamlessly into entertainment setups. Installing Steam OS
Steam OS, a Linux-based operating system, serves as the backbone of this gaming PC. It is designed to optimize gaming performance while offering a full desktop experience. To install Steam OS, you can use the Steam Deck recovery image, which provides a straightforward setup process.
The operating system is highly customizable. Tools like Decky Loader and CSS Loader allow you to personalize the interface to match your preferences. Additionally, the built-in Discover Store offers access to a wide range of applications, emulators, and utilities, allowing you to expand the system's functionality beyond gaming.
Steam OS supports everyday tasks such as web browsing, email, document editing, and even 4K video playback. Its intuitive interface ensures a smooth experience, even for users unfamiliar with Linux-based systems. This versatility makes it an excellent choice for both gaming and general use. Building a Low-Cost Steam OS Gaming PC
Watch this video on YouTube.
Dive deeper into Steam OS with other articles and guides we have written below. Gaming Performance: What to Expect
This budget-friendly build delivers impressive gaming performance, capable of running most modern titles at high settings. At 1440p resolution, you can expect smooth gameplay with the help of FidelityFX Super Resolution (FSR), which enhances frame rates without sacrificing visual quality. For an even more fluid experience, 1080p at ultra settings is a great alternative.
Popular games such as Spider-Man 2, Cyberpunk 2077, and Ratchet and Clank: Rift Apart perform exceptionally well on this system. While performance may vary slightly compared to Windows-based systems, Steam OS often matches or exceeds expectations, particularly for Linux-optimized titles. This makes it a viable option for gamers seeking a seamless and cost-effective gaming experience. Efficient Cooling and Quiet Operation
Thermal management is a critical aspect of any gaming PC, and this build excels in maintaining optimal temperatures. During extended gaming sessions, the CPU averages a temperature of 56°C, while the GPU operates at approximately 67°C. These figures demonstrate the effectiveness of the cooling system, even under heavy loads.
In addition to efficient cooling, the system operates quietly, making sure an enjoyable gaming experience without distracting noise. This makes it an ideal choice for shared spaces or living room setups where noise levels are a concern. Practicality and Everyday Use
This gaming PC is designed with versatility in mind. Its compact size and controller-friendly setup make it a perfect addition to your entertainment center, eliminating the need for a keyboard and mouse in many scenarios. This design is particularly appealing for those who prefer a console-like gaming experience.
Beyond gaming, the system handles everyday tasks with ease. Whether you're browsing the web, streaming videos, or working on light productivity tasks, this build offers reliable performance. Its ability to seamlessly transition between gaming and general use makes it a practical choice for users seeking a multipurpose device. Building a Cost-Effective Gaming Solution
Assembling a Steam OS gaming PC on a budget is a smart way to enjoy high-quality gaming without overspending. By combining affordable components with the efficiency of Steam OS, you can create a system that excels in both performance and practicality. Whether you're a casual gamer or a tech enthusiast, this build offers a user-friendly and versatile solution for your computing needs. Its compact design, quiet operation, and ability to handle everyday tasks make it a valuable addition to any home setup.
