Stock markets advance after Japan-US trade deal
NEW YORK : Stock markets rose on Wednesday after Japan and the US hammered out a trade deal that included lowering President Donald Trump's tariffs on Japan's crucial car sector.
Investors were also cheered by news that Washington had reached agreements with Indonesia and the Philippines, stoking optimism that more countries will follow suit before Trump's August 1 deadline.
'News of a trade agreement between the US and Japan is fostering optimism among investors that further deals might be reached before punishing tariffs come into force,' said AJ Bell investment director Russ Mould.
Wall Street pushed higher, with the Dow rising more than one percent and the S&P 500 and Nasdaq both powering to fresh all-time closing records.
In Europe, London's FTSE 100 ended the day up 0.4%, after hitting another record high at the open.
Paris piled on 1.4% and Frankfurt also advanced, tracking gains in Asia.
Tokyo surged over 3% after the US president announced a deal lowering tariffs on some Japanese goods to 15%, down from the threatened 25%.
The deal will also reduce tolls on autos – a sector accounting for 8% of Japanese jobs – to 15%, compared with 25% for other countries.
In return, Japan pledged to invest US$550 billion in the United States, Trump said on social media.
Shares in carmaker Toyota rocketed higher by more than 14%, Mitsubishi 13% and Nissan 8%.
European carmakers also rallied, Stellantis jumping around nine percent in Paris.
Shares in German automakers BMW, Mercedes Benz, Porsche and Volkswagen all rose more than 4%.
The deal is providing optimism that other countries can 'seal good deals if they pledge investment into the US', said Kathleen Brooks, research director at trading group XTB.
Trump also hailed an agreement with Manila to lower levies on Philippine goods by one percentage point to 19%, while tariffs on Indonesia were slashed from 32% to 19%.
Shares in Manila and Jakarta rallied.
The announcements boosted hopes of other deals before next Friday's deadline, though talks with the European Union and South Korea remain unresolved.
US treasury secretary Scott Bessent said Wednesday that Washington was making progress on tariff negotiations with the European Union, with talks planned later in the day between the bloc's top trade negotiator and his American counterpart.
Japan's 10-year government bond yield soared to the highest since 2008 after media speculation that Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba would resign after a weekend election debacle. He denied the reports.
Elsewhere in Asia, Hong Kong hit its highest level since late 2021, while Shanghai was flat.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
30 minutes ago
- The Star
How the US became the apex predator on trade
For a region often hailed as the future of the global economy, it's been an unedifying experience. One by one, Asian leaders swallowed trade accords with the United States that are slightly better than envisaged months ago, but more punitive than when they bet on access to the American market as a development strategy decades ago. The glory days of supply chains must seem like a prehistoric time to the countries that lined up to concede to White House demands for levies. Certainly a throw-back to an earlier, less prosperous, age: The overall level of US tariffs is now the highest since 1930s, according to Bloomberg Economics. Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba was once adamant he would never accept duties, especially on autos, but concluded he could live with a 15% penalty. The European Union's top official, Ursula von der Leyen, said last Sunday the 15% rate the bloc settled on with President Donald Trump was the best she could manage. Key economies yet to strike a deal, such as South Korea and India, risk more adverse terms than those that already went along to get along. Trump is demanding a demonstration of obeisance and, in important ways, is receiving it. At the top of the commercial food chain is the United States, still the premier economy by a healthy margin. Tariffs may not revive the working-class communities that he claims to champion, but Trump can put on an emotionally satisfying show. Fingers crossed And the nations that have yielded get Trump off their back – and cross their fingers that they will fare better under the next president. In this sense, it's useful to think in terms of apex predators, those at the pinnacle of the natural food chain that are able to devour smaller players, according to Dmitry Grozoubinski, a former Australian trade negotiator. 