Ibiza Rocks Brit's death sparks blame war in holiday resort after fourth tragedy
A popular party hotel known for hosting Brits abroad has been plunged into the centre of a political war following the death of an ice hockey star.
Ibiza Rocks hit headlines after sportsman Gary Kelly, 19, from Scotland, plummeted to his death after falling off a balcony at the resort on Monday. He has been named as the fourth person to die at the resort since April 27. The four-star hotel have since paused their events programme in response to the incident. A spokesperson for the Ibiza Rocks Hotel said: 'We are deeply shocked and devastated by the recent incidents that have tragically occurred.
"Our priority is to support those affected and their loved ones during this incredibly difficult time, and to fully assist the authorities with their investigations. The safety and wellbeing of our guests has, and always will remain, our highest priority.'
The recent deaths have sparked outrage from socialist politicans in the area. They have accused the conservative Popular Party of prioritising the interests of those 'who benefit from the lack of control'.
And PSOE opposition politicians say they want the Tourism Minister Jaume Bauza to visit the resort so he can see 'first-hand' the type of situation they say politicians in charge of the resort are facilitating. The tragedy occurred just two weeks after 26-year-old Evan Thomson, from Aberdeen, fell to his death from the same hotel in an incident which led to his family and friends criticising safety precautions at the venue.
A 19-year-old Italian tourist of Turkish origin plunged to her death on April 27 from a fourth-floor at the hotel, owned by the Ibiza Rocks Group which is led by the British founders of island super club Manumission. On April 30, a British woman, aged 33, died in her room at the adults-only hotel after going into cardiac arrest.
There is no suggestion that the hotel is to blame for any of the four deaths that have occurred on the premises since the end of April at this time. But the PSOE party, which governs nationally as part of a coalition but leads the opposition both in San Antonio and in the Balearic Islands region, issued a hard-hitting statement following on from the tragedy.
The party's statement said: 'The PSOE of San Antonio publicly denounces the worrying increase of tourism of excesses in the municipality during the two years of Marga Prohens' Partido Popular Balearic Islands Government with the direct complicity of San Antonio mayor, Marcos Serra, and Vicent Mari's Ibiza island council. It also demands urgent measures to stop the deterioration in co-existence, security and image.
"The PSOE regrets the death of yet another tourist and with the lack of direction the municipality is suffering, again asks the mayor to convene round-table talks to work on the change of tourism model we need.'
It added: 'What we are experiencing today is the confirmation of a deliberate policy of permissiveness on the part of the Partido Popular, which puts the interests of those who benefit from the lack of control before the well-being of citizens. The PSOE denounces that the Balearic PP government has chosen to protect excesses and progressively dismantle the tools of control.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
28 minutes ago
- Spectator
Soul suckers of private equity, Douglas Murray on Epstein and MAGA & are literary sequels ‘lazy'?
First up: how private equity is ruining Britain Gus Carter writes in the magazine this week about how foreign private equity (PE) is hollowing out Britain – PE now owns everything from a Pret a Manger to a Dorset village, and even the number of children's homes owned by PE has doubled in the last five years. This 'gives capitalism a bad name', he writes. Perhaps the most symbolic example is in the water industry, with water firms now squeezed for money and saddled with debt. British water firms now have a debt-to-equity ratio of 70%, compared to just 4% in 1991. Britain's desperation for foreign money has, quite literally, left Britain 'in the shit'. Gus joined the podcast to discuss further, alongside the journalist Megan Greenwell, author of Bad Company: Private Equity and the Death of the American Dream. (00:46) Next: why is MAGA so incensed over Jeffrey Epstein? Six years after he died, the Jeffrey Epstein scandal is still haunting Donald Trump. Trump had vowed to release all files on various cases that attract conspiracy theorists – from JFK to Martin Luther King Jr. What makes the Epstein case different, as Douglas Murray writes in the magazine this week, is that the case was so recent and Epstein's ties with the elites, many of whom are still in power. Trump appeared to backtrack on releasing files relating to Epstein, prompting ire from the MAGA world, and there is now mounting cross-party pressure to uncover who knew what. Mike Johnson, the House speaker, sent representatives home early for summer, and there is even talk of Ghislaine Maxwell testifying. Why is the Epstein scandal such a lightning rod for MAGA rage? Douglas Murray joined the Spectator to discuss. The full interview can be found on Spectator TV. (15:49) And finally: are literary sequels 'lazy'? It's 'sod's law', says the Spectator's literary editor Sam Leith, that when a friend's book is due to be reviewed in the pages of the books section that you edit, the review will be bad. Mike Cormack reviews Men In Love by Irvine Welsh this week, calling the decision by Welsh to pen another sequel to Trainspotting 'lazy'. At the Spectator this made us ponder whether this is true of all literary sequels, and what motivates authors to stick with characters and stories that they know. Sam joined us to discuss further alongside Lucy Thynne, the Telegraph's deputy literary editor. (33:59) Hosted by William Moore and Lara Prendergast. Produced by Patrick Gibbons and Megan McElroy.
