
Newfound Mechanism Rewires Cellular Energy Processing for Drastic Weight Loss
NEW YORK, May 21, 2025 /PRNewswire/ — Mice genetically engineered to lack the ability to make the amino acid cysteine, and fed a cysteine-free diet, lost 30 percent of their body weight in just one week, a new study shows.
Published online May 21 in Nature, the work found that cysteine depletion disrupts the normal metabolic pathways used by mammalian cells to convert food into energy, forcing the animals to rapidly burn fat stores in a futile attempt to meet energy demands.
Led by researchers at NYU Grossman School of Medicine, the study reveals key details about how cells process fuels like carbohydrates and fats (metabolism), and how cysteine depletion affects tissues. Experiments showed that lowering cysteine levels caused a drop in levels of the small molecule called coenzyme A (CoA), which rendered inefficient mechanisms that convert carbohydrates and fats into energy.
Despite CoA being involved in more than 100 intermediate metabolic reactions and serving as a partner (cofactor) for 4% of all enzymes in the body, scientists had previously been unable to study its function directly. This is because mice with defective CoA synthesis typically do not survive beyond three weeks of age. The current findings detail, for the first time, how CoA shapes metabolism in adult mice.
'Our surprising findings reveal that low cysteine levels triggered rapid fat loss in our study mice by activating a network of interconnected biological pathways,' said co-senior study author Evgeny Nudler, PhD, the Julie Wilson Anderson Professor in the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology at NYU Grossman School of Medicine, and an investigator with the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. 'While driving weight loss in the clinic remains a key future mission, we are most excited for the moment about the profound, fundamental aspects of metabolism revealed in this study,' added Dr. Nudler.
The current finding does not immediately suggest a new approach to weight loss, the authors caution, as cysteine is found in nearly all foods. Achieving a truly cysteine-free diet would require patients to consume a specially formulated solution that would be challenging for most. Moreover, because cysteine is involved in numerous cellular pathways, eliminating it – such as through a drug that inhibits cysteine production – could make organs more vulnerable to everyday toxins, including medications.
That said, the study authors say it is worth considering that fruits, vegetables, and legumes contain much lower levels of cysteine and its precursor, the sulfur-containing amino acid methionine, than red meat. While earlier studies have linked low sulfur amino acid intake to health benefits, this study clarifies that these benefits are due to cysteine depletion specifically, and not methionine restriction.
'Given that achieving maximum cysteine deprivation weight loss in the mice was dependent on both diet and deletion of the gene, moving forward we can now restore cysteine production genetically in specific cells or tissues and determine the role of each in the dramatic weight loss we observed,' said co-senior author Dan L. Littman, MD, PhD, the Helen L. and Martin S. Kimmel Professor of Molecular Immunology in the Department of Pathology, and a professor in the Department of Cell Biology, at NYU Grossman School of Medicine. 'We hope in the future to hijack parts of this process to induce a similar weight loss in humans but without completely removing cysteine,' added Dr. Littman, who is also an investigator with the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.
Overlapping MechanismsThe study is the first to examine the effects of removing cysteine, or any of the nine of the essential amino acids, which must be obtained through diet and are required for building proteins that make up most of the body's enzymes, tissues, and signaling molecules. The findings revealed that eliminating cysteine from the mammalian body led to far greater weight loss than the removal of any other essential amino acid.
Specifically, cysteine deprivation disrupted oxidative phosphorylation, the main process for producing adenosine triphosphate (ATP), the molecule that serves as cells' energy currency. Oxidative phosphorylation is known to be tightly dependent on CoA. As a result, sugar-derived intermediate molecules (carbon skeletons) such as pyruvate, orotate, citrate, and α-ketoglutarate were no longer used efficiently, and were instead lost in the urine. In response, the body turned to stored lipids (fats) to make energy.
Further, the team found that cysteine restriction activates both the integrated stress response (ISR), a signaling network that restores cellular balance after stress, and the oxidative stress response (OSR), which is triggered by higher levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) following depletion of glutathione, the body's primary antioxidant. ROS can oxidize (take away electrons from) and damage sensitive cell parts like DNA.
