![[UPDATED] Azalina: Judicial vacancies to be filled in accordance with Federal Constitution](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.nst.com.my%2Fimages%2Farticles%2FJudicialvacancies-MS0907_NSTfield_image_socialmedia.var_1752071556.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
[UPDATED] Azalina: Judicial vacancies to be filled in accordance with Federal Constitution
Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Law and Institutional Reform) Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said said the matter was discussed during today's Cabinet meeting, which also acknowledged public concerns over the issue.
"The government fully understands the public's concern regarding the importance of upholding the continuity and integrity of the judiciary as a cornerstone of the rule of law.
"The appointment process will be carried out in accordance with Article 122B of the Federal Constitution, which states that the appointments are made by the King of Malaysia on the advice of the prime minister, after consultation with the Conference of Rulers," she said in a statement.
Azalina said the upcoming 269th Meeting of the Conference of Rulers is scheduled to take place from July 15 to 17.
She gave her assurance that the appointment process would be conducted strictly in accordance with the Federal Constitution and relevant laws.
In the meantime, following the vacancy in the office of the Chief Justice, Chief Judge of Malaya Tan Sri Hasnah Mohammed Hashim is carrying out the functions and duties of the Chief Justice, including those under the Constitution.
"This is in accordance with Article 131A of the Federal Constitution, paragraph 9(1)(b), and subsection 9(3) of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964, to ensure continuity in the administration of justice," she said.
Azalina said the government remains committed to strengthening public confidence in the judiciary, including by considering long-term improvements to promote transparency and judicial independence.
She also urged all quarters to allow the constitutionally mandated process to proceed smoothly and appropriately in the interest of the country, the rule of law, and institutional stability.
On July 2, Chief Justice Tengku Maimun retired upon reaching the mandatory retirement age of 66.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
6 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Zahid says Anwar addressed judicial appointment issues with BN MPs
KUALA LUMPUR, July 13 — Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim has clarified issues related to judicial appointments during a meeting with Barisan Nasional MPs, BN chairman Datuk Seri Ahmad Zahid Hamidi said. According to Free Malaysia Today, Zahid said the matter was among the issues raised during the one-hour meeting on Friday. 'The king would take into account the personality and background of the prospective appointee when deciding on the matter and we should respect the decision,' he told reporters after opening the Selayang Umno divisional meeting in Sungai Buloh. Zahid said BN held the view that the appointment of the chief justice should not be politicised. He also said BN believed that any royal commission of inquiry into judicial appointments would contradict the government's stance, as stated by law and institutional reform minister Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said. Azalina previously said the government would study the best practices of other countries in appointing judges, with preliminary comparative research to be conducted involving the systems in the UK, India, Australia and Singapore. Delays in filling top positions in the judiciary have prompted calls for a public inquiry and a parliamentary hearing. The chief justice and the president of the Court of Appeal have both recently retired. Chief Judge of Malaya Tan Sri Hasnah Hashim is now serving as acting chief justice, while Federal Court judge Datuk Zabariah Yusof is the acting Court of Appeal president.
Focus Malaysia
6 hours ago
- Focus Malaysia
Rakyat again swamp Agong's FB page to express a host of displeasure against PMX, Madani gov't
DETRACTORS had for a second time flooded the page book of His Majesty Sultan Ibrahim, King of Malaysia to convey a slew of disgruntlements against Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim and his Madani administration. The latest was through the comment section of the Johor ruler's post that the appointment of judges to Malaysia's superior courts must be handled with care and integrity to prevent the matter from being politicised. Citing Article 122B of the Federal Constitution, the July 10 statement by Istana Negara highlighted that the Yang di-Pertuan Agong appoints the top four judicial office holders and other superior court judges based on the PM's advice after consultation with the Conference of Rulers. The first time a similar venting of public displeasure happened was three weeks ago when Sultan Ibrahim posted a photo of him meeting PMX who also briefed the former on current developments and various current issues. It cannot be immediately ascertained if such practice of undermining PMX at the highest level is orchestrated by the Opposition in the wake of the PAS-backed Turun Anwar rally at Dataran Merdeka in Kuala Lumpur on July 26 which has targeted to draw some 50,000 participants. What is sure, however, is that running down the public image of a serving PM in such a manner has been unprecedented and is reflective of a sense of desperation in tandem with the escalating public trust deficit on PMX and his Madani administration following the May 23 PKR central leadership polls. In the latest antic, the most popular comment has called for the 're-opening of the (Datuk Seri Ahmad) Zahid Hamidi case file', alluding to the discharged not amounting to acquittal (DNAA) judgment bestowed on the Deputy PM from all 47 charges of criminal breach of trust (CBT), corruption and money laundering in relation to Yayasan Akalbudi funds. The comment was, however, denounced by Madani government backers as 'falling outside the topic'. Another commenter lamented the appointment 'of problematic individual such as PMX' which he described as 'a big mistake for the country' which again necessitated Madani keyboard warriors to come to PMX's defence. A perhaps more balanced view is one which paid tribute to PMX for having mooted judiciary reform by sparking public pressure following the 'looks like me and sounds like me' V.K. Lingam's case yet he himself is now caught in an 'impending judiciary crisis'. However, many Madani backers tend to brush aside concerns over a brewing judiciary crisis on grounds that the 'judges were not sacked as during the Mahathir era but just that they've reached their mandatory retirement age'. One commenter even seized the opportunity to seek the National Palace's urgent intervention to ensure that the case of incarcerated former premier Datuk Seti Najib Raszak 'is tried with due diligence'. At the end of the day, a number of commenters wanted the Agong and the Conference of Rulers to rely on their own discretion to decide on judiciary appointments without intervention from politicians who includes the PM himself. – July 13, 2025 Main image credit: Bernama
