Transport demo to take to skies
Whoosh chief executive Dr Chris Allington said it would begin operating as soon as the middle of next year, and more information would be released soon.
"Within the next few weeks, we'll be cutting ribbons and starting to dig holes."
He told an audience at the Electrify Queenstown trade show yesterday the on-demand system, which moves fully-electric, self-driving cabins around an elevated cable network, could solve the resort town's traffic congestion issues.
The company unveiled a working prototype at its Christchurch base last September after six years of development.
The demo system, which was being jointly funded by Whoosh and Remarkables Park Ltd, would have all its key features including cabins for four or five people, stations and an app.
It would give residents the opportunity to experience it and provide feedback.
"We'll then make it better, and hopefully we can work with the team and deliver something down here."
The company had mapped out a 50-station network that linked the resort's town centre to Frankton and the eastern and southern suburbs.
It already had projects under way in the United States and the first, in a 485ha park in the city of Irvine, California, was expected to be operating by the end of next year.
It was also working on projects in Japan and the Middle East.
Dr Allington said a Whoosh system had many advantages over a gondola system.
It could disperse its users across a greater number of smaller stations, avoiding the queues likely at peak commuter times with a gondola system's fewer, larger stations.
Its modular nature allowed it to be expanded as demand required.
"You can form three-dimensional networks in your cities which fit in the existing urban spaces.
"You're no longer stuck with straight lines and a limited number of stops."
Whoosh was not the only mass transportation system being touted for Queenstown yesterday, which also featured a talk by Doppelmayr New Zealand chief executive Garreth Hayman.
Doppelmayr NZ is working with tech entrepreneur Rod Drury and former Infrastructure Commission chief executive Ross Copland on a gondola system designed to move 3000 people an hour.
The first stage, estimated to cost $250m, would run from the town centre up to a Queenstown Hill station, along to a Lake Johnson station, down to the Frankton bus hub, then on to the airport.
Part of the Queenstown Lakes and Central Otago district councils' regional deal submission, the plan's backers hope to have it operating by late 2028.
Dr Allington told the Otago Daily Times a gondola "solves one problem, but not every problem", and could co-exist with Whoosh.
If a Whoosh system was wanted for Queenstown, his company would be "very happy" to build one.
"If not, we've got plenty of projects to keep us busy."
guy.williams@odt.co.nz
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
3 days ago
- Scoop
New Report: Uber Shifted Millions Offshore, Avoiding $56m In NZ Tax
A new report from the Centre for International Corporate Tax Accountability and Research (CICTAR), commissioned by Workers First Union, argues that multinational rideshare and delivery giant Uber appears to be shifting hundreds of millions in misclassified profits out of New Zealand, costing the country millions in tax revenue. Read the full report HERE: The report examines Uber's local and global business practices and approach to revenue and taxation, concluding that Uber's practice of misclassification extends beyond its exploitation of New Zealand employment law and exists as a foundational principle of the business. "In 2023, Uber's NZ subsidiaries paid just $1.2 million in tax while transferring some $200.2 million in 'intercompany service fees' offshore, likely to an intellectual property holding company in Delaware," said Edward Miller, CICTAR researcher. "Recording these profits in Aotearoa would have delivered another $56 million in tax revenue and helped to fund the roads, infrastructure and public services that companies like Uber depend on to operate." The report, titled "The Business of Misclassification', describes Uber's treatment of service fees - the fee drivers pay the company to use its platform - as its source of declared revenue rather than the fare paid by passengers. "Uber believes it is a technology company rather than a transport company, and that drivers are its consumers, who pay a service fee to use the platform and be connected with end-users, with whom they contract directly," said Mr Miller. "Not only does this misclassify the business transaction and the workforce, but it also has the effect of misclassifying firm revenue and taxable profit." "Shifting profits to a jurisdiction like Delaware could enable Uber to deploy the billions in tax assets it has accumulated through its rapid expansion, delivering extraordinary benefits to shareholders." In 2024, New Zealand's Court of Appeal confirmed the Employment Court's original ruling from 2022, which found that Uber had misclassified a group of Uber drivers as 'contractors', which denied them access to minimum wages, sick leave, the right to collectively bargain and other entitlements. This report argues that misclassification itself sits at the heart of the Uber model. "The 2023 financial statements for Uber's NZ subsidiaries state combined firm revenue of $365 million, but this presumes that Uber is a technology company that simply delivers services to drivers," said Mr Miller. "We estimate that the revenue generated by delivering transport services came to $867 million that year, which would have made it the 61st largest company in the country." "Taxing digital service providers is a huge challenge for regulators, but failure to do so will see a growing proportion of economic activity in New Zealand recorded as digital services provided by overseas companies." Dennis Maga, Workers First General Secretary, said the report's conclusions would be "shocking" to Uber union members and should motivate politicians to close loopholes in law that allowed predatory multinationals to take advantage of New Zealanders and the country's infrastructure. "The entire Uber model is built on deception," said Mr Maga. "I don't think anyone really believes that Uber is just a tech company that connects passengers and drivers through an app. It's a transport company that makes millions in profit and simply does not pay its fair share of tax." Mr Maga said Minister Brooke van Velden must stop "cosying up" to Uber and cease her push to enshrine Uber's "dodgy" business practices in law. "Instead of laying out the red carpet for Uber to write their own laws, the Minister should be protecting New Zealanders from exploitation and ensuring they contribute something back to our country, rather than just taking our money overseas," said Mr Maga. The Supreme Court of New Zealand will hear Uber's final appeal on the case of the four Uber drivers who were misclassified as contractors on Tuesday 8 and Wednesday 9 July. This follows rejected Uber appeals to the Employment Court and the Court of Appeal. "The world is watching," said Mr Maga. "Will we meet the challenge in front of us and ensure fairness in our tax system, or will we be another victim of a corporate steamroller that is crushing economic sovereignty around the world?"
