
One in six Irish couples will struggle with infertility – what are the options?
raising a child
from birth to the age of 21 was put at almost €170,000 in an eye-watering report in May, a 60 per cent increase since 2015.
The figure, gleaned from a survey of 1,000 presumably financially-scarred parents in Laya Life's Cradle to College Cost Index, covered everything from essentials such as nappies and baby formula through to pocket money, family holidays, Communion and Confirmation gifts, third-level fees and rent supports.
But for one cohort of people, the financial challenges around raising a child begin years in advance of shopping for cots or even maternity wear because of infertility issues.
Fertility treatments are not cheap. One round of
in vitro fertilisation
(IVF) in a private clinic costs as much as €6,500.
READ MORE
With an average of three rounds considered standard per couple and tests and other medical exams heaped on top, IVF can cost about €20,000, with no guarantee of success.
Sarah Magner (46), a pharmacist, and her husband, Darren O'Brien (43), a teacher, self-funded their four-year IVF journey at a cost somewhere between €40,000 and €50,000. The couple used up savings and worked extra jobs; Magner as an assessor in the Irish Pharmaceutical Union and O'Brien worked as a photographer, while the couple lived as frugally as they could. Even so, the costs and disappointments continued to mount.
'I only met my husband when I was 35, so I was over the hill fertility-wise and when nothing was happening for us, I went to my GP when I was 37, who referred me to a fertility clinic,' says Magner.
'We did one round of IVF and got one free embryo transfer and it didn't work. And we kept trying – again, the first attempt didn't work but the second embryo did and we had our daughter who is now six.
'The third transfer didn't work, the fourth resulted in a miscarriage and then it was in the middle of Covid and we found ourselves out of embryos, and the IVF clinics were closed. So we contacted a clinic in Ukraine to try again and after our second round, we found out we were pregnant with my son, who has just turned three.'
Sarah Magner and Darren O'Brien's two children, Meadhbh and Iarlaith. Photograph: Darren O'Brien
The costs racked up, with the first round of IVF in a private clinic, which produced one embryo, at €6,000. The second round cost €12,000, in which eight embryos were produced and the first transfer was included in the cost, with each subsequent transfer costing €1,500.
The couple also paid another clinic €10,000 and a further €1,000 for transfers along with extra costs for any tests carried out along the way.
[
'Injecting yourself daily is difficult to navigate at work': Managing fertility treatment while working
Opens in new window
]
'It sounds stupid, but if they ask you to have a test for €300 or €400 for something, there is a part of you thinking of the thousands you've already spent and how €400 on top of that wasn't actually that bad,' says Magner.
'It all becomes relative to that huge amount of money you've already invested into IVF. All those tests add up, and if you go down the supplements route, which I didn't because of my professional background, you are looking at even more costs.
'Ukraine was slightly cheaper overall; we spent €8,000, plus flights and accommodation.'
Magner and O'Brien's journey through IVF spanned from 2017 until 2021 and the huge financial squeeze on the household reflects that of thousands of others in Ireland.
'It's a big financial outlay no matter how you look at it,' says Caítriona Fitzpatrick, chairwoman of the National Infertility Charity, which provides support to and advocates for people seeking fertility treatment.
One round of in vitro fertilisation (IVF) in a private clinic costs as much as €6,500. Photograph: iStock
She said the charity sees many people at their support meetings who 'get a credit union loan, sell a car, borrow from family members, or take on a second job' to fund fertility treatment. 'This financial burden tends to come at times when people have lots of other financial demands such as marriage or buying a house.'
'If IVF is unsuccessful, it's absolutely devastating for a person because they've put a huge amount of emotional and mental time into this, as well as the huge costs, and they can come out with nothing at the end of it.'
But is there any financial relief on such fertility costs? Well, like most medical expenses, you can claim tax back on the cost of fertility treatments at the standard rate of 20 per cent.
So, if you paid €5,000, you can claim €1,000, once you have not claimed these expenses elsewhere, such as from a private health insurance provider or through compensation.
Any drugs required as part of the fertility treatment can be acquired under the Drugs Payment Scheme, where you will pay a maximum of €80 per month for all approved prescribed medicines.