Remarkably, this simultaneous activation of ISR and OSR—previously observed only in cancer cells—was shown to occur in normal tissues in mice in the cysteine-restriction group, with the two stress responses reinforcing each other. The study also shows that ISR and OSR, acting independently of CoA depletion, increase production of the stress hormone GDF15, which contributes to food aversion and degradation of acetyl-CoA-carboxylase, a key enzyme in lipid synthesis. This increased weight loss further in the study mice by preventing the replenishment of their fat stores.
Along with Drs. Evgeny Nudler and Dan Littman, the study's co-senior authors, co-first authors were Alan Varghese, a joint student in labs of Drs Littman and Nudler in the Department of Cell Biology, and Ivan Gusarov in the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology at NYU Grossman School of Medicine. Additional NYU Langone contributors included Daria Dolgonos, Yatin Mankan, and Mydia Phan from the Department of Cell Biology; Ilya Shamovsky and Drew Jones from the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology; Begoña Gamallo-Lana and Adam Mar from the Department of Neuroscience; Rebecca Jones from the Division of Advanced Research Technologies; Thales Papagiannakopoulos from the Department of Pathology, and Michael Pacold from the Department of Radiation Oncology and Perlmutter Cancer Center. Other study authors were Maria Gomez-Jenkins and Eileen White of Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, and Rui Wang of the Department of Biology at York University in Toronto.
The study was supported by the long-term funding from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI) and the Blavatnik Family Foundation. Additional support was provided by the National Institutes of Health grants S10OD010584-01A1, S10OD018338-01, 1OT2CA278609-01, R35GM147119, and R01AI158687. The research was also funded by the American Cancer Society (grant RSG-21-115-01-MM), the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (grant RGPIN-2023-05099), and Cancer Research UK (grant CGCATF-2021/100022).
About Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI)HHMI is one of the largest private funders of biomedical research, with an endowment exceeding $27 billion. Through its Investigator Program, HHMI supports approximately 300 leading scientists across the United States, selected for their bold and fundamental approaches to scientific discovery. Each investigator receives unrestricted annual funding through renewable seven-year terms, granting them the freedom to pursue high-risk, high-reward research that often falls outside the scope of traditional funding mechanisms.
About the Blavatnik Family Foundation The Blavatnik Family Foundation provides many of the world's best researchers, scientists, and future leaders with the support and funding needed to solve humankind's greatest challenges. Led by Sir Leonard Blavatnik, founder and chairman of Access Industries, the Foundation advances and promotes innovation, discovery, and creativity to benefit the whole of society. Over the past decade, the Foundation has contributed more than US$1 billion to more than 250 organizations.
About NYU Langone HealthNYU Langone Health is a fully integrated health system that consistently achieves the best patient outcomes through a rigorous focus on quality that has resulted in some of the lowest mortality rates in the nation. Vizient Inc. has ranked NYU Langone the No. 1 comprehensive academic medical center in the country for three years in a row, and U.S. News & World Report recently placed nine of its clinical specialties among the top five in the nation. NYU Langone offers a comprehensive range of medical services with one high standard of care across 7 inpatient locations, its Perlmutter Cancer Center, and more than 320 outpatient locations in the New York area and Florida. With $14.2 billion in revenue this year, the system also includes two tuition-free medical schools, in Manhattan and on Long Island, and a vast research enterprise.
