Green Bay Police Chief Chris Davis provides details on local immigration enforcement policies
In an over 13-minute video uploaded to YouTube by the Green Bay Police Department, Chief Davis answered nearly a dozen questions people have posed about Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) policies and what local officials would do concerning immigration enforcement in the city.
'No Kings' anti-Trump military parade protests planned all across Wisconsin on Saturday
The questions from the video are listed below, with a summarization of answers from Chief Davis:
Is the Green Bay Police Department assisting ICE with arrests?
Chief Davis said in the video that the department isn't assisting and that they've had no communication with ICE since well before January 1.
Arrests are made under federal authority that local police don't have, and it wouldn't be appropriate for the Green Bay Police to do so.
Why are so many people appearing to be jailed in Brown County on an 'ICE Safekeeper' hold?
Chief Davis said the department believes they were immigration enforcement arrests potentially through an agreement with the jail; however, they are not involved with as they do not have the lawful authority to make arrests solely based on immigration charges.
How does someone locate a detainee currently in ICE custody?
The Immigration and Customs Enforcement website has a locator system at ICE.gov.
What is the Green Bay Police Department's current policy regarding cooperation with ICE?
Chief Davis said that federal law prohibits local government officials from stopping employees from cooperating with immigration enforcement; however, they are not required to cooperate with ICE.
The Green Bay Police Department's policy is to evaluate any request from federal government bodies on a case-by-case basis, considering if it's an appropriate use of city resources and its potential impact on public safety.
Chief Davis said that officers are asked to let officials know if they have had contact with ICE; however, no such case has been mentioned.Federal law prohibits anybody from impeding a federal enforcement group from doing their duties, as they have jurisdiction here.
Chief Davis added that they have expectations of all law enforcement groups, whether it's local, state or federal, that they do their work in a lawful manner with respect to the community.
The Green Bay Police Department, according to Chief Davis, does not receive notice, and they have not received any related to immigration; however, this does not mean they will not be notified in the future.
The Green Bay Police Department may be prohibited from publicly informing residents about an upcoming ICE raid, as sometimes they are confidential. Similar to a search warrant related to another case, it could create safety issues if public notice is issued in advance.
ICE could notify the public if it chooses to.
The First Amendment gives a constitutional right to free speech and to peaceably assemble, and it applies to all people in the United States.
The Green Bay Police Department takes this very seriously, especially with the rise in protests.
Chief Davis said that while protest isn't a crime, crime is not a protest, and that officials won't tolerate property damage, safety threats to anybody and people who choose to be violent will be held accountable.
Chief Davis also added that he understands most people who come out for protests have no intention to commit crimes, but that it is their responsibility to protect and ensure the right to peacefully protest.Law enforcement activities require planning, which is confidential, as it is part of a code of ethics, Chief Davis said in the video. It is not up to the Green Bay Police Department to talk about things that may be happening enforcement-wise unless it's part of the plan to publicize things like traffic regulation.
Chief Davis said that any law enforcement agencies wishing to come into the Green Bay community are encouraged to talk to the local police first because they know best what works in this area, and may be willing to help as long as it's legal without a negative impact on the people.
Chief Davis said that the Green Bay Police Department is here to keep anybody and everybody in the city safe, no matter what.
'It is not relevant to that work for us to ask someone what their immigration status is. If you have a problem, as in being the victim of a crime or there's a safety issue, we're not going to ask you about your immigration status; we don't need to know that.'
'Immigration enforcement is not our responsibility, and federal immigration policy is not something that I can influence. We all took an oath to keep our community safe and to serve the community that's here in Green Bay right now and that has not changed.'
fact from fiction on social media?
'One of the biggest problems we're seeing right now is this proliferation of rumors and misinformation on social media,' Chief Davis said. 'There's a lot of energy on this issue right now and people have very strong feelings on it, and that's what people who spread misinformation on social media count on, that the heightened emotions on these issues will make it easier for people to believe things that aren't true.'
Chief Davis said to take everything on social media with a grain of salt, whether it's using a fact-checking site or other resources to learn more accurate information.'The Green Bay Police Department is here to keep people safe,' Chief Davis said. 'At the same time, the federal government has its authority and it's not appropriate for us to impede that. We all have opinions, I've got mine, but in our organization, we don't let those opinions get in the way of our work.'
The Green Bay Police Department's focus is local public safety, and Chief Davis says it will not get into the business of immigration enforcement as they aren't trained for it.
