logo
Wimbledon expansion plan goes into legal tie-break

Wimbledon expansion plan goes into legal tie-break

Reuters12 hours ago
LONDON, July 7 (Reuters) - Wimbledon fans will have eyes only for the tennis this week but for those who run the world's oldest and most prestigious Grand Slam, the real high-stakes contest will unfold not on their grass, but in London's Royal Courts of Justice.
On one side of the legal net is the campaign group Save Wimbledon Park, while facing them in a judicial review of their ambitious expansion plan on Tuesday and Wednesday will be the All England Lawn Tennis and Croquet Club (AELTC).
It is the latest stage of a long-running fight that has split the south-west London "village", which has been home to the Championships since 1877.
Last September the AELTC secured planning permission from the Greater London Authority (GLA) to treble the size of the main site to include 39 new courts including an 8,000-seat show court by redeveloping a former golf course on parkland land it already owns.
The 200-million-pound ($272.92-million) expansion aims to increase daily capacity to 50,000 people from the current 42,000, upgrade facilities and move the qualifying rounds on site to mirror the Australian, French, and U.S. Opens.
The plans have the backing of several leading players, including Novak Djokovic, and 62% of 10,000 residents in Merton and Wandsworth, the London boroughs that share the new site, also support the scheme, according to the AELTC.
'Our confidence in the development and the proposals that we've been working on for many years is as strong as it ever has been,' Wimbledon tournament director Jamie Baker told Reuters.
'For the championships to continue to be in the position that it is and to deliver all the benefits to stakeholders including the local community it is vital that we are able to stage the tournament on one site and bring all the grounds together."
However, this week's judicial review will decide whether the GLA's decision to grant planning permission was unlawful.
Opponents of the development, including Thelma Ruby, a 100-year-old former actress who lives in a flat overlooking the park, and West Hill Ward Councillor Malcolm Grimston, say the club's plans will cause environmental damage and major disruption to the area.
'It's terribly important that it does not go ahead not just for myself but for the whole planet and future generations," Ruby told Reuters.
"I overlook this beautiful landscape and there are all sorts of covenants that say you mustn't build on it, and yet the tennis people have this unnecessary plan they admit will cut down all these glorious trees, which will harm wildlife.
'They're using concrete, building roads, they're going to have lorries polluting and passing my window every 10 minutes. The whole area will be in chaos as they're closing off roads,' she said.
Save Wimbledon Park says the GLA failed to consider covenants that were agreed by the AELTC, including restrictions on redeveloping the land, when it bought the Wimbledon Park golf course freehold from Merton council in 1993 for 5.2 million pounds.
The AELTC paid a reported 63.5 million pounds to buy the Golf Club's lease, which was due to run until 2041.
The campaign group also believes the GLA failed to consider the land's statutory Public Recreation Trust status which means it should be held as "public walks or pleasure grounds".
'It is not antipathy towards the AELTC that's driving this, as some of the benefits are real, such as the extension of lake,' councillor Grimston told Reuters.
'The problem is that it will treble the footprint of the current Championship and turn what currently has very much a feel of being rural England and a gentle pace of life into an industrial complex that would dominate the views of the lake.
'That's why it's classified as Metropolitan Open Land, which is the urban equivalent of the green belt that has been protected for many decades in planning law in the UK and rightly so,' he said.
The AELTC say the plans will improve the biodiversity of the park, as well as bringing parts of it back into public use.
'The London Wildlife trust have endorsed the plans, they've spent many hours scrutinising our analysis and our expert views," the AELTC's head of corporate affairs Dominic Foster said.
"We know that this expansion will deliver a very significant benefit to biodiversity, whereas golf courses are not good for biodiversity.'
($1 = 0.7328 pounds)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Wimbledon 2025 LIVE RESULTS: Djokovic BEHIND as Sinner waits, Shelton and Swiatek also feature on Day 8
Wimbledon 2025 LIVE RESULTS: Djokovic BEHIND as Sinner waits, Shelton and Swiatek also feature on Day 8

The Sun

time37 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Wimbledon 2025 LIVE RESULTS: Djokovic BEHIND as Sinner waits, Shelton and Swiatek also feature on Day 8

Good morning and welcome to SunSport's live blog of Wimbledon! Today's action features some huge names, with the likes of Novak Djokovic and Jannik Sinner looking to progress to the quarter-finals. The Serbian great faces a tricky test in Alex de Minaur in the first match on Centre Court, while Sinner closes the day on Wimbledon's most iconic stage against Grigor Dimitrov. Ben Shelton is looking to extend his best-ever run at the All England Club as he faces surprise package Lorenzo Sonego in the last-16. A first-time champion is guaranteed in the women's contest - and three top 10 seeds will feature in SW19 today. Mirra Andreeva and Emma Navarro meet on Centre Court in a blockbuster clash while former world No1 Iga Swiatek faces Clara Tauson.

