Suze Orman: 3 Retirement Curveballs To Watch Out For
Most people don't know how long they'll live or what their old age will look like, and there's no shortage of brutal realities. For example, most people will have to reduce or all together stop driving by their mid-70s. Additionally, the lifetime risk of dementia increases to over 50% among those who reach age 75. And most people are likely to develop a condition requiring long-term care in their senior years. You can hope for the best, but you have to prepare for the worst.
Find Out:
Read Next:
In a recent post on her blog, financial expert Suze Orman discussed three common retirement curveballs. Even if you're lucky enough to dodge these curveballs, you need to know what they are and to stress-test your retirement plan to make sure that if you are struck, you — and your finances — can handle it.
This year's Retirement Confidence Survey by the Employee Benefit Research Institute found that 3 in 4 people working expect to go on to continue to earn money in retirement. But that doesn't usually happen.
'In reality, only three in 10 people surveyed who are retired are working for pay,' Orman wrote.
The top reason retirees opt to go back to work is to be able to make money amid rising costs of living. But what if you physically or mentally can't return to a working lifestyle?
Around 46% of Americans ages 75 and older and 24% of those ages 65 to 74 reported having a disability, according to estimates from the Census Bureau's 2021 American Community Survey (ACS). Who's to say that you won't be among the Americans who have a disability in retirement, and one that renders you unable to generate income?
Be Aware:
Maybe you're set on retiring at the full retirement age of 66 or 67, depending on when you were born. Maybe you're thinking you may even push it back a couple years to make some more money before you bid adieu to working life. Consider the cruel possibility that you may not have a choice but to retire early.
'About two-thirds of people surveyed who reported they retired earlier than planned said it wasn't their idea,' Orman wrote, citing data from the Retirement Confidence Survey. 'About 30% said they stopped working due to downsizing or other strategic staffing changes at their job, and another 30% had a health problem or disability that pushed them to retire early. Some people reported stopping work earlier to care for a spouse or another family member.'
Do you want to sail smoothly into retirement? Maybe do leave the full-time hustle and bustle but work as a consultant for a few years before exiting the workforce? Well, yet another brutal reality could strike. A bad health event or some other serious situation in your life may force you to pull the plug fast on the working life.
'Half of the surveyed workers said they plan to have a gradual transition to retirement where they have reduced hours, rather than a cold-turkey full-time stop,' Orman wrote. 'Yet nearly 3 in 4 retirees said they, in fact, didn't have the gradual transition, and instead did an abrupt change from working on Friday and being retired on the following Monday.'
They're called curveballs because we don't see them coming. But that doesn't mean we can't prepare for them so that if they do hit us, we're not taken down with them.
More From GOBankingRates
Clever Ways To Save Money That Actually Work in 2025
This article originally appeared on GOBankingRates.com: Suze Orman: 3 Retirement Curveballs To Watch Out For
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
VIG Is a Popular Dividend ETF for Passive Income. But Is It the Best?
With a 1.8% yield, the Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF isn't the highest-paying dividend ETF. Instead of focusing on stocks with high yields, it focuses on those with extended track records of dividend increases. It could be a great ETF for investors who are more concerned with building their future income streams. 10 stocks we like better than Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF › The Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (NYSEMKT: VIG), also commonly referred to simply by its ticker symbol, VIG, is an index fund that holds a portfolio of more than 330 dividend-paying stocks. But with dozens of excellent exchange-traded funds (ETFs) focused on dividend stocks to choose from, is this one the right fit for you? Let's take a closer look at the Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF and which types of investors it could be the best dividend stock ETF for. The Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF tracks the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers index, which includes only stocks with established track records of raising their dividends every year. Unlike some of the other dividend-focused ETFs offered by Vanguard, stocks don't necessarily need to have above-average dividend yields to be included -- just a dividend growth streak of at least 10 straight years. In part for this reason, the ETF has a 1.8% yield. That's more than you'd get from an S&P 500 index fund, but it isn't close to what most "high dividend" ETFs offer. However, it's important to realize that this ETF isn't about creating a large stream of income immediately. In fact, the index that it tracks excludes the highest-yielding 25% of stocks that would otherwise meet its criteria. Though that might seem counterintuitive, there's a logical reason why: Often, a particularly high dividend yield is the result of a plunging stock price. Given that many noteworthy stock declines are triggered by bad news for the underlying business, and that such troubles can