logo
Education, Dodd Stadium and jobs: Five takeaways from the May 5 Norwich City Council meeting

Education, Dodd Stadium and jobs: Five takeaways from the May 5 Norwich City Council meeting

Yahoo06-05-2025

Long Norwich City Council Meetings are how you know budget season is in full swing.
The council held a regular meeting on Monday, May 5. The chambers were packed with people who wanted to talk about the Board of Education budget and the future of Dodd Stadium, as the city council adopted a preliminary budget.
The next public hearing for the budget is on May 12 at 7:30 p.m. The City Council has to adopt a budget by 11:59 p.m. on June 9, or else the City Manager's proposed budget from April 7 will automatically be adopted.
Here are five takeaways from this week's City Council Meeting.
Board of Education
The Norwich City Council had proposed a $956,809 reduction to the Norwich Board of Education's increase as proposed by the draft budget, which would have yielded a no increase year.
Superintendent Susan Lessard said the ad-hoc committee did not have the chance to review the work of City Manager John Salomone's 1% budget increase, instead of the 4.5% the Board of Education originally requested. This is at a time when other area districts are requesting around a 5.5% increase, she said.
The Ad Hoc Committee would meet the following night on May 6, Lessard said.
The Board of Education approached its budget differently this year by involving the city council early in the process, and already included significant reductions, Lessard said.
'We did this in good faith and with trust in the process,' she said.
Lessard said that a 1% increase is not sustainable but can be made to work for fiscal year 2025-2026. During the past two years the district already cut and demoted numerous administrators to math and reading specialists and classroom teachers.
City Councilmember Stacy Gould was one of the sponsors of the cut. She was encouraged by what Lessard said, and, urging Lessard to stay within the 1% increase figure, she opted to withdraw the agenda item.
Norwich Sea Unicorns General Manager Lee Walter, Jr. talks with Norwich City Councilmembers Stacy Gould and Bill Nash after the meeting Monday night.
Dodd Stadium
While there was an agenda item concerning listing Dodd Stadium for sale, the council decided to postpone any decisions until the fiscal year 2025-2026 budget is completed.
Dodd Stadium has been a staple of Norwich for 30 years, and had been home to minor league baseball teams until 2019, when Major League Baseball took away its affiliation from the then Connecticut Tigers and many other teams across the country.
The now Norwich Sea Unicorns have been successful in the college ball Futures League, winning the past two championships. Large community events, including the Greater Norwich Area Chamber of Commerce's Healthy Living Festival, use it as event space. However, it costs the city up to $300,000 annually to operate it, and the stadium is due for maintenance.
There was vocal support for the city not selling Dodd Stadium from both people who work for the team and community members.
One community member who spoke in support was Brandon Hyde, who said the stadium is a place of unity in a currently divided world.
'I understand there are costs and challenges, but the cost of losing this is far greater than the price of preserving it,' he said.
The only community member who spoke against the stadium was Joanne Philbrick. She questioned how many of the team's employees are actually Norwich residents and reminded the city council they need to reduce the tax burden for seniors, she said.
After the meeting, Sea Unicorns General Manager Lee Walter thought it was smart to postpone the vote.
'We know how much of a burden things are in the city, but I just don't want them to gloss over what Dodd Stadium means and what our organization brings to the city,' he said. 'I want it to be a creative discussion, and this allows time for it to happen.'
Walter wants to work on creating more events and activities alongside baseball so Dodd Stadium doesn't have an annual cost to the city, he said.
Staples
City Council President Pro Tempore Joe DeLucia wanted to know if the Norwich Community Development Corporation or the City of Norwich itself had made any attempt to save the Norwich Staples location, which is expected to close next week. The business provides valuable services and residents will now have to travel to New London, he said.
Norwich Mayor Peter Nystrom said he called Staples' corporate office, but nobody returned his call. DeLucia still wants to see if something can be done.
With Hartford Healthcare taking over Staples' spot, Nystrom reminded the public that HHC is still a tax-paying entity in the city.
Firefighters
Firefighting is still a partisan issue in Norwich.
One agenda item the city council considered, and eventually failed, was reductions to the police department, public works, and both paid and volunteer fire departments. After the city council decided to vote on the funds for the volunteer fire department separately, it declined to cut funds for the police, paid firefighters, and public works.
Gould wanted the volunteer departments to keep their money because it goes directly to firefighting, because the volunteers work for free, she said.
DeLucia countered that while volunteer firefighters save Norwich money, they still cost the city $1.5 million a year once you figure in factors like a special tax abatement and the relief fund. Gould responded by saying not every volunteer firefighter in the city benefits from those programs, and she felt it was unfair to cut from volunteers if the police, public works and paid fire department kept its money, she said.
The cut to the volunteer fire departments also failed.
One job saved
At the April 16 Public Hearing, Sally Masse explained to the council the importance of her job as the Rose City Senior Center Receptionist, and advocated to keep her job.
After that, Norwich Human Services Director Kate Milde spoke with City Comptroller Josh Pothier, and they decided Masse's job could be saved for at least fiscal year 2025-2026 through being half paid by city money and half paid from the opioid settlement funds.
City Councilmember Shiela Hayes wants to see if opioid settlement funds can be used to also save other city jobs, including Jake Dilts' role as an assistant program manager for Norwich Human Services and as the coach of the Norwich Raptors youth rugby team.
This article originally appeared on The Bulletin: Five takeaways from the May 5 Norwich City Council Meeting

