Waymo Eyes Three New US Cities for Autonomous Robotaxi Launch in the Coming Months
Given its relatively early development stage, the use of self-driving technology on public roads has been controversial, but that hasn't stopped Waymo from receiving backing from key voices.
'Waymo has worked with GHSA and our first responder network as they've expanded their service, always putting safety first. As someone who walks to work almost every day, I'm excited to share the road with Waymo in Washington, D.C.,' Jonathan Adkins, CEO of Governors Highway Safety Association, said in Waymo press release. The autonomous rideshare service has logged over 50 million miles through December 2024, with a Waymo post on X, formerly Twitter, stating that the company found their self-driving technology had 83% fewer airbag deployment crashes, 81% fewer injury-causing crashes, and 64% fewer police-reported crashes compared to a human driving the same distance in San Francisco and Phoenix.
Still, Waymo's technology isn't without its flaws. The rideshare company's autonomous fleet collected 589 tickets last year in San Francisco, equating to $65,065 in fines. Waymo commonly received tickets for dropping passengers off in commercial loading zones, blocking traffic, failing to observe street cleaning parking restrictions, and double-parking. The company noted its vehicles would sometimes drop passengers in commercial loading zones when alternative drop-off areas were congested main roads or a spot too far from the rider's destination. Waymo also added that some citations also occurred during brief parking when an SUV was too far from its facility.
While 589 tickets aren't nothing, they're a drop in the bucket when it comes to San Francisco's traffic citations, representing less than 1% of total tickets. Waymo has used vehicles like Chrysler's Hybrid Pacifica minivan in the past, but as of now, the company exclusively utilizes Jaguar's all-electric I-PACE SUV and is working on diversifying its fleet.
Cities like Washington D.C. will serve as another key challenge for Waymo, as The Nation's Capital was rated as having the ninth-most traffic out of any US city for 2024, according to INRIX. Waymo launched its first international test in Tokyo, Japan, in December 2024, foreshadowing a more prominent global presence. The rideshare service's Level 4 self-driving technology remains ahead of Tesla's autonomous programs, which operate at Level 2. Level 4 indicates that Waymo SUVs can complete all driving tasks within specific conditions, which includes geofencing or pre-defined areas in the company's case.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
10 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Yes, Chrome Really Can Survive Without Google
An estimated 4 billion people around the world use Chrome. But what if Google didn't control the world's most-used web browser? There's a chance this question might no longer be hypothetical. In the U.S. government's landmark antitrust case against Google for illegally monopolizing the online search market, one of the most consequential and hotly debated remedies on the table is the proposed spin-off of Chrome—a browser that drives more than a third of Google's search traffic and acts as a powerful gatekeeper to the internet. In court, Google cast doubt on the idea that any other company could successfully run Chrome. But it's simply not true that Google alone is capable of running Chrome. A new report from the Knight-Georgetown Institute (KGI)—co-authored by the two of us, KGI's executive director and Firefox web browser's former chief technology officer—shows that it is technically feasible for Chrome to be divested. Our report concludes that an independent Chrome browser could stand on its own without Google, and could still compete with rivals like Microsoft Edge, Apple Safari, and Mozilla Firefox. Google Chrome logos are displayed on a cell phone. Google Chrome logos are displayed on a cell start with the basics about Chrome. Chrome is built on Chromium, an open-source software project with 35 million lines of code that are publicly accessible. Any company or developer can build a functional browser from Chromium today—and many already do, including Microsoft, Brave, and Perplexity. The new owner of Chrome would build on the underlying Chromium code base. If Chrome were spun off, the new owner would need to replace certain Google-owned components and services. Consider Safe Browsing, a feature that alerts users when they visit a suspicious website or encounter harmful downloads. It's run by Google, but it's also already used by competing browsers. Chrome's new owner could continue using it—and Google may well have reasons to continue running it—or adopt alternative approaches, like partnering with another company. Similarly, technical blueprints exist for how to run services like bookmark syncing and software updates. However, we shouldn't expect the new owner to replicate or recreate everything Google does—nor should it. Any buyer willing to front the resources to buy Chrome is not likely to be interested in