NatWest to make huge change to millions of accounts within DAYS – and customers need to check now
NATWEST is making a huge change to millions of bank accounts within days - and customers should check if they're affected.
The major high street bank is slashing interest rates on a host of accounts from May 30.
1
NatWest is slashing rates on nine of its accounts from later this month
Credit: Alamy
The move comes after the Bank of England (BoE) slashed its base rate from 4.5% to 4.25% this month - the fourth cut since 2020.
The base rate is charged to smaller high street banks and any falls are usually echoed in savings rates.
NatWest is cutting interest rates on five of its savings accounts from May 30 including its Digital Regular Saver, Flexible Saver and Cash ISA.
Meanwhile, rates on three other savings accounts and a kids current account will be slashed from July 15.
Scroll down to see tables of all the accounts that are affected and their new rates. Meanwhile, this is the full list of impacted accounts:
Digital Regular Saver (from May 30)
Flexible Saver (from May 30)
Savings Builder (from May 30)
Cash ISA (from May 30)
Help to Buy ISA (from May 30)
First Saver (from July 15)
Adapt Account (from July 15)
First Reserve (from July 15)
Primary Savings (from July 15)
How much the interest rates on these accounts will fall depends on how much you have in them.
For example, if you've got a Digital Regular Saver, the interest rate will fall from 6.17% AER to 5.5% AER from May 30 on any balances between £1-£5,000.
AER stands for Annual Equivalent Rate (AER) and shows the interest rate if interest is paid and compounded once a year.
For those with more than £5,000 in one of the accounts, the rate will fall from 1.25% AER to 1.15% AER.
Switch bank accounts for free perks
Interest rates on the Savings Builder account will fall from 2% to 1.75% for anyone with a balance of between £1 and £10,000 from May 30.
Meanwhile, for balances over £10,000, the interest rate will fall from 1.25% to 1.15%.
NatWest customers with a children's First Saver account and a balance of more than £1 will see the interest rate fall from 2.25% to 2.05% from July 15.
Meanwhile, if you've got a First Reserve account with £1 or more in the account, the interest rate will fall from 1.25% to 1.15%.
A spokesperson for NatWest said: "Following the Bank of England base rate cut, we will be passing on the rate cut in full to our customers on a Standard Variable Rate (SVR) mortgage.
"SVR will be reduced from 7.49% to 7.24%, effective from June 1.
"SVR customers may also be able to save money by switching to one of our fixed rate mortgages.
'Following the Bank of England base rate cut, we have made reductions to some of our variable rate savings accounts.
"We will communicate these changes to customers in due course, giving at least 14 days' notice of any changes.
"Details of these changes are available on our website now."
MAJOR BANKS CUTTING RATES
NatWest has already cut interest rates on a host of its bank accounts twice since the end of 2024.
In December, it dropped the interest rates on its Digital Regular Saver, Flexible Saver and Savings Builder accounts.
Then in March, it cut rates on 11 variable rate savings accounts including its Digital Regular Saver and Flexible Saver again.
Banks and building societies have been reducing interest rates across dozens of accounts in recent months as the BoE continues to cut its base rate.
Nationwide is cutting interest rates on over 60 savings accounts from June 1 including a number of ISAs and easy access accounts.
The Sun also exclusively revealed how Virgin Money is lowering the interest rate on its M Plus Saver account next month.
If you've got a savings account with an interest rate set to drop, it's worth shopping around for a better deal.
Check out comparison sites like moneysavingexpert.com and moneyfactscompare.co.uk to browse the best accounts on the market.
SAVING ACCOUNT TYPES
THERE are four types of savings accounts fixed, notice, easy access, and regular savers.
Separately, there are ISAs or individual savings accounts which allow individuals to save up to £20,000 a year tax-free.
But we've rounded up the main types of conventional savings accounts below.
FIXED-RATE
A fixed-rate savings account or fixed-rate bond offers some of the highest interest rates but comes at the cost of being unable to withdraw your cash within the agreed term.
This means that your money is locked in, so even if interest rates increase you are unable to move your money and switch to a better account.
Some providers give the option to withdraw, but it comes with a hefty fee.
NOTICE
Notice accounts offer slightly lower rates in exchange for more flexibility when accessing your cash.
