logo
Gukesh defeats Magnus Carlsen once again as Garry Kasparov says: ‘Now we can question Magnus' domination'

Gukesh defeats Magnus Carlsen once again as Garry Kasparov says: ‘Now we can question Magnus' domination'

There was no angry smash on the table this time. Or an exasperated sigh of 'Oh my God' that was heard around the world. There probably won't be a thousand reels on social media too. On Thursday, for the second time in two games while facing Gukesh, Magnus Carlsen was forced to throw in the towel and resign against the current world champion. After his loss in the classical format against the Indian teenager at Norway Chess a few weeks back, this time the defeat for the Norwegian came in a rapid game at the SuperUnited Rapid and Blitz Croatia 2025 in Zagreb. After the victory, Gukesh heads into the final day of the three-day rapid section as the sole leader with 10 points, while Carlsen is miles behind on six points.
There is a case to be made that this result is even more significant than the one at Norway Chess: after all, Carlsen was playing with white pieces and in a format that Gukesh supposedly struggles in as compared to classical chess.
'Now we can question Magnus' domination,' former world champion Garry Kasparov, who was on commentary for the official stream, said. 'This is not just his second loss to Gukesh, it's a convincing loss. It's not a miracle… or that Gukesh just kept benefitting from Magnus' terrible mistakes. It was a game that was a big fight. And Magnus lost.'
Before the start of the tournament, Carlsen had gone as far as saying that he would treat the games against the 19-year-old world champion as ones against one of the 'presumably weaker players in the tournament'.
As Carlsen had explained, 'Gukesh hasn't done anything to indicate that he's going to do well (in rapid and blitz). It remains to be proven that he's one of the best players in such a format (rapid and blitz). This is a very, very strong field that we have here. Players like Gukesh have a lot to prove. In the course of 27 rounds, things usually show. I hope for Gukesh's sake that he can play better.'
Over the course of six games in two days at Zagreb, Gukesh has done much more than 'playing better'. After losing the first round clash against his world championship second, Jan-Krzysztof Duda, Gukesh had crushed four of the strongest players in the field in a row: Alireza Firouzja, Praggnanandhaa, Nodirbek Abdusattorov and Fabiano Caruana before his takedown of Carlsen.
The resignation from Carlsen, in 49 moves, came on Thursday with more muted emotions from him, just a simple handshake, no eye contact, just a grimace before walking off the stage.
On Thursday, just like at Norway Chess, Carlsen had a significant advantage from the start of the game. Both players had blitzed out their moves at the start with Carlsen trying to catch his opponent off guard with the English Opening. But on the 23rd move, Carlsen did something inexplicable: he opted to push his b pawn ahead to b4, a move that made former world champion Garry Kasparov gasp. Before that move, Carlsen had a sizeable advantage on the board and a single minute edge on the clock.
But that move had changed the course of the match, felt Kasparov.
'B4? You don't play b4, you just don't play b4,' gasped Kasparov as soon as he saw what Carlsen, his one-time trainee, had done on move 23. Kasparov closed his eyes in horror and looked away from the screen. 'This is something wrong.'
He repeated 'you don't play b4' many more times. Over and over.
Kasparov had much more generous things to say about Gukesh, even when Carlsen had an advantage on the board.
'Playing Gukesh is like playing a computer. He's the most resilient player. He has many lives in each game. You have to beat him about five times in each game. You will be winning, but at one point (like at Norway Chess) you lose concentration and you're lost.'
That's precisely what's happened to Carlsen twice now.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why it's Testing times for coach Gautam Gambhir and Team India
Why it's Testing times for coach Gautam Gambhir and Team India

