logo
Is Alphabet's Stock Too Cheap to Ignore?

Is Alphabet's Stock Too Cheap to Ignore?

Globe and Mail13 hours ago
It's been an interesting year for the "Magnificent Seven" stocks, a name given to Alphabet (NASDAQ: GOOG)(NASDAQ: GOOGL), Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, Amazon, Meta Platforms, and Tesla because of their size and influence on the market. Big tech stocks have been on a roller-coaster ride thanks to the Trump administration's revolving tariff plan, economic question marks, and investors shifting to defensive and dividend stocks to hedge against a potential downturn.
Although Alphabet hasn't experienced the worst drop this year (that honor goes to Tesla and Apple), it appears to be the most undervalued of the bunch after its recent declines. It's now approaching "too cheap to ignore" territory.
Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Learn More »
Just how cheap is Alphabet's stock?
There are several metrics you can use to determine the relative value of a stock. In this case, I want to look at Alphabet's forward price-to-earnings ratio (P/E). This essentially tells you how much you're paying per $1 of its earnings. The higher the P/E ratio, the more expensive a stock is. The forward P/E ratio tells you how much you're paying per $1 of a company's projected earnings over the next 12 months.
The P/E ratio itself won't tell you if a stock is undervalued because what's considered "high" and "low" depends on the industry. However, comparing similar companies in the same industry can give you an idea, and when comparing Alphabet to other "Magnificent Seven" stocks, it appears undervalued.
TSLA PE Ratio (Forward) data by YCharts.
For some perspective, Alphabet's average P/E ratio over the past decade is around 29.7. Over the past five years, it's been around 25.5. Even the S&P 500 is currently trading much higher at 28 times earnings.
Why is the market valuing Alphabet so low?
Much of the skepticism surrounding Alphabet is related to the growth of tools and apps like ChatGPT and TikTok and if this will affect how frequently people use Google Search. For quite some time, when you had a question you needed answered, you'd ask Google and be led to a website that ideally had the answer. Now, you can ask ChatGPT and receive an instant, descriptive answer, or type it into TikTok and watch a short, engaging video on the topic.
Google Search -- which was 56% of Alphabet's $90.2 billion in revenue in the first quarter -- makes money when people click on sponsored links and ads, so you can see how reduced usage wouldn't be ideal. However, Alphabet has tried to address this issue by integrating its own AI tools into Google Search.
Investors may be skeptical about whether Google Search can maintain its dominance (or monetize its new AI Overviews feature), but those concerns seem overblown when considering how the market is currently valuing Alphabet. Its revenue growth is still in line with what it's been over the past couple of years.
GOOGL Revenue (Quarterly YoY Growth) data by YCharts.
Alphabet is more than just Google Search
There's no question that Google Search is Alphabet's bread and butter, and that will likely be the case for the foreseeable future. However, other segments, such as YouTube, Google Cloud, and Waymo, have been growing impressively.
Google Cloud, in particular, has the potential to become a major revenue source for Alphabet in the future. In the first quarter, it made $12.3 billion in revenue, up 28% year over year. Google Cloud likely won't catch up to Amazon Web Services or Microsoft Azure in market share anytime soon, but the cloud industry, in general, is growing so much that there's plenty of money to be made without being the dominant leader.
There may be questions surrounding Alphabet, but it has a robust business and is here to stay. At its current trading price, Alphabet stock is too cheap to ignore.
Should you invest $1,000 in Alphabet right now?
Before you buy stock in Alphabet, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Alphabet wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $722,181!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $968,402!*
Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is1,069% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to177%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of June 30, 2025
Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Randi Zuckerberg, a former director of market development and spokeswoman for Facebook and sister to Meta Platforms CEO Mark Zuckerberg, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Stefon Walters has positions in Apple and Microsoft. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta Platforms, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Tesla. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why Uber Stock Was in the Fast Lane in June
Why Uber Stock Was in the Fast Lane in June

Globe and Mail

timean hour ago

  • Globe and Mail

Why Uber Stock Was in the Fast Lane in June

The biggest story in June concerning autonomous driving was Tesla 's long-awaited robotaxi launch, but the news surrounding Uber Technologies (NYSE: UBER) could have a bigger impact in the near term. Shares of Uber climbed 10.9% in June, according to data provided by S&P Global Market Intelligence, on investor excitement about the company offering autonomous rideshare services in a second major U.S. market. Uber and Waymo extend their alliance Uber is perhaps the biggest name in ridesharing and initially had hoped to develop its own self-driving vehicle, but the company, in recent years, has been more focused on partnering with others. The approach has allowed Uber to offer customers in select markets access to self-driving vehicles well ahead of its competition. In June, Uber began offering self-driving rides in Atlanta using Alphabet 's Waymo service. Uber is the only way to book Waymo rides across a 65-square-mile stretch of the Georgia city. This is the second market where the two companies have partnered. Uber said that there are about 100 Waymo vehicles in Austin, Texas, available on its platform and said customers have given the Waymo vehicles an average rating of 4.9 out of 5 stars. Is Uber stock a buy? For years, investors have seen proprietary autonomous technology as a must-have for companies hoping to offer autonomous rideshare services. But as the vehicles roll out from a number of vendors in the years to come, it appears the actual technology could become commoditized. Uber, by virtue of the size and reach of its app and existing platform, has a built-in advantage of a ready-made customer list. By partnering with Waymo and other vendors, Uber gets the best of both worlds: Advancing driverless rideshare without spending billions to develop the tech. Investors excited about the potential of autonomous rideshare should consider giving Uber shares a test drive. Should you invest $1,000 in Uber Technologies right now? Before you buy stock in Uber Technologies, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Uber Technologies wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $722,181!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $968,402!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is1,069% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to177%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 30, 2025