The video can be watched in full at the following link.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Poll: Trump's approval rating falls to new low amid mass deportation raids
As mass deportation raids by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) continue to spark protest and split public sentiment, President Trump's approval rating has slipped to a new low in the latest Yahoo/YouGov poll. A survey of 1,597 U.S. adults, which was conducted from June 26 to June 30, finds that just 40% now approve of how Trump is handling his job as president, down from 44% in March. Meanwhile, a full 56% of Americans — up from 50% in March — currently disapprove of Trump's performance. That's a net swing of 10 percentage points away from the president over the last three months. At this point in Trump's first term, his disapproval rating was 13 points higher than his approval rating, according to YouGov data. Today, it's 16 points higher. In comparison, former presidents Barack Obama (+14) and Joe Biden (+7) both enjoyed positive approval ratings halfway through their first year in office. Immigration has long been an area of relative strength for Trump. Before last November's election, 48% of Americans predicted he would do a better job on the issue than former Vice President Kamala Harris, his Democratic rival; just 36% thought Harris would do better. And even in March, after a couple of months in office, more Americans approved (48%) than disapproved (44%) of how Trump was actually handling immigration as president — in contrast to nearly every other issue. But that's no longer the case. Throughout 2025, Trump's disapproval rating on immigration has steadily risen — to 46% in April, then 48% in May — before jumping to 52% in June, amid the recent ICE raids. At the same time, the president's approval rating on immigration has fallen to 44%. In other words, what was a net positive issue for him (+4 points in March) is now a net negative (-8). Immigration isn't the only area where Trump has lost ground over the last month. Disapproval of how he's handling the cost of living (up from 59% to 63%) and trade and tariffs (from 57% to 60%) has also shot up. But the new Yahoo/YouGov poll suggests that ICE's ongoing crackdown may be having a bigger effect on the public. With workplace raids and 'roving patrols,' ICE has dramatically ramped up its efforts to apprehend and deport undocumented immigrants in recent weeks throughout major cities such as Los Angeles, Chicago and Seattle. The Trump administration claims its agents are targeting 'the worst of the worst — including gang members, murderers and rapists' who have 'reigned terror' on American communities. The Department of Homeland Security frequently puts out press releases publicizing the capture of these 'heinous criminals.' But on-the-ground reporting has revealed that ICE is also sweeping up otherwise law-abiding immigrants — and even some U.S. citizens — as it strives to meet the administration's new quota of 3,000 arrests a day, up from 1,000 previously, and kick-start what Trump has described as 'the largest domestic deportation operation in American history.' This shift has not proven to be popular, according to the Yahoo/YouGov survey. Far more Americans now say they disapprove (50%) than approve (36%) of the "large-scale deportation raids in Los Angeles and other cities," for instance. Among Latino Americans (who voted for Trump last November in record numbers) that gap is bigger: 62% disapprove to 19% approve. Even independents (who tend to swing elections one way or the other) disapprove (57%) rather than approve (32%) of Trump's ICE raids by a wide margin. Overall, a majority of Americans (51%) now think Trump has gone too far in "arresting and deporting immigrants" — a number that's ticked up 4 points since April. Fewer say his approach has been about right (26%) or that he hasn't gone far enough (15%). A full 55% of independents think Trump has gone too far. Public opinion appears to turn on who Trump is targeting for deportation. According to the Wall Street Journal, top White House aide Stephen Miller — the architect of Trump's immigration agenda — held a testy meeting in May at ICE headquarters, where he demanded that officers do 'what they needed to do' to make more arrests, including rounding up noncriminals in public places. Miller told agents they 'didn't need to develop target lists of immigrants suspected of being in the U.S. illegally, a long-standing practice,' the Journal reported. 'Instead, he directed them to target Home Depot, where day laborers typically gather for hire, or 7-Eleven convenience stores. Miller bet that he and a handful of agents could go out on the streets of Washington, D.C., and arrest 30 people right away.' When asked to choose which immigration approach they prefer, however, just a quarter of Americans (25%) say the federal government should follow Miller's blueprint and "round up and deport as many undocumented immigrants as possible, regardless of whether they've committed other crimes." Far more (61%) want to "deport undocumented immigrants who have committed crimes since arriving in the U.S., but create a pathway to citizenship for those who have otherwise obeyed the law." As a result, a greater number of Americans now think ICE is deporting "mostly the wrong people" (40%) rather than 'mostly the