Borneo Post
11 hours ago
- Borneo Post
Democratic practicality holds sway on re-delineation debate
Sarawak Premier Datuk Patinggi Tan Sri Abang Johari Tun Abang Openg (front, left) on his way to DUN chambers for the special sitting, tabling the Bill on re-delineation. — Photo from the Office of Premier of Sarawak TWO crucial concepts came to mind as I set about to address with some depth the issue of re-delineation. They are 'democratic practicality' and 'democratic social conscience' – the latter is chosen to make the relevant but challenging-sounding word 'conscientisation' simpler. Both concepts, which are essentially underpinned by people-centricity, interlock and act as the primary lens through which understanding, clarity and a renewed sense of obligation to duty is brought to the fore. Notwithstanding, the goal of re-delineation is straightforwardly basic, yet the dynamics are as intricate and fascinating. More intriguing and perplexing is when a lawmaker chooses to view and contest it purely from the political perspective. The latter has been made to appear so by critics who choose to sift the re-delineation exercise through their own perception of what they perceive as political and power-generating. Under-representation The re-delineation of Sarawak state electoral constituencies and the expansion of parliamentary constituencies are matters of considerable concern to Sarawak, as they are a pivotal alteration to the state's political stakes and national voice. The Bill on the re-delineation exercise, which was tabled and passed at the Sarawak State Legislative Assembly (DUN) early this week, sought to address the age-old complaint of under-representation in many constituencies across the state. The ball is now in the court of the Election Commission (EC) to pursue and act judiciously for parliamentary endorsement. The eight-year period for re-delineation has lapsed and Sarawak may now kick off the process that is provided for under Article 113 (2) of the Federal Constitution and read together with Schedule (13) of the Federal Constitution, which takes into account various factors including the number of voters in a constituency and other difficulties faced by rural areas. Two important elements must be acknowledged as the deciding determinants in a re-delineation proposal; namely, preventing imbalance between urban and rural voters and maintaining representation in accordance with Sarawak's size and multiracial character. Compelling argument Indeed, a compelling argument in support of re-delineation is provided by the widespread mixed ethnic and socioeconomic populace spread across vast geographical space which renders the problem of logistic challenging. Notwithstanding, the debate on the subject matter has not escaped the adversarial eye of the oppositionists whose stance seems to be driven by undue anxiety over the hypothetical political and power dynamics, implying that the proposal would be favour Gabungan Parti Sarawak (GPS), the state's ruling coalition. Whilst we cannot easily ignore the presence of the political component, the prospect of improved expanded social inclusivity and development must eventually outweigh all other considerations in the debate. At a more collective level, you simply cannot talk of democracy without connecting the topic to politics, development and the masses. Essentially, there is an inter-locking relationship of the three but ultimately people, development and progress are the solution to the equation that cannot be disputed. Democratic practicality To the well-meaning critic, the re-delineation underscores a profound need for an expanded democratic framework in Sarawak. Such a framework is deemed vital for adequately serving the growing, widespread population and for keeping abreast of the rapid economic and social advancements witnessed in the post-pandemic development era. Initially, Sarawak had 48 state constituencies before the first state election in 1969, and this was followed by an increase to 56 in 1985, 62 in 1995, 71 in 2005, and 82 in 2015. Sarawak's last re-delineation exercise was in 2015. The proposed increase in the number of state seats will imminently result in a correspondingly increase in the number of parliamentary constituencies. The provision of Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63) – and more especially the withdrawal of Singapore from Malaysia, which left many parliamentary seats in the island republic taken over by parties based in Peninsular Malaysia – is the basis for the justified belief that the anticipated increase in the number of parliamentary seats is due to proportionate representation and seat allocation. Sarawak contends that the imbalance and injustice must be corrected, and that the state must be allocated a fair share. Expanded power of electoral representation The debate on the re-delineation takes us to further explore the expanded power of electoral representation on a higher plane. In this, the proposed increase in the number of state seats will correspond with an increase in the number of parliamentary seats, although the latter is to be done through a separate exercise. The increase in numbers will effectively translate to a louder and stronger voice in Parliament. This opens up the democratic space and provides greater leverage for Sarawak MPs to speak up with a more unified voice on specific development needs, resource allocation, and the full implementation of the MA63. This is the nuanced reality that will change the complexion of politics at the federal level as Sarawak steps up closer to exercising the crucial authority. Full attendance at the special DUN sitting on July 7. — Photo from the Office of Premier of Sarawak Balanced, equitable representation There is no doubting that the increasing