[
Employee who took time off work for IVF treatment wins €10,000 for unfair dismissal
Opens in new window
]
If you have to travel abroad for fertility treatment, such as Magner and O'Brien, there is also an allowance to claim 20 per cent back on treatment expenses in a hospital or clinic. And if that treatment isn't available in Ireland, travel expenses can also be claimed.
The
Health Service Executive
(HSE) estimates that about one in six heterosexual couples in Ireland may experience infertility – an issue the World Health Organisation labels as 'a disease of the male or woman reproductive system defined by the failure to achieve a pregnancy after 12 months or more of regular unprotected sexual intercourse'. However, progress to make assisted human reproduction treatments more affordable and transparent remains slow.
Unlike all other EU countries, Ireland still has no specific legislation governing the area of assisted human reproduction treatment, though that is expected to change in the coming months, with a board and staff currently in formation.
'Fertility treatment through the public system is only available since September 2023, along with the announcement of six regional hubs and the first partnerships with private clinics, but this is being rolled out very slowly,' adds Ms Fitzpatrick.
'There are a lot of restrictions around that too and we have been told that when the regulatory authority is in place, they'll be able to expand that into donor conception and other areas to allow more people to avail of the public system.'
Time off work is another contentious issue in the fertility treatment debate. There is currently no legislation requiring employers to allocate paid leave or time off for important appointments or indeed, disappointments, during an IVF journey.
Qualifying couples, and primarily women, must first meet strict requirements to avail of the state-run Model of Care for Fertility service. Photograph: iStock
But, in the absence of statutory duties, more and more employers are taking the lead in offering supports when it comes to compassionate leave. Bank of Ireland, and Lidl are among those offering additional leave days for those seeking IVF treatment.
Others are even more progressive. University College Cork offers employees five additional paid leave days per cycle, up to a maximum of three cycles, while PwC provide eight days of paid leave for fertility consultations and appointments.
Ms Fitzpatrick also says the charity sees more employers 'seeking our advice or looking to create an internal policy' around supporting staff undergoing fertility treatment. Although, she says this 'varies widely' from proactive employers to those dealing with a staff requests on the matter.
'It would be very beneficial to see some guidance given to employers around this and certainly when the new regulatory authority is in a position to draw from the data around the whole area of fertility treatment in Ireland.'
Since the introduction of the State-run Model of Care for Fertility, run in conjunction with the HSE's National Women & Infants Health Programme, which also includes intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection, 2,300 couples have been referred for assisted human reproduction treatment as of last month, with hubs receiving an average of about 550 referrals a month.
But qualifying couples, and primarily women, must first meet strict requirements to avail of the service. Aspiring mothers must be under 41 at the time of GP referral to a regional hub, while men must be under 60, and the aspiring mother must have a body mass index (BMI) of between 18.5 and 30.
'We have asked for the criteria to be medically reviewed... [Here's] one example, we had one person contact us and there was male infertility in the relationship, but because her BMI is over the criteria, the couple are not allowed to apply for the scheme even though she has no fertility issues,' says Ms Fitzpatrick.
[
Even with funding, infertility is a hard and lonely road
Opens in new window
]
'This seems incredibly unfair that she was penalised for a male infertility issue. If it's male fertility issue in the need for IVF treatment, do we still need to be looking at woman BMI in terms of criteria?'
Ms Fitzpatrick says educating people on fertility journeys and the limitations in the State's offering should be a priority because often assisted human reproduction is only on a person's radar when conception becomes a problem. Also, individuals going down the treatment route alone, using sperm donors, can incur costs of more than €5,000 depending on the number of sperm straws required. And that journey is not catalogued by any State scheme.
'There's a bit of a historical hangover in this country around contraception and having children, but when somebody decides they do want to be a parent and struggle to conceive, the HSE scheme will only fund couples not individuals,' adds Ms Fitzpatrick.
'From a really practical perspective, we will always advise people on this journey to start with their GP, who will refer them into the public health system. That is covered and funded so it's worth being in the public system even if they can't take you the full length of the journey.