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Judge voids VB City Council's vote that implemented 10-1 voting system
Judge voids VB City Council's vote that implemented 10-1 voting system

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Judge voids VB City Council's vote that implemented 10-1 voting system

VIRGINIA BEACH, Va. (WAVY) — A judge has ruled a 2023 vote taken by City Council to institute a 10-1 district election system is now void, but held off on dictating what system must be put into place to elect council and School Board members. Instead, state Circuit Court Judge Randall Smith, retired out of Chesapeake, stayed his ruling Monday until after a referendum on the voting system is held in November. Voters in the city will have the choice to either endorse continuing to use the 10-1 system that has been used in the 2022 and 2024 elections, or transition to a 7-3-1 system, spelled out in the City Charter. Either way, Smith's ruling made clear the authority to change the election system lies in the hands of the Virginia General Assembly. Former City Council member Linwood Branch, who led several plaintiffs in bringing the suit last year, was pleased with ruling. 'Every voting change we've ever had in our city, beginning with the merger in 1963, the citizens of Virginia Beach have determined by referendum their voting system,' Branch said. 'We broke with precedent this time, but I'm glad seven members of council are now going to get us back to having the citizens have that opportunity. It's their vote. It's no one else's.' The voting system governing Virginia's largest city has been debated for years. In Branch's suit, the plaintiffs alleged the city illegally eliminated three at-large seats expressly established under the City Charter when it passed its decennial redistricting measure in 2023. Virginia Beach was split into 10 separate districts of approximately 46,000 people. Each voter is only allowed to vote for the mayor and representative of the district they reside in under the 10-1 system. That's a far change from the city's longtime system. Traditionally, Virginia Beach races were conducted in what became known as a 'hybrid at-large' system. Seven of the members serving on the city council or school board had to live in certain parts of the city, but every voter could vote for not only every district member, but also three at-large members and the mayor — thereby, a 7-3-1 system. While a law passed by the General Assembly in 2021 abolished the use of the hybrid-at large system, 7-3-1 remains codified in the charter. Smith agreed with plaintiffs that only the General Assembly can change the charter. 'It's a pure legal case,' said Brandan Goodwin, an attorney representing the plaintiffs. 'And you saw today that the judge's ruling was properly correct, that there was no authority in those statutes to eliminate the at-large seats guaranteed to the citizens of Virginia Beach in the city charter. That's what our case is about and now, moving forward, the city has done the right thing and is pursuing this referendum to let the citizens have a voice.' However, the Virginia Beach City Attorney's office argued the 10-1 was the 'only legally viable system under both federal and state law' when the decennial redistricting needed to be passed. In 2021, United States District Judge Raymond Jackson ruled that Virginia Beach's former 7-3-1 system 'denies Hispanics, African Americans and Asians equal access to the electoral and political process.' While a federal appeals court overturned Jackson's ruling, the Virginia Beach City Attorney deemed it too late to stop the use of the court-imposed 10-1 system for the 2022 City Council and School Board elections. Jackson dismissed the federal case after the city committed to efforts to have the General Assembly amend the City Charter for the 10-1 system. Proponents of the 10-1 system point to Virginia Beach City Council becoming the most 'diverse city council' in the history of the city following the 2022 election. They also point to 2023 data from University of Virginia's Weldon Cooper Center that found the 10-1 district voting system was supported by 81% of city residents, with a 95% confidence level. However, those in the business, tourism and agriculture communities have fought back. Branch, who owns the Days Inn at the Oceanfront, favors a new 7-3-1. 'I think every citizen has, has lost power,' Branch said. 