Harmanpreet Kaur Breaks Record As India Captain Slams 84-Ball Ton vs England
Harmanpreet's knock gave India their second highest ODI score against England, but at no stage their highest score of 333/5 against this opponent, recorded in September 2022 in Canterbury, was under threat.
The India skipper played spectacular stokes particularly on the off-side which she peppered with most of her 14 boundaries. A few of them came down the ground and one was hit behind the wicket.
Harmanpreet also stitched vital stands along the way, putting on 81 runs for the third wicket with Harleen Deol (45) to set the platform while her 110-run stand off only 77 balls with Rodrigues gave India the push for a total in excess of 300.
Richa Ghosh then provided the finishing touches with a brisk 38 off 18 balls with three fours and two sixes, marking an all-round show for the visitors who had earlier clinched the five-match T20I series.
The platform, however, was set by a strong opening stand of 64 runs between Smriti Mandhana and Pratika Rawal.
While both the batters were able to play their roles to near-perfection — Mandhana being the aggressor and Rawal being the second fiddle — they could not get to their personal milestones.
Mandhana took the initiative to attack early on and looked in ominous touch until a false shot led to her exit.
The India vice-captain had done well to crack five fours until she reached out to a short and wide ball from Sophie Ecclestone in the 18th over, which she pulled with considerable effort, but straight to Sophia Dunkley at midwicket.
Mandhana made 45 off 54 balls with five fours.
Before that, Rawal's resistance had ended in the 13th over when a faint edge was collected by 'keeper Amy Jones off Charlie Dean, which wasn't heard by the on-field umpire, but was discovered on a review taken by England.
Rawal made 26 off 33 balls with two fours.
Rodrigues looked to be in her rhythm when she cracked three consecutive fours off Dean in the 41st over of the innings and smacked two in a row again in the spinner's next over.
However, she could not push on beyond a 45-ball 50 which included seven fours.
On her part, Deol was also set for a big knock before she was bounced out by seamer Lauren Bell, dismissed for 45 off 65 balls with four boundaries
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Deccan Herald
22 minutes ago
- Deccan Herald
When Vishwanath and Vengasarkar pulled off a miracle at Lord's
Bengaluru: As India began the uphill task of saving the fourth Test, losing two wickets before even getting a run, few would have backed them to survive the six-plus sessions remaining in a match thoroughly dominated by two former cricketers in different continents might have quietly believed India could pull off the improbable. Sunil Gavaskar (in England for commentary duties) and G R Vishwanath, connected through cricket and bound by family ties, had once done something similar 46 summers ago, though at different phases of the innings, on English soil but at the more storied Lord's. .Much like this fourth Test at Old Trafford, where India started their second innings staring at a 318-run deficit, the S Venkataraghavan-led team, back then, began the third innings of that match trailing by 323 after collapsing for 96 in their first innings. They too had eight sessions to bat vs England: Captain Gill silences doubters with coming-of-age performance. 'You never forget such moments, they live forever with you to cherish,' Vishwanath told DH, reflecting on Sunday's drama in Manchester where Ravindra Jadeja (107 n.o.) and Washington Sundar (101 n.o.) batted with heart to salvage the match after KL Rahul (90) and skipper Shubman Gill (103) had laid the foundation. .The 1979 Test had proceeded on similar lines. Gavaskar (54) and Chetan Chauhan (31) gave India a solid platform before Dilip Vengsarkar and Vishwanath wore down England's bowlers with brilliant centuries. Their 208-run stand saw Vengsarkar score 103 off 295 deliveries, and Vishwanath craft 113 off 337. They occupied the crease for 353 and 351 minutes respectively, falling within three runs of each other. But by then, their job was done. India had faced 148 overs, five more than they did in Manchester, marking the first of three times they batted that long after conceding a 300-plus humble, Vishwanath noted they were aided by some rain, unlike in Manchester. But, as he added, India still batted more overs that day, against Ian Botham and company..'It was a great feeling though the play was interrupted by rain. Yesterday, which we drew, that was a terrific effort. Almost playing out two days… I know the feeling. It's always a big task when you are playing the second innings. With a huge deficit, you are only trying to save the game. But it's not that easy because you are not sure whether you want to play your natural game or you want to see the situation, all these things cross your mind.'