Contact: Gregory Williams, gregory.williams@nyulangone.org
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Malaysian Reserve
6 hours ago
- Malaysian Reserve
ASPIRE for Lung Cancer launches the APAC Lung Cancer Policy Consensus as a regional call to action for improved lung cancer care
SINGAPORE, Aug. 1, 2025 /PRNewswire/ — On 31st July 2025, a unified consensus document for improving lung cancer care in the Asia-Pacific (APAC) region was officially launched in Singapore, marking a pivotal moment in the regional fight against lung cancer. This represents the first comprehensive consensus for the region, an evidence-based agreement between stakeholders across the healthcare ecosystem that outlines shared priorities, strategies, and recommendations to elevate the standard of lung cancer care across diverse health systems. Held on the eve of World Lung Cancer Day, the initiative involved over 43 contributors, including clinicians, academics, patient advocates, and health organisations across 14 APAC health systems. Launch Highlights and Key Voices The APAC Lung Cancer Policy Consensus was launched with keynote contributions from: Dr Mary Bussell (TriMar Strategies), who delivered an overview of the global lung cancer consensus and its relevance to regional efforts Mr Yannick Romero (Union for International Cancer Control – UICC), who contextualised the APAC consensus within the broader global lung health resolution, emphasising policy alignment and strategic integration Ms Helena Wilcox (The Lung Cancer Policy Network – LCPN), who highlighted how the APAC framework enables regional advancement in care and partnership building Mr Francis Goh (Lung Cancer Education and Advocacy for Patients – LEAP), Singapore) stressed the pivotal role of patient voices in shaping lung cancer policy and health system transformation A/Prof Herbert Loong (Asia Pacific Coalition against Lung Cancer – APCLC) and Asst Prof Yeon Wook Kim (SNU Bundang Hospital), who provided an in-depth presentation on the consensus development process, five key pillars, and concrete calls to action Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the APAC region, and accounts for nearly 60% of global cases. With regional incidence projected to exceed 1.8 million by 2040, the need for a cohesive, regional strategy to combat the disease has never been more urgent. Furthermore, survival rates in the APAC region often lag behind global benchmarks, with five-year survival rates frequently below 20%. This fragmented landscape highlights the critical need for a coordinated approach, one that addresses the unique epidemiological, environmental, and healthcare challenges within the region. The APAC Lung Cancer Policy Consensus is the result of an extensive collaborative process involving two expert working sessions, one patient workshop and a final expert voting session, with input from patients, clinicians and academic leaders across the region. The consensus lays out a unified policy framework anchored in five core principles, all aimed at driving sustainable, equitable improvements in lung cancer prevention, detection, treatment, and stigma reduction across the region. Importantly, the APAC Consensus aligns closely with the Global Lung Cancer Consensus, which was first ratified at the 9th International Lung Cancer Network in 2023. By endorsing this global statement, the APAC region reaffirms its commitment to improving lung cancer outcomes. The Five Global Principles Anchoring the APAC Lung Cancer Policy Consensus: Improve and Expand Prevention Strengthen tobacco control, public education, and environmental risk research to prevent lung cancer across all exposure types Expand screening and diagnostic access through inclusive guidelines and innovative technologies to enable timely lung cancer detection Promote timely, affordable access to modern and personalised lung cancer treatments across diverse healthcare settings Foster cross-sectoral collaboration and advocacy to drive investment and policy reform in lung cancer care Address stigma through education and empowerment to support early diagnosis, treatment adherence, and community acceptance A Region-Specific Approach to Lung Cancer Care The APAC Lung Cancer Policy Consensus is not just a regional adaptation of global recommendations; it is a comprehensive response to the distinct challenges faced by the APAC region. Unlike Western health systems that primarily focus on smoking-related lung cancer, the APAC region must contend with a higher prevalence of lung cancer in never-smokers due to factors such as environmental pollutants, and genetic predispositions. Moreover, the region's healthcare systems are highly heterogeneous, ranging from well-resourced settings with cutting-edge cancer care to lower-resource environments building on basic cancer services. Given these disparities, a one-size-fits-all approach would be ineffective. The APAC Lung Cancer Policy Consensus presents a regionally tailored action plan that offers specific strategies and targets to improve lung cancer care and outcomes, ensuring that every health system in the region, regardless of its capacity, can make progress toward the shared goals. 'We call on policymakers, healthcare leaders, and stakeholders across the APAC region to urgently prioritise and implement policies that improve lung cancer outcomes. While the specific solutions will vary across health systems, this consensus provides a shared foundation to guide national efforts. By acting now and adapting these recommendations to local contexts, we can foster a future where healthcare systems of all sizes work together to overcome regional challenges.' said Judy Li, Consortium Manager at ASPIRE for Lung Cancer. Looking Ahead The launch of the APAC Lung Cancer Policy Consensus marks the start of a sustained regional effort to transform lung cancer care in the Asia-Pacific region. Over the coming months, ASPIRE for Lung Cancer and its partners will continue to engage with policymakers, healthcare leaders, and patient advocacy groups to ensure that the consensus principles are translated into concrete action, with measurable outcomes. Through this regional collaboration, APAC aims to drive meaningful change that will improve survival rates and quality of life for lung cancer patients across the region. For more details about the APAC Lung Cancer Policy Consensus or to learn how you can get involved in advancing lung cancer care in your region, visit About ASPIRE for Lung Cancer ASPIRE (Asia Pacific Policy Review and Engagement) for Lung Cancer is a collaborative multilateral effort focused on improving lung cancer outcomes in the Asia-Pacific region through policy reforms. We advocate for prioritising lung cancer in government action plans, aiming to drive transformative changes that enhance patient access and care. We believe in the influence of collaboration and collective action to drive positive change. We therefore work with governments, agencies, NGOs and patient groups, bringing together multi-disciplinary experts to improve health outcomes for lung cancer patients in the APAC region. CONTACT: ASPIRE for Lung Cancer,


The Star
11 hours ago
- The Star
Did a lab of AI 'scientists' design a possible Covid-19 treatment?