Media Credit: ETA PRIME Filed Under: Guides, Hardware
Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals
Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Geeky Gadgets
13 hours ago
- Geeky Gadgets
Ryzen Z2 Extreme vs Z1 Extreme Gaming Processor Showdown
Is the Ryzen Z2 Extreme the future of portable gaming, or does the Z1 Extreme still hold its ground in 2025? With AMD's relentless push for innovation, the Ryzen Z2 Extreme promises new advancements, boasting a hybrid architecture and a more powerful RDNA 3.5 GPU. Yet, the Z1 Extreme, with its robust Zen 4 foundation, remains a formidable contender, especially in multi-core workloads. For gamers, creators, and tech enthusiasts, the question isn't just which processor is faster—it's which one delivers the best balance of performance, efficiency, and value. The answer may not be as straightforward as it seems, especially when trade-offs like base clock speeds and core configurations come into play. In this piece, we'll dissect the critical differences between these two processors, from their architectural breakthroughs to their real-world performance in gaming and productivity. You'll discover how the Z2 Extreme's hybrid design impacts multi-core tasks, why its GPU performance might redefine expectations, and whether its promise of future driver optimizations is enough to sway potential buyers. Whether you're eyeing a gaming laptop upgrade or simply curious about AMD's next-gen innovations, this comparison will help you navigate the nuances of these innovative chips. After all, the battle between the Z2 and Z1 Extreme isn't just about specs—it's about how those specs translate into everyday experiences. Ryzen Z2 vs Z1 Comparison Architectural Advancements and Core Specifications Both the Ryzen Z1 Extreme and Z2 Extreme feature 8 cores and 16 threads, but their architectural designs and clock speeds set them apart. Here's a detailed breakdown of their specifications: Ryzen Z1 Extreme (Zen 4): 8 cores, 16 threads, a base clock of 3.3 GHz, a boost clock of 5.1 GHz, and a 12 Compute Unit (CU) RDNA 3 integrated GPU. 8 cores, 16 threads, a base clock of 3.3 GHz, a boost clock of 5.1 GHz, and a 12 Compute Unit (CU) RDNA 3 integrated GPU. Ryzen Z2 Extreme (Zen 5): A hybrid architecture with 3 Zen 5 performance cores and 5 Zen 5C efficiency cores, maintaining the same 8-core, 16-thread configuration. It features a base clock of 2 GHz, boost clocks of 5 GHz for Zen 5 cores and 3.3 GHz for Zen 5C cores, and a 16 CU RDNA 3.5 integrated GPU. The Z2 Extreme's hybrid design introduces a balance between performance and efficiency, while its enhanced GPU architecture delivers improved graphical capabilities. However, the reliance on efficiency cores and lower base clock speeds introduces trade-offs in multi-core workloads. Performance Analysis: CPU and GPU CPU Performance The Z2 Extreme benefits from the architectural advancements of Zen 5, offering superior single-core performance. This makes it a strong contender for tasks that rely on single-threaded operations. However, its multi-core performance slightly trails the Z1 Extreme due to the inclusion of Zen 5C efficiency cores, which operate at lower clock speeds. For users focused on multi-core workloads such as video rendering or complex simulations, this could be a critical consideration. GPU Performance The Z2 Extreme's 16 CU RDNA 3.5 integrated GPU represents a significant leap in graphical performance compared to the Z1 Extreme's 12 CU RDNA 3 GPU. Benchmarks across various games and graphical tasks highlight the Z2 Extreme's dominance: Cyberpunk 2077: Higher frames per second (FPS) at both 17W and 25W TDPs, offering smoother gameplay. Higher frames per second (FPS) at both 17W and 25W TDPs, offering smoother gameplay. Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Forza Horizon 5, and Black Myth: Wukong: Noticeable performance gains, particularly at lower power levels. Noticeable performance gains, particularly at lower power levels. Horizon Zero Dawn: Minimal performance difference, underscoring the importance of game-specific optimization. While the Z2 Extreme excels in most scenarios, its performance gains are not uniform across all games, emphasizing the role of software optimization in maximizing its potential. Ryzen Z2 Extreme vs Z1 Extreme Which One Wins in 2025 Watch this video on YouTube. Enhance your knowledge on Ryzen consoles by exploring a selection of articles and guides on the subject. Memory Capabilities and Power Efficiency Both processors are equipped with 24GB of LPDDR5X RAM, but the Z2 Extreme supports faster memory speeds of up to 8000 MT/s, compared to the Z1 Extreme's 7500 MT/s. This improvement enhances system responsiveness and performance in memory-intensive applications such as data analysis and multitasking. In terms of power efficiency, the