Landlords ‘looting' millions of leaseholders under Labour
Landlords ‘looting' millions of leaseholders under Labour

Telegraph

time38 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Landlords ‘looting' millions of leaseholders under Labour

Labour is allowing England's five million leaseholders to be 'looted' after stalling on its pledge to abolish the centuries-old system, campaigners have warned. A series of reforms aimed at boosting leaseholder powers have been unveiled by the Government, but critics argue they will fail to deliver change. Under new rules, leaseholders will be able to more easily challenge extortionate service charges, which they are required to pay to cover the upkeep of shared areas in their building. The new proposals – labelled 'performative nonsense' by campaigners – come after Labour previously rowed back on a commitment to abolish leasehold within 100 days of taking power. Housing minister, Matthew Pennycook, said the party still plans to bring the 'feudal system' to an end, but a timeline on the pledge has not been made clear. The smaller reforms have been proposed in a new consultation unveiled by Angela Rayner's Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government. It says leaseholders will receive a standardised service charge documentation each year which will spell out clear and detailed information about how their rates are calculated and spent. This is hoped to 'make it easier for them to challenge unreasonable bills, and potentially save money where expenses are unjustified'. Further reforms are aimed at stopping leaseholders who have successfully challenged their bill from having to automatically pay for landlords' litigation costs. Property managers will also be forced to qualify as professional practitioners for the first time. Mr Pennycook said: 'This bold package of reforms will arm leaseholders with greater rights and protections, and empower them to challenge poor practice and unreasonable charges and fees.' But Harry Scoffin, of the campaign group Free Leaseholders, said the proposals do not go far enough and leaseholders will continue to be 'looted' by landlords. He said: 'There is this endless number of consultations. The Government is investing all of this energy on tweaking the current system, rather than abolishing leasehold. We will continue to be looted. 'It's a real worry. Leaseholders are exhausted, and do not want to spend years of their life becoming serial litigators challenging their landlords, which is what would happen here. 'The Government says the reforms will strengthen the arm of leaseholders, but this won't work. These tribunals aren't friendly and leaseholders are sometimes up against KCs, literally the creme de la creme lawyers in the land.' Posting on X, Jay Silva wrote: 'More dithering. Why do we need more consultations? How many more of them do successive governments want?' Another user labelled the proposals 'performative nonsense'. They said: 'You said you would abolish leasehold and have not. This is more stalling.' Last October, Mr Pennycook warned that leasehold reform could take as long as five years, describing it as a 'whole of Parliament commitment'. In its manifesto, Labour said it would 'ban new leasehold flats and ensure commonhold is the default tenure'. The party went on to reiterate this promise in the King's Speech, also promising to regulate ground rents and to 'act quickly' to implement its reforms. In May 2023, Lisa Nandy, the former shadow housing secretary, said a future Labour government would bring forward legislation to abolish leasehold within 100 days. But in April, the party quietly dropped this pledge. The Leaseholders Charity said the Government's latest proposals – which are out for consultation until the end of September – were announced 'with as much enthusiasm as a visit to the dentist'. There are 4.8 million leasehold properties in England, equivalent to a fifth of the country's housing stock. In 2023-24, leaseholders paid an average annual service charge of £1,720, but some costs spiralled to five figures.

Umpire has 'rest day' after line-call controversy
Umpire has 'rest day' after line-call controversy

BBC News

time42 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Umpire has 'rest day' after line-call controversy

The umpire who officiated the match at the centre of Sunday's electronic line-calling controversy at Wimbledon is "having a rest day", the All England Club's chief executive "operator error" meant the ball-tracking technology was accidentally deactivated for one game in the fourth-round match between Britain's Sonay Kartal and Russia's Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova on Centre sent a backhand long when game point down at 4-4, but this was not detected by the line-call system, which instead made two automated calls of "stop".Umpire Nico Helwerth opted to replay the point - which Kartal won - but was criticised by Pavlyuchenkova and some pundits for not using his authority to overrule and call the ball All England Lawn Tennis Club (AELTC) said he had "followed the established process".Asked about Helwerth's absence from the umpire rota on Monday, AELTC chief executive Sally Bolton said: "We have rotation of our umpires regularly. A little bit like the players, the umpires also need rest days throughout the tournament. "So he's having a rest day today."He's fine. Look, it's really important to say that the umpire followed the protocols in place. He did what he needed to do on court and acted entirely correctly." On Sunday evening, Pavlyuchenkova told BBC Sport that Helwerth had acknowledged to her after the match that he should have taken the initiative to overrule and call it out."I think the chair umpire should be able to take the initiative, that's what he's there for," she said."That's why he's sitting on that chair. Otherwise, I think we could have also had a match without the umpires. "They have no problem giving us fines and code violations for any reason so I would like them to be a bit more attentive to this sort of situation when the ball is very close to him."The rulebook states that if the electronic line-calling system fails to make a call, "the call shall be made by the chair umpire".It adds: "If the chair umpire is unable to determine if the ball was in or out, then the point shall be replayed. This protocol applies only to point-ending shots or in the case when a player stops play." The electronic system was introduced at this year's Championships, replacing line judges, who had been a staple on court for 147 technology is an "enhanced" version of the previous Hawk-Eye system, which was used when players challenged calls made by line is a line-calling hub inside Wimbledon's grounds, where 50 operators use 144 screens to monitor the ball-tracking footage from 12 cameras on each court. The AELTC added: "We continue to have full confidence in the accuracy of the ball-tracking technology. The live ELC [electronic line calling] system relies on the Hawk-Eye operators, the review official and the technology to work in harmony. This did not happen."In this instance there was a human error and as a consequence we have fully reviewed our processes and made the appropriate changes."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store