These accounts don't lock your cash away for as long as a typical fixed bond account.
You'll need to give advance notice to your bank - up to 180 days in some cases - before you can make a withdrawal or you'll lose the interest.
EASY-ACCESS
An easy-access account does what it says on the tin and usually allows unlimited cash withdrawals.
These accounts tend to offer lower returns, but they are a good option if you want the freedom to move your money without being charged a penalty fee.
REGULAR SAVER
These accounts pay some of the best returns as long as you pay in a set amount each month.
You'll usually need to hold a current account with providers to access the best rates.
However, if you have a lot of money to save, these accounts often come with monthly deposit limits.
According to Moneyfacts, Chip is offering the best rate on an easy access savings account, with a rate of 4.77%.
Meanwhile, the best easy access cash ISA is with Trading 212 and offering a rate of 4.86%.
Do you have a money problem that needs sorting? Get in touch by emailing money-sm@news.co.uk.
Plus, you can join our Sun Money Chats and Tips Facebook group to share your tips and stories
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
.jpeg%3Fwidth%3D1200%26auto%3Dwebp%26quality%3D75%26trim%3D121%2C0%2C1456%2C0%26crop%3D&w=3840&q=100)
Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
No cheer for borrowers as rates held
Greg Macvean Photography In a widely predicted decision, the Bank of England held interest rates at 4.25 per cent this month. Sign up to our Scotsman Money newsletter, covering all you need to know to help manage your money. Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... While many will have hoped for a cut – especially those of us with a mortgage to pay – an uncertain global political and economic environment plus ongoing inflationary pressures saw that being ruled out, for now at least. But many commentators are expecting two more rate cuts by the end of the year, especially with three of the nine Monetary Policy Committee members voting this month to reduce the base rate to 4 per cent. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad All eyes will now turn to the next meeting in August to see what will be announced then and whether it will bring some more cheer for borrowers. In a Bank of England statement following the rate decision, it said: 'There remain two-sided risks to inflation. Given the outlook, and continued disinflation, a gradual and careful approach to the further withdrawal of monetary policy restraint remains appropriate.' It added: 'The committee will continue to monitor closely the risks of inflation persistence and what the evidence may reveal about the balance between aggregate supply and demand in the economy.' You'll notice on Page 7 that one of our long-term partners, Waverton, has officially become W1M. This follows an announcement in March that the firm was consolidating with London & Capital, providing 'exceptional breadth and depth of global advice and planning, combined with institutional-quality investment management'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad W1M manages more than £21 billion in assets, placing it among the UK's largest wealth managers. The merged firm says it aims to grow its market share, with a focus on high net-worth and ultra-high net-worth individuals, charities, and institutions. W1M said it combines the strengths of both firms to address the complex, international, and intergenerational needs of wealthy families, including cross-border advice, institutional-quality investment management, global tax and portfolio reporting. In this issue of Scotsman Money, Sean Lowson of W1M explores the speculation that Cash ISAs are under threat and what this could mean for savers. Meanwhile, Tom Ham chief executive of Calton examines Inheritance Tax and explains why 'estate planning is both an art and science'. Craig Barrie of estate agency Revere explains how he has drawn from his experience of working in Dubai to offer clients a personal service. And in our Q&A section, Andrew Sutherland of Acumen answers a query from a reader on putting shares into an ISA wrapper.
New Statesman
2 hours ago
- New Statesman
Is Nigel Farage right about the Bank of England?
