Long-running road and rail projects to go ahead after year-long pause
Most have been in the works for several years, and many have already received planning permission.
But their future was thrown into doubt last year when Labour announced a review of transport infrastructure projects, saying the previous Conservative government had promised to deliver some without putting enough money forward.
In a statement to Parliament, then-transport secretary Louise Haigh accused the Tories of leaving a £2.9 billion gap between what it had announced and what it had funded.
Almost a year after launching its internal review, the Government has now decided to press on with five major road schemes, five rail projects and 28 smaller road schemes, saying they will cut journey times, ease congestion, create jobs and support new housing.
Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander said: 'Transport is the backbone of our economy, which is why we are giving them the record funding boost they need, putting taxpayers' money where it matters most and making everyday journeys easier.
'With over £92 billion investment, including the biggest ever boost for city regions in the North and Midlands, we're delivering the schemes that fast-track economic growth and jobs, connect communities, and will help us build 1.5 million new homes, as we deliver our plan for change.'
Preparatory work for some of the projects has continued despite the pause, but Tuesday's announcement means they can now proceed in full.
For some projects, supporters will hope the backing marks the final stage of a long-running process.
One, a widening of the A66 Trans-Pennine route, was first proposed in 2016, while the reopening of the railway between Portishead and Bristol has been the subject of a 25-year campaign.
The A66 upgrade was given planning permission in March 2024, but was delayed by an ultimately unsuccessful legal challenge and put on hold by the new Government's review. Construction is now expected to start this winter.
Former prime minister Rishi Sunak, whose constituency is served by the A66, welcomed the announcement, saying it would improve 'journey reliability' given the existing road's 'poor safety record'.
The Portishead line, reopening a railway that was closed in the 1960s, was also thrown into question by the review, but then West of England mayor Dan Norris announced funding had been secured in February this year.
On Tuesday, the Government announced it would invest another £27 million in the project, which it said would 'connect an additional 50,000 people' and support 'a significant new housing development'.
Other major road schemes confirmed on Tuesday include the M54-M6 link, the M60 Simister Island junction near Manchester, the A38 Derby junctions and improvements to the A46 Newark bypass.
Both the Simister Island and Newark bypass projects are yet to receive planning permission.
The Government has also confirmed its commitment to build new stations at Wellington and Cullompton in the South West and Haxby in Yorkshire, which had all been part of the Conservatives' Restoring Your Railway project that was scrapped when Labour came to power.
Funding for the stations, along with the Midlands Rail Hub plan to add 300 trains a day to the West Midlands network, was previously announced at last month's spending review.
Other, smaller, schemes include improvements to the Middlewich Eastern Bypass, in Cheshire, and the A382 between Drumbridges and Newton Abbot, in Devon.
Chancellor Rachel Reeves said the investments were 'long overdue' and would 'transform local communities and improve living standards across the country'.
But the Conservatives accused the Government of using the announcement as a 'distraction tactic'.
Shadow transport secretary Gareth Bacon said: 'Labour are re-announcing projects that are already under way in order to distract from their failing economic strategy of high tax and high borrowing. They just don't have a plan.
'Rachel Reeves's catastrophic economic mismanagement and Keir Starmer's total inability to control his own party has led to a string of unfunded U-turns, meaning that more tax rises are coming.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
10 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Britain remains trapped in poor economic policy
Randeep Ramesh certainly tackles a worthwhile and complex modern economic policy conundrum (Labour could find the money it wants without raising taxes. This is austerity by amnesia, 29 June). But his opinion that the Bank of England should simply hand over the cash proceeds from quantitative tightening (QT) and that central bank independence is somehow partly responsible for Britain's economic woes, are misguided. Central bank independence was hard-won and has largely proven a resounding success in the developed world for more than 30 years. Allowing a central bank to hand over substantial moneys from QT revenues to the Treasury would be a recipe for disaster, against the spirit if not the letter of the law, as well as a dangerous precedent. More broadly, there is merit in Ramesh's push to coordinate fiscal and monetary policy better. Neither the Treasury nor the Bank are immune to criticism in their failures to act earlier to stave off the inevitable post-Covid inflation spike by raising rates more quickly in late 2021-early 2022, before the Ukraine war. Equally, the Treasury may have acted in a more nuanced fashion in removing the government-led stimulus NewmanLondon A big thank you to Randeep Ramesh for explaining the implications of quantitative easing (QE) and QT. This insane orthodoxy simply gives public money to banks and the City. In 2007-08, the then Bank governor, Mervyn King, pontificated about 'moral hazards' for banks with regard to their risky behaviour, but then it was the public purse that took the hit from the crash and has been picking up the tab ever since. It is a parasitic system geared to the benefit of the City and the oligarchy. Gordon Brown's granting of independence to the Bank was a mistake, driven by his anxiety to reassure the City that Labour was not a threat. Running the economy is profoundly political and ideological, and the notion that only state technocrats can be trusted with monetary policy is nonsense. Rachel Reeves is making the same mistake by trying to fit her spending to Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) predictions. The creation of the OBR was simply a George Osborne wheeze to help justify his disastrous austerity policy, which Reeves is in danger of WoodKidlington, Oxfordshire Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.
