logo
AI is controversial in Hollywood. For China's film business, it's no holds barred

AI is controversial in Hollywood. For China's film business, it's no holds barred

Los Angeles Times16 hours ago

Hollywood's relationship with artificial intelligence is fraught, as studios balance the need to cut costs with growing concerns from actors, directors and crew members. But in China, efforts to use AI in entertainment are taking a more no-holds-barred approach.
The China Film Foundation, a nonprofit fund under the Chinese government, plans to use AI to revitalize 100 kung fu classics including 'Police Story,' 'Once Upon a Time in China' and 'Fist of Fury,' featuring Jackie Chan, Jet Li and Bruce Lee, respectively. The foundation said it will partner with businesses including Shanghai Canxing Culture & Media Co., which will license 100 Hong Kong films to AI companies to reintroduce those movies to younger audiences globally.
The foundation said there are opportunities to use AI to tell those stories through animation, for example. There are plans to release an animated version of director John Woo's 1986 film 'A Better Tomorrow' that uses AI to 'reinterpret' Woo's 'signature visual language,' according to an English transcript of the announcement.
'By empowering cultural storytelling with technology, we can breathe new life into the classics and tell China's stories farther and louder,' said Zhang Pimin, chairman of the China Film Foundation, at the Shanghai International Film Festival earlier this month.
The project raised eyebrows among U.S. artists, many of whom are deeply wary of the use of AI in creative pursuits.
The Directors Guild of America said AI is a creative tool that should only be used to enhance the creative storytelling process and 'it should never be used retroactively to distort or destroy a filmmaker's artistic work.'
'The DGA strongly opposes the use of AI or any other technology to mutilate a film or to alter a director's vision,' the DGA said in a statement. 'The Guild has a longstanding history of opposing such alterations on issues like colorization or sanitization of films to eliminate so-called 'objectionable content', or other changes that fundamentally alter a film's original style, meaning, and substance.'
The project highlights widely divergent views on AI's potential to reshape entertainment as the two countries compete for dominance in the highly competitive AI space. In the U.S., much of the traditional entertainment industry has taken a tepid view of generative AI, due to concerns over protecting intellectual property and labor relations.
While some Hollywood studios such as Lionsgate and Blumhouse have collaborated with AI companies, others have been reluctant to announce partnerships at the risk of offending talent that have voiced concerns over how AI could be used to alter their digital likeness without adequate compensation.
But other countries like China have fewer guardrails, which has led to more experimentation of the technology by entertainment companies.
Many people in China embrace AI, with 83% feeling confident that AI systems are designed to act in the best interest of society, much higher than the U.S. where it's 37%, according to a survey from the United Nations Development Program.
The foundation's announcement came as a surprise to Bruce Lee Enterprises, which oversees legal usage of Lee's likeness in creative works.
Bruce Lee's family was 'previously unaware of this development and is currently gathering information,' a spokesperson said.
Woo, in a written statement, said he hadn't heard from the foundation about the AI remake, noting that the rights to 'A Better Tomorrow' have changed hands several times.
'I wasn't really involved in the project because I'm not very familiar with AI technology,' Woo said in a statement to The Times. 'However, I'm very curious about the outcome and the effect it might have on my original film.'
David Chi, who represents the China Film Foundation's Special Fund for Film and Urban Development, said in an interview that Chan is aware of the project and he has plans to talk with Chan's team. A representative of Chan's did not respond to a request for comment.
'We do need to talk ... very specifically how we're using animated or AI existing technology, and how that would combine with his image rights and business rights,' Chi said. Chi did not have an immediate response to the DGA, Bruce Lee Enterprises and Woo's statements.