Photo byAfter Labour's fiscal shambles over the past week, it is depressing to see the only genuine economic radicalism in British politics emerging from the right. Reform deputy leader Richard Tice's recent claim that 'everything is up for debate' on the Bank of England once again shows why the party is setting the pace on national political discussion. It doesn't exactly hurt the party to have a strangely enamoured mainstream media, and an alternate news ecosystem around GB News that is mainlining its alt-right talking points. But Reform's willingness to seize the policy initiative shows that the party grasps the extent of Britain's economic dysfunction. From demanding the nationalisation of British Steel, to insisting taxpayers shouldn't foot the bill for quantitative easing (QE), Reform has been unafraid to challenge the orthodoxy. Its opponents urgently need to raise their game, or risk continuing to play catch up from now until the next election. The blunt truth is that the claims made for central bank independence were always overblown, and today, in a world of chaotic, repeated, overlapping crises, sacrosanct independence is a luxurious relic few countries can afford to maintain. The Bank of England's current mandate is not fit for purpose and in any case the Bank has operated well outside of it since the financial crisis. The arrival of so-called unconventional monetary policy in early 2009, in the form of QE, represented a major expansion of its powers. The Bank's balance sheet grew alongside its remit, with huge short-term impacts on wealth inequality (since shamefacedly admitted by the Bank) and with the longer-term costs to the Exchequer that Tice highlighted. There have been more graphic examples of over-reach: it wasn't 'markets' alone that removed Liz Truss as prime minister but the Bank of England governor Andrew Bailey's extraordinary intervention, in a press conference at the International Monetary Fund, that helped to stoke the market panic which forced her resignation in September 2022. 'Independence' for the Bank has turned, over the three decades since Gordon Brown granted it, into something dangerously close to 'dominance'. But killing this sacred cow will require a confrontation with the high priests of modern economics. Since the mid-1990s, the doctrine in mainstream Western economic thinking has been that central banks should be 'independent' of government, meaning that decisions over what has become the central economic management tool of interest rate-setting should be made by the banks without the broader, elected government involved. Central banks would be granted a simple mandate by their government to achieve a certain target for inflation, usually around 2 per cent, and expected to vary interest rates as they saw fit to achieve that. [See also: The QE theory of everything] The theory behind this was that if governments were left to set central bank interest rates themselves, they would game the system – cutting interest rates ahead of elections, for example, to stoke up the economy in the short run, at the risk of higher inflation. But knowing this, consumers, businesses and (crucially) those in financial markets would not believe governments when they also claimed to want to fight inflation. These promises would not be credible. Expectations of future inflation would be higher, and this would, in turn, feed back into actually higher inflation today. By breaking the link between elected governments and the central bank, independence was supposed to restore credibility to monetary policy. Sticking tightly to their mandate, ruled over by wise technocrats, independent central banks would act as credible guardians of price stability. Some costs were clear, even at the time. Excessively high interest rates maintained by the Bank of England following independence in 1997 were blamed, largely accurately, for further waves of deindustrialisation under New Labour. The pound was held at a value that made manufacturing exports uncompetitive: 1.5 million manufacturing jobs went, largely ignored at the time, between 1997 and 2009. Factory closures here may have appeared to be a price worth paying. Inflation remained low, interest rates manageable, real wages grew and a great expansion of consumer borrowing fuelled wider economic growth. The Bank of England governor at the time, Mervyn King, claimed to have midwifed the 'Nice' decade – Non-Inflationary, Continual Expansion. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe This was pure hubris. The arrival of central bank independence as a doctrine coincided with the extraordinary transformation of China, in particular, from one of the poorest countries on the planet to what is, by some measures, the world's largest economy. The relationship wasn't coincidental: the freeing up of global financial systems that 'independent' central banks were a component part of enabled the spread of consumer borrowing on a heroic scale throughout the Global North and this, in turn, helped lubricate the flow of cheap consumer products opened up by the mass industrialisation of East Asia. But what, plausibly, has more impact on consumer prices: a letter from Gordon Brown to the governor of the Bank of England, or 300 million Chinese moving from the countryside to work in factories? If you can buy a 50-inch flatscreen TV today for a fraction of its price even a few years ago, that isn't because the Bank's Monetary Policy Committee managed to keep voting the right way. It's the ending of this cheap flow that really heralds