make it harder for a company to pay and raise dividends, foregoing the highest-yielding options in the near term can be a smart strategy for achieving reliable payout growth over the long term. The idea is that this fund holds stocks that will be paying significantly more in dividends 10 years from now, 20 years from now, and so on. Like most Vanguard ETFs, the Dividend Appreciation ETF is a low-cost investment vehicle. It has a rock-bottom 0.05% expense ratio, which means that for every $10,000 in invested assets, your annual fee expense will be just $5. (To be clear, this isn't a fee you have to pay -- it will simply be reflected in the fund's performance over time.) As of the latest update, the Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF owned 337 stocks, and it's a weighted index, so some stocks make up significantly more of the portfolio than others. Top holdings include Broadcom, Microsoft, Apple, Eli Lilly, and JPMorgan Chase. One of the most interesting features of this ETF is that because it doesn't require above-average dividend yields, it includes a lot of high-growth companies that many dividend ETFs exclude. For example, Broadcom -- the largest holding in the fund -- has a dividend yield of just 1% at its current share price. However, that tech company has grown its payouts at a double-digit percentage pace and has increased them for 14 consecutive years. Because it has more growth stock exposure than most dividend ETFs, the Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF has the potential to deliver stronger total returns. There's no such thing as an ideal dividend ETF for everyone -- that's why there are dozens of them to choose from. The Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF could be an especially great choice for investors who want dividend income in their portfolios but are more concerned with how much they'll be getting paid in the future than the current yields of their stocks. In a nutshell, if you're 70 years old and relying on your portfolio for income today, or if you're preparing to retire within the next few years, the Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF might not be a great fit for you. On the other hand, if you're still a decade or more away from retirement, it could be an excellent ETF to help you build an income stream for the future without sacrificing growth potential. Before you buy stock in Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $713,547!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $966,931!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,062% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 177% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 23, 2025 JPMorgan Chase is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. Matt Frankel has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Apple, JPMorgan Chase, Microsoft, and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF. The Motley Fool recommends Broadcom and recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. VIG Is a Popular Dividend ETF for Passive Income. But Is It the Best? was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio
Fox News
11 minutes ago
- Fox News
Iran's leadership is ‘worried' about its future, UC Berkeley professor says
All times eastern Fox Business in Depth: Red, White and Blue Collar/Dagen McDowell Maria Bartiromo's Wall Street FOX News Radio Live Channel Coverage
The Verge
11 minutes ago
- The Verge
Tesla says it delivered its first car autonomously from factory to customer
This might be a bigger deal than the robotaxis. Tesla said it completed its first fully autonomous vehicle delivery from factory to customer. A video posted on X shows the vehicle — a Tesla Model Y — leaving the company's Austin Gigafactory, driving on the highway, passing through suburban sprawl and residential neighborhoods, before arriving at a customer's apartment building. Tesla CEO Elon Musk had promised the first fully autonomous delivery would take place June 28th. But on Friday he announced that the milestone had been achieved a day early. 'There were no people in the car at all and no remote operators in control at any point. FULLY autonomous!' Musk wrote on X. 'To the best of our knowledge, this is the first fully autonomous drive with no people in the car or remotely operating the car on a public highway.' That last part isn't accurate. Waymo has been operating fully driverless vehicles with passengers on the highway for over a year. The vehicles, which are driving on freeways in Phoenix, San Francisco, and Los Angeles, are only available to employees of the company, with the goal to open them up to the public at a later date. But Tesla's achievement is still notable, especially when you consider the rocky rollout of the company's robotaxi service. The robotaxis launched with safety monitors in the passenger seat with access to a kill switch, and within a few days the vehicles were recorded committing several safety lapses, including driving over the double-yellow line into the opposite lane of traffic and hard braking in the middle of the road for no apparent reason. By proving it can operate fully autonomous vehicles on highways without a safety monitor present in the vehicle, Tesla is able to demonstrate that its Full Self-Driving system is getting closer to Musk's promise of 'unsupervised' driving. The robotaxis aren't quite there yet, still requiring safety monitors and remote supervisors. That leaves Tesla in limbo between confidence that its technology can handle the driving without anyone in the vehicle, but less confident when there's a human being riding inside.