Z2 Extreme demonstrates better performance scaling at lower wattages. At a 17W TDP, it outperforms the Z1 Extreme in efficiency, making it an ideal choice for portable devices like gaming laptops and handheld consoles. However, as power consumption increases, the efficiency advantage diminishes, narrowing the gap between the two processors. Future Potential Through Driver Updates One of the most promising aspects of the Z2 Extreme is its potential for future performance improvements through driver updates. AMD has a strong track record of enhancing hardware performance via software optimizations, and the Z2 Extreme is expected to benefit from similar updates. Over time, these optimizations could address some of the current performance gaps, particularly in multi-core tasks and game-specific scenarios. Choosing the Right Processor for Your Needs The Ryzen Z2 Extreme introduces meaningful advancements in GPU performance, architectural design, and memory capabilities, making it a compelling choice for gaming enthusiasts and users focused on graphics-intensive tasks. However, its mixed CPU performance and incremental improvements over the Ryzen Z1 Extreme may not justify an upgrade for all users. For those who already own a Z1 Extreme, waiting for future driver updates and optimizations might be the more prudent option. On the other hand, new buyers prioritizing gaming performance, power efficiency, and future-proofing will find the Z2 Extreme to be a forward-looking solution. Ultimately, the decision should align with your specific needs, whether they center on gaming, productivity, or a balance of both. Media Credit: ETA PRIME Filed Under: Gaming News, Hardware, Top News Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
Daily Mirror
2 days ago
- Daily Mirror
Lenovo Legion Go S (SteamOS) review – OS upgrade delivers mind-blowing performance boost
Lenovo's latest handheld is the first officially licensed device to run SteamOS, and that's a big deal. The first gaming handheld with Steam OS, that isn't called a Steam Deck, is here, and it's excellent. This is the Lenovo Legion Go S with Steam OS, the world's first officially licensed handheld powered by SteamOS, an operating system built specifically for gaming. In my Lenovo Legion Go S (Windows) review, I said that "you're probably better off either waiting for the SteamOS version of this handheld or getting a Steam Deck OLED", rather than committing to buy one. So, now the SteamOS version of Lenovo's device is here, is it worth the wait? The Legion Go S with Steam OS can be configured with up to an AMD Z1 Extreme processor and up to 1TB of internal storage, but the version we're testing here is the model with the AMD Z2 Go processor and 512GB of storage, and is priced at £499 / $599 / AU$$903 (rough conversion). That's just £20 more than the Steam Deck OLED, and on paper, the Legion Go S has better specs. Lenovo Legion Go S (Steam OS) design and features Just like the Windows version that we tested a few weeks ago, the SteamOS version of the Legion Go S has an 8-inch, 1920x1200 resolution display, which is 120Hz, 500 nits peak brightness, and has a variable refresh rate. In fact, this device is identical to the Legion Go S with Windows we tested previously, apart from two things: the colour and the operating system. This is the exact same device from a technical point of view, other than it runs Steam OS instead of Windows 11. It's even got the same design, with Hall Effect joysticks, a very small touchpad, a D-pad, four menu buttons, triggers, bumpers, and an SD card slot, along with two USB 4.0 ports on the top of the handheld. The colour, which is Nebula Nocturne, a blue/purple colour, is absolutely stunning, and I much prefer this to the white of the Windows version and the black design of the Steam Deck OLED. Although I really liked the retro MSI Claw 8 AI+ colour, I'd say this is the best-looking handheld I've tested to date. It really is stunning in person. Lenovo Legion Go S (Steam OS) performance But, the big selling point of the device is that it's the world's first officially licensed handheld powered by SteamOS. SteamOS is Valve 's Linux-based operating system that's optimised for gaming, while retaining access to the power and flexibility of a PC. By default, the Steam Client serves as the user interface and provides connectivity to Steam online services, but you can still access the standard Linux desktop by switching to desktop mode and using it as a PC. If you didn't know, only the original Steam Deck and the Steam Deck OLED, both manufactured by Valve, are the only other handhelds running this OS right now. So, with Windows 11 being very much not optimised for gaming, or gaming handhelds in general, in my previous experience, will SteamOS actually lead to better performance? Well, in a