the end of the low-inflation decades. The halting of globalisation, rudely made permanent on Donald Trump's 2 April 'Liberation Day', and more fundamentally the conjoined crises of the climate and nature, all point towards a sharp and permanent reversal of those long decades of falling prices. Climate change means economic activity becomes harder and more costly. And today, it is rising food prices that have started to push up overall inflation in both the US and the UK. Staples like chocolate have soared in price in recent weeks, directly linked to adverse weather worsened by a changing climate. Conventional central bank policy is useless here. Putting up interest rates in London does not make more cocoa grow in drought-struck Ghana. If anything, by restricting future investment, it is likely to worsen this supply-side inflation over time. Nor do interest rates stop the new profiteers of shortage and disruption, like the fossil fuel companies and global agribusinesses, generating all time-record profits from this ecological cost-of-living crisis. This new high-inflation world is wreaking havoc with structures inherited from the old. Higher interest rates, and attempts by central banks to 'unwind' earlier QE, are now creating notional 'losses' on central bank balance sheets – losses that the Treasury has agreed to indemnify. Work by the New Economics Foundation suggests these now run to an extraordinary £130bn over the rest of the decade, after peaking at over £40bn last year. These are payments from the Treasury that go, via the Bank of England, to paying those commercial banks that hold accounts with it. It is these payments that Tice has targeted but which, to their credit, the Bank's former deputy governor for monetary policy Charles Bean and Gordon Brown have both flagged as an extraordinary indulgence in a time of austerity. 'Tiered reserves' – the Bank paying interest on only part of the accounts held – would be a smart, partial solution. The transformation has to go further. Dealing with a world of repeated price shocks and crises from non-monetary sources will require coordination between fiscal and monetary authorities. A very useful recent paper from LSE's Centre for Economic Transition Expertise calls for 'adaptive inflation targeting' from central banks, giving them greater flexibility and time to respond to climate and other shocks, while coordinating with the fiscal authorities. Strategic stocks of essential supplies, as called for by the economist Isabella Weber, and Swiss-style price controls (a quarter of consumer prices in Switzerland are regulated by the government) should all be part of the mix. Common-sense solutions remain anathema to the partisans of central bank 'independence', who tend to see any attempt at coordination between parts of government as clearing the route to the dreaded 'fiscal dominance' of monetary policy – an inflationary spiral of government deficits and money-printing. But the greater risk today is inaction in the name of orthodoxy, drifting further into instability and shortages with our most important economic institutions unable to cope. It shouldn't be left to Tice and Reform to make the case for radical change. [See also: Who's afraid of Gary Stevenson?] Related
Scottish Sun
21 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
The five ‘Ozempic money rules' that could save you £3,100 a year – and you can even have spending cheat days
Savvy saver Karen Powell reveals her strict money diet that helps her save hundreds of pounds a year BELT TIGHTENING The five 'Ozempic money rules' that could save you £3,100 a year – and you can even have spending cheat days SO-called "fat jabs" are notorious for their rapid and drastic weight loss results - but have you heard of the "Ozempic" money rules? Financial experts have revealed exclusively to Sun Club readers the five ways to slim down your finances, including how to make a money diet plan. Advertisement 2 Weight loss jabs are famous for helping people get slim quick - but there are also Ozempic money rules too Credit: Getty 2 From scheduling money days in your diary to cutting your tax bill, there's ways to make big savings Credit: Getty Ozempic-style weight loss jabs including Mounjaro are now used by 1.5million Brits and this week new data revealed that they are even affecting supermarket sales. They work by affecting the hormones that make you feel hungry and helping to reduce food cravings, allowing users to make healthier food choices and reduce their calorie intake. But could applying Ozempic money rules help slim-line your spending and put £3,146 a year back in your pocket? We explain. Advertisement 1. Pinpoint binge spending - save £1,179 If you're guilty of splashing the cash without thinking about the consequences, you may be a "binge spender". The impulse to splurge can get more intense during warmer months, when the beer gardens are more tempting and there's paddling pools to buy. Some 50% of people admitted to overspending an average of £1,179 last summer, according to a survey of over 2,000 people by NatWest. Sarah Coles from the investment platform Hargreaves Lansdown said a good place to start is to understand your bad habits. If you find that you are shopping late at night, spending too much with friends or on family, or treating yourself when you're feeling low, put in place solutions to stop you from acting on your impulses. Advertisement "You could delete your card details from online shops, only take a card with a limited amount of money on it when you go out, or have a mood buddy you can message when you're feeling down, to give you a chance to help you find a better solution than shopping." 