.'You need a sort of extra concentration. Of course, that's in the beginning, once you get going you have to play your natural game. And once you build the partnership, you always want to carry on with that because one wicket makes a lot of difference. And so, you don't want to give away the initiative. That's where the opponent will definitely come back. You need a different approach while saving the game. It was a tremendous effort.'.While Vishwanath and Vengsarkar were bona fide batting greats, the determination shown by Jadeja, whose batting has notably evolved, and Washington, long labeled a bowling all-rounder but now reasserting his batting prowess, was no less remarkable..'I think it's a huge task which India had,' Vishwanath said, shifting focus to the present-day heroes. 'And they came out brilliantly. Everyone talks about the wicket becoming slower but not on the fourth and fifth day. Because even on a good track, you will have some wear and tear and those footmarks and left-arm bowling (Liam Dawson)… All these things count. It's the effort of the batsmen, totally.'.'You get into the next Test with a lot of confidence. To draw from 0/2, credit should also go to Gill and Rahul. That's the foundation which was needed.'.As the match drew nearer to a hard-fought draw, Vishwanath couldn't help but recall the famous 1979 escape..'You always get into that frame of mind,' he said. 'Because you always go back to your innings. That situation and how I played, how the partnership which me and Dilip had. And then the team survived and all these things. So definitely, you feel that. We had a tremendous welcome (in the dressing room). When I went in, the whole team really appreciated that – 'what a marvellous innings' and all. The players and the managers… We never had the kind of support staff we have now but still, whatever we had, they all got behind us. So now you just imagine (what would have happened) when these two (Jadeja and Washington) got hundreds and got back. These are the moments you play for and cherish.'
Economic Times
22 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Lesson from Manchester? Ben Stokes & co believe that the world should play the game as per the moral code they have in their heads
Washington Sundar was on 80 and Ravindra Jadeja on 89 when Ben Stokes had had enough. He wanted to shake hands with the batsmen, the mandatory overs in the final hour of the final day of the fourth Test had begun. India batted on, and when both batsmen had reached three figures, called it quits at 425 for 4. Sounds perfectly reasonable. ADVERTISEMENT Except Stokes lost his rag on the field. Do you want a Test hundred against Harry Brook's bowling? England asked the batsmen at the crease, forgetting momentarily that they had been kept on the field for 143 overs, and having reduced India to 0 for 2, could only pick up two more wickets. Stokes was welcome to bowl whoever he wanted, but, with one Test to play, and there being no chance of forcing a result, he used his non-bowlers. On the field, frustrated that they could not do more after being in such a strong position, Stokes' momentary loss of calm might be forgiven. Aching limbs and tired bodies can play tricks on the calmest of minds. But, to suggest that India were putting personal milestones ahead of the game was churlish in the extreme. The fact is that England threw everything they could at India's batsmen, who dug deep and battled hard for a draw. Having done all the hard work, exactly why should either Washington or Jadeja walk off? Stokes was within his rights to offer, Shubman Gill equally so, to politely followed was problematic, to put it mildly. To state the obvious, Test hundreds don't come easy. Ask Washington, who has been left stranded on 85 and 96. India will eventually realise that Washington is a top-order batsman who also bowls very well, and when he's deployed higher up the order, there will no doubt be many more hundreds to follow. But, here he was on the verge of his maiden Test ton, and Stokes's England thought he was a bad sport for not running for cover at the earliest? ADVERTISEMENT Jadeja already had four Test hundreds to his name before this game, but he's a slightly different beast. Jadeja has played so many invaluable hands for India, many of them not close to three figures, but worth more than that in the context of the game. And, about three years ago, Jadeja was batting on 175 against Sri Lanka at Mohali when he told Rohit Sharma, the captain, to declare the Indian innings in order to give themselves enough time to bowl out the opposition. Which, of course, Jadeja planned to play a big part in. It's not as though Jadeja is a milestone even if he were, it should be no concern of the opposition captain. If the pursuit of personal milestones was affecting the team, that's a problem for Gill to deal with. If anything, a tough-but-fair competitor such as Stokes should welcome the opposition doing this. ADVERTISEMENT But even that is beside the point. The issue