US aerospace industry anxious as tariffs loom
At the request of President Donald Trump, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick's department launched an investigation on May 1 to determine whether to impose tariffs of between 10 and 20 per cent on civil aircraft and parts, including engines.
The US industry those tariffs were crafted to protect swiftly let the administration know it was not interested.
'Imposing broad tariff or non-tariff trade barriers on the imports of civil aviation technology would risk reversing decades of industrial progress and harm the domestic supply chain,' the Aerospace Industries Association (AIA) said in a letter addressed to Lutnick and obtained by AFP.
The interested parties were given until Jun 3 to communicate their positions.
The very next day, Lutnick announced that Washington aimed to 'set the standard for aircraft part tariffs' by the end of this month.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
'The key is to protect that industry,' he said, adding: 'We will use these tariffs for the betterment of American industry.'
But AIA and the Airlines for America (A4A) trade association voiced fear that far from helping, the tariffs would end up harming US manufacturers.
No fix needed
'Unlike other industries, the civil aviation manufacturing industry prioritizes domestic production of high-value components and final assembly,' AIA pointed out.
According to the organisation, US aerospace and defence exports reached US$135.9 billion in 2023, including US$113.9 billion for civil aviation alone.
This allowed the sector to generate a trade surplus of US$74.5 billion and to invest US$34.5 billion in research and development, it said.
The sector employs more than 2.2 million people in the US across more than 100,000 companies, which in 2023 produced goods worth nearly US$545 billion.
In its response to Lutnick, the A4A highlighted how beneficial the international Agreement on Trade in Commercial Aviation (ATCA) had been by helping to eliminate tariffs and trade barriers over nearly half a century.
'The US civil aviation industry is the success story that President Trump is looking for as it leads civil aerospace globally,' it insisted.
A full 84 per cent of production was already American, it said, stressing that Washington 'does not need to fix the 16 per cent' remaining.
'The current trade framework has enhanced our economic and national security and is a critical component to maintaining our national security moving forward,' it said.
For manufacturers, the potential tariffs would act like sand jamming a well-oiled machine that has been running smoothly for decades, experts warned.
They would also throw off balance an ultra-sensitive supply chain still recovering from the Covid-19 pandemic.
'Competitive disadvantage'
'To avoid the situation getting worse, we advocate to keep aerospace outside of trade wars,' Willie Walsh, head of the International Air Transport Association (Iata), told the organisation's general assembly last week.
AIA meanwhile stressed that 'aircraft and parts are already in high demand and have a limited supply.'
'Integrating new suppliers and expanding capacity is complex, timely, and costly,' it warned, pointing out that finding suppliers capable of meeting rigorous safety certifications could 'take up to 10 years.'
Delta Airlines also argued for sticking with the status quo, cautioning that the proposed tariffs 'would hinder Delta's ability to maintain its current trajectory.'
'If component parts incur tariffs upon entering the US, Delta will be at a competitive disadvantage to foreign competitors,' it said.
'The action would also impose an unexpected tax on Delta's purchases of aircraft contracted years in advance.'
Delta chief Ed Bastian insisted in late April that the airline 'will not be paying tariffs on any aircraft deliveries we take,' adding that it was 'working very closely with (European group) Airbus' to minimize the impact.
Delta pointed out in its letter to Lutnick that it currently had 100 aircraft on order from Boeing, and that it was demanding that its Airbus A220s be produced primarily in Mobile, Alabama.