What does a scientist look like? A bright-eyed intellectual donning a white lab coat and goggles? Often, yes. But these days, they could take on the look of a stack of computer servers softly humming away in an air-conditioned building. That's what a group of scientists from the San Francisco-based Chan Zuckerberg Biohub and Stanford University aim to do with a 'Virtual Lab' of artificial intelligence scientists tasked with doing original research on a potential treatment for COVID-19. 'You can imagine each researcher having their own team of AI scientist(s) that can be their assistants,' said James Zou, a professor and computer scientist at Stanford University who co-led the study. 'It's quite versatile … I'm super excited that the Virtual Lab could be an accelerator for many types of science.' The AI scientists held meetings, wrote code, and made (virtual) biological models before proposing a slate of molecules to help treat recent COVID variants. After testing the Virtual Lab's suggestions in the real lab, the scientists found two molecules that might serve as a potential COVID treatment, as they describe in a paper published Tuesday in the journal Nature. While the potential treatment has a long way to go before becoming medicine, the (human) researchers say their model of creating a group of AI scientists could help accelerate discoveries across the scientific world. Scientific discovery often relies on groups of experts coming together to workshop ideas from different angles to try and solve a problem together. This can produce results that can shift the scientific world – the work that led to the 2024 Nobel Prize in Chemistry involved dozens of scientists in fields from biology to computer science. But access to that depth of connection can be hard to come by, argue Zou and his colleagues. So Zou wondered if there was a way to imitate those conversations between real-world researchers but with AI. While some individual AI systems already are about as good as humans at answering some scientific questions, few people have experimented with putting those AIs in conversation with each other. To test the idea, the team decided to create a Virtual Lab of AI scientists and give it a thorny, open-ended problem: creating antibody treatments for recent strains of COVID-19. Antibodies can help treat the disease, but are made less effective every time the virus evolves into a new variant, so quickly developing new antibodies could help keep treatments up to date. The Virtual Lab was run by an AI Principal Investigator, who after getting the assignment, made a team of AI experts to collaborate with on the task. The human researchers armed the AI experts with software that would help them do their jobs such as a software to model proteins for an AI biologist. Together, the AI lab held group meetings to come up with ideas, and then individual meetings to accomplish individual tasks. The AI team came up with a path to propose treatments – opting to create nanobodies, the antibody's smaller cousin. The group proposed potential treatments, then wrote code, created computer models to test those treatments and improve on the design of the potential treatment. 'One of the benefits of the virtual lab is that their meetings are much more efficient than our human meetings,' said Zou, noting that the meetings are over in a matter of minutes and several can be run at the same time. 'They can actually run a lot of meetings and run these meetings in parallel so they don't get tired.' As a testament to this speed, while it took the researchers months to set up the virtual lab, it only took the Virtual Lab two days to propose 92 different candidates of potential COVID-19 treatments. Of these, two seemed particularly promising in attaching themselves to COVID-19 proteins in the lab, meaning they could be potential treatments. Importantly, while many AI systems provide answers without explaining how they got there, the Virtual Lab had a transcript of all of its conversations. This allowed the human to understand the logic behind the AI scientists' decisions. 'That was very encouraging to us,' said John Pak, a biochemist and staff scientist at the Chan Zuckerberg Biohub who co-led the study. 'As a researcher, you can always be kind of hesitant to incorporate (AI) into your daily routine, but with the virtual lab and the AI agents, it felt pretty natural to interact with.' Samuel Rodrigues, an AI researcher who was not involved in the study, called the research 'a very exciting advance' over email. Rodrigues, CEO of FutureHouse, a San Francisco-based company building AI to automate scientific research, described the approach of multiple AI scientists as 'very visionary' and 'extremely important' for incorporating AI into science. While he noted that the system would likely have to be tweaked to do other tasks, he argued that was a minor limitation. 