political clout of Sarawak-based parties, under the GPS alliance, may well be the deciding factor in the upcoming federal elections and on important Bills in Parliament. Sarawak's voice no longer remains muted or relegated. The rise and shift of power would give Sarawak MPs a more authoritative role in making governmental bargains or pushing for certain policy outcomes. For Sarawak, a more equitable re-delineation can lead to more balanced representation of the different communities, make constituencies easier for Sarawak MPs to handle, and also allow for planned development to be effectively executed by directing resources more specifically towards erstwhile disenfranchised communities. The economies of scale are justified by planned critical mass, which forms the basis for social inclusivity of communities across rural Sarawak. Overall, this exercise can lead to parliamentary democracy being more balanced, with Sarawak's distinctive contributions and interests receiving their proper place in national policy-making. The issues of logistics, ethnic heterogeneity, vast geographical expanse and challenging terrain are key defining factors when considering reviewing the physical size and jurisdiction of a constituency in Sarawak, with the view to re-delineating and setting up new boundaries. Due to the size and widespread vastness of the land, particularly in the rural and far-flung constituencies in Sarawak, boundaries implemented often cover heterogeneous communities. As a result, effective representation becomes a challenging task for representatives who have to traverse a long distance, largely with little infrastructure, to interact with their constituents. Such geographical barrier has a sobering impact on logistics, where campaigning, the delivery of basic services, and voters being transported to voting stations become easier during election season which is a natural component of democracy. In an effort to ensure that all of the people, especially in the remote areas, are represented proportionately and appropriately, re-drawing constituency lines and their numbers is not just an administrative exercise, but an intrinsic democratic exercise towards having more representative government and to allow each Sarawakian to be heard regardless of how remote one's residence or distinctive cultural identity is. Enlarging democratic space Enlarging the democratic geographic space is underscored by the moral conscience of enhancing socioeconomic development and stepping up participatory development across the community. The trajectory is a reflection of the moral and democratic colours of the present leaders set within the broader definitive context of social justice and inclusivity. Therefore, the appeal to broaden the geographic basis of democracy must not be viewed narrowly as a political abstraction. Conversely, it is an extrapolation of a moral necessity based on the premise that authentic social advancement is dependent upon an equitable dispersal of power and opportunity. Those who fail to take the political blinkers off their eyes won't be able to see this, or would choose to view it from a jaundiced perspective. In fact, the very path of such democratic expansion is a direct consequence of the unyielding moral and democratic principles of the ruling leadership in GPS, whose vision goes beyond political dominion to encompass genuine human thriving. Social inclusivity Therefore, the whole exercise of re-delineation that comes squarely within the broad sweep of organic social inclusivity, attempting to break down walls and provide a voice and stake in the group journey towards an added equitable and prosperous country to every man, wherever he or she stands or comes from. This expansion of geographic and democratic space provided by re-delineation is intrinsically linked to the enhancement of holistic socioeconomic development, as it ensures that development strategies are not imposed from above, but are informed by the lived realities and needs of diverse communities, especially those who live in the margins or far-flung settlements, far from mainstream development. Furthermore, holistic development that is driven and upheld by commitment to planned democratic sustainability invigorates participatory development, empowering citizens to actively shape policies, allocate resources, and engage with their elected representatives through meaningful partnership; thereby, fostering a sense of ownership and sustainability in progress. File photo shows a voter marking his ballot paper in the voting booth. — Bernama photo Moral, democratic convictions of leadership Indeed, the very trajectory of this democratic enlargement serves as a direct reflection of the immutable moral and democratic convictions of the incumbent leadership, whose vision extends beyond mere political control to encompass genuine human flourishing. This entire endeavour is situated within the expansive framework of comprehensive social inclusivity, striving to dismantle barriers and ensure that every individual, regardless of their location or background, has a voice and a stake in the collective journey towards a more just and prosperous society. There is little disagreement that over time democracy and development are mutually reinforcing. Advances in one may produce advances in the other, in a process of mutual interaction and reinforcement. A key component of representative democracy, which is based on the ideas of representation and public service, is the interaction between elected officials and their constituents. If the physical distance between elected officials and the electorate can be successfully closed with adequate infrastructure and acceptable constituency sizes, then all of this will be operationally effective. Elected officials are entrusted with the responsibility of representing the interests of their constituents within the government and acting as a link between the people and the government. This relationship involves communication, understanding constituent concerns, and, where possible, assisting in solving their problems. In essence, the relationship between elected representatives and constituents is a dynamic partnership that is vital for a functioning democracy. It requires ongoing effort from both sides to ensure that the voices of the people are heard, and that the government is responsive to their needs. Toman Mamora, PhD (Nottingham UK) Social Anthropology. • Tokoh Media Sarawak • Communication and research consultant DUN re-delineation sarawak seats