But if the tariffs are imposed, it warned, 'Delta would likely be forced to cancel existing contracts and reconsider contracts under negotiation.' AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
26 minutes ago
- Straits Times
India reels from the shock of Trump's onslaught
NEW DELHI – President Donald Trump's new list of tariffs on half the world's countries sent the United States' trading partners scrambling to understand how their businesses will be affected. India got the bad news a day earlier – its goods face a tariff of 25 per cent or more – but the extra time was hardly enough to adjust to the fresh chaos. Indian negotiators had not expected to conclude a meaningful deal in time to meet Mr Trump's revised deadline of Aug 1. But they did expect to be treated as well as their neighbours, and to keep haggling with US officials until October or November, when Mr Trump was invited to visit India as part of the Quad defense group, which brings together four big democracies – India, the United States, Japan and Australia – with a shared interest in standing up to China. Instead, they were fed a heap of insults and injuries. Along with the 25 per cent rate, one of the highest in Asia and only a point lower than what was threatened on 'Liberation Day' in April, India was informed that its existing trade barriers are 'strenuous and obnoxious'; it will be charged an untold penalty for buying Russian oil; it is a 'dead economy.' It's archrival Pakistan was praised and promised an oil exploration deal. Hurt feelings aside, the results are confusing. Two of the biggest categories of exports to the United States from India are personal electronics, worth about US$14 billion a year, and pharmaceuticals, worth US$10 billion. Mr Rajesh Sharma, executive director of India Cellular and Electronics Association, said smartphones were exempted from these tariffs; so did executives at pharmaceutical companies. But on Aug 1, after reading the executive order, the Global Trade Research Initiative in New Delhi concluded the opposite. India's stock markets dipped on the news for two days running. Indian and international banks wrote notices warning that the country's generally hard-charging economic growth is likely to slow measurably as a result of the tariffs. Then there are the unknown tariffs. On July 6, Mr Trump wrote that countries aligned with the Brics group, of which India is a founding member, would incur an additional 10 per cent penalty. Then on July 14, he said that, if Russia didn't make peace with Ukraine within 50 days, he would punish its trading partners with 'secondary tariffs' of 100 per cent. That figure is making Indians worry anew. Mr Trump added 'plus a penalty' to the 25 per cent rate imposed on India, for buying Russian oil and weapons. Ms Shashi Tharoor, a prominent member of the opposition, spoke to an Indian news agency about the possible impact. 'There's even talk of a 100 per cent penalty,' he said, 'which will destroy our trade with America.' There is evidence that Indian buyers of Russian oil were already pulling back before the executive order. 'Indian refiners have reduced Russian crude purchases this week,' said Ms Sumit Ritolia, an analyst at Kpler, which tracks shipping and commodities. They were already 'looking to further diversify, amid rising concerns over potential US sanctions,' having spent years taking advantage of discounted Russian oil to reduce their imports from the Persian Gulf. Reducing the United States' trade deficit is one of the Trump administration's goals, so persuading India to buy more American oil and gas would make sense. Last year, India exported US$45.7 billion more goods to the United States than it imported. It spent about three times as much importing oil. If a third of that were redirected to American sources, their bilateral trade would be evened out. Mr Trump's angry barrage of social media has complicated further negotiations. The breakdown of trust between Mr Narendra Modi, India's prime minister, whom Mr Trump called his 'true friend,' the US president is likely to make it harder to complete any deal, analysts say. Indian news outlets have reported that Mr Trump wanted to iron out some outstanding issues, after four rounds of direct talks between the two sides, in a phone call with Mr Modi. The Indian government was anxious to avoid any of his last-minute surprises. The US commerce secretary accused India of 'slow-rolling' its trade negotiations. Indian officials and analysts say the friction is caused by a fundamental difference of approach. Mr Trump has a penchant for quick, top-down dealmaking. India's bureaucracy moves at a methodical pace, especially when it comes to opening up the agriculture market, which is politically sensitive. India's recently concluded trade deal with Britain took three years of talks, under two British prime ministers. On Aug 1, India's Foreign Ministry released a statement that put on a brave face. 'India and the United States share a Comprehensive Global Strategic Partnership,' established in 2013 between President Barack Obama and then-Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, 'anchored in shared interests, democratic values and robust people-to-people ties.' The ministry stuck to principles, revealing no plan for breaking through Mr Trump's hard line. 'This partnership has weathered several transitions and challenges,' the statement said. 'We remain focused on the substantive agenda that our two countries have committed to and are confident that the relationship will continue to move forward.' NYTIMES
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Trump administration Is freezing over $387 million for UCLA