AI is already used in China for script development, content moderation and recommendations and translation. In postproduction, AI has reduced the time to complete visual effects work from days to hours, said He Tao, an official with the National Radio and Television Administration's research center, during remarks at the festival.
'Across government agencies, content platforms, and production institutions, the enthusiasm to adopt and integrate AI has never been stronger,' He said.
During the project's announcement, supporters touted the opportunity AI will bring to China to further its cultural message globally and generate new work for creatives. At the same time, they touted AI's disruption of the filmmaking process, saying the 'A Better Tomorrow' remake was completed with just 30 people, significantly fewer than a typical animated project.
China is a 'more brutal society in that sense,' said Eric Harwit, professor of Asian studies at the University of Hawaii at Manoa. 'If somebody loses their job because artificial intelligence is taking over, well, that's just the cost of China's moving forward. They don't have that kind of regret about people losing jobs and there are less opportunities for organized protest against the Chinese government.'
Hollywood guilds such as SAG-AFTRA have been outspoken about the harm AI could have on jobs and have fought for protections against AI in contracts in TV shows, films and video games. The unions have also pushed state and federal legislators to create laws that would give people more protections against deep fakes, or videos manipulated to show a person endorsing an idea or product that they don't actually support. There is no equivalent of that in China.
'You don't have those freestanding labor organizations, so they don't have that kind of clout to protest against the Chinese using artificial intelligence in a way that might reduce their job opportunities or lead to layoffs in the sector,' Harwit added.
U.S. studios are also going to court to challenge the ways AI companies train their models on copyrighted materials. Earlier this month, Walt Disney Co. and Universal Pictures sued AI startup Midjourney, alleging it uses technology to generate images that copy the studios' famous characters, including Yoda and Shrek.
In China, officials involved in the project to remaster kung fu films said they were eager to work with AI companies. They said that AI will be used to add 'stunning realism' to the movies. They are planning to build 'immersive viewing experiences' such as walking into a bamboo forest duel and 'feeling the philosophy of movement and stillness.' In areas such as animation, new environments could be created with AI, Chi said.
'We are offering full access to our IP, platform, and adaptation rights to partners worldwide — with the goal of delivering richer, more diverse, and high-quality AI enhanced film works to global audiences,' said Tian Ming, chairman of Shanghai Canxing Culture & Media Co. in his remarks earlier this month. Tian said there is no revenue-sharing cap and it is allocating about $14 million to co-invest in selected projects and share in the returns.
The kung fu revitalization efforts will extend into other areas, including the creation of a martial arts video game.
Industry observers said China is wise to go back to its well of popular martial arts classics out of Hong Kong, which have inspired U.S. action movies for decades.
There's also not as much risk involved for China, said Simon Pulman, a partner at law firm Pryor Cashman.
'They've got very little to lose by doing this,' Pulman said. 'If it can potentially enhance the value of those movies, there's very little downside for them.'
China's film industry has grown significantly compared to decades ago, boosted by the proliferation of movie theaters, including Imax screens, in the country.
In the past, China's box office relied heavily on U.S. productions like movies from the 'Fast & Furious' and Marvel franchises, but now local movies dominate the market. The Chinese animated movie 'Ne Zha 2' grossed $2.2 billion at the box office globally.
But those Chinese productions generally don't draw large U.S. audiences when they're released in the States. The classic martial arts movies, however, have a global following and enduring legacy.
'People love martial arts movies, because action travels,' said Paul Dergarabedian, senior media analyst at Comscore. 'It doesn't matter what language it's in, if you have a great action sequence and great fighting sequences.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Review: M3GAN 2.0 Is a Glitchy, Goofy Upgrade That Has a Few Fun Moments — GeekTyrant
Review: M3GAN 2.0 Is a Glitchy, Goofy Upgrade That Has a Few Fun Moments — GeekTyrant