nutshell, yes, absolutely. It's benchmark time, baby, and strap in, because this is wild. Here's the Legion Go S Windows 11 version against the Steam OS version in four popular Steam games: Lenovo Legion Go S (Windows 11) vs Lenovo Legion Go S (SteamOS) Cyberpunk 2077 benchmarking tool (Medium graphics setting) The Elder Scrolls 4: Oblivion Remastered (Medium graphics setting) Elden Ring (Medium graphics setting) Black Myth: Wukong benchmarking tool (low graphics settings, FSR 100% resolution scale) For context, here's the Lenovo Legion Go S (SteamOS) against the Steam Deck OLED running at the lower resolution of 1280x000, which matches the latter's native resolution. Lenovo Legion Go S vs Steam Deck OLED Cyberpunk 2077 benchmarking tool (Medium graphics setting) Lenovo Legion Go S (SteamOS): 47fps (average) Steam Deck OLED: 34fps (average) The Elder Scrolls 4: Oblivion Remastered (Medium graphics setting) Lenovo Legion Go S (SteamOS): 28fps (average) Steam Deck OLED: 21fps (average) Elden Ring (Medium graphics setting) Lenovo Legion Go S (SteamOS): 46fps (average) Steam Deck OLED: 38fps (average) Shadow of the Tomb Raider benchmarking tool (highest graphics setting) Lenovo Legion Go S (SteamOS): 49fps (average) Steam Deck OLED: 40fps (average) Black Myth: Wukong benchmarking tool (low graphics settings, FSR 100% resolution scale) Lenovo Legion Go S (SteamOS): 39fps (average) Steam Deck OLED: 30fps (average) Finally, here's the Lenovo Legion Go S compared to the MSI Claw 8 AI+, a device that's almost double the price. Lenovo Legion Go S vs MSI Claw 8 AI+ Cyberpunk 2077 benchmarking tool (low graphics setting) Lenovo Legion Go S (SteamOS): 32fps (average) MSI Claw 8 AI+: 42fps (average) Shadow of the Tomb Raider benchmarking tool (high graphics setting) Lenovo Legion Go S (SteamOS): 36fps (average) MSI Claw 8 AI+: 46fps (average) Black Myth: Wukong benchmarking tool (low graphics settings, FSR 100% resolution scale) Lenovo Legion Go S (SteamOS): 22fps (average) MSI Claw 8 AI+: 30fps (average) Now, although the MSI Claw 8 AI+ is clearly the better device in terms of performance, you'd expect that, considering there's a £400 difference between the two devices. So, when you look at price-to-performance metrics, even in the games it performed worst in, comparatively against the MSI Claw 8 AI+, with the Go S, you're clearly getting better price-to-performance, as you're definitely not getting double (or half) the performance. In terms of battery life, I was a bit disappointed to see really similar performance levels between the Windows and the Steam OS versions. The Windows version managed just about an hour and a half on Cyberpunk 2077 in performance mode, which matches what we saw with the Windows version. However, this is around half an hour less than the Steam Deck OLED manages, which is still the king of efficiency, even if it is at a lower resolution. Lenovo Legion Go S (Steam OS) final thoughts In conclusion, then, the Legion Go S with SteamOS retains the strong design and hardware choices made with the Windows version, but adds a truly gaming-optimised operating system, giving it better performance pretty much across the board. I can confidently say, if you're going to buy the Legion Go S, don't get the Windows version, get this one! But, there are compromises. SteamOS doesn't do everything perfectly; it can't play games from other launchers, for example, and it can't play every game in the Steam library. For example, on the Windows version, I could boot up F1 25, or EA FC 25 for that matter, but EA 's anti-cheat doesn't play nice with Linux, and you just can't get them to launch in SteamOS. Then there's the price, too, which, yes, is only £20 more than the Steam Deck OLED. But you get half the storage and half the brightness, you don't get an OLED display, you get a smaller battery, and it's quite a bit heavier than its Valve rival, almost 100g in fact. But you do get the higher resolution and higher refresh rate display. If performance at a value is all you care about, the Legion Go S with Steam OS is the handheld to go for right now. In terms of the value that it offers, it really is a compelling option for the price, and it should certainly make you think twice about spending £899 or £799 on more expensive handhelds, when this is available for under £500. It's a bit trickier against the Steam Deck OLED, though. If you choose the Go S, there are tradeoffs and compromises to be made, so it's going to come down to personal preference and what you want from a handheld. But, there's no denying that this device is a serious rival to the Steam Deck OLED in the more value-oriented gaming handheld space, and I'm really excited to see which other brands can work with Valve to get SteamOS on their handhelds in future. Because the world's first licensed one is pretty damn sweet.