right people' (37%). Negative sentiment about arrests and deportations has tarnished ICE's image as well. Most Americans now see the agency unfavorably (52%) rather than favorably (39%), and the number who view it very unfavorably (40%) is nearly twice as large as the number who view it very favorably (23%). Reflecting this backlash, ICE gets overwhelmingly negative ratings from Democrats (8% favorable, 85% unfavorable), Latino-Americans (25% favorable, 67% unfavorable), African-Americans (11% favorable, 63% unfavorable) and adults between the ages of 18 and 29 (28% favorable, 61% unfavorable). Among white Americans, however, more see ICE favorably (48%) than unfavorably (45%). As for the protests against recent ICE raids by people in Los Angeles and elsewhere, more Americans approve (47%) than disapprove (40%). But that gap is smaller than the one between those who disapprove (again, 50%) and approve (36%) of the raids themselves, suggesting at least some Americans think the protests went too far. In line with that theory, a majority say the protests were either 'mostly violent' (26%) or 'about equally peaceful and violent' (28%) rather than 'mostly peaceful' (37%). Either way, Trump's response to the protests — sending 'nearly 5,000 armed troops to the city against the objections of state and local officials" — is just as unpopular as the raids themselves, with 50% of Americans saying they disapprove and just 38% saying they approve. __________________ The Yahoo News survey was conducted by YouGov using a nationally representative sample of 1,597 U.S. adults interviewed online from June 26 to 30, 2025. The sample was weighted according to gender, age, race, education, 2024 election turnout and presidential vote, party identification and current voter registration status. Demographic weighting targets come from the 2019 American Community Survey. Party identification is weighted to the estimated distribution at the time of the election (31% Democratic, 32% Republican). Respondents were selected from YouGov's opt-in panel to be representative of all U.S. adults. The margin of error is approximately 3.2%.
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Military veteran gets a life sentence for plotting an FBI attack after his Jan. 6 arrest
WASHINGTON (AP) — A military veteran was sentenced Wednesday to life in prison for plotting to attack an FBI office and assassinate law enforcement officers in retaliation for his arrest on charges that he was part of the mob that stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, court records show. Edward Kelley was one of the first rioters to breach the Capitol. Nearly two years later, Kelley made plans with another man to attack the FBI office in Knoxville, Tennessee, using improvised explosive devices attached to vehicles and drones, according to prosecutors. Last November, a jury convicted Kelley of conspiring to murder federal employees, solicitation to commit a crime of violence and influencing federal officials by threat. Kelley, 36, received a pardon from President Donald Trump for his Jan. 6 convictions, but a judge agreed with prosecutors that Trump's action did not extend to Kelley's Tennessee case. That makes Kelley, who is from Maryvale, Tennessee, one of only a few Capitol riot defendants remaining in prison after the Republican president's sweeping act of clemency. U.S. District Judge Thomas Varlan handed down Kelley's life sentence during a hearing in Knoxville, according to court records. The judge denied a request for Kelley to be released pending the outcome of an appeal. Prosecutors had recommended a life sentence for Kelley, saying he was remorseless and incapable of rehabilitation. 'On the contrary, Kelley not only believes the actions for which he was convicted were justified but that his duty as a self-styled 'patriot' compelled him to target East Tennessee law enforcement for assassination,' they wrote. Kelley served in the Marine Corps for eight years. He was deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan before his 2015 discharge from the military. On Jan. 6, 2021, Kelley was captured on video helping two other rioters throw a Capitol Police officer onto the ground and using a piece of wood to damage a window, according to the FBI. He was the fourth person to enter the Capitol through a broken window, the FBI said. After a trial without a jury, a federal judge in Washington convicted Kelley last November of 11 counts stemming from the riot. Before Kelley could be sentenced, Trump pardoned him and hundreds of other convicted Capitol rioters. Kelley argued that his pardon was broad enough to cover his conduct in the Tennessee case, but the judge disagreed. Varlan said Kelley's crimes in the Tennessee case were separated from Kelley's conduct on Jan. 6 'by years and miles.' Prosecutors reached the same conclusion. In other Jan. 6 cases, however, Trump's Justice Department has argued that the pardons apply to separate convictions. For instance, prosecutors concluded that a Kentucky man's pardon for storming the Capitol also covered his conviction for illegally possessing guns when FBI agents searched his home for the Jan. 6 investigation. Kelley has been jailed since December 2022. His lawyer, Mark Brown, said Kelley did not hurt anybody or directly threaten anybody with violence. Brown urged the judge to reject prosecutors' request to apply a 'terrorism enhancement' in calculating his client's sentence. 