India Today

timean hour ago

  • India Today

Why it's Testing times for coach Gautam Gambhir and Team India

It seemed like the arc of a big-budget Bollywood drama: the arrival of a fiery new lead, an early rush of optimism, some swaggering victories, and then—just as the music swells—an abrupt turn into trouble. Gautam Gambhir's tenure as India's head coach has so far been part thriller, part family saga and part box-office the former opener took over from Rahul Dravid in July 2024, ahead of a white-ball tour of Sri Lanka, it was billed as a new era: intense, fearless and unflinchingly direct. Few, however, anticipated how quickly the romance of appointment would give way to the grind of responsibility. India won the T-20 series 3-0 in Sri Lanka but lost the ODIs there has been silverware—the Champions Trophy crown in February 2025 and an almost unblemished T20 record that includes clean sweeps against Sri Lanka and Bangladesh, besides beating South Africa 3-1 in November 2024 and England 4-1 in January-February this year. But Test cricket—that old, unsparing critic—has been far less Gambhir took charge, India have played 11 Tests: won three, lost seven and drawn one. The win percentage—just 27.3 per cent—is unsettling by Indian standards. The contrast between formats couldn't be starker: in white-ball cricket, India have thrived. In the longest form, they've stumbled, often spectacularly. But as in any great script, the coach is not the only character in this unfolding drama. The supporting cast has fumbled its lines too—dropped catches, misfiring bowlers, fragile middle orders. Gambhir's role is under scrutiny, yes. But so is the very fabric of India's Test would be safe to surmise that Gambhir's apprenticeship as India's head coach is now firmly behind him. When the former opener succeeded Rahul Dravid in July 2024, ahead of a white-ball tour of Sri Lanka, few could have anticipated how quickly the romance of appointment would give way to the reality of pressure. But in cricket, as in life, the longer format remains the true crucible. And there, the figures are far less LITMUS TESTIndia's Test troubles began last year at home—ironically, their fortress. In a rain-curtailed match in Bengaluru against New Zealand, Rohit Sharma opted to bat first on a damp surface. India were skittled for 46, their lowest-ever home total. What could have been dismissed as a freak collapse turned into a pattern as India went on to lose 0-3 to the visiting Kiwis, the spinners feasting on frail techniques and poor whitewash inflicted by New Zealand stripped much of the sheen from India's 2-0 Test series victory over Bangladesh in September 2024—a series where the opposition offered little resistance. Then came the marquee tour of Australia, stretching from November to January. A famous 295-run triumph in Perth briefly rekindled hope, but it was swiftly extinguished by three sobering vulnerabilities were laid bare by their second-innings batting collapses: 175 in Adelaide (a 10-wicket loss), 8 without loss in Brisbane (match drawn), 155 in Melbourne (a 184-run defeat), and 157 in Sydney (defeated by six wickets). Such performances with the bat simply do not win you Test in the very Perth Test they won, India had been bowled out for just 150 in the first innings. Yet they rallied spectacularly in the second, declaring at 487 for 6—a commanding total that piled pressure on Australia and paved the way for a memorable came June 2025—and with it, England. In Leeds, India walked into Headingley in the throes of transition: no Rohit Sharma, no Virat Kohli, no R. Ashwin. This, for all intents and purposes, was Gambhir's India—a fledgling side led by Shubman Gill, flanked by the youthful promise of Yashasvi Jaiswal, Sai Sudharsan and Rishabh Pant. The result? Another defeat. But this one was as humbling as it was a seaming Headingley pitch, India's batting order once again unravelled—not so much from lack of ability as from an alarming absence of application. Despite producing five centuries across the match, the side's brittle underbelly was ruthlessly exposed. In the first innings, only five batters reached double figures; of the remaining six, three were dismissed for second innings echoed the same dysfunction: three ducks, three others scoring 4, 4 and 8, with just five again crossing into double digits. The five centuries—so valuable in isolation—were effectively nullified by the anaemia of the rest. And yet, the blame cannot rest solely with the coach Gambhir, for all his vaunted cricketing intelligence and warrior's mindset, must shoulder a measure of responsibility. His combative persona may have set the press gallery alight, but his strategic imprint on this Test side remains elusive. The batting group, in particular, has displayed no coherent plan against lateral movement—a curious blind spot in a country where the ball is known to speak from the first session to the makes it more confounding is that Gambhir's own playing career was built on grit and adaptability, especially in challenging overseas conditions. His teams, thus far, have shown worryingly little of GAME, BIG PICTUREBut here's the inconvenient truth: a coach is only as good as his players. And cricket, most cruelly in Tests, offers no hiding place for errors that unfold over five that first Test against England, one top-order batter played across the line, gifting his wicket cheaply. A slip fielder shelled a regulation catch. A star bowler—expected to lead the attack—failed to take a single second-innings wicket. Gambhir could do little. In such a scenario, India were always destined to lose. It was not strategy that failed, but said, the coach is not blameless. Selection calls, rotation management, field settings and the overall tactical narrative remain squarely his remit. Why persist with some bowlers in conditions unsuited to them? Why the hesitation to groom a left-arm spinner when most of India's defeats have come without them? And why this inconsistency in trusting youth, one match too soon or one series too late?Gambhir's supporters argue he is still early into the job. His critics wonder aloud whether the learning curve, given the stakes, can afford to be so Gambhir was never expected to be Dravid. His appointment wasn't about calm stewardship—it was about changing gears. If Dravid was 'The Wall', Gambhir was brought in to rattle it, to infuse aggression, self-belief and a harder edge. That philosophy has, to some extent, delivered dividends in white-ball cricket. But Test cricket, with its long shadows and slower reckonings, demands more than passion. It demands patience, systems and the quiet, meticulous art of Gambhir must now decide is whether he is content to be a man of mood and momentum—or if he can become a craftsman of the format that still defines cricket's highest to India Today Magazine- EndsMust Watch