2. Put spending on a diet plan - save £1,000 Just like a diet plan can help you stay on track with your weight loss goals, making a budget can help to shrink your spending. Some 6.8 million people are struggling to pay for essentials, according to research by Money Advice Trust last year. First, you'll need to know your income, and list all your outgoings. Essential bills are your rent or mortgage, council tax, energy, utilities, food, travel and childcare. Advertisement Then look at what you are spending on non-essential things, like coffees, subscriptions, meals out and clothes, for example. To save money, start chopping the amount of cash you spend on anything that is not an essential bill. 'Use an app or spreadsheet - whatever helps you stay consistent," said Myron Jobson from the investment platform interactive investor. "The goal isn't perfection, it's awareness. Knowing where your money goes is the first step to making it go further. "Cutting back on nice-to-haves could save £1,000 a year." Advertisement Here's my spending diet plan - and how I keep on track SAVVY saver Karen Powell keeps her spending on a strict diet plan to save her hundreds of pounds every year. Karen, 63, from Surrey Hills, has budgets for different outgoings and checks her banks statements each week to make sure she's on track with her money. Karen, who runs the time management and organisation skills company The Organising Lady, said: "It's so important to slim down your spending for your mental health, relationships, and family. "There's nothing worse about worrying about money. "Spending can be addictive if you're not careful - it's a dopamine hit going shopping." To keep her finances on track, Karen limits her spending. "I try and stick to £100 a week on food. "We're careful with holidays, and will only have two 'splurge meals' out while we're away. "Me and my sister set a £20 limit on birthday and Christmas presents. "And me and my husband don't buy gifts for each other." She makes sure to never throw away any food by bulk cooking and freezing - which she reckons saves her £600 a year at least. She also puts time in her diary each week to monitor her finances. "Once a week, I'll look at my bank account to make sure I haven't splurged and so I can keep track of what I've spent." She also has "treat" days, where she'll buy affordable things for herself to avoid overspending on big shopping trips. "I'm human and I love clothes - I just make sure I choose well now, and stick to the rule of one in, one out and sell my unwanted clothes on sites like Vinted." 3. Make time for finances like exercise - save £375 We've all been there - you just can't be bothered to go to the gym, or go for a run. But just like scheduling exercise days in your calendar can help you keep on track with your fitness, plotting "money" days in your diary can help you get richer. Aim to sit down and do a finances spring clean two times a year, said Sarah. She said: "Make a list and put a time in your diary and you'll finally get round to all those things you've been putting off. "For example, automating payments on your finance days to help you avoid missing debt repayments can save you £100 a year or more. Advertisement "While shopping around for car insurance can save £75, shopping for a better energy deal could save £200 a year. "Don't try to do everything at once or you'll get exhausted and give up. Start with something simple and build from there." 4. Have cheat days - save £200 Restricting your diet to just salad means there's a higher chance of binge eating. The same goes for your finances. There's a greater chance you'll have a shopping blow out if you've put yourself on a super strict budget. The trick is to have "cheat days", where you treat yourself to something nice but affordable so it won't ruin your budget. Advertisement That could be anything from getting a cheeky Maccies once a fortnight for the family, or treating yourself to a new piece of clothing once a month, or two months. Sarah said drip-feeding yourself treats instead of overspending could save you £200 a year. 5. Slim down your tax bill - save up to £392 Nobody likes paying tax - but there are handy tax reliefs that can help keep more money in your pocket. Married couples can save up to £252 a year in tax thanks to the marriage tax allowance. This tax break allows those who earns less than the £12,570 personal allowance (the amount you can earn before you start paying income tax) to give up to £1,260 of that allowance to their partner. Advertisement You can backdate claims by up to four tax years, which means you can get a maximum of £1,260. Work from home? You could get up a tax break worth up to £140 a year. You can claim working from home tax relief if your job requires you to live away from your office, or your employer doesn't have an office. You can't claim the relief if you choose to work from home. The relief aims to help you pay for essential bills like business phone calls and energy. You can claim tax relief on £6 a week. Advertisement So if you are a basic rate tax payer, that means you pay a 20% tax rate. So 20% of £6 is £1.20 a week back in your pocket - which over the year racks up to £62.40 a year. Higher rate tax payers would be eligible for £2.40 a week (£124.60 a year), as their tax rate is 40%. While additional rate taxpayers would get £2.70 a week (£140.40 a year) as their tax rate is 45%.