perfectly copying everything Google has done, and would rather compete on its own terms according to its own business interests. It will be key for Chrome's new owner to recruit and retain the engineering talent needed to build and maintain Chrome. A well-resourced new owner—one committed to the future of an independent Chrome—could build a top-tier team with the right mission and incentives, drawing from a talent pool that exists both inside and outside of Google. A successful divestiture would also require court-ordered guardrails and transitional support from Google. With the above in place, Chrome's 4 billion users should continue to enjoy the same high-quality browser experience they've come to expect from a major browser, and perhaps even benefit from new browser innovations that are no longer tied to Google's corporate priorities. Some features would surely change as the new owner crafts the product according to its own goals, but the key components of a fast, secure browsing experience are all within reach for an independently operated Chrome. Concerns about the potential Chrome spin-off sometimes exhibit a sort of Stockholm syndrome: fear of a world without the monopolist's resources. We often get asked how an independent Chrome could possibly make money—as if a product with 4 billion global users would not be an attractive asset with many monetization options. Possible business models could draw on search, advertising, artificial intelligence (AI), enterprise use, and other services. If the court adopts some of the government's other proposed remedies as well—for example, requiring Google to syndicate its search results or search ads—many new potential business opportunities could open up. Breaking Chrome away from Google wouldn't break the browser. An independent Chrome browser can successfully compete should Google be forced to sell off Chrome. Alissa Cooper is executive director of the Knight-Georgetown Institute. She is a recognized leader in the development of global internet standards, policy, and governance. Prior to joining KGI, Alissa spent a decade at Cisco Systems in senior engineering and executive roles, including vice president of technology standards and vice president and chief technology officer for technology policy. Eric Rescorla is a senior research fellow at the Knight-Georgetown Institute. He is the former chief technology officer, Firefox, at Mozilla, where he was responsible for setting the overall technical strategy for the Firefox browser. Eric has contributed extensively to many of the core security protocols used in the internet, including TLS, DTLS, WebRTC, ACME, and QUIC. Most recently, he served as chief technologist for the Center for Forecasting and Outbreak Analytics at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The views expressed in this article are the writers' own.
CNET
12 minutes ago
- CNET
These Are the First FireSat Images for Finding Wildfires from Space
At Google I/O in May, Google revealed that it's working with the Earth Fire Alliance on FireSat, a program that combines new high-resolution satellites with AI analysis to pinpoint wildfires in their earliest stages and help responders knock them down before they grow. This week the alliance released the first images captured by the initial satellite, showing how fires as small as 5-by-5 meters -- about the size of a classroom -- can be detected from space. FireSat identified this small roadside fire in Oregon in June 2025. Muon Space and Earth Fire Alliance Existing satellite systems scan for fires, but at a coarser resolution. In one image from Oregon, using MWIR (Mid-Wave Infrared) heat-sensing imaging, a small roadside fire showed up as a bright speck. According to the alliance, it wasn't detected by other space-based systems. Using up to six infrared channels, FireSat can detect new fires as well as hot burn scars from earlier fires, as shown in this June 15 image from Ontario, Canada. Muon Space and Earth Fire Alliance This example from Ontario, Canada, on June 15, 2025, shows the Nipigon 6 fire, a new blaze detected using the MWIR spectrum, but it also shows how LWIR (Long-Wave Infrared) was used to identify areas left over from a previous burn in 2020, which are heated due to a lack of vegetation. At the bottom, a false-color composite of SWIR (Short-Wave Infrared), NIR (Near-Infrared) and visible Red channels helps track the life cycle of the fire. Currently, the Earth Fire Alliance has one protoflight satellite, built by Muon Space, aloft for testing. With three satellites in orbit, FireSat will be able to scan locations globally twice a day. And when the program is fully operational, in 2030, a network of more than 50 satellites is expected to cut that time down to 20 minutes; for areas that are more prone to fires, that interval will be every 9 to 12 minutes. One key reason for Google's involvement in the alliance is to sort through the massive amount of data that will be generated. Muon Space estimates that each satellite will cover 190 million square kilometers per day, and the multispectral instrument on