German court overturns ban on far-right magazine
BERLIN - A German court has overturned a ban on far-right magazine Compact that was accused of inciting hatred against Jews and foreigners, with a judge deciding on Tuesday that the publication was not extreme enough to justify it.
The Federal Administrative Court's ruling dealt a blow to attempts to contain the nativist Alternative for Germany party, the second-largest in parliament after February's election, and its range of online and print outriders.
Former Interior Minister Nancy Faeser banned the magazine, which had a circulation of 40,000 and a deep social media footprint, last July, labelling it a "mouthpiece of the right-wing extremist scene".
In his ruling, however, Ingo Kraft said that although Compact contained many extreme statements, including voicing support for expelling German citizens of migrant background, they did not amount to proof that the organisation behind the magazine was "intrinsically" unconstitutional.
"The Basic Law allows even its enemies freedom of opinion and of the press," Kraft wrote.
The magazine's chief editor Juergen Elsaesser, who has said Compact wants to overthrow Germany's "regime" and describes himself as a supporter of Russian President Vladimir Putin, retweeted a picture of himself captioned with the single word: "Sieg!", or "Victory".
For the AfD, which has long pursued a strategy of peppering the state with complicated lawsuits and parliamentary questions that slow its working and discredit them, the ruling is a morale boost after it underperformed polls in the election.
Bjoern Hoecke, leader of the party's most radical wing, cast his party and the magazine as defenders of democratic norms against the previous Social Democrat interior minister's authoritarian instincts.
"Instead of prosecuting Islamists, she hunted down harmless critics of the government," he wrote on social media. "She caused great harm to democracy."
The Interior Ministry, now led by the conservative Alexander Dobrindt, did not immediately respond to an e-mailed request for comment. REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Kremlin says anti-government protests in Serbia could be an attempted 'colour revolution'
Demonstrators block the road during an anti-government protest demanding snap elections, in Belgrade, Serbia, June 29, 2025. REUTERS/Marko Djurica/ File Photo Kremlin says anti-government protests in Serbia could be an attempted 'colour revolution' MOSCOW - The Kremlin said on Monday that it could not rule out the possibility that anti-government protests in Serbia, a close Russian ally, could be an attempted "colour revolution", but that it was sure the Serbian leadership could restore calm. Serbian police on Saturday clashed with anti-government protesters demanding snap elections and an end to the 12-year rule of President Aleksandar Vucic. "Despite the fact that Serbia is, of course, under unprecedented pressure - we cannot rule out that well-known methods are being used there to provoke colour revolutions," Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters. "We have no doubt that the current Serbian leadership will be able to restore law and order in the republic in the very near future," he added. Russia has traditionally regarded Vucic as a close ally and the Serbian leader was in Moscow on May 9 to watch the Red Square military parade held to commemorate the Soviet victory over Nazi Germany in World War Two. Months of protests across Serbia, including university shutdowns, have rattled Vucic, a populist, whose second term ends in 2027, when there are also parliamentary elections scheduled. Vucic said unspecified "foreign powers" were behind the protest on Saturday and that protesters had been attempting to "topple Serbia" but had failed. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
2 hours ago
- Straits Times
North Korea's Kim seen draping coffins with flag at Russia treaty anniversary
Russian Culture Minister Olga Lyubimova speaks to North Korean leader Kim Jong Un during a performance, in Pyongyang on June 29. PHOTO: REUTERS SEOUL - North Korea's state media showed on June 30 leader Kim Jong Un draping coffins with the national flag in what appeared to be the repatriation of soldiers killed fighting for Russia against Ukraine, as the countries marked a landmark military treaty. In a series of photographs displayed in the backdrop of a gala performance by North Korean and visiting Russian artists in Pyongyang, Mr Kim is seen by rows of a half a dozen coffins, covering them with flags and pausing briefly with both hands resting on them. The scene followed images of North Korean and Russian soldiers waving their national flags with patriotic notes written in Korean. Mr Kim is seen at the gala seemingly overcome with emotion and audience members wiping away tears. North Korea's state KRT television aired the performance, which was attended by Russian Culture Minister Olga Lyubimova who is leading a delegation to mark the first anniversary of the strategic partnership treaty as Mr Kim's guest. The performance was enthusiastically received for inspiring confidence in the 'ties of friendship and the genuine internationalist obligation between the peoples and armies of the two countries that were forged at the cost of blood', KCNA news agency said. Mr Kim and Russian President Vladimir Putin signed the strategic partnership treaty in June 2024 in Pyongyang. It includes a mutual defence pact. After months of silence, the two countries have disclosed the deployment of North Korean troops and lauded the 'heroic' role they played in Moscow's offensive against Ukraine to reclaim the Kursk region in western Russia. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Business Times