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox The Trump administration paused the research funding as part of an investigation by the government's antisemitism task force. WASHINGTON - The federal government is freezing over US$300 million (S$387 million) in research funds for UCLA over claims of antisemitism and bias at the institution, according to its chancellor and Trump administration documents. In a statement on July 30, the chancellor Julio Frenk said that the federal government was cutting 'hundreds of grants' to the university. Letters this week to UCLA from the Energy Department, National Science Foundation and National Institutes of Health accuse the university of adhering to 'illegal affirmative action' policies, failing to do enough to combat antisemitism on campus and discriminating against women by allowing the participation of transgender athletes. The Trump administration paused the research funding as part of an investigation by the government's antisemitism task force, two administration officials said. The freeze included about US$240 million in research grants from the Department of Health and Human Services and the NIH, US$81 million from the NSF and US$18.2 million from the Energy Department, a White House spokesperson said. The move makes UCLA the latest university to be targeted by Trump administration officials. It comes amid a broader pushback by the administration against what it sees as 'woke' ideologies. The NSF said in a statement that it was 'suspending awards to UCLA because they are not in alignment with current NSF priorities and/or programmatic goals.' The NIH did not immediately respond to a request for comment. In recent weeks, Columbia University, the University of Pennsylvania, Harvard, Brown and others have had federal funding reduced or threatened based on broad accusations from the Trump administration that range from antisemitism to improper support for diversity, equity and inclusion programs. In some cases, the government has used the threat of funding cuts to extract concessions and hundreds of millions of dollars from universities. Last year, UCLA was the site of one of the nation's biggest protests against the Israeli military offensive in the Gaza Strip. The demonstrations prompted claims from across the political spectrum that the university didn't do enough to protect Jewish students or pro-Palestinian demonstrators. On July 29, the university agreed to pay more than US$6 million to settle a lawsuit from Jewish students and a professor who said that the university had allowed a hostile protest on campus. After the settlement was announced, the Department of Justice separately said that it had found the university violated civil rights laws by failing to respond to students' complaints of antisemitism. Although the Trump administration intensified its attacks on UCLA this week, the school had been a target of the government's scrutiny for more than a year. In May 2024, Mr Frenk's predecessor, Gene D. Block, testified before a congressional committee examining campus antisemitism. And in February, a Trump administration task force on antisemitism identified UCLA as one of 10 schools it intended to visit as it investigated whether 'remedial action is warranted.' In recent weeks, UCLA would not say whether any of the task force's investigators had been to the campus. Mr Frenk said in his statement on July 30 that UCLA had taken 'concrete action' to address antisemitism and discrimination, including creating a new office of campus safety. 'This far-reaching penalty of defunding lifesaving research does nothing to address any alleged discrimination,' he wrote. He called the cuts a 'loss for Americans across the nation' whose work and health rely on the university's research. The funding cut is an early test for Mr Frenk, who became chancellor in January, as well as Mr James B. Milliken, who took over as the University of California system's leader on Aug 1. State and education leaders have been deeply concerned about the possibility that the Trump administration would target the university system as a whole, but especially the campuses in Los Angeles and Berkeley. Both schools were on the antisemitism task force's list for potential visits. But the Department of Education has also said it was investigating accusations of antisemitism at several other UC campuses. NYTIMES
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
US President Trump reserves harshest tariff rates for Laos, Myanmar and Syria
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox US President Donald Trump's revised global tariff plan unveiled on Aug 1 hit Laos and Myanmar hard with a 40 per cent import duty – the second-highest rate in the world behind only Syria at 41 per cent. The White House has not explained its rationale, and US trade with all three is small compared with its other partners. Myanmar remains under US sanctions following its 2021 coup, and Laos has drawn US scrutiny for deepening ties with China. Syria, meanwhile, had been penalised for human rights abuses under former President Bashar Al-Assad, but the US has sought to ease those restrictions since his overthrow last year. In Myanmar's case, trade with the US totalled US$734 million (S$947 million) last year – yet the penalty will deepen an economic collapse that began when Min Aung Hlaing seized power in a coup more than four years ago. Washington has imposed sanctions for what it sees as the junta's use of violence against civilians and suppression of democracy activists. The tariff announcement came just a day after Myanmar's junta lifted emergency rule, paving the way for elections later this year. The US and other governments have criticised the vote as being neither free nor fair. Myanmar's junta chief praised Mr Trump in a rare letter last month and compared his military's coup to the US president's baseless claims of election fraud, suggesting both leaders were victims of rigged votes. Mr Min Aung Hlaing also requested a reduced tariff rate and offered to send a high-level trade delegation to Washington. Deputy Commerce Minister Min Min said by phone the government was unaware of the development and declined to comment. As for Laos, US exports to the South-east Asian nation totalled US$40.4 million last year, while imports reached US$803.3 million. The US has raised concern over its economic dependence on China and mounting debt tied to Chinese infrastructure projects. Mr Trump recently signed an executive order easing sanctions on Syria to help rebuild the war-torn country and support its new government. Observers say there may be a simple reason for the high levies. 'Rather than pick on these three nations, I suspect limited bandwidth in DC led officials to focus on bigger fry,' said Simon Evenett, founder of the St. Gallen Endowment for Prosperity Through Trade, a group based in Switzerland that tracks trade policies. BLOOMBERG
