logo
Vodafone lenders worried about the fate of loans as telco seeks more debt

Vodafone lenders worried about the fate of loans as telco seeks more debt

Mint04-07-2025
Mumbai: Lenders to Vodafone Idea Ltd are worried that the telecom operator which is trying to borrow ₹35,000 crore more may prioritize paying its government debts over its new bank loans, a person aware of the matter said.
Their concern centres around the company's ability to sustain loan repayments on the proposed loans if Vodafone Idea has to pay the adjusted gross revenue (AGR) dues to the government. The weakest player in India's telecom landscape has been steadily posting losses since FY17.
On 19 May, the Supreme Court rejected petitions from Bharti Airtel Ltd and Vodafone Idea to waive some of the dues linked to their AGR. Vodafone Idea had sought a waiver on interest, penalty, and interest on penalty crossing ₹45,000 crore on the ₹83,400 crore pending AGR dues. The four-year moratorium on these payouts ends in September.
In May, the operator told the Supreme Court that it would not be able to operate beyond the current financial year without bank funding.
According to another person, whether banks approve the fresh loan proposal depends on promoter Aditya Birla Group injecting additional equity or providing a backstop to assure banks in case the telco's health worsens in future.
To be sure, last financial year, the telco raised ₹4,000 crore in a preferential issue of shares to promoters, with Aditya Birla Group putting in ₹2,100 crore and Vodafone Group ₹1,900 crore.
'The company wants to raise ₹35,000 crore from banks; but for that, the promoters have to put in more equity or produce a corporate guarantee from a strong group company," said the first person cited above. 'In such a situation, if there is no additional skin in the game, bankers are not willing to put in more money."
The second person said discussions between Vodafone Idea and a consortium of banks have been underway even before the AGR case returned to court. The person said there were a few virtual meetings between the bankers in the consortium and the management of Vodafone Idea a few months back, where lenders raised the two contentious issues on additional equity and promoter guarantee.
'This information is incorrect, and no such proposal is on the table," a spokesperson for Vodafone Idea said, without saying which proposal was being referred to.
The spokesperson added: 'We remain in active discussions with lenders and will provide an update at the appropriate time."
Also Read: Sword of Damocles hangs over Vodafone Idea's bank guarantees
'The position of lenders has not changed; the AGR setback in the Supreme Court has only made it worse," said the second person cited above.
According to Care Ratings, bankers to Vodafone Idea include State Bank of India, Punjab National Bank, Canara Bank, Bank of Baroda, and Axis Bank. While some have given term loans, others have provided bank guarantees. Its bank debt stood at ₹2,330 crore as on 31 March, as against ₹4,040 crore a year ago, as per disclosures made to analysts on 2 June.
Email sent on Wednesday to the State Bank of India—Vodafone Idea's largest lender—remained unanswered.
What complicates the matter is the government's decision not to convert more of the company's dues to equity. Following two rounds of such conversions, the government now owns a 49% stake in Vodafone Idea. Promoters Aditya Birla Group and Vodafone Group held a 25.6% stake, while the remaining are public shareholders.
On Wednesday, telecom minister Jyotiraditya Scindia told CNBC TV18 in an interview that the government's stake in the telco 'will not go beyond the current 49%".
While banks seem reluctant, the company is actively chasing loans. Akshaya Moondra, chief executive officer, Vodafone Idea told analysts on 2 June that the 'primary source of fundraising remains bank borrowing", which the telco is working on.
'The conversion of government dues to equity, along with the upgrade in the credit rating, are facilitating factors for us to take those discussions forward. Post the conversion, the engagement has started again seriously," Moondra told analysts.
While the first round of equity conversion took place in 2023, the latest one happened in April, taking the total government stake to 49%. In May, Vodafone Idea's board approved raising ₹20,000 crore through a follow-on public offering (FPO), private placement, or other permissible mode.
Also Read: Two months after second lifeline, Vodafone Idea again raises survival fears
Analysts believe that raising debt is crucial to the telco's expansion plans.
'...we believe the company's network investments remain contingent on debt raise which, in turn, is dependent on continued support/AGR relief from the Government of India. Stabilization of the subscriber base, along with further relief from the government of India remains imperative for Vi's long-term survival," analysts at Motilal Oswal Financial Services said in a note to clients on 2 June.
The tussle over AGR has stretched out over almost 20 years. On 17 April, Vodafone Idea, which has 198.2 million mobile subscribers, submitted a representation to the government, seeking a waiver of interest, penalty and interest on penalty on its AGR dues.
The telco said the government's AGR liability demand stood at ₹83,400 crore as of March end, with an annual instalment of approximately ₹18,000 crore due starting 31 March 2026 for the next six years. In comparison, Vodafone Idea generated ₹8,400-9,200 crore cash annually in the last three years.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Supreme Court agrees to hear pleas for review of verdict on liquidation of Bhushan Steel
Supreme Court agrees to hear pleas for review of verdict on liquidation of Bhushan Steel

The Hindu

time7 hours ago

  • The Hindu

Supreme Court agrees to hear pleas for review of verdict on liquidation of Bhushan Steel

The Supreme Court on Tuesday (July 29, 2025) fixed July 31 for hearing pleas seeking a review of a May 2 verdict that set aside a resolution plan submitted by JSW Steel Limited for Bhushan Steel and Power Limited (BSPL), holding it illegal and in violation of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). A Bench of Chief Justice B.R. Gavai and Justice Satish Chandra Sharma allowed an application for open-court hearing and fixed July 31 for hearing a batch of pleas seeking a review of the verdict. "Application(s) for listing review petition(s) in open court and application for oral hearing are allowed. Issue notice. List these matters on July 31, 2025 at 3 p.m.," the bench ordered. The Court considered the review pleas in chambers by circulation and passed the order. The former promoters of BSPL urged the top court on July 21 to accord an open-court hearing to their plea for a review of the May 2 verdict. The former promoters of BSPL were Sanjay Singhal and his family, specifically including his father Brij Bhushan Singhal and brother Neeraj Singhal.