'Even reaching out to someone such as ourselves – can help as everybody involved in the charity has been part of the process at some level.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
‘Constructive' talks take place between Minister and disability service providers, says department
Talks between Minister for Disability Norma Foley and service providers on problems faced by the sector have been described as 'constructive'. The Department of Disability said that the meeting on Tuesday formed part of ongoing engagement. Organisations providing specialist disability services have been concerned for some time about funding for the sector. The Irish Times reported in May that more than two dozen bodies providing services to tens of thousands of people warned there was 'an extreme risk' to their ability to expand services or, in many cases, sustain existing operations. [ Disability service providers warn of 'extreme risk' to operations and ability to expand Opens in new window ] In an unprecedented joint letter to Health Service Executive chief Bernard Gloster , the chairmen/women of 26 voluntary disability service providers – voluntary public service organisations and voluntary grant-aided bodies – said their ability to deliver existing services and meet the needs in their communities was under threat. READ MORE The letter said many organisations were facing such acute financial situations that their boards were 'concerned they may be in breach of the reckless trading provisions of the Companies Act'. The department said on Tuesday that Ms Foley, in conjunction with the HSE, had 'had a constructive meeting with disability services organisations ... and further engagements will be arranged over the coming weeks/months.' Taoiseach Micheál Martin has said the issue of disability is a top priority for his Government. However, while the amount of money allocated for specialist disability services has grown by €1.6 billion since 2020, the Government has recognised that some providers are experiencing 'funding, operational and governance challenges'. The letter sent to the HSE in May said that boards of public service disability organisations were 'having to operate in crisis mode'.


Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
‘Burned out' bra saleswoman wins €15,800 for constructive dismissal
A lingerie saleswoman who said she was forced to quit her job of nearly 20 years over the health impact of workplace stress at due to a 'toxic' work environment at a Dublin department store has won €15,800 for constructive dismissal. Karrin Breslin was awarded the sum on foot of a complaint under the Unfair Dismissals Act 1977 against Chantelle Lingerie Ltd, the operator of a concession in the lingerie department of the unidentified store. The Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) awarded Ms Breslin her full losses after ruling that the international lingerie brand repudiated her contract of employment by failing to address grievances about understaffing and rostering while her health deteriorated over the course of two years. It was submitted on behalf of Ms Breslin – an employee of the brand since 2004 – that when the department store reopened in May 2021 following the Covid-19 lockdown, her section was down to 12 staff with just two full-time, compared with 10 full-timers out of 17 before the pandemic. READ MORE The tribunal heard Ms Breslin had moved from north Co Dublin to Co Wexford during the pandemic closure. She asked at that stage to be given a set working day of 9am to 5.30pm, she said. Her employer's response was that 'this was not a request that could be granted given the opening hours of the shop and the need for a fair departmental roster', the tribunal was told. The tribunal was told that the department store, rather than the lingerie brand, was responsible for setting the roster governing Ms Breslin's working hours. 'I feel my mental and physical health has deteriorated ... I don't have a good work/life balance and it's going to get worse due to the late closing times coming back again,' she wrote. Ms Breslin's case was that her job was made 'overwhelming and physically hard' because of these issues and that she began to experience anxiety, low mood, high blood pressure and gastrointestinal problems 'as a result of work-related stress'. Following a medical absence in June 2022, Ms Breslin again wrote to her employer and set out that because the department was so 'understaffed' that sales were being lost because customers were walking out without being served. Her employer's position was this was 'a commercial point and not a personal grievance'. Ms Breslin had seven periods of certified medical leave between January 2022 and the summer of 2023, the tribunal heard. In an exchange of emails with her employer during her fifth period of medical leave in June 2023, Ms Breslin said she believed her illness was 'work-related'. 