each satellite records across six channels. With AI and software assistance from Google, the program should filter out false positives. AI is playing a larger role in fighting wildfires around the world -- NASA is using its vast trove of Landsat satellite data to build predictive models of where fires are likely to erupt next. "There are millions of things that can be mistaken for a fire," said Chris Van Arsdale, Google Research climate and energy lead and chair of the Earth Fire Alliance board of directors. "Looking for fires becomes a game of looking for needles in a world of haystacks." FireSat can locate wildfires in areas too remote to be detected by many other methods, as seen in this example showing Alaska on June 21. Muon Space and Earth Fire Alliance It will also be important to prioritize fires that crews can respond to. A June 21, 2025, image of a remote area of Alaska shows a fire that wasn't observable by ground-based sources. A FireSat image composite showing wildfires in Australia. Muon Space and Earth Fire Alliance In this image from Borroloola, Northern Territory, Australia from July 11, 2025, the FireSat satellite identified multiple wildfires spread over a large distance, which would help fire responders coordinate efforts. The Earth Fire Alliance is currently working with some fire departments and other early adopters to help determine how best to parse the data and communicate with responders. "What you're looking at now is raw imagery that is helpful for the technologists, the scientists [and] the remote sensors," said Kate Dargan Marquis, former California state fire marshall and senior wildfire advisor to the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, a main underwriter of the Earth Fire Alliance. "But for firefighters, we'll build fire data products on this data." That would include map-based tools with AI underpinnings to help them understand where and how they can make fire response decisions, she noted. The FireSat satellite and the people who helped build it. Muon Space The data will eventually be made available for public resources, such as those used by the consumer app Watch Duty. Brian Collins, executive director of Earth Fire Alliance, explained that the current early adopter program includes pathways to determine how to disseminate the information being collected, be that through local dispatchers or other sources. "A very informed public can make decisions [such as when to prepare to evacuate] in advance of being told," he said, adding that a public that understands fire is no longer scared of fire. Although FireSat is still in its first stages and won't be considered operational until three satellites are in orbit, in 2026, the initial data and imagery looks to be a promising tool for fighting wildfires around the globe.
Forbes
13 minutes ago
- Forbes
Microsoft Deadline—72 Hours To Stop Using Your Passwords
Do not leave this too late. 'The 'password era is ending,' Microsoft has warned its billion users, confirming that it wants all those users to delete their passwords given that account attacks are now surging. As part of this change, a 72 hour deadline means you must act now. On the surface, Microsoft's decision to delete any passwords you have stored in its Authenticator app is straightforward. 'You can continue to access them,' it says, 'with Microsoft Edge, a secure and user-friendly AI-powered web browser.' The Authenticator app 'will continue to support passkeys,' which has been overlooked as the password deletion warning has grabbed the headlines. Microsoft doesn't want you to move your passwords, it wants you to replace them with passkeys where you can. So don't move your passwords, stop using them use passkeys instead. Just as with Google's warning to Gmail users, Amazon's warning to Prime users, and Microsoft's own warning to all its users, this is the time to make that change. All these major providers support passkeys, and you should add them now. 'If you have set up Passkeys for your Microsoft Account,' you must 'ensure that Authenticator remains enabled as your Passkey Provider. Disabling Authenticator will disable your passkeys.' Microsoft has already killed its autofill password capability. So while some of your passwords cannot be replaced with passkeys and need to be moved, where accounts do support passkeys, you should take this opportunity to stop using those passwords and upgrade the security on the accounts instead. And before blindly moving passwords to Edge, you should also bear in mind the security risks in using browser-based passwords managers. A standalone app is best, ensuring a fire-gap between the websites you visit and the passwords you have saved. 'While enrolling passkeys is an important step,' Microsoft says, 'it's just the beginning. Even if we get our more than one billion users to enroll and use passkeys, if a user has both a passkey and a password, and both grant access to an account, the account is still at risk for phishing. Our ultimate goal is to remove passwords completely and have accounts that only support phishing-resistant credentials.'