'They are to a large extent paying protection money,' he told me. Tariffs of around 20% seem to be the benchmark for South-East Asia, based on deals announced with the Philippines, Indonesia and Vietnam. In the case of the latter two, they negotiated the US down from higher levels than foreshadowed in April. They will still hurt. Vietnam, which has become an export dynamo, may see its shipments to America drop by one third. Efforts to squeeze China are a feature of the pacts; Washington wants to curb the ability of Chinese firms to re-route products through third countries. The Philippines appeared to suffer a humiliation; the levy on goods from the archipelago was just a hair lower than what was announced by Trump a few weeks ago. Many details are still to be resolved and countries haven't given up on getting better terms. The common element, aside from just getting what passes as a deal done, is allowing Trump some of the theatre he craves. Praise the agreements and the White House's occupant. Counting on ties And, perhaps, when the attention is elsewhere, you can get a slightly better deal. Philippines President Ferdinand Marcos Jr made it clear he hasn't given up. Ahead of his recent meeting with Trump at the White House, his team put great store in the close historical ties between the two nations; the Philippines was once a US colony and it regularly brushes up against Chinese ships in the South China Sea. On the face of it, Manila got little from the arrangement. Marcos' best shot is to work with negotiators while Trump has moved on. Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth hinted at this by saying there may be a military component to the accord. 'The wolf is now at other doors,' said Grozoubinski, author of the book Why Politicians Lie About Trade. 'The indignity hurts less than the fight would. In return, counterparts get a semblance of certainty about the cost of entry to the United States, a vital component in the competition for foreign direct investment,' Grozoubinski added. The escape can be a form of victory. In the case of Vietnam, for example, the country is still fairly competitive with a 20% tariff. It stings, but probably isn't enough to warrant a producer packing up and going somewhere else. It may all be worth it to keep access to US customers. The administration foreshadowed this calculous before 'Liberation Day'. Stephen Miran, chair of Trump's Council of Economic Advisers, told Bloomberg Television in March that nations have little choice other than to sell to the United States. They will pay up to retain that privilege. Seoul, you are next. South Korean officials have dangled a shipbuilding partnership as part of a potential compact. Talks with China, underway in Sweden, will be something else. Hopefully, the world economy won't be too damaged. The question Chinese President Xi Jinping will ask is whether the fight is worth it and how much resistance his own economy can stand. — Bloomberg Daniel Moss is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asian economies. The views expressed here are the writer's own.
The Star
31 minutes ago
- The Star
Trade tariff risks likely to affect Westports
TA Research said it is keeping its financial year 2025 (FY25) to FY27 earnings forecast unchanged. PETALING JAYA: Westports Holdings Bhd is likely to report a profit of between RM420mil and RM475mil for the first half of financial year 2025 (1H25). In a note, TA Research said the projected amount accounted for 45% to 50% of its full-year forecast. Westports will be releasing its results for the second quarter of financial year 2025 (2Q25) tomorrow. 'In general, we expect 2Q25 key operating metrics to track the trade performance of Malaysia and China during the period. 'As such, we project Westports' 2Q25 gateway and transhipment volume to be around 1.2 million to 1.25 million and 1.53 million to 1.58 million twenty-foot equivalent units, respectively, by referring to Malaysia and China's respective trade growth of 6.1% and 4.5% year-on-year in 2Q25. 'We keep our financial year 2025 (FY25) to FY27 earnings unchanged at this juncture and maintain Westports' FY25 transhipment and gateway volume growth assumptions of 3% and 2%, respectively, pending the tariff outcome soon,' it said. TA Research was hopeful that the government would secure a favourable deal with the United States on the tariffs, although the odds appeared slim. Should negotiations fall through, the research house said the looming 25% export tariff would significantly undermine Malaysia's trade competitiveness, putting the country at a distinct disadvantage. 'More critically, we expect tariff-inflated US imports would dampen consumer spending in the fourth quarter of this year, particularly given that many consumers likely stocked up during the 90-day tariff reprieve.' US President Trump had indicated that all countries would face tariffs ranging from 15% to 50%. 'As such, Malaysia would be able to minimise the impact from the structural change only if the tariff is set at the 20% levels or near its peers namely Vietnam (20%), the Philippines (19%), Indonesia (19%), Japan (15%) and the European Union (15%). 'As the access to United States' high-tech chips and China's rare earth minerals and magnets would remain the key concerns of both countries and subject to export restrictions, we believe the rule of origin would also be applied to Malaysian exports as the country is one of the important transhipment hubs in the Strait of Malacca. 'In other words, higher tariffs could be imposed on goods transhipped through Malaysia like the trade deal between the United States and Vietnam, which includes a 40% tariff on transhipment.' TA Research has downgraded its rating on Westports to a 'sell', ahead of the looming risk from the trade tariff. However, it maintained Westports' target price at RM5.57 per share. 'As the share price has appreciated by 22% since the port tariff hike announcement, we believe the market has fully priced in the positive impact from port tariff adjustment,' according to the research house.