'I wouldn't pick this gentleman': Ex-England captain slams Prasidh Krishna after another disappointing performance for India
'I wouldn't pick this gentleman': Ex-England captain slams Prasidh Krishna after another disappointing performance for India

First Post

timean hour ago

  • First Post

'I wouldn't pick this gentleman': Ex-England captain slams Prasidh Krishna after another disappointing performance for India

On a day when Indian pacers, Mohammed Siraj and Akash Deep, went all over on England, Prasidh Krishna had a day to forget. Noting his performance, a former England captain has given a harsh verdict on Prasidh. read more Mohammed Siraj and Akash Deep emerged as the heroes for Team India on Day 3 of the Edgbaston Test against England. The duo picked up the entire English lineup- Siraj took 6 wickets and Akash Deep snared 4 dismissals. While Siraj and Akash prevailed in attaining purchase from the surface, it was a different scenario for the third bowler of the Indian pace battery. Prisidh Krishna went wicketless and was hammered by Jamie Smith and Harry Brook intermittently. He was given only 13 overs to bowl and in it, he conceded 73 runs, which can be adjudged quite expensive in the world of Test cricket. Krishna had a forgetful outing in the Oval Test as well, and after yet another flop show experts are losing patience on him. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Also Read | Harry Brook and Jamie Smith smash records as England mount thrilling comeback against India at Edgbaston Michael Atherton goes harsh on Prasidh Krishna Former England captain Michael Atherton showcased his angst with Shubman Gill and Gautam Gambhir over the selection of Prisidh Krishna. Atherton did not mince any words and went harsh by stating that if he were at the place of Shubman Gill then he would not have picked Krishna, but rather entrusted Kuldeep Yadav to do the job for him. 'I wouldn't pick this gentleman, Prasidh Krishna. I would have picked Kuldeep Yadav,' said Atherton in commentary when Krishna was being hammered all over the ground by Smith and Brook. While Prasidh Krishna has had a dry run till now in the series, there is still time left for him to overturn the tide. However, he would have to perform in the second innings and justify his selection in the team. India gain massive advantage over England on Day 3 Having posted a massive total of 587 on the board, Team India endured the batting heroics of Harry Brook and Jamie Smith, and still managed to bundle out England at the score of 407. A lead of 180 has been garnered, which took the shape of 244 at stumps, following a positive display of batting by Yashasvi Jaiswal and KL Rahul. Day 4 will be crucial and could reveal the winner. India will start the Day 4 proceedings at 64/1.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store