Scoop
18-06-2025
- Scoop
On Sacrificing Worker Rights On The Altar Of Commerce
In the interests of efficiency, maybe Brooke van Velden should just outsource her Workplace Relations and Safety Ministry to Business NZ and be done with it. Because (obviously) corporate wishes are her command. In the interests of efficiency, maybe Brooke van Velden should just outsource her Workplace Relations and Safety Ministry to Business NZ and be done with it. Because (obviously) corporate wishes are her command. Within a short time in the job, van Velden has trashed a decade of pay equity work, given the 90 day fire-at-will power back to employers, reduced worker rights to bargain collectively, and signalled her intention to reduce sick pay entitlements for part-time workers. Despite New Zealand's horrendous record of workplace deaths, injuries and illness, van Velden plans to reduce Worksafe's enforcement role and revert to the employer-written, voluntary codes of health and safety that New Zealand experimented with in the 1990s, and which directly contributed to the Pike River tragedy. In the process, she plans to reduce the safety requirements placed on employers and company directors – while at the same time, making workers more responsible for dealing with unsafe conditions in the workplace. It goes on. As promised, van Velden is also amending current employment law in ways that will make gig economy workers unable to argue in court that their actual working conditions entitle them to the same rights as employees. In the sane legislative package, she will also restrict access to personal grievance processes. In the light of all this, media reports that 'business leaders are backing [these]changes' will come as a surprise only to people unaware that the Pope is a Catholic. The certainties of injustice By virtually privatising her portfolio, van Velden is giving up any pretence of pursuing a fair and equal balance in the workplace, between the rights of employers and the rights of workers. As Dennis Maga of the Workers First Union says, these law changes (to do with contractor/employee status) are being pushed through Parliament in order to pre-empt the Supreme Court hearing next month of an appeal against a ruling by the Employment Court that four Uber drivers were employees, not contractors. According to Maga, the government 'has no regard for evidence, no time for judicial process.' Moreover: 'Instead of strengthening our protection against exploitation, Brooke van Velden is laying out the red carpet for employers like Uber to come into New Zealand and take advantage of cheap labour with next to no rights, and no ability to challenge their employment status.' Shrinking Sick Leave On the campaign trail back in August 2023, National had promised that it would not reduce the number of sick days employees receive. Luxon said he wouldn't get rid of the 10 days of sick leave which was increased from five by Labour in 2021. 'It is what it is now and it's passed and we won't be changing it now,' Luxon told reporters. What van Velden is working on – with National's support – is a reduction in sick leave entitlements, by shifting to a so called 'pro rata' system whereby an entitlement to sick leave accrues less readily over time. Currently, all workers – full-time, part-time or casual – are entitled to 10 days of sick leave if they have been with their employer continuously for six months, and have worked an average 10 hours a week, and at least one hour in every week, or 40 hours in every month. van Velden clearly intends to introduce a pro rate system in which sick leave entitlements in future will differ more sharply between full time and part time workers. As more and more work gets casualised, employers who rely on casual labour have an obvious interest in seeing a reduction in worker entitlements. How many workers stand to be affected? As of the first quarter of this year, there were 584,000 part time workers in this country and nearly 70% of them – 404,000 in all –were women. As with the coalition government's demolition of pay equity, any shift to a tougher pro rate system for part-time workers will disproportionately affect women. At this point, much will depend on how van Velden calculates her 'pro-rata' system – will sick leave accrue in proportion to how many hours are worked per week, or how many days of the week are worked? Incredibly, van Velden could not/would not comment to RNZ's Lisa Owen on which measure she has in mind, or even – on principle – which measure would be more fair to the employees affected. For many workers, the measure chosen could significantly affect how their sick leave accrues. A Owen pointed out, some people – e.g. in the health system – work 40 hours, but this can be compressed into four day shifts. Alternatively, other workers may work several short shifts, spread out over an entire week. So which pro rata measure is it to be – hours, or days per week ? van Velden isn't saying, at least not until Cabinet has signed off, and it has become a fait accompli. Even more incredibly, the RNZ interview revealed that van Velden is pursuing a 'solution' – ie. reduced access by part-time workers to sick leave – before gathering any evidence