India-US trade talks: GTRI warns against one-sided deal; says farmers, digital space must be protected
Representative image
India must ensure that any trade agreement with the United States is balanced, not politically driven, and protects critical sectors like agriculture, digital infrastructure, and regulatory sovereignty, the Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI) cautioned on Friday.
With talks entering a crucial phase in Washington, the clock is ticking toward the July 9 deadline, the end of US President Donald Trump's 90-day suspension of country-specific tariffs, announced on April 2.
'The more likely outcome is a limited trade pact, styled after the US-UK mini trade deal announced on May 8,' said GTRI founder Ajay Srivastava as cited by PTI. 'Any trade deal with the US must not be politically driven or one-sided.
It must protect our farmers, our digital ecosystem, and our sovereign regulatory space,' he emphasised.
India's chief trade negotiator is currently in Washington, with both sides racing to finalise an interim agreement that would help avert steeper tariffs.
According to news agency
ANI
, if no deal is reached, India risks facing baseline duties of 10% on exports, a less severe scenario than the original 26% tariff threat, though concerns over lack of reciprocity remain.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Trading CFD dengan Teknologi dan Kecepatan Lebih Baik
IC Markets
Pelajari
Undo
As per GTRI, under the mini-deal framework, India may agree to reduce tariffs on a wide range of industrial goods, including automobiles, a long-pending demand from Washington.
In agriculture, limited market access may be extended via tariff-rate quotas (TRQs) and duty reductions on items like ethanol, apples, walnuts, almonds, raisins, avocados, olive oil, spirits, and wine.
However, GTRI and other trade experts argue that India must draw red lines.
Key sectors such as rice, wheat, and dairy, which are vital to rural livelihoods and national food security, must remain insulated from external pressure.
India fears any concession here could set a precedent, potentially undermining the minimum support price (MSP) system and the public procurement model in the future.
Beyond tariffs, the US is likely to push for large-scale commercial orders, including purchases of oil, LNG, aircraft from Boeing, helicopters, and nuclear reactors.
Washington may also seek greater foreign direct investment (FDI) access in multi-brand retail, benefiting players like Walmart and Amazon and demand liberalised rules on remanufactured goods.
While US President Trump recently hinted at a 'very big' trade deal with India, he also said that not every country will get one and some may instead receive a tariff notification. 'We have one coming up, maybe with India. Very big one...
We're going to open up India,' he said during a speech.
Despite the urgency, GTRI warned that India should not rush into a deal that lacks transparency or undermines long-term policy autonomy.
'India must hold its ground and insist on a reciprocal, balanced, and transparent agreement,' the think tank said.
Stay informed with the latest
business
news, updates on
bank holidays
and
public holidays
.
AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
17 minutes ago
- Time of India
FPIs pump in Rs 13,107 crore into Indian markets in a week; sharp rise amid RBI rate cut, global easing
Representative image (Image credits: ANI) Foreign portfolio investors (FPIs) made a net investment of Rs 13,107.54 crore into Indian markets during the week of June 23 to June 27, according to data released by the national securities depository limited (NSDL). The strong inflow reflects a surge in investor confidence, with heavy buying especially on Monday and Friday. The total net investment by foreign investors in June now stands at Rs 8,915 crore, indicating a positive shift in sentiment. Favourable global climate, RBI rate cut boost FPI sentiment The recent turnaround in foreign investor activity follows easing geopolitical tensions involving the US, Iran, and Israel. The improvement in global sentiment has encouraged investors to view emerging markets like India more favourably. On the domestic front, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) recently cut interest rates by 50 basis points in its latest monetary policy committee (MPC) meeting, aiming to boost economic growth. Inflation also remains under control, adding to investor optimism, reported ANI citing the data. A combination of global stability, policy support, and strong macroeconomic indicators has positioned India as an attractive destination for foreign investment. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch CFD với công nghệ và tốc độ tốt hơn IC Markets Đăng ký Undo Key domestic drivers such as macroeconomic indicators, institutional buying, and sector-specific triggers, like monsoon progress, consumption patterns, and infrastructure momentum, are expected to shape short-term FPI behaviour. In comparison, May witnessed Rs 19,860 crore in net FPI inflows, marking the best month for foreign investment so far this year. Meanwhile, FPIs had pulled out Rs 3,973 crore in March, and Rs 78,027 crore and Rs 34,574 crore in January and February, respectively. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Time of India
24 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Taking politics out': Pete Hegseth rechristens US Navy ship named after gay rights leader; gives it World War II sailor's name