Reuters
3 days ago
- Reuters
Intel's foundry future depends on securing a customer for next-gen chipmaking tech
SAN FRANCISCO, July 24 (Reuters) - Intel (INTC.O), opens new tab warned investors on Thursday that it may have to get out of the chip manufacturing business if it does not land external customers to make chips in its factories. New CEO Lip-Bu Tan said on Thursday the company's engineers were busy working with customers to jump-start its next-generation contract manufacturing process, or foundry, as the company announced big layoffs alongside a wider-than-expected third-quarter loss outlook. Those customers for the company's so-called 14A manufacturing process are crucial to the success of the technology - so much so that if it fails to secure a big one, it could shut down its cutting-edge manufacturing business altogether, according to Intel's quarterly filing on Thursday. The possibility that Intel could drop out of the cutting-edge manufacturing business would be a historic shift for a company that has described itself as a steward of Moore's Law - an observation by Intel co-founder Gordon Moore about the fast rate of development of the chip industry that held true for decades. Intel is the only U.S. chipmaker capable of making advanced computing chips. Intel has struggled for years due to management missteps, missing out on the AI race and losing market share to its longtime rival AMD (AMD.O), opens new tab. Former CEO Patrick Gelsinger poured money into Intel's foundry business, aiming to compete with chip manufacturing giant TSMC ( opens new tab. Tan, who has already taken steps to right the ship, said on a post-earnings call on Thursday that he was personally reviewing all chip designs and investments. "We're developing Intel 14A ... from the ground up in close partnership with large external customers," Tan said in a memo released with the results. "Going forward, our investment in Intel 14A will be based on confirmed customer commitments. "We will build what our customers need, when they need it, and earn their trust through consistent execution." Intel said that without a significant customer, it would consider cancelling or pausing development of 14A and subsequent technologies. Should the company take the step, it planned to continue to manufacture chips with its 18A technology and a variant through 2030, according to the filing. In a post-earnings conference call, Tan said on Thursday that he is focused on working with customers to ensure 14A is a success and that tight collaboration with external customers is something that was absent from the company's 18A, which is set to go into high-volume production later this year. Tan said bringing those prospective customers in and gaining their feedback during 14A's development has already made it more promising than 18A. "That gave me a lot more confidence that this time, we have customers (that) are engaging early enough in the inception" of 14A, Tan said. "We learn from our mistakes, and we can learn quicker and then get a better result." The consequences of a decision to halt internal manufacturing would be significant for Intel, the filing said. It would mean that over time, Intel would become dependent on Taiwan's TSMC ( opens new tab for contract manufacturing, or foundry, services. Doing so would also put it at a competitive disadvantage to competitors such as AMD, which has longer relationships and experience working with TSMC. Intel had roughly $100 billion of chipmaking equipment as of June 28. If the company halted its 14A manufacturing line, the company expects "significant material impairments" related to the company's foundry assets, the company's filing said.