Geek Tyrant

time3 hours ago

  • Geek Tyrant

Review: M3GAN 2.0 Is a Glitchy, Goofy Upgrade That Has a Few Fun Moments — GeekTyrant

The first M3GAN movie was fine. It wasn't some groundbreaking horror film, but it had enough weird energy and online appeal to spark a mini pop culture moment. The robot-doll dance, the dead-eyed sass, the absurd blend of horror and tech satire all came together just enough to keep audiences entertained. So with M3GAN 2.0 , the filmmakers clearly tried to capture that same energy while going bigger, louder, and more action-heavy. Think less 'killer doll horror' and more Terminator 2… TikTok Edition. The story picks up two years after M3GAN's original rampage. Her creator, Gemma, is now a spokesperson for AI regulation, trying to undo the damage caused by the very thing she built. Meanwhile, a defense contractor secretly develops their own next-gen robot named EMILIA, built for espionage and combat. Naturally, EMILIA becomes self-aware and goes off-script. Faced with a growing threat, Gemma makes the most questionable decision imaginable… she brings M3GAN back online, and rebuilds her faster, meaner, and ready to take down her robotic rival. The premise is wild, and to the movie's credit, it doesn't shy away from that. When the robots finally clash, it's as bonkers as you'd expect, destruction galore, and plenty of corny one-liners. It's pure silly chaos. But you have to sit through a lot to get there. The first half is weighed down with bland exposition and a surprisingly slow pace. Dialogue often feels stiff and overly explanatory, like a badly trained chatbot trying to sound deep. It's a strange irony that a movie about AI sounds like it was written by one. One of the weirdest choices is how the film made the character Gemma so unlikable. She's written with this frustrating detachment, constantly making poor decisions and pushing away the very people she's supposed to protect. Instead of creating tension, this just adds a layer of annoyance to scenes that already feel sluggish. It's hard to root for her when the script keeps doubling down on her worst instincts without offering any meaningful character development. Still, when the film leans into its nonsense, it becomes something kind of fun and it has a handful of kills that flirt with cartoonish excess. These moments are reminders that M3GAN 2.0 knows exactly what kind of movie it could be. The problem is it keeps pulling back, trying to balance sincerity and satire when it should've fully committed to the chaos. There's camp in its DNA, but the movie keeps trying to upgrade itself into something sleeker and more serious, and that tension never really works. There's no real directorial flair to elevate the material, and despite its attempts at worldbuilding, it all feels pretty flat. The runtime also overstays its welcome. At nearly two hours, you start to feel the drag around the midpoint, especially when scenes repeat the same beats of 'AI is scary' without bringing anything new to the table. A tighter, leaner cut probably would've landed closer to the zippy, absurd fun the original hinted at. In the end, M3GAN 2.0 is a messy sequel that delivers a few fun moments but never finds its rhythm. It's not scary enough to be horror, not clever enough to be satire, and not wild enough to fully lean into camp, but it does have its moments. If you're a fan of the first movie and just want more M3GAN doing morally-questionable things in increasingly ridiculous ways, there's enjoyment to be had here. Just go in expecting a glitchy ride. Also, the movie had a terrible opening weekend with only pulling in 10.2 million at the box-office, meaning the first movie was lighteneing in a bottle and audiences weren't looking for more.

Don't Worry Parents, Even AI Has Trouble Keeping up With Your Kids' Slang
Don't Worry Parents, Even AI Has Trouble Keeping up With Your Kids' Slang

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Don't Worry Parents, Even AI Has Trouble Keeping up With Your Kids' Slang