Pete Hegseth US defense secretary Pete Hegseth on Friday (local time) announced the new name - USNS Oscar V Peterson - of USNS Harvey Milk, days after he directed the United States Navy to rename the ship. "We are taking the politics out of ship naming," he wrote on X along with a video announcing the move. The "politics" Hegseth referred to is that the ship's previous name was a tribute to Harvey Milk, a politician and gay rights activist. Milk, who served four years in the Navy in the Korean War but left due to his sexuality, later became California's first openly homosexual politician. In November 1978, aged 48, he was shot and killed inside San Francisco city hall by Dan White, a former San Francisco supervisor. He was also the subject of the 2008 critically-acclaimed biopic "Milk." On the other hand, Oscar V Peterson spent 20 years in the Navy and was killed during a World War II battle, in an act of self-sacrifice which saved lives. Peterson received a posthumous Medal of Honor for his act of bravery. USNS Harvey Milk, a fleet replenishment oiler, was originally named in 2016 under then-President Barack Obama, a Democrat. Its name-change comes amid a push from Hegseth to remove DEI (diversity, equity and inclusion) and "woke" policies from the department of defense, which he leads in the administration of Donald Trump, a Republican. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Perdagangkan CFD Emas dengan Broker Tepercaya IC Markets Mendaftar Undo When the move was first reported earlier this month, Rep Nancy Pelosi, a California Democrat, called it a "shameful, vindictive erasure of those who fought to break down barriers for all to chase the American Dream." "As the rest of us are celebrating the joy of Pride Month, it is my hope that the Navy will reconsider this egregious decision," Pelosi's statement read.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
35 minutes ago
- First Post
Israel-Iran ‘12-days war': How West Asia is on a strategic reset
The future geopolitical landscape of West Asia is likely to be multipolar, prompting both global powers and regional actors to recalibrate their strategies accordingly read more West Asia has witnessed over a dozen major conflicts since World War II due to the contentious nature of its security dynamics, attributed largely to the interplay of external, regional and domestic factors. The recent skirmish between Israel and Iran amply vindicated the above intricacies. The sudden eruption of recent hostilities leading to a full-scale war was the result of simmering belligerence between Tel Aviv and Tehran since the 1979 Islamic Revolution. Iran's strategy to prosecute a proxy war without getting entangled in a conventional conflict with Israel was finally challenged. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD On June 13, 2025, Israel launched Operation 'Rising Lion' against Iran in a preemptive effort to prevent Tehran from acquiring nuclear capabilities and avert an 'existential threat'. In the massive aerial strike, Israeli fighter jets pounded around 100 sites across Iran, primary targets being nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan, besides key military installations. Iran was caught by surprise, and as per the experts estimate, lost almost 15 per cent of its missile arsenal and crucial air defence systems. Several Iranian top military commanders were also killed. Iran's retaliation came a day later by way of large-scale drones and ballistic missile strikes against Israel. The initial strikes were followed by intense exchanges of missile barrages by both sides. Having achieved complete air domination, Israel was able to inflict colossal damage on Iran's war-fighting machinery. On the other hand, Iran's retaliation was confined to waves of missile strikes, as its air force, being weak, was missing in action. This notwithstanding, Iran's hypersonic missiles were able to penetrate the Israeli air defence and cause considerable damage to the infrastructure. Given the lack of strategic depth and doctrine of fighting swift, short wars, the war of attrition was proving unaffordable for Israel, costing hundreds of millions of dollars a day. Iran, on the other hand, was well poised to sustain a longer conflict, as around two-thirds of its missile arsenal (estimated to be around 3,000) was still intact after a week of fighting. Ten days into the conflict, there was a major escalation when the US joined Israel in the fight against Iran by launching Operation 'Mid Night Hammer' in the wee hours of June 22, 2025. The aerial strikes were undertaken by a package of seven B2 bombers, wherein Iranian nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz and Esfahan were struck with GBU-57 deep penetrating, bunker buster bombs. President Donald Trump declared that all three nuclear sites had been completely obliterated. Iran vowed to avenge the American aggression, which it did the following day in the form of a symbolic missile strike on the US air base at Al Udeid in Qatar, but there was no damage or casualties. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD On June 23, Trump, with mediation from Qatar, announced a phased ceasefire between Israel and Iran, declaring that the '12-Day War' was over. There were few truce violations before Israel and Iran accepted the ceasefire, which came into effect on June 24 and has held on so far. The stage appears to be now set for the next phase – diplomatic duels at the negotiation table, as talks are expected to resume in the near future. The wars are fought to be won, with precise politico-military aims. In this case too, both Iran and Israel claimed to be winners, having attained their respective objectives. Iran declared national victory over the Jewish regime and America. Concurrently, the Israeli foreign ministry also strongly claimed that Israel has not only achieved all objectives in the war but also killed hundreds of terrorists in Iran. Tel Aviv also announced that the outcome of the war has placed Israel in the ranks of the world's leading powers. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Well, Israel did succeed in degrading Iran's nuclear capability significantly, albeit with American assistance. Israel did demonstrate its ability to dominate the airspace and operate deep inside Iranian territory, thus taking a heavy toll on Iranian military installations. While Iranian nuclear installations have suffered considerable damage, as per Rafael Grossi, the head of the UN nuclear watchdog, 'It would be too much to assert that Iran's nuclear has been wiped out after the Israeli-American campaign.' Israeli Ambassador to France Joshua Zarka has stated that 14 key Iranian nuclear scientists were killed, implying a serious setback to Tehran's nuclear programme. In the Israeli attacks, as per Iran's Health Ministry, 627 of its citizens were killed and 4,870 were wounded. Iran, despite taking heavy losses and having an adverse air situation, was able to cause damage to Haifa port, Ben Gurion airport and a few military bases. 29 Israelis were reported to be killed and 3461 injured during the Iranian strikes. This did have considerable impact, causing fear of psychosis amongst the civilians. Iranian proxies' militias Hamas, Houthis and Hezbollah kept a low profile, as these militias have been considerably weakened by the Israelis sustained operations over the years. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The global polity favoured diplomacy and dialogue. Whereas the US was actively involved in the conflict, Russia and China – Iran's close allies – only extended diplomatic support. While Moscow advocated restraint and offered mediation, Beijing supported negotiation and projected an image of neutral peacemaker. Given the apprehensions of an oil crisis manifesting, renewed calls for negotiations and support for Qatar and Oman in mediation did accelerate the efforts for de-escalation and ceasefire. The Islamic world stood factionalised, keeping in view their national interests. The Arab nations, especially the Gulf countries, evidently are not in control of their foreign policies. The future geopolitical and security architecture of the Middle East is in for a makeover. The superpower rivalry is bound to intensify with the US deepening its role as a security guarantor for Israel and Gulf states. China will leverage its economic influence to expand its mediation role and align with Russia to ensure regional stability. Russia will strive to adopt a balanced role, supply military technology to Iran and simultaneously cultivate ties with Israel and Arab states. Turkey will continue with its quest for regional dominance and project itself as a balancing force vis-à-vis Iran and Israel, as well as consolidate its position in Syria and Iraq. India, given its immense strategic and economic interest in the region, will need to be proactive given the prevailing fluid situation. Stable West Asia is in India's interest to progress its key initiatives like the 'India Middle East Europe Economic Corridor' (IMEEC) project and Chabahar port. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The new security framework of the region is in the making, wherein Israel and Iran would be engaged in a mutual threat containment regime, with heavy reliance on precision weapon systems. Tehran will retain the ability to reactivate 'non-state' proxies and is unlikely to give up its nuclear ambitions easily. Gulf states could be working towards evolving 'integrated regional defence systems' while engaging in deeper defence cooperation with the US and Israel, besides consolidating their role as mediators. The Abraham Accord tent is expected to get wider as more nations are likely to join in for security insurance. This will weaken the Palestine cause. Will the Arabs allow Tehran to take the lead? It is a moot question, given today Hamas's main backer is Iran. The salient strategic trends indicate the likelihood of weaponisation of energy infrastructure and militarisation of sea lanes of communication around the Red Sea. The global polity will be working to obviate this situation by seeking diversification of the energy supply lines. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Like all the major conflicts, the '12-Days War' leaves behind a trail of destruction and demolished geopolitical structures, leading to major strategic shifts. The future geopolitical landscape of West Asia will be multipolar in nature, with global powers and regional players recalibrating their strategies accordingly. The general environment is likely to remain highly fragile, marked by intense competition and confrontations fuelled by religious, ideological and identity politics, with the possibility of conflict looming large. Given the overarching complexities, the West Asia region is set to remain in a state of flux, lasting peace being a distant possibility. The writer is a war veteran, currently Professor of Strategic and International Relations. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.