New Straits Times
4 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Oil shock looms as Trump cuts Russia deadline to 10 days
UNITED States President Donald Trump unexpectedly shortened his deadline for hitting Russia with the most severe sanctions on its oil exports to date. While the market has called the president's bluff thus far, the sheer scale of the threat may force investors to start pricing in this meaningful tail risk. Speaking alongside British Prime Minister Keir Starmer in Scotland on Monday, Trump said he was giving Moscow only 10 to 12 days to reach a deal to end the war in Ukraine before he would impose so-called secondary sanctions on its oil exports, cutting short his previous 50-day timeframe set on July 14. The sanctions would slap 100 per cent tariffs on buyers of Russian oil, with the biggest customers being India and China. This move has the potential to disrupt global oil supplies, given that Russia exported 4.68 million barrels per day (bpd) of crude oil in June, around 4.5 per cent of global demand, as well as 2.5 million bpd of refined products, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA). Going through with the secondary tariffs on Russia risks causing a severe spike in oil prices that could put upward pressure on US inflation, an outcome that could stay Trump's hand, even if he is "disappointed" in Russian President Vladimir Putin. And there have been several headline-grabbing moments in recent months where the Republican president has rowed back on his threats, including the "reciprocal tariffs" originally announced on April 2 that he quickly toned down in the face of market pressure. But Trump has also made good on some of his threats, most notably the bombing of Iran's nuclear facilities on June 22. Unlike his initial announcement on secondary tariffs, which investors appeared to shrug off, oil prices rose by nearly three per cent on Monday. So his erratic Russia policy may make some investors wary of writing off the risk altogether. The next question is, would secondary tariffs — a relatively untested, blunt financial weapon — be effective? The answer is probably yes. One of Russia's key customers, India — the largest importer of seaborne Russian crude in June at 1.5 million bpd — is currently engaged in tense trade talks with the US. New Delhi is, therefore, unlikely to want to exacerbate trade tensions with Washington and thus may be apt to ditch Moscow in favour of new, though undoubtedly more expensive, energy sources. On the other hand, China, which imported around two million bpd of Russian oil in June via pipeline and by sea, is less likely to change its buying patterns since it already faces several layers of US tariffs and considers its ties with Moscow to be strategic. But the Kremlin's finances would still be squeezed regardless if India were to cease purchasing Russian oil, as China would likely be able to buy it even more cheaply. The scale of the potential new sanctions' impact on the global oil market is hard to gauge, given current supply and demand dynamics. World oil demand is expected to grow by 700,000 bpd this year, its lowest rate since 2009, while supplies are forecast to rise sharply by 2.1 million bpd to 105.1 million bpd, according to the IEA. The growth in supply has been driven in recent months mostly by output increases by the Saudi Arabia-led oil producing group collectively known as Opec+. The group in April started unwinding 2.2 million bpd of production cuts and upped the United Arab Emirates' (UAE) production quota by 300,000 bpd. The Opec+ production increases have led, naturally, to a decline in the group's spare production capacity, but Saudi Arabia still held, as of June, 2.3 million bpd of production it can bring on stream within 90 days, while the UAE and Kuwait held 900,000 bpd and 600,000 bpd of spare capacity, respectively. This means that the three Gulf producers could ramp up output relatively quickly in the event of a sudden supply disruption. But that knowledge is unlikely to be enough to calm markets should Trump impose his secondary sanctions, partly because of the uncertainty surrounding possible retaliatory measures by Moscow. Trump's latest threat could be an empty one, but it has shortened the fuse of a timebomb that oil markets might struggle to ignore.