'Would you join an HOA where you could only vote for two of 11 board members? That's what we have in Virginia Beach. You don't have the power to influence any decision and voting is accountability. … I look at our Virginia Aquarium. It's one of the jewels of our city. And yet it right now, it's unfunded. They have compromised aquarium tanks that are going to not work because nobody from other districts really cares. That's not how Virginia Beach is supposed to be, that you worry about one little district and not the whole city. More at-large representation will take care of citywide issues as well, which is important. We're not a little small town.' Gov. Glenn Youngkin (R-Va.) vetoed a City Charter change last year because of Branch's lawsuit. Late last year, a majority of City Council members didn't support requesting a charter change, as the case was still ongoing. Smith made clear his ruling does not change the lawful elections under 10-1 of 2022 and 2024. 'He's not doing anything about that ruling until the public has a chance to speak in the referendum,' said Chris Boynton, a deputy city attorney for Virginia Beach. 'And at that point, he believes the case will likely resolve itself, either by 10-1 happening by virtue of the public support and perhaps General Assembly action, or 7-3-1 after the referendum. Then we'd have to deal with the federal and the state Voting Rights Act implications of that.' Branch said he would honor 'the will of the people' either way. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Chicago alderpeople to question CPD about presence at ICE action
Chicago alderpeople to question CPD about presence at ICE action

CBS News

time7 hours ago

  • CBS News

Chicago alderpeople to question CPD about presence at ICE action

Alderpeople call for answers on why Chicago police were at ICE raid Alderpeople call for answers on why Chicago police were at ICE raid Alderpeople call for answers on why Chicago police were at ICE raid The CPD responded to the scene, and many have questioned why they were there. Some alderpeople are now demanding that the CPD explain. The City Council Committee on Immigrant and Refugee Rights is holding a hearing Tuesday on the matter. Its chair and members said it is time for the Police Department to speak openly about why officers stayed on scene — despite Chicago's Welcoming City Ordinance prohibiting the CPD from participating in civil immigration enforcement operations or assisting ICE. On Wednesday, June 4, ICE agents arrested 10 people who said they thought they were showing up for an immigration status appointment at the BI Incorporated building at 2245 S. Michigan Ave. The BI Corporation operates the Intensive Supervision Appearance Program for immigrants, a program that allows ICE to monitor migrants facing immigration proceedings without placing them in custody — sometimes through electronic monitoring. Nearly a month later, some activists are outraged. While the detainment upset some, many were just as furious to see Chicago police officers also on the scene that day. "We want to walk through the events of that day," said Ald. Jessie Fuentes (26th). Fuentes is one of several City Council members requesting more transparency from the department about what brought officers out. On that day, the commander of the Central (1st) Chicago Police District told the crowd a law enforcement call was made. "We don't know what the situation is," Cmdr. David Harris said at the time. "We got a call that law enforcement needed an assist." "When CPD shows up and understands that that is not the case, and then fully understands that this is an event in which ICE is detaining individuals that are going through a legal immigration process, why weren't they completely scaled back immediately?" said Fuentes. Yet Chicago police at the time also issued this statement: "The Chicago Police Department responded to the 2200 block of S. Michigan for two calls of assist the police officer, which initiated the emergency response. "Officers arrived without knowledge of immigration enforcement occurring at the location. CPD spoke with individuals inside a building at the location, as well as the large crowd gathered outside. CPD was on-site to ensure the safety of all involved, including those exercising their First Amendment rights. "At no point did CPD assist in immigration enforcement. All actions taken by CPD during this incident were in accordance with CPD policy and the City of Chicago Municipal Code, including the Welcoming City Ordinance. No arrests were made by CPD and the crowd dispersed without incident." The committee wants to see body camera video from Chicago police, and hear conversations made between the agencies, though it does not have subpoena power for these requests. "Because that will allow us to fully understand," Fuentes said. "Are we, in fact, holding true to the Welcoming City Ordinance?" The Chicago City Council committee is demanding testimony from both the Office of Emergency Management and Communications and the Chicago Police Department. There was no word late Monday on whether anyone from either organization accepted. The hearing is set for Tuesday morning.