simply is that Stokes, and it seems some of his teammates, believe that the world should play the game as per the moral code they have in their heads. Not the rules of the game, and really, it should end there, but cricket has put this thing called spirit on a pedestal like no other sport. As one legendary cricketer once said, the spirit of cricket is best taken after the day's play, about three fingers deep and with as many cubes of ice. ADVERTISEMENT The sour taste in the mouth left by England's bitterness will pass soon enough, given the quick turnaround before the final Test. One of cricket's most diabolical decisions, Greg Chappell asking his brother to roll the ball underarm to New Zealand with six needed off the final ball to tie the game, was within the rules as they stood then. But, Chappell, when he had time to think about having won fair and square, freely admitted that the decision was the wrong one and the product of a mind that had endured a poor season, and was addled. It wasn't even heat of the moment. Perhaps Stokes will reach similar clarity at some point. Because his telling the world how this game ought to be played smacks of entitlement and privilege. For the best part, Stokes plays his cricket hard, gives it his all, and puts the game front and centre. Stokes is popular with fans and his worthy adversaries. Much more of this sort of behaviour and this might change. Gautam Gambhir, India's coach, defended his team, asking if England would have walked off with an early finish had the shoe been on the other foot. What he should have been asking was why his own batsmen came off so early in the end. After Stokes's first offer, it took only about 15 minutes for boxes to be ticked. But, having seen England's reaction, India should have made England bowl every last ball they were due, if only to make the point that neither the spirit of the game nor the moral high ground was the sole preserve of the England team.
The Hindu
22 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Divya, the girl who could become the queen
The little girl was dressed in a pink frock and a pinker overcoat. 'Divya Deshmukh,' she said when one asked her what her name was, on that November afternoon at the Nehru Stadium in Chennai. The year was 2013. She had just won the National Under-9 girls' chess championship, which was held as one of the side-events of the World championship match between Viswanathan Anand and Magnus Carlsen at Hyatt Regency. How time flies! Divya is now one of the most exciting young talents in international women's chess. The latest proof came on Monday, at Batumi in Georgia, where she became the first Indian woman to win the chess World Cup. In an all-Indian final, she defeated the much more experienced, higher-rated Koneru Humpy. After both the classical games had been drawn, the title had to be decided in tiebreaker games, played with shorter time controls. The first game was drawn in 81 moves. Divya had white pieces, and she ensured half-a-point through perpetual checks with her queen. The second game, in which Divya was black, was wilder, with both players making significant mistakes. On the 42nd move, an unwise pawn-push down the centre by Humpy had given the younger woman a clear advantage. But Divya returned the compliment just a move later, going for a pawn-exchange, instead of which she should have played her rook on the back rank. And now it looked the point in the second game too would be shared, in an equal rook-and-pawn ending. On the 54th move, however, Humpy went for a pawn-capture with her rook, and black got the advantage back But, Divya failed to capitalise yet again. Humpy's 69th move, with her pawn on the king-side, proved fatal, though. This time, Divya, made no mistake. When black's extra pawn reached the penultimate rank, threatening to turn into a queen, Humpy extended her hand, and conceded defeat. It was a significant moment for Indian chess. Here was the undisputed queen congratulating the princess who could one day become the queen. Divya's right hand went towards her face, and there would be tears of joy. She, however, forced a smile as FIDE president Arkady Dvorkovich came up to her and congratulated her. A little later, all her pent-up tears came out, as did her mother's. Namrata had sacrificed her career as a gynaecologist for the sake of her daughter's career. It hasn't been easy for the family, with Divya not having a sponsor, and chess, contrary to popular notion, is an expensive sport, as you need to travel around the world and quality coaches do not come cheap. The prize-money from the World Cup should come in handy: she has become richer by $50,000. That isn't the only thing that should make her smile. By winning the World Cup, she became India's 88th Grandmaster, and only the fourth woman from the country to do so. She, along with Humpy, also qualified for the Candidates tournament. This was very much a World Cup to remember for India's women.