Republican budget bill dismantles climate law passed by Democrats
Republican budget bill dismantles climate law passed by Democrats

Globe and Mail

timean hour ago

  • Globe and Mail

Republican budget bill dismantles climate law passed by Democrats

WASHINGTON (AP) — The sprawling Republican budget bill approved by the Senate Tuesday removes a proposed tax on solar and wind energy projects but quickly phases out tax credits for wind, solar and other renewable energy. The Senate approved the bill 51-50 as President Donald Trump and GOP lawmakers move to dismantle the 2022 climate law passed by Democrats under former President Joe Biden. Vice President JD Vance broke a tie after three Republican senators voted no. The bill now moves to the House for final legislative approval. The excise tax on solar and wind generation projects was added to the Senate bill over the weekend, prompting bipartisan pushback from lawmakers as well as clean energy developers and advocates. The final bill removes the tax but mostly sticks with legislative language released late Friday night and would end incentives for clean energy sooner than a draft version unveiled two weeks ago. Some warn of spike in utility bills Democrats and environmental groups said the GOP plan would crush growth in the wind and solar industry and lead to a spike in Americans' utility bills. The measure jeopardizes hundreds of renewable energy projects slated to boost the nation's electric grid, they said. 'Despite limited improvements, this legislation undermines the very foundation of America's manufacturing comeback and global energy leadership,' said Abigail Ross Hopper, president and CEO of the Solar Energy Industries Association. If the bill becomes law, 'families will face higher electric bills, factories will shut down, Americans will lose their jobs, and our electric grid will grow weaker,'' she said. The American Petroleum Institute, the top lobbying group for the oil and gas industry, applauded the bill's passage. 'This historic legislation will help usher in a new era of energy dominance by unlocking opportunities for investment, opening lease sales and expanding access to oil and natural gas development,'' said Mike Sommers, the group's president and CEO. While Democrats complained that the bill would make it harder to get renewable energy to the electric grid, Republicans said the measure represents historic savings for taxpayers and supports production of traditional energy sources such as oil, natural gas and coal, as well as nuclear power, increasing reliability. In a compromise approved overnight, the bill allows wind and solar projects that begin construction within a year of the law's enactment to get a full tax credit without a deadline for when the projects are 'placed in service,'' or plugged into the grid. Wind and solar projects that begin later must be placed in service by the end of 2027 to get a credit. The bill retains incentives for technologies such as advanced nuclear, geothermal and hydropower through 2032. Bill 'could have been worse,' Murkowski says Changes to the renewable energy language — including removal of the excise tax on wind and solar — were negotiated by a group of Republican senators, including Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski and Iowa Sens. Joni Ernst and Chuck Grassley. Iowa is a top producer of wind power, while Murkowski is a longtime supporter of renewable energy as crucial for achieving energy independence, particularly for isolated rural communities in Alaska. Murkowski, who voted in favor of the final bill, called her decision-making process 'agonizing.' Changes that push back the timeline for terminating wind and solar credits mean that 'a good number' of Alaska projects would still qualify, she said. 'Again, it's not all we wanted. It could have been worse,' she told reporters Tuesday. Murkowski praised provisions calling for more oil lease sales in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and other areas in Alaska and increased revenue sharing. Rhode Island Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, the top Democrat on the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, called the bill a 'massively destructive piece of legislation' that 'increases costs for everyone by walloping the health care system, making families go hungry and sending utility bills through the roof.' The bill 'saddles our children and grandchildren with trillions and trillions of dollars in debt — all to serve giant corporations, fossil fuel polluters and billionaire Republican megadonors who are already among the richest people on the planet,' Whitehouse said. EV credits eliminated Wyoming Sen. John Barrasso, the No. 2 Senate Republican, hailed the bill for rescinding many elements of what he called the Biden administration's 'green new scam,' including electric vehicle tax credits that have allowed car owners to lower the purchase price of EVs by $7,500. The bill also blocks for 10 years a first-ever fee on excess methane emissions from oil and gas production. Industry groups fiercely opposed the methane fee, which was authorized by Democrats in the 2022 climate law but never implemented. The GOP bill also increases oil and gas leases on public lands and revives coal leasing in Wyoming and other states. 'Today, the Senate moved President Trump's agenda forward,'' said West Virginia Sen. Shelley Moore Capito, a Republican who chairs the Senate environment committee. Clean energy advocates were deeply disappointed by the bill, which they argue undoes much of the climate law before it fully takes effect. 'By eliminating a number of clean energy incentives and slashing others, this bill represents a significant step backward for America's energy future,' said Nathaniel Keohane, president of the Center for Climate and Energy Solutions, a nonprofit that seeks to accelerate the global transition to net-zero greenhouse gas emissions. 'Curtailing incentives for electricity generated from wind and solar power is particularly shortsighted'' and will raise energy prices for households and businesses and threaten reliability of the electric grid, Keohane said. ___

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store