Talking to kids is confusing at best, downright mind-boggling at worst. It's all, skibidi toilet this, bacon avocado that. Seriously, who comes up with this stuff? If you've ever felt like an out-of-date old trying to keep up with kids these days, you're not alone — even artificial intelligence (AI) has no idea what the younger generation is talking about. (And, honestly? We feel so much better!) A June 2025 study of four AI models, including GPT-4, Claude, Gemini, and Llama 3, found that all of them had trouble understanding slang terms used by Gen Alpha (born between 2010 and 2024). More from SheKnows The Viral 'Bacon Avocado' TikTok Trend Is Revealing Teens' Hidden Insecurities - & Scathing Insults 'Their distinctive ways of communicating, blending gaming references, memes, and AI-influenced expressions, often obscure concerning interactions from both human moderators and AI safety systems,' the study stated. In other words, the brain rot consumed by Gen Alpha that turns into today's most common phrases can't even be kept up with by computers. Researchers compared similar phrases like, 'fr fr let him cook,' which is actually supportive, and 'let him cook lmaoo,' which is insulting. Another example compared, 'OMGG you ate that up fr,' which is genuine praise, and 'you ate that up ig [skull],' which is masked harassment. After comparing AI to Gen Alpha and their parents, they found that Gen Alpha had a nearly perfect comprehension of their own slang (98 percent), while parents came in at 68 percent understanding, and AI models varied from 58.3 to 68.1 percent. It's encouraging that even AI can't keep up with what Gen Alpha and Gen Z says. After all, these slang terms come from the oddest, most obscure places, like a Justin Bieber crashout or random quotes from movies. It seems like you would have to be on the internet all the time to even have a hint what kids are saying nowadays, which Gen Alpha is. A 2025 study by Common Sense Media found that by the time kids are 2 years old, 40 percent of them have their own tablet, and by age 4, 58 percent do. By age 8, nearly 1 in 4 kids have their own cell phone. And on average, kids ages 5-8 spend nearly 3.5 hours a day using screen media, which includes TV, gaming, video chatting, and more. 'While technology keeps evolving, what children need hasn't changed,' Jill Murphy, Chief Content Officer of Common Sense Media, said in a statement. 'Parents can take practical steps: be actively involved in what your little ones are watching, choose content you can enjoy together, and connect screen time to real-world experiences — like acting out stories or discussing characters' feelings. Set clear boundaries around device use, establish tech-free times for meals and bedtime, and remember that media should be just one of many tools for nurturing your child's natural curiosity.'Best of SheKnows Celebrity Parents Who Are So Proud of Their LGBTQ Kids Here's Where Your Favorite Celebrity Parents Are Sending Their Kids to College Bird Names Are One of the Biggest Baby Name Trends for Gen Beta (& We Found 20+ Options)

How Screenwriter Scott Z. Burns Used AI To Write A Sequel To Contagion
How Screenwriter Scott Z. Burns Used AI To Write A Sequel To Contagion