that a problem actually exists. After all, sick leave entitlements are only a cost burden to employers if and when that sick leave gets taken – and, Owen asked, has van Velden got any evidence that the part-time workers in this country are taking disproportionate amounts of sick leave? No, van Velden indicated. Finally, Owen asked again about the likely impact on women workers given their dual roles in the paid work force, and as the main child carers at home. Many are single parents, or have partners also working shifts in order to make ends meet. So when school kids get sick, and their mothers'sick leave entitlements have been reduced, Own asked, what will happen? van Velden's reply could hardly have been more utopian: She dismissed concerns that changing the sick leave entitlements would disproportionately affect women, saying 'if we truly care about gender equality, we shouldn't have this assumption that women are the ones in a relationship taking time off to look after their children when they're sick'. Yep, when the reality faced by low income women is in conflict with an ideological principle that serves the interests of commerce, you can always rely on the ACT Party to defend the principle, no matter how unjust its outcomes may be. Parlour music for moderns Some music critic once likened the effect of listening to a lot of Erin Durant's music to always eating off the fine china i.e. it feels classy, when you feel like doing classy. Durant herself once wryly described her music as 'spare, gospel-tinged and redolent of old parlours.' The parlour formalities aside…much like Joanna Newsom, Durant's soprano tends to flutter at the top end of her range, but she usually feels more grounded both in her delivery, and in her subject matter. Overall, the same critic concluded, Durant sounds like Nanci Griffith or Sandy Denny singing a Joanna Newsom song. High praise anyway, on all counts. Durant was born and raised in New Orleans, worked for a decade in New York City, and is now based in Topanga Canyon. The influences of geography aside, the lyrical concerns, bookish conceits and complex structures of these piano-based songs – many of which include a trademark change of rhythm, midstream – are entirely her own. 'Islands 'for instance, is about an escape – to an idealised paradise of 'palms ad driftwood, like Hemingway said' – that gets interrupted by a call from a partner at home who had encouraged her to go and have a good time, but who is now needily on the phone, killing whatever tentative buzz might have been in the offing. The song shifts between the justifications of starting afresh – 'You must have known/that your pleasure was gone/You let me go/you must have known' – and the responsibilities still being felt, even for a dying relationship. The song ends with the singer at the crossroads, still undecided: Any New Orleans native who call a song 'Rising Sun' and who begins each chorus with the line ' There is a house in New Orleans' is aware of the weight of tradition. A word here for producer Kyp Malone (from the group TV On The Radio) who has broadened the palette of Durant's songs with added instrumentation, but couched it in a deft, dry production that never overwhelms the main event. I love the humour and directness in the opening lines of this track: Hello wind, haven't seen you in years Have you been out on the plain with the others? I've been here, learning some rituals Like how to truly love another… To be alone feels like a life of crime But to fear the unknown is an uglier rhyme… Finally…here's a typically intricate single from Durant's new album, Firetrail :
Scoop
17-06-2025
- Scoop
ERA Changes Hurt Workers, Pander To Big Business
The Green Party says proposed changes to the Employment Relations Act announced today by the Government will further undermine workers' rights while pandering to big business. 'This cruel Bill will cut off our most vulnerable workers from the rights that belong to them,' says the Green Party spokesperson for Workplace Relations and Safety, Teanau Tuiono. "Our economy has been built by our workers - supporting them means supporting ourselves. For generations, workers' rights have been hard-won and should be protected as a cornerstone of a people-focused modern economy. 'Today, this Government has put forward a number of dangerous changes to the ERA, including redefining the roles of employees and contractors to allow gig economy companies like Uber to trample over the rights of their workers. 'The removal of automatic union membership on collective agreements will result in lower wages, and putting up barriers to raising personal grievances will entrench power imbalance and harm in our workplaces. 'All of this quite clearly plays directly into the hands of companies looking to cut corners and boost profit margins at the expense of our workers and communities. 'The Coalition has unapologetically pushed its anti-worker agenda this term - including gutting Pay Equity, scrapping fair pay agreements, reinstating 90-day trials, and introducing effective cuts to the minimum wage. 'A Green Government would undo the laundry list of attacks made by the current Government on the rights of workers,' says Teanau Tuiono.
