Corruption remains pervasive across sectors, levels of government in India
'India has overtaken Japan to become the world's fourth-largest economy,' said NITI Aayog Chief Executive Officer (CEO) BVR Subrahmanyam, citing the IMF data at a press conference on May 26, 2025 of the 10th NITI Aayog Governing Council meeting on 'Viksit Rajya for Viksit Bharat 2047' in New Delhi. 'We are the fourth largest economy as I speak. We are a $4 trillion economy as I speak, and this is not my data. This is IMF data. India today is larger than Japan,' said Subrahmanyam.
It is the wish and prayer of 140 crore citizens of India, that is Bharat, that their beloved country becomes the largest economy of the world much before we celebrate the centenary of our independence in 2047. It is also their dream to see the annihilation of monstrous income and wealth inequalities among them as soon as possible so that they are not deprived of their right to life with dignity, equality, justice, fraternity and liberty. This will be possible only when India has unwavering commitment and will power to implement affirmative measures and welfare policies in toto. If the economy grows in terms of size, one expects that even the people's ease of living should increase in an ambiance of peace and brotherhood. Today's India is grappling with poverty, mass discrimination, sluggish justice system, poor policing, rampant corruption, and continued monopolization of national resources, opportunities, facilities and privileges by a miniscule percentage of people.
Let us look at some areas of concern where the ground realities speak louder than empirical data. India faces a multitude of health challenges including a high burden of both communicable and non-communicable diseases, inadequate healthcare infrastructure, particularly in rural areas, and significant health inequities. These challenges are further compounded by factors like poverty, lack of awareness, and lifestyle-related issues. Our country continues to grapple with high rates of infectious diseases like tuberculosis, malaria, and HIV/AIDS. Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs) such as cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, and cancer are on the rise, becoming a leading cause of death and disability.
India also faces challenges in maternal and child health, including high rates of malnutrition and mortality. Many regions, particularly rural areas, lack sufficient healthcare facilities, including hospitals, clinics, and diagnostic centres. There is a shortage of doctors, nurses, and other healthcare professionals, especially in rural and remote areas. Significant disparities exist in access to healthcare services between urban and rural areas. Poverty, lack of education, and other socioeconomic factors contribute to health inequities. Women and marginalized communities often face additional barriers to accessing healthcare. So, we need to invest massively in the public sector healthcare
Similarly, India faces significant educational challenges, particularly for marginalized communities like Scheduled Castes (SCs), Scheduled Tribes (STs), and Other Backward Classes (OBCs), in achieving higher Gross Enrollment Ratio (GER) in higher education. Key issues include persistent inequalities, inadequate infrastructure, financial constraints, and quality concerns. Poverty, lack of access to quality schooling, and social discrimination continue to hinder educational attainment for SCs, STs, and OBCs. Rural areas and certain states or regions often lag behind in terms of educational infrastructure and opportunities, further exacerbating inequalities.
There are other challenges as well. For example, girls, particularly in rural areas, face additional challenges like early marriage and household responsibilities, leading to lower enrollment and higher dropout rates. Soaring tuition fees in higher education institutions make it difficult for students from marginalized backgrounds to afford higher education. While scholarships are available, they often don't cover the full cost of education, leaving many students struggling financially. Students may resort to loans to finance their education, which can lead to significant debt burdens. Inadequate number of higher education institutions, particularly in rural and remote areas, restricts access for many students.
Many institutions lack basic infrastructure like classrooms, sanitation, and access to clean drinking water, impacting the learning environment. Limited access to the internet and digital resources hinders access to information and learning opportunities. An outdated curriculum and lack of emphasis on critical thinking skills hinders students' development. A shortage of qualified and trained teachers, particularly in specialized fields, can impact the quality of education. Inadequate research facilities and support remain a major stumbling block in the advancement of knowledge and innovation.
Moreover, high drop-out rates, particularly during transitions between different levels of education, indicate systemic weaknesses. Insufficient support systems for students from marginalized communities, including counseling and mentorship, can lead to attrition. Globalization has led to increased competition among Indian institutions, highlighting disparities in quality and standards. Hence, the increased competition poses challenges for weaker institutions to survive and thrive. So, we need a multi-pronged approach, including targeted interventions to improve access, affordability, and quality of education for all, with a special focus on marginalized communities.