The Independent
21 minutes ago
- The Independent
‘No plans' for watch towers outside House of Lords as new security fence erected
Parliament has 'no plans' to erect watch towers at the front of the House of Lords, the authorities have said. The administration was responding to a question by a former Home Office minister about the possible installation of observation posts to provide security personnel with a 'clear view' over a new metal fence, which has recently gone up to protect the site. The long length of high metal railing has provoked controversy at Westminster with concerns it 'cuts off sightlines' to potential attackers. Scotland Yard recently denied claims made in Parliament that police felt the barrier was 'dangerous' and said it had been erected 'in full consultation' with the force, including firearms and counter-terror experts. Peers previously heard the fence was put up as part of moves to improve security along the historic estate's western boundary, separating Old Palace Yard from St Margaret Street and Abingdon Street. In a written parliamentary question, Tory frontbencher Lord Blencathra, who has previously held a series of ministerial roles including at the Home Office, had asked 'whether there are plans to erect observation towers in front of Peers' Entrance to provide security officers a clear view of St Margaret Street over the security fence'. In reply, Lords senior deputy speaker Lord Gardiner of Kimble said: 'There are no plans to erect observation towers in front of the Peers' Entrance. 'The design of the Abingdon Street fence components was undertaken to carefully balance security requirements and heritage considerations, whilst maintaining necessary lines of sight for the security personnel working in this area, including at nearby entrances.' In a separate written question, Lord Blencathra also challenged the authorities over 'the justification for the difference in style and design' between the bars installed and those surrounding the House of Commons. In response, Lord Gardiner said: 'Where possible, the newly installed fence along the west front of the Palace of Westminster has been designed to be sympathetic to the existing fences, while also meeting different and specific requirements. 'The primary driver of the difference is that the fence along the west front has been designed to be completely removeable to accommodate the variety of access needs to Old Palace Yard.' He added: 'This meant it was not possible to match exactly the fence at Cromwell Green.' Meanwhile, Conservative former Cabinet minister Lord Forsyth of Drumlean has pressed the parliamentary authorities over 'the cost per metre of the security fence' and the total cost of the project. In rejecting his request, Lord Gardiner said: 'In publishing the costs of a security asset, an adversary would be provided with information about the level of and efficacy of the mitigation we have in place. 'For these reasons, the costs of the newly installed Abingdon Street fence are not in the public domain. 'The fence is not 'off the shelf' and incorporates security measures specifically designed to keep out a wide range of hostile actors.' But, he added: 'In order to balance transparency with security, the House of Lords Finance Committee will undertake an enhanced programme of scrutiny of both costs and performance of security works, on a quarterly basis.' Lord Forsyth has previously complained of being stonewalled about the bill for a new front door to the Lords on security grounds, which was subsequently revealed to have cost nearly £10 million – far in excess of the original estimate – and also not work. A former public spending watchdog has been asked to investigate the Peers' Entrance project which has been branded 'a scandalous waste of public money'.
The Independent
21 minutes ago
- The Independent
Fujitsu getting away ‘scot-free' from Horizon scandal, says postmaster
A Scottish postmaster who was wrongly convicted under the Horizon scandal says Fujitsu is getting away 'scot-free' from its role in the affair. Rab Thomson welcomed the first tranche of Sir Wyn Williams' final report, which was released in London on Tuesday. Mr Thomson spent around 20 years fighting to clear his name after being accused of theft. The 65-year-old, from Alva in Clackmannanshire, was one of the first to have his conviction overturned and was able to do so in advance of a special law being passed at the Scottish Parliament to exonerate Horizon victims. Mr Thomson's mother had worked at the Post Office for 30 years and the accusation of theft against him came a few years after he took over the business. He told the PA news agency: 'I feel quite emotional.. 'There's other stories in there worse than mine, don't get me wrong, but it's heartbreaking for it to come to this length – it's going to drag on to March next year.' He said he had been particularly emotional about the part of the report relating to himself and his mother. Mr Thomson said he and his mother did not speak for a year after the allegation of theft was made against him. He said his mother kept herself in her house following the allegation up until her death, saying: 'People were talking behind her back – 'her son stole from the Post Office'. 'But none of the people that accused me of stealing, some of them have not even come forward and apologised. 'So I don't know how they're feeling, maybe guilt I don't know.' Mr Thomson added: 'If I can get a victory over this, compensation-wise for people out there who haven't had a penny yet and get them as much as we possibly can, then hopefully my mum's up there and she'll be smiling on me.' He welcomed the report but had one caveat, saying: 'The only problem I see is, I don't know why we're not taking on Fujitsu? 'Why is Sir Wynn not taking on Fujitsu? Because at the end of the day it's them that's brought this crisis to us – at the moment they've got away scot-free.' In April, Mr Thomson and others launched the Scottish Postmasters for Justice and Redress (SPJR) group. He has encouraged other Scots affected by the issue to seek redress. Fujitsu has already acknowledged it has a 'moral obligation' to contribute to compensation for those affected by the scandal, pending the outcome of Sir Wyn Williams' inquiry. Commenting on the report, SNP MP Chris Law said: ' Westminster is still dragging its heels in delivering fair compensation and it is essential that the Labour government immediately removes every bureaucratic barrier and blockade so that these victims finally get the justice they so badly need. 'The starkness of this report lays bare the tragedies, and even the loss of life, that came about as a direct result of this scandal. 'After decades of failures and cover-ups by successive Westminster governments, Fujitsu and the Post Office, hundreds of people who worked hard for local communities have been made to fight far too long for justice – there must be no more delays from this UK Labour government.'