'Overall, we are impressed by and are very big fans of this work,' he said. The scientists agree that to create more informed AI experts, future users could arm them with tools and training to make them better, but argue that the system is already quite versatile. Even so, they admit that the Virtual Lab has its limits. AI systems can sometimes make up facts based on erroneous or incomplete data, such as when an early version of Google's AI overview suggested putting glue into pizza sauce or eating a rock a day. To minimise these sorts of gaffes, the team included an AI scientific critic as part of the Virtual Lab to question the assertions of the rest of the group, and often had the lab run several meetings on the same question to see if they arrived at similar conclusions. Ultimately, the Virtual Lab still relied on a human expert who can guide the AI, check its work, and test its assertions in real life. The researchers also noted that while the nanobodies may be responsive in a petri dish, human bodies are far more complicated, so using these molecules as a treatment would require far more testing before scientists knew whether the nanobodies actually would work in people. Despite these limitations, both Zou and Pak argue that the Virtual Lab offers a valuable tool for research across fields. 'We're really focused on exploratory research that could – in the hands of others – be useful,' said Pak. 'I'm kind of excited about testing this out with different scientific questions … I'm looking forward to trying it out with other projects that we have going on in the lab.' – The Mercury News/Tribune News Service


Malaysian Reserve
16 hours ago
- Malaysian Reserve
BioLab Holdings, Inc. Launches Its Largest Clinical Trial to Date Evaluating Human Placental Membrane Products
Study Will Compare Four Amnion-Based Therapies Plus Standard of Care to Standard of Care Alone in Chronic Wound Management PHOENIX, July 31, 2025 /PRNewswire/ — BioLab Holdings, Inc., a Phoenix-based medical manufacturer specializing in regenerative wound care, has initiated its most comprehensive clinical trial to date. The multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled study will evaluate the efficacy of four human placental membrane (HPM) products in combination with standard of care (SOC) compared to SOC alone in the treatment of nonhealing diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) and venous leg ulcers (VLUs). The trial, formally titled 'A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Modified Multi-Platform Trial Assessing the Efficacy of Human Placental Membrane Products and Standard of Care Versus Standard of Care Alone in the Management of Nonhealing Diabetic Foot Ulcers and Venous Leg Ulcers (BIOCAMP),' will enroll 650 subjects across up to 30 clinical sites nationwide. 'This study represents a major milestone in our commitment to advancing wound care through rigorous clinical research,' said Dr. Marshall Medley, chief medical officer at BioLab. 'By evaluating our full suite of amnion-based products in a real-world setting, we aim to provide clinicians with robust data to guide treatment decisions for patients with chronic wounds.' Participants will be randomized to receive one of four BioLab products—Tri-Membrane Wrap™ (HPM-1), Membrane Wrap™ (HPM-2), Membrane Wrap-Lite™ (HPM-3), or Membrane Wrap-Hydro™ (HPM-4)—in addition to SOC, or SOC alone. Treatments will be applied weekly for up to 12 weeks or until complete wound closure is achieved and confirmed two weeks later. Optional weekly visits will allow for dressing changes in both study arms. The study is designed to capture real-world clinical outcomes and support the growing body of evidence for the use of placental-derived allografts in chronic wound management. For more information on BioLab Holdings, Inc. and its regenerative wound care solutions, visit About BioLab Holdings, Holdings, Inc. is a Phoenix-based medical manufacturer focused on wound healing and regenerative medicine. Its product portfolio includes Membrane Wrap Lite™, Tri-Membrane Wrap™, Membrane Wrap™ and Membrane Wrap – Hydro™, all derived from human amniotic membrane. These minimally manipulated allografts are designed to preserve the tissue's natural properties and support healing. BioLab is committed to delivering safe, high-quality products through innovation, education and exceptional customer service. Learn more at Contact: Kwyn LowePhone: 406.314.5120Email: kwyn@