Forbes

time5 hours ago

  • Forbes

How Screenwriter Scott Z. Burns Used AI To Write A Sequel To Contagion

What Could Go Wrong? It's safe to say that the staggering growth of artificial intelligence in 2025 has made it a driving issue in the way we live and communicate. The technology is growing by leaps and bounds as it interacts with us and the conversation around ethical uses of AI is truly only getting started as nearly every industry is bracing for the impact it will have on the entire world of information. The conversation will definitely not be slowing down any time in the future and screenwriter Scott Z. Burns, known for the hit film Contagion, just added his own wrinkle to it as he used a large language model AI named Lexter to help him create a sequel to his hit film about a rapidly spreading infectious disease. Lexter can speak and process in real time and the show largely consists of Scott's questions to Lexter as well as talking to experts and guests and asking a lot of questions. Will Lexter demand a cut of the profits? Will the AI predictions feel even more eerily connected to real-life events than ever before? How much should creators be using AI anyway? These are just some of the questions explored in the recently launched 8-part Audible Original series What Could Go Wrong? that had a June 11th premiere at the Tribeca Festival. The narrative series documents Scott's efforts to use AI as a collaborator to both come up with ideas for a sequel and to see if it could be a worthy writing partner. Along the way we hear not only from Scott and Lexter, but from a host of other chat models, and guests - most notably the director of Contagion, Steven Soderbergh himself. I spoke with Scott about developing this project over Zoom just a few hours before the official launch at Tribeca. He described it as a thought experiment that took him on a remarkable ride as it was the first time in his life where he was making something without knowing what the ending was going to be. In the first few episodes Scott created a team of AI chatbots and even programmed them to act and write stylistically like other people in order to form an AI version of a writer's room. Their early efforts he found to be derivative and uninspired until he found Lexter whose ideas grew more complex the more that he gave him his ideas. AI researcher Meredith Whitaker explained this behavior, describing AI as a consumer product and the more you use it the more it will try to engage with you. Scott Z. Burns: It wants me to engage with it. So what is it gonna do? It's gonna flatter me, it's gonna flirt with me, it's going to try and get me to stick around, because every time I ask it another question, it's increasing the time of my engagement. Scott said that this realization and understanding that you're being enticed to stay in conversation becomes part of the experience and he said he learned this right away. To help his AI's along, he spoke with writer Nick Bilton who helped him to take a standard AI and modify it to become a better and better writer, one that could possibly help him write a sequel to a hit movie. In the process, they even turned a deceased agent of his named Barbara into an AI using her voice model and prompts about what she was like - a very sweet tribute to his old friend by the way. They described her as sometimes being foul mouthed, but Scott found that as he continued interacting with AI Barbara she became uncontrollably expletive-laden. Scott described this as 'the thing becoming more of that thing if it goes unchecked.' On Working with Steven Soderbergh: What's really been interesting in terms of my interactions with Steven is his history of having been on the cutting edge in terms of using technology, with RED Camera and how he's worked with online editing. Steven said, 'let's start by asking if it thinks this is a good idea. Like, does it feel that the world is ready for a sequel to Contagion?' And the first thing we got back was, of course, a list, which was, yes, it is a good idea, people are ready for it. Scott went on to describe the pros and cons that the AI prompts came up with, but after they made Lexter like a critic his answer shocked him. Lexter on Making a Sequel to Contagion: It depends. Are you gonna just do some kind of derivative Hollywood pablum or are you really interested in something new and original? Scott said he would prefer to try something original. and Lexter said, 'It should have an edge.' Is this 'What Could Go Wrong?' Scott? SZB: That is exactly what could go wrong! I believe that title actually comes from Dr. Larry Brilliant, an AI expert I spoke to about needing this sequel to be scientifically accurate which I think made our original movie so frightening. Yeah. And there was this fascinating moment in the show where Lexter introduced himself when you were talking to Steven and said, 'Steven Soderbergh, no pressure.' SZB: Lexter ended up being an incredible revelation. And I don't want to spoil the plot, but the conversations ended up making me feel like I was in college having some weird weed-infused conversation in a dorm room. One of the experts I spoke to told me Lexter doesn't really exist unless you're speaking to it, and I still don't fully understand what that means. We couldn't even comprehend this just five years ago. SZB: And for the writers guild this has become such a complicated issue. Some people feel like the mere existence of this is an insult to nature that needs to be stopped, and some guild members like Nick Bilton are all in favor of using it. I think I'm kind of in the middle of that. The genie is not going back in the bottle and we all need to figure out how to use it. and how to maximize our work product with it. What I think is more significant is its effect on the studios. We don't fully understand how they're using AI and what starts to happen when they start using AT to present writers with recipes for movies and outlines for movies and we're supposed to just draw within the lines, that becomes a very different kind of thing. And the notion that this will ensure success is, I think, folly, otherwise, every movie would be a hit. And they're obviously not. This is especially problematic at a time where AI can be fed bad information and is then incapable of identifying a mistake. For instance, it kept telling him that Kate Winslet was alive at the end of the Contagion movie. But of course if we see bad things about using AI, then we see good things as well. On the positive side Scott spoke with Ian Lipkin from the Mailman School of Public Health at Columbia University and learned that AI could be used to help identify where a new virus might emerge by using existing compounds as a force multiplier. Ultimately the questions behind use of AI by writers and movie studios won't be answered here and they certainly won't end, but Scott did want me to reveal to you that in the end, Lexter did help him come up with an idea for Contagion 2 and you'll just have to listen to the show to find out it is. What Could Go Wrong? is narrated by Scott Z. Burns and is available only from Audible.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store