The National
an hour ago
- The National
If I was John Swinney, here's what I would say to Donald Trump
You might expect me to want the First Minister to boycott a meeting with the current US president. I personally would not have actively sought out a meeting, but heads of state meet heads of state and talking to people you don't like is part of geopolitics. That does not mean prostrating yourself, or complying – but it also doesn't mean grandstanding. This is not a serious meeting and there is nothing at stake. Talk about the weather for a bit and smile for the camera. It won't change US policy. READ MORE: Donald Trump protest planned near mother's birthplace during Scotland visit Of course most of us want to see someone put Donald Trump in his place, but posing is meaningless – it is what you do that counts. So Scotland's First Minister should courteously welcome Donald Trump back to Scotland and otherwise do his best to say as little as possible – while the rest of us make boaking gestures in the background. That does not mean Scotland should treat this current incarnation of the USA passively. The US has not only become an unreliable partner, it is much less important to us than it was. In reality the British establishment is clinging to the US almost wholly because we have degraded our defence capabilities to the extent that we are entirely reliant on the US for defence. There are also sectors of the Scottish economy that heavily export to the US (notably whisky and textiles) and in turn the US supplies us with a number of software systems on which we rely. In terms of access to markets, however, it is China that is manufacturing cost-effective batteries, solar panels, wind turbines and electric vehicles. We need those more than we need Oreos. And yes the US still controls the global reserve currency, but Scotland is less exposed to 'dollar bullying' since we don't have our own distinct currency. This gives us some leeway to insulate ourselves from the erratic behaviour of the US. First, we should be tasking our economic development agencies to work with producers to diversify their markets. If China, India, Brazil, Mexico and others aren't buying enough whisky then we need to help them because they're clearly missing out. In the turbulent world in which we currently live, any exporter overly reliant on a single nation state is vulnerable. Second, we need to start to develop direct trading relationships with what used to be known as the Brics counties – because they are dominant among the emerging economic players and all of them have large-scale production capacity that links to our needs. We assume that US corporations will always act as go-betweens and we need to stop assuming that. Third, we should look at areas of vulnerability which could be exposed if the US's behaviour gets more erratic still (we're only one eighth of the way through Trump's term and it isn't clear what is coming next). If a nation state has indicated a willingness to use economic blackmail as a policy tool then you should look at where you might have exposure. One example of this is in software. Think of the public sector's ability to operate and now ask what would happen if a technology boycott was ever enacted – it has already been used against China. How would we cope?Other nations are quietly already addressing this weakness. Denmark has dropped public sector use of all Microsoft Office products and is exploring dropping Microsoft more generally. It has shifted to using open source applications such as OpenOffice (which is what we use in Common Weal). France has also shifted much of its public sector IT to OpenOffice (or rather a version known as LibreOffice) and Germany has just announced it is doing the same. Extending this to a logical conclusion it is simply mad that Scotland is relying solely on US corporate AI. Other nations are training bespoke, public-good AI systems which they then own. Scotland should do the same. Fourth, we should start to move our soft power diplomacy. There is almost a reflex reaction that 'overseas' means 'US'. How much more might we get tapping in to diaspora in Canada, Australia and New Zealand? Might a Tartan Week in Bejing achieve more than one in New York? Does the average Indian policy-maker know we exist? We are moving rapidly into a multipolar world and Scotland must adapt. Insulting the US President is frankly a stupid way to do business – but pretending he isn't a threat to our national interests is unrealistic and being inactive in the face of that risk is really dangerous. Scotland shouldn't stand on the steps and waggle its bare bum at Trump even if it makes us feel better. We should suck up the reality of global diplomacy, do what is needed to get Trump out the country without having developed one of his crazy grudge matches – and then we should roll up our sleeves and take concrete action to make sure no nation can ever bully us like this again.
STV News
an hour ago
- STV News
Trump's Scotland visit is 'distraction' from Epstein association, says professor
Donald Trump's four-day Scotland visit will be used as a distraction from his association with the pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, a professor of American history has said. Fabian Hilfrich, a senior lecturer at the University of Edinburgh, said the visit is 'in Trump's interest' because it will take him away from the United States, where he said the US President's involvement in the Epstein case 'doesn't seem to be going away'. Less than 24 hours ahead of the US President's visit, the White House downplayed reports that Trump's name appears in Justice Department files about the convicted sex trafficker. The Wall Street Journal reported that Trump's Attorney General Pam Bondi told the President that his name appeared in documents related to the Epstein case in May. Getty Images The White House denies this, saying it is another example of 'fake news stories'. Trump had previously been friends with Epstein, who was arrested in 2019 on federal sex trafficking charges. Epstein killed himself in his cell in New York City while awaiting trial. His former girlfriend, the British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell, was later convicted at trial and sentenced to 20 years in prison for sex trafficking, conspiracy and transportation of a minor for illegal sexual activity. President Trump filed a lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal and media mogul Rupert Murdoch a day after the newspaper published a story reporting on ties to wealthy financier Jeffrey Epstein. The newspaper described a sexually suggestive letter that it said bore Trump's name and was included in a 2003 album for Epstein's 50th birthday. On Thursday, a subcommittee in the US House of Representatives voted to subpoena the Department of Justice for the files relating to the Epstein investigation. Dr Hilfrich said the question is whether or not the Justice Department will release the files and what they might contain. He called Trump 'the ultimate Teflon president' – a convicted felon and who has had many cases run against him that have all been dismissed by his base. However, Dr Hilfrich said the Epstein case feeds into far-right conspiracy theories about historic child abuse rings propagated by some of the President's closest allies. 'Now that there is potential that their own hero is involved or implicated with cases having to do with historic child abuse, it is, for some of them, a bridge too far,' Dr Hilfrich said. Dr Hilfrich said Trump will spin his Scottish visit as a 'slightly nostalgic, romantic, and certainly business-related trip' to open his newest golf course in Aberdeenshire. 'I think quite broadly, this [visit] is very much at the moment in Trump's interest because it will certainly be nice for him to be away from the US where his involvement in the Epstein case doesn't seem to be going away,' Dr Hilfrich said. 'If he can find any way of distracting from it at the moment, he'll be glad to do so. 'I don't think we can expect any big policy pronouncements or anything like that. Although Trump being Trump, he's always good for a surprise. So we'll have to wait and see.' Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