As a nation, we continue to grapple with several other systemic challenges that obstacle equitable progress. Justice remains elusive for many due to an overburdened judiciary, delayed trials, and limited access for the poor and marginalized. Legal remedies often remain out of reach for those in rural and semi-urban regions, amplifying social inequities. Income inequality is another deep-rooted concern. A small percentage of the population controls a significant portion of wealth, while a large segment struggles with subsistence. This disparity affects access to basic services, quality education, and healthcare, perpetuating poverty across generations.
Opportunities – whether in education, employment, or entrepreneurship – are unevenly distributed. Urban-centric development has left rural and semi-urban areas with limited pathways to prosperity. Moreover, land holdings are highly fragmented and often disputed, especially among small and marginal farmers. Land reforms have been inconsistent, further constraining agricultural productivity and rural livelihoods. Affirmative action policies, such as reservations and targeted welfare schemes, suffer from half-hearted implementation. Bureaucratic inertia, political interference, and lack of proper targeting dilute their intended impact.
Corruption remains a pervasive issue, cutting across sectors and levels of government. It erodes public trust and diverts resources meant for the poor. Compounding the issue is the poor auditing and evaluation of development and welfare schemes. Many programmes in rural and semi-urban areas lack transparency, measurable outcomes, or community feedback mechanisms, leading to leakages and inefficiencies. To move forward, we must strengthen institutions, ensure policy continuity, adopt evidence-based programme evaluations, and build a more accountable governance framework. Equitable justice, fair access to income and opportunities, and genuine implementation of reforms are critical to realizing the nation's full potential.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
2 hours ago
- Economic Times
Nuke law recast expected to cap supplier liability
Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads A More Viable Framework Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Draft in Making India is considering a total recast of laws governing atomic energy , including the Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage (CLND) Act, said people familiar with the matter. In particular, the revamp will seek to address the open-ended liability of suppliers under the current law as the Centre seeks to rope in private aims to expand its nuclear energy capacity to 35-40 GW by 2035 and 100 GW by 2047. Policymakers are of the view that the laws require changes if the target is to be met. India currently has 22 operating reactors, with an installed capacity of 6,780 MW. 'Instead of multiple piecemeal changes, there is a thinking that the laws be rewritten completely,' said one of the persons Atomic Energy and CLND Acts were introduced in the context of a state-owned nuclear thrust. Now, however, 'The idea is to encourage private sector participation and not discourage it,' the person liability law, envisaged as a safeguard against fallout after any accident, has been a long-standing concern of potential Section 6(1) of the CLND Act caps the total liability for each nuclear incident at 300 million special drawing rights, a reserve asset defined by the International Monetary Fund and equivalent currently to Rs 3,700 6(2) sets the operator's maximum liability at Rs 1,500 suppliers' worries stem from Section 17, which allows for a potentially large liability. This states that the operator will have recourse to liability claims where 'the nuclear incident has resulted as a consequence of an act of supplier or his employee, which includes supply of equipment or material with latent defects of substandard services.'This imposes unlimited liability on a supplier, said one of the persons cited.'A supplier may be sourcing or subcontracting various inputs from other suppliers,' the person said. 'Besides, a plant has several components and so liability cannot be that of a single supplier.'According to ongoing deliberations, the liability of a supplier to a nuclear operator would be capped at a certain defined value. Some liability beyond that amount would likely be assumed by the government, said a third person.A nuclear fund could be created as proposed in the current CLND, but with a more defined contribution from the operator that could be based on each unit of power generated.'Hectic drafting exercise is on, along with discussions,' the person said. 'These would also be discussed with stakeholders before being put up for the Cabinet nod.' The government is keen to get the legislation through the Parliament in the current calendar year, he added. An inter-ministerial committee is firming up changes to the proposed recast would also take into account global best practices and conventions to which India is a signatory. While India has signed the Convention of Supplementary Compensation (CSC), it's yet to ratify the accord.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Nuke law recast expected to cap supplier liability
India is considering a total recast of laws governing atomic energy , including the Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage (CLND) Act, said people familiar with the matter. In particular, the revamp will seek to address the open-ended liability of suppliers under the current law as the Centre seeks to rope in private investment. India aims to expand its nuclear energy capacity to 35-40 GW by 2035 and 100 GW by 2047. Policymakers are of the view that the laws require changes if the target is to be met. India currently has 22 operating reactors, with an installed capacity of 6,780 MW. 'Instead of multiple piecemeal changes, there is a thinking that the laws be rewritten completely,' said one of the persons cited. The Atomic Energy and CLND Acts were introduced in the context of a state-owned nuclear thrust. Now, however, 'The idea is to encourage private sector participation and not discourage it,' the person added. The liability law, envisaged as a safeguard against fallout after any accident, has been a long-standing concern of potential investors. A More Viable Framework Currently, Section 6(1) of the CLND Act caps the total liability for each nuclear incident at 300 million special drawing rights, a reserve asset defined by the International Monetary Fund and equivalent currently to Rs 3,700 crore. Section 6(2) sets the operator's maximum liability at Rs 1,500 crore. But suppliers' worries stem from Section 17, which allows for a potentially large liability. This states that the operator will have recourse to liability claims where 'the nuclear incident has resulted as a consequence of an act of supplier or his employee, which includes supply of equipment or material with latent defects of substandard services.' This imposes unlimited liability on a supplier, said one of the persons cited. 'A supplier may be sourcing or subcontracting various inputs from other suppliers,' the person said. 'Besides, a plant has several components and so liability cannot be that of a single supplier.' According to ongoing deliberations, the liability of a supplier to a nuclear operator would be capped at a certain defined value. Some liability beyond that amount would likely be assumed by the government, said a third person. Draft in Making A nuclear fund could be created as proposed in the current CLND, but with a more defined contribution from the operator that could be based on each unit of power generated. 'Hectic drafting exercise is on, along with discussions,' the person said. 'These would also be discussed with stakeholders before being put up for the Cabinet nod.' The government is keen to get the legislation through the Parliament in the current calendar year, he added. An inter-ministerial committee is firming up changes to the framework. The proposed recast would also take into account global best practices and conventions to which India is a signatory. While India has signed the Convention of Supplementary Compensation (CSC), it's yet to ratify the accord.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
7 hours ago
- First Post
Nigeria: Muhammadu Buhari, former military ruler and two-term president, dies at 82 after prolonged illness
Buhari, 82, who first led the country as a military ruler after a coup in the 1980s, earned a devoted following for his brand of anti-corruption conviction politics read more Nigeria's former President Muhammadu Buhari, who led Africa's most populous country from 2015-23 and was the first Nigerian president to oust an incumbent through the ballot box, died in London on Sunday, a presidential spokesperson said. 'President Buhari died today in London at about 4:30 p.m. (1530 GMT), following a prolonged illness,' President Bola Tinubu's spokesperson said in a post on X. Buhari, 82, who first led the country as a military ruler after a coup in the 1980s, earned a devoted following for his brand of anti-corruption conviction politics. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD He referred to himself as a 'converted democrat' and swapped his military uniform for kaftans and prayer caps. 'I belong to everybody and I belong to nobody,' was a constant refrain Buhari told supporters and critics alike. Buhari defeated Goodluck Jonathan in 2015 in what was judged to be Nigeria's fairest election to date. Many hoped the retired major general would crack down on armed groups, just as he had as the country's military head of state. Instead, violence that had mostly been confined to the northeast spread. That left swathes of Nigeria outside the control of its stretched security forces as gunmen in the northwest, armed separatists and gangs in the southeast roamed unchecked. Much of his appeal lay in the anti-corruption ethos that was a central plank of his agenda both as a military and civilian ruler. He said endemic corruption in Nigeria's political culture was holding people back. 'Baba Go Slow' But Buhari quickly disappointed after his 2015 win. He took six months to name his cabinet. During that time, the oil-dependent economy was hobbled by low crude prices, prompting people to call him 'Baba Go Slow'. His second victory in 2019 came despite his first term being blighted by Nigeria's first recession in a generation, militant attacks on oilfields, and repeated hospital stays. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Born on December 17, 1942, in Daura in the northwestern state of Katsina state, Buhari enrolled in the army at 19. He would eventually rise to the rank of major-general. He seized power in 1983 as a military ruler, promising to revitalise a mismanaged country. Buhari took a tough line on everything from the conditions sought by the International Monetary Fund to unruliness in bus queues. In 1984, his administration attempted to kidnap a former minister and vocal critic living in Britain. The plot failed when London airport officials opened the crate containing the abducted politician. His first stint in power was short-lived. He was removed after only 18 months by another military officer, Ibrahim Babangida. Buhari spent much of the following 30 years in fringe political parties and trying to run for president until his eventual victory over Jonathan in 2015.