3 hours ago
- Business Times
Tariff bullying is working too well in Europe
US President Donald Trump's April tariff barrage felt like the height of hubris. It infuriated allies, damaged his popularity at home and triggered financial market chaos so acute that the whole thing was paused within days – the latest sign of America's Icarus-like tendency to try to remake the world every few decades. Yet three months on, as the deadline for a compromise looms, Europe's own syndrome risks emerging: a tendency to look more like a collection of Asterix villages than a cohesive whole. It is now looking increasingly likely that the European Union's 27 members, whose common trade policy is led by Brussels, will be faced with what is called an 'asymmetric' deal. There will be no removal of all tariffs imposed or threatened by Trump, including a baseline levy expected at 10 per cent. If that is the case, the UK's bare-bones deal – which failed to cancel its own 10 per cent tariff or a 25 per cent levy on steel and aluminium – has become a kind of precedent: a few carve-outs, a gushing tweet and hope that Trump moves on. Canada has also become a precedent, withdrawing its digital services tax on tech companies after the US made it a red line for talks. Financial markets see cause for cheer as a de-escalation path takes form. The question then becomes whether – or how – the EU retaliates. Aside from responding to the economic hit against an export flow worth US$605.9 billion last year, from Airbus airliners to Volkswagen cars, not doing so might be a signal that bullying works. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Last week, Nato allies agreed to more than double defence spending targets to 5 per cent of gross domestic product (of which 1.5 per cent would go on related infrastructure), addressing a Trumpian bugbear while also ensuring more orders for US arms. G7 allies also appear to have offered concessions on global taxation of US companies in return for the dropping of a 'revenge tax'. The EU has been offering other carrots for months, from buying more US imports to cooperating on China. Which is why Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned it might soon be time to 'respond in kind'. The thing about retaliation is that it requires unity, especially if the idea is to go beyond goods and into services provided by dominant US companies such as Alphabet or Amazon. And even if the EU Commission is taking a strident tone, the combination of geopolitical risk and weak economic growth does not generally inspire unity. Few heads seem willing to rise above the parapet. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz wants to get on with delivering on lofty promises of national renewal, not get bogged down in a tariff war. Italy's Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni might want to preserve her relationship with Trump, which was on display at the Nato summit. Countries to the east, closer to the war in Ukraine, are more focused on access to American hard power, as displayed in spectacular fashion in Iran. And while French President Emmanuel Macron will want to play the role of trade warrior, even his administration might see the value of a focus on securing protections for its own industries such as aerospace. Spain, the most recent target of a verbal lashing from Trump, seems somewhat isolated and has not rallied much of a wave of solidarity. During the Brexit saga, the UK's oft-repeated mantra was 'no deal is better than a bad deal'. Nobody is saying that in Brussels these days, even as officials try to uphold red lines on defending existing regulation. Such is life when faced with the closest thing the world has to a superpower – and when dependency on the said superpower runs deep, from security to technology. To be clear, the EU is hardly powerless in trade; and after deepening cooperation with Japan and Canada, there will be added impetus to cut new deals elsewhere. As for the US, a last dash for the finish line may produce a better outcome than the one currently on the table. But either way, the lesson for the EU is it must address the dependencies that help the bullying work. That will require collective action – on a defence industrial base that reduces fragmentation and increases innovation; on a capital market that is failing to create and scale up new companies; and on the technological gaps that make talk of sovereignty unconvincing. Icarus syndromes are quickly shaken off, but Asterix syndromes last forever. BLOOMBERG