'There are major obstacles stopping me from doing a good job and this has been going on for years. It's got far worse in the last 4 months and definitely having a negative impact on my working life due to a stressful and sometimes toxic work environment,' she wrote. In responding correspondence, she was told: 'I am hoping you can get to the bottom of your sickness so you feel better,' the WRC heard. The tribunal heard that Ms Breslin worked her last shift on 25th June 2023 and ultimately did not return to work before she tendered her resignation on 31st October that year. Chantelle's managing director, who gave evidence, said she had assumed Ms Breslin would return to her job when she got better and that her resignation 'was pleasant and made no mention of issues or other employees' behaviour'. When it was put to her in cross-examination that Ms Breslin had told her she was 'burned out', the managing director said she 'understood there was an issue' of work-related stress but that she 'did not relate this' to Ms Breslin's resignation. Asked what she had done to respond to the staffing issues raised by Ms Breslin, the managing director said these were 'a matter for the shop'. In her decision, adjudicator Patricia Owens wrote Ms Breslin had been raising 'serious concerns for her physical and mental health' starting in October 2021. While the managing director made efforts to resolve 'minor issues' for Ms Breslin around medical certs and annual leave, 'more complex matters' around roster problems and staff shortages 'were never addressed', Ms Owens wrote. 'I consider that the respondent failed in its duty of care to the complainant to protect her health, safety and wellbeing while at work,' Ms Owens wrote. She considered the firm's failure to respond adequately to amount to 'repudiation of contract', upholding Ms Breslin's unfair dismissal claim. Ms Owens awarded the claimant €15,800, her full losses for five months' unemployment. A further complaint of disability discrimination under the Employment Equality Act was ruled out of time by the Commission. Ms Breslin was represented by Aisling Irish of Parker Law Solicitors in the case, while human resources consultancy Tom Smyth and Associates appeared for the employer.


Irish Times
15 hours ago
- Irish Times
Minister who lost two siblings to cancer introduces ‘right to be forgotten' law
Cancer survivors will have the 'right to be forgotten' to allow them to obtain mortgage protection without discrimination based on their past diagnosis. Legislation is now expected to be passed by the Oireachtas in the autumn. It was first introduced in the Seanad by then Fianna Fáil senator Catherine Ardagh in October 2022, was reintroduced by her as a TD in the Dáil in February, and has now been taken up by the Government. Minister of State for Finance Robert Troy said: 'For too long cancer survivors in Ireland have faced a challenging and unfair situation where they can be refused cover or be charged higher premiums because of their past diagnosis.' Mr Troy said the Central Bank (Amendment) Bill 'aims to put a stop to this by giving effect to the right-to-be-forgotten concept that is now becoming recognised throughout Europe'. Laws are already in place in France, Germany, Netherlands, Belgium and Luxembourg. READ MORE The Minister, who has special responsibility for insurance, reintroduced the Bill in the Dáil on the last day before the summer recess. Mr Troy said: 'I lost two siblings to cancer and I see it as a great privilege to be in a position to effect positive change.' The Bill 'gives statutory weight to protections that were previously voluntary, making them enforceable by law'. He said his is a 'crucial step forward'. 'At the heart of the Bill is the straightforward but powerful principle that, where survivors have completed treatment and remained in remission for a defined period, a past cancer diagnosis should not be held against them in the underwriting of mortgage protection insurance.' They will not have to disclose their cancer after a set period of remission. A five-year timeline is under consideration. [ Buying a home after surviving cancer: 'No matter how much paperwork I gave, it never sufficed for mortgage protection' Opens in new window ] Under a previous, voluntary code, not adopted by some insurers, a survivor could access mortgage protection after seven years of remission or five years if individuals were diagnosed when under the age of 18. The Bill focuses solely on cancer survivors and mortgage protection and does not cover other financial products or medical conditions. Mr Troy said this is for 'prioritisation and pragmatism'. They were taking a 'stepwise approach similar to other EU member states, focusing first on where the need is greatest and where there is the clearest evidence base'. Ms Ardagh said discrimination can be very damaging, 'with people having to relive their cancer diagnosis'. People have been quoted 'prohibitively high premiums' despite being in remission for many years. 'It has meant house purchases collapsing at the very last minute, family plans being put on hold, or feeling trapped by a system that continues to define them by the most difficult chapter in their lives.' Sinn Féin's Máire Devine welcomed the Bill but questioned if five years cancer-free was fair. There are 'the difficult years of battling cancer', but only when they are cancer-free 'does the clock start for five years of waiting to apply for a mortgage'. 'That does not seem right to me,' she said.