Illegal sale of fireworks, illicit import of Chinese fireworks caused loss of 40% to fireworks traders, says federation
Illegal sale of fireworks, illicit import of Chinese fireworks caused loss of 40% to fireworks traders, says federation

The Hindu

time10 hours ago

  • The Hindu

Illegal sale of fireworks, illicit import of Chinese fireworks caused loss of 40% to fireworks traders, says federation

Federation of Tamil Nadu Fireworks Traders have alleged that illegally functioning online sale of fireworks and illicit import of Chinese fireworks has caused a loss of ₹800 crore to the fireworks traders of the country during 2024 Deepavali season. Talking to reporters here on Tuesday, the federation president V. Raja Chandrasekaran said that despite the Supreme Court banning taking online orders and sale of fireworks in 2018, the illegal online sale continued. 'This has been more pronounced in Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh. Before it spreads to other States, the Government should ensure that no online sale of fireworks could be done,' he said. Besides, stealth import of Chinese goods continued, he charged. He pointed out that even recently, Chinese fireworks worth ₹35 crore were seized in Mumbai. 'The combination of online sales and Chinese imports had affected the business of traders to the extent of 40%, which is around ₹800 crore to ₹1000 crore, during Deepavali season 2024,' he said. The federation would proceed with a case of contempt of court for allowing online sale of fireworks besides initiating criminal case, he said. License for fireworks shops Mr. Chandrasekaran complained that applications submitted for permanent cracker shops in February and March 2025 were yet to be processed. 'The process should have been completed within two months,' he said. Besides, the license for permanent cracker shops is issued for five years under Explosives Act 2008. However, since the Department of Fireworks and Rescue gives no-objection certificate for only one year, the Revenue Department was giving license for only one year in many districts, he complained. Besides, he insisted that the inordinate delay in giving license for temporary cracker shops during Deepavali season was taking a huge toll on the traders. 'The applications should be invited 90 days before Deepavali and the 15-day license should be given one month ahead of Deepavali to help the traders plan their business,' he said. The federation secretary, N. Elangovan, was present.

Supreme Court agrees to hear JSW Steel's review plea in Bhushan Power case
Supreme Court agrees to hear JSW Steel's review plea in Bhushan Power case

Mint

time10 hours ago

  • Mint

Supreme Court agrees to hear JSW Steel's review plea in Bhushan Power case

In a relief for JSW Steel Ltd, the Supreme Court on Tuesday agreed to hear a review petition in open court against its 2 May verdict quashing the company's ₹ 19,350 crore acquisition of Bhushan Power and Steel Ltd and ordering BPSL's liquidation. A bench led by Chief Justice B.R. Gavai and Justice Satish Chandra Sharma passed the order during a closed-chamber review hearing, allowing the matter to be heard in open court and issuing notice on the plea. 'Application(s) for listing review petition(s) in open Court and application for oral hearing are allowed. Issue notice. List these matters on 31.07.2025 at 03:00 p.m.,' the order stated. This development comes as a relief for JSW Steel, providing it one final legal opportunity to retain control of BPSL, which it acquired in March 2021 through the corporate insolvency resolution process. The court's decision also offers a breather to lenders such as State Bank of India and Punjab National Bank, who filed separate review petitions in support of JSW Steel. The May ruling not only cancelled the acquisition but also made banks return ₹ 19,350 crore paid by JSW, putting nearly ₹ 34,000 crore of total bank exposure at risk. 'While it's still too early to predict the final outcome, the acceptance of the review petition shifts the narrative from JSW Steel having definitively lost BPSL to a more hopeful outlook. It's certainly a step in the right direction,' said Suman Kumar, vice president–metals and mining, Dolat Capital. JSW Steel did not immediately reply to emailed queries. In its plea, JSW Steel argued that it had significantly improved BPSL's operations since the acquisition. BPSL's production capacity has nearly doubled—from 2.3 million tonnes per annum in 2017 to 4.5 mtpa in 2025, JSW Steel said. Revenue rose from ₹ 8,701 crore in FY17 to ₹ 25,973 crore in FY25, and exports averaged ₹ 2,976 crore annually over the last four years, it added. Both JSW Steel and lenders have cautioned that liquidation would harm BPSL, which has been running as a profitable and viable business under the approved resolution plan. The Supreme Court had earlier granted interim relief on 26 May, ordering status quo on liquidation to allow JSW Steel to file the review petition. The 2 May ruling was based on petitions filed by dissenting financial creditors, including Kalyani Group's Torsteel and former BPSL promoter Sanjay Singal, who challenged delays in the resolution plan's implementation. The May ruling found that the acquisition violated provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), particularly regarding adherence to strict timelines. BPSL was among the Reserve Bank of India's original list of 12 large defaulters flagged in 2017 for resolution under the IBC. At the time, the company owed over ₹ 47,000 crore to its lenders.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store