'Kelley does not deserve the same sentence as an actual 'terrorist' who injured or killed hundreds or thousands of America citizens,' Brown wrote. Kelley's co-defendant, Austin Carter, pleaded guilty to a conspiracy charge in January 2024. He is scheduled to be sentenced on Aug. 4. Kelley created a list of 36 law-enforcement officers to target for assassination and shared it with Carter, calling it their first 'mission,' according to prosecutors. All the officers were involved in Kelley's May 2022 arrest on Capitol riot charges and the FBI's search of his home. 'The proof at trial established that Kelley targeted law enforcement because of their anticipated role in the civil war that Kelley hoped to initiate and because of his animus towards those who participated in his May 2022 arrest and search of his home,' prosecutors wrote. Kelley, Carter and a third man used an encrypted messaging platform to discuss plans, prosecutors said. Carter testified that he met with Kelley to conduct military-style training in November 2022. 'Carter's testimony was unequivocal — he had no doubts that, had he and Kelley not been arrested, the law enforcement personnel included on Kelley's list would have been murdered,' prosecutors wrote. Kelley's attorney said the case involved 'little to no planning.' 'Discussions did not lead to action," Brown wrote. "And while people may not like what Mr. Kelley had to say, he stands behind his position that he has a First Amendment right to free speech.'
The Hill
29 minutes ago
- The Hill
House GOP advances Trump megabill after Johnson calls conservative holdouts' bluff
House Republicans advanced their 'big, beautiful bill' full of President Trump's legislative priorities early Thursday morning, overcoming a key procedural hurdle after GOP leaders left the vote open for hours to quell an internal revolt. The chamber voted 219-213 to adopt a rule governing debate on Trump's domestic agenda, opening up discussion on the megabill and teeing up a final vote on the package. The vote was something of a gamble for Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.), who has faced opposition to the legislation from various corners of his ideologically diverse conference. Heading into the rule vote, conservatives had warned that they would sink the procedural measure unless it was delayed beyond Wednesday. Johnson called their bluff, held the vote open for more than five hours, and then adopted the rule after winning just enough support — an effort that got a big boost from Trump, who spoke with some of the holdouts during the long, midnight impasse. Adoption of the rule sets the stage for Johnson and his leadership team to pass the legislation later Thursday morning, well ahead of their self-imposed July 4 deadline. The Senate had passed the same bill on Tuesday, so the legislation will head directly to Trump's desk, where he's expected to sign it with a ceremonial flourish on Independence Day. The chamber adopted the rule after a whirlwind of an afternoon on Capitol Hill, which saw a different procedural vote stall for more than seven hours as holdouts huddled with Johnson and White House aides behind closed doors. It marked the longest vote in House history. Hardline conservatives have hammered the 'big, beautiful bill,' wary that it cuts too little in federal spending and piles too much onto the national debt. Those concerns only grew after the package returned from the Senate, which had altered the initial House bill in ways that increased deficit spending. On Wednesday morning, a number of hardline conservatives had vowed to vote against the rule if it came to the floor. By Wednesday evening, those warnings had softened slightly. But shortly before the House rule hit the floor, several spending hawks told reporters that if Johnson called the vote they would abstain, requesting more time to learn the details of the Senate-passed bill. The Speaker called the vote anyway, successfully calling their bluff and allowing the tenuous process to move forward. Leadership called the vote minutes after Trump urged Republicans to approve the megabill Wednesday night. 'It looks like the House is ready to vote tonight. We had GREAT conversations all day, and the Republican House Majority is UNITED, for the Good of our Country, delivering the Biggest Tax Cuts in History and MASSIVE Growth. Let's go Republicans, and everyone else – MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!' Trump wrote on Truth Social. But then leaders were forced to again hold a vote open for more than five hours to solidify support. For several hours, it stalled at four GOP 'no' votes and 10 Republicans withholding their vote. Eventually, two of the holdouts voted to advance the measure, but Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) flipped his 'yes' vote to 'no,' putting the tally at 207 to 217. Several hours later, the president spoke directly with some of the holdouts, including Reps. Victoria Spartz (R-Ind.) Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.) and Massie. Not long afterward, Johnson announced that he'd secured the votes to pass the rule. The House will now proceed to debate on the 'big, beautiful bill' and then a vote on final passage, which Johnson said he expected around 8 or 8:30 a.m.