More large-scale water and sewer projects ahead for Greenville
More large-scale water and sewer projects ahead for Greenville

Yahoo

time8 hours ago

  • Yahoo

More large-scale water and sewer projects ahead for Greenville

Having replaced more than 1,300 feet of water line and nearly 2,000 feet of sewer pipe so far this year in residential areas alone, it's been a busy time for Greenville's water utilities department. Many of the water distribution projects this year have involved not only replacing existing pipe but adding loops for better circulation/reduce water discoloration or to allow future repairs to be made without completely shutting off a neighborhood's water, Greenville utility superintendent Jon Herbert explained at a city council work session last week. Specific projects of this kind that have so far been completed this year include ones on Bourland Street, Upthegrove Street, Turtle Creek Drive and Division Street. In addition to those water line replacements in residential areas, the now-completed water main replacement through downtown Greenville on Washington Street was a highly visible project, as it was in a high-traffic area. The replacement became necessary after a major break last July, for which 80-years-worth of iron buildup inside the pipe was a contributing factor. 'It's a 20-inch line, but you were pretty much only getting about 12-inches in flow because of the buildup,' Herbert said. Meanwhile, on the sewer side of things, the department has also replaced about 4,550 feet of sewer main feeding lift stations near Walmart Supercenter and Graham Park. Ongoing water distribution and wastewater collection projects that are scheduled to be completed by the end of this year include replacing 600 feet of sewer pipe on Walnut Street and the citywide switching out of its water meters from the older positive displacement units to those compatible with the new, more advanced system. The new metering infrastructure – described as including not just the meters themselves but also software, nine towers with cellular gateways, collection equipment and maintenance services – is expected to be fully installed and ready to 'go live' within three to five months. When the system goes live, the high-tech meters will be logging data into the system about every 7.5 second, Shellie Rabroker with Core & Main (the Texas distributor of the specific system) told the city council in April. The system would also allow for the city to keep up to 96 days of usage data for each customer, which could be referred to when billing disputes arise. 'It puts the burden of proof back into the customer's court,' Rabroker said. She also explained that customers would have a portal into the system that they could log into, not only to monitor their water usage but to also troubleshoot for leaks and set usage parameters to help stay within budget. For the 2025-2026 budget year, projects in the department's sites include replacing 6.5 miles of water main valves, side feel connections and air release valves under East Loop (from the intersection of Stuart Street and Anderson Street to the Service First Credit Union near L3Harris) – a large project that is planned in seven phases and will total a projected $10.35 million. The East Loop transmission main project may be included in the 'Phase 2' water infrastructure bond in 2